Notices
944 Turbo and Turbo-S Forum 1982-1991
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Clore Automotive

VW/Audi 07K (2.5L 20V I5) Swap Thread

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-01-2018, 10:23 PM
  #256  
V2Rocket
Rainman
Rennlist Member
 
V2Rocket's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Nashville, TN
Posts: 45,540
Received 646 Likes on 500 Posts
Default

Alex...couldn't you just use a 951 clutch disc (240mm ?)
Old 05-01-2018, 10:41 PM
  #257  
vt951
Rennlist Member
 
vt951's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Cincinnati
Posts: 2,083
Received 30 Likes on 13 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by alxdgr8
Any thoughts on making it use a 240mm flywheel to utilize the larger pressure plates from non-I4 VAG engines (I5, V6tt, V8)? This would possibly complicate finding a 240mm clutch disc that has the correct spline for the torque tube. 240mm clutch conversion is pretty common for 1.8T's so there are several options for 240mm 6-bolt flywheels. Another benefit is for people that would rant to run an 8-bolt forged TTRS crank instead of a forged 6-bolt crank from an early car. I'm not sure if there are any 8-bolt 228mm flywheels. The other option is to machine extra bolts to the 6-bolt crank/flywheel as Jim Green and others have done.
I've been emailing with David at SPEC and he had the same suggestion (240 mm). He's cooking up some ideas now, but I think that could be the direction we go in. As V2rocket suggested, I think a 951 clutch disk will work as it's 240 mm and obviously has the correct spline for the torque tube. He also suggested I look at using the VW TOB instead of the GM unit due to potential difference in the pressure plate finger diameter. So, I'm going to head down that path next. Lastly, I mentioned the 6-bolt vs. 8-bolt crank problem, and David said SPEC will be able to supply single mass 240 mm flywheels for both the 6-bolt and 8-bolt applications.

I'm amazed at the support I'm getting from Quick Time and SPEC on this project...

Last edited by vt951; 05-01-2018 at 11:11 PM.
Old 05-01-2018, 10:45 PM
  #258  
vt951
Rennlist Member
 
vt951's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Cincinnati
Posts: 2,083
Received 30 Likes on 13 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by alxdgr8
And I think it might be nice to have 15 deg and 0 deg engine mount angle holes on the torque tube connection
Alex, are you thinking this for the VR6? or some other reason?
Old 05-02-2018, 12:50 AM
  #259  
alxdgr8
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
alxdgr8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 3,817
Received 54 Likes on 36 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by vt951
Alex, are you thinking this for the VR6? or some other reason?
No, was thinking 07k but you've gone further down the route of oil pan clearance so you know that better.
Recently in conversations with Hank, in retrospect he wishes he had gone the route of mounting vertically (like VR6 swaps do, but that's driven by the OE adapter) and keeping the stock VW pan and changing the crossmember instead.
I was kind of thinking the same with my swap and doing a tubular crossmember...but I haven't mocked anything up for that to see if that would even work without really screwing up the steering rack angles since I imagine the rack would need to move down.
Old 05-02-2018, 12:51 AM
  #260  
alxdgr8
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
alxdgr8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 3,817
Received 54 Likes on 36 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by V2Rocket
Alex...couldn't you just use a 951 clutch disc (240mm ?)
Touche, good point. Didn't remember 944/951 off the top of my head.
Old 05-02-2018, 12:55 AM
  #261  
alxdgr8
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
alxdgr8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 3,817
Received 54 Likes on 36 Posts
Default

Looking more now, we might need the engine angle anyways to have the intake manifold clear the brake booster/master cylinder. So probably disregard my comments on 0deg engine angle.
Old 05-02-2018, 04:19 AM
  #262  
333pg333
Rennlist Member
 
333pg333's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 18,916
Received 96 Likes on 79 Posts
Default

To avoid that you could pull out the OEM brake stuff and put in a pedal box. Might be easier that way?
Old 05-02-2018, 06:42 AM
  #263  
vt951
Rennlist Member
 
vt951's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Cincinnati
Posts: 2,083
Received 30 Likes on 13 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by alxdgr8
No, was thinking 07k but you've gone further down the route of oil pan clearance so you know that better.
Recently in conversations with Hank, in retrospect he wishes he had gone the route of mounting vertically (like VR6 swaps do, but that's driven by the OE adapter) and keeping the stock VW pan and changing the crossmember instead.
I was kind of thinking the same with my swap and doing a tubular crossmember...but I haven't mocked anything up for that to see if that would even work without really screwing up the steering rack angles since I imagine the rack would need to move down.
I have milled off quite a bit of the stock pan and it is close to fitting under the hood. The crossmember is currently what’s holding the engine up too high, but the steering rack isn’t far from it. My solution could be a tubular crossmember, and possibly a slightly lower steering rack position (guessing maybe 1/2”). in the pic below, there is clearance, but the engine is about 3/4” too high for hood clearance.



Old 05-02-2018, 07:01 AM
  #264  
vt951
Rennlist Member
 
vt951's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Cincinnati
Posts: 2,083
Received 30 Likes on 13 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by alxdgr8
Looking more now, we might need the engine angle anyways to have the intake manifold clear the brake booster/master cylinder. So probably disregard my comments on 0deg engine angle.
I will look at it again.
Old 05-02-2018, 09:29 AM
  #265  
vt951
Rennlist Member
 
vt951's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Cincinnati
Posts: 2,083
Received 30 Likes on 13 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 333pg333
To avoid that you could pull out the OEM brake stuff and put in a pedal box. Might be easier that way?
Patrick, we could certainly do that but I’m trying hard to make this a relatively simple installation as well as avoid sheet metal modifications. It is always an option to stand the engine up and clear more room for a tubular exhaust manifold and huge turbo (which might be what you have in mind?). Perhaps we just get Quick Time to offer two versions; one at 15 degrees and the other with the engine bolt pattern clocked back to 0 degrees. Should be very simple for them to do that, since they cut the flange profile and mounting holes with a cnc laser.

I think clocking the engine side of the bellhousing would be better than adding a second set of holes on the torque tube interface since then we can keep the starter and TOB mounted in the correct locations / orientations. I’ll have to look closer at how I’m going to mount the starter in both clockings though.

Last edited by vt951; 05-02-2018 at 10:01 AM.
Old 05-02-2018, 10:45 AM
  #266  
ChaseAlberti
Cruisin'
 
ChaseAlberti's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: CT
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

What is everyone planning on doing for motor mounts?

I'm going to attempt to use a couple of mounting holes towards the front of the 07k and somehow incorperate that into the 944 mounts.
Old 05-02-2018, 10:54 AM
  #267  
vt951
Rennlist Member
 
vt951's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Cincinnati
Posts: 2,083
Received 30 Likes on 13 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ChaseAlberti
What is everyone planning on doing for motor mounts?

I'm going to attempt to use a couple of mounting holes towards the front of the 07k and somehow incorperate that into the 944 mounts.
I haven't designed my motor mounts yet... the progression I'm working is: bellhousing, oil pan, motor mounts (potentially integrated into or bolted onto a tubular cross member), intake manifold, turbo plumbing. All of these things affect the others, so I'm trying not to work myself into a corner.

If you want to have a go at it, check out the mounts that Iroz makes. I think their approach of using a standoff manifold block on the driver side will work well because the accessories get in the way of attaching anywhere else on that side of the engine block.



Old 05-02-2018, 11:12 AM
  #268  
ChaseAlberti
Cruisin'
 
ChaseAlberti's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: CT
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by vt951


I haven't designed my motor mounts yet... the progression I'm working is: bellhousing, oil pan, motor mounts (potentially integrated into or bolted onto a tubular cross member), intake manifold, turbo plumbing. All of these things affect the others, so I'm trying not to work myself into a corner.

If you want to have a go at it, check out the mounts that Iroz makes. I think their approach of using a standoff manifold block on the driver side will work well because the accessories get in the way of attaching anywhere else on that side of the engine block.
I already have Iabed's oil filter housing. It would make sense to integrate the mounts into the crossmember if we have to end up building a tubular one due to the clearance issue! Im going to pull the 944 engine this weekend to mock everything up though.
Old 05-02-2018, 11:14 AM
  #269  
nickskater09
5th Gear
 
nickskater09's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by V2Rocket
i say that because they seem not to have any interest in acquiring actual customers, only shotgunning pictures of beautiful cars with 1.8 engines fitted.

they have a continuous history of never answering direct questions through any line of communication regarding pricing info, so for now, just wall posters.
Sorry but MWR has built almost all the cars for customers,
​​​​​​ all of which are being driven, sans a couple rare cars that are staying with the shop. I'd hardly consider them "wall posters." Maybe some video of this "wall poster" turning laps would be nice. https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=2011042082302735&id=109417815798514
Old 05-02-2018, 11:31 AM
  #270  
Darren Linck
1st Gear
 
Darren Linck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default MWR 1.8T in action ON THE TRACK

Does the 1.8T use the same BH pattern at the I5?
a lot of interest lately around the web for 944 1.8 swaps, especially since MWR only builds wall posters.
if viable i think youd get a lot more than 5 orders.




Quick Reply: VW/Audi 07K (2.5L 20V I5) Swap Thread



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 07:18 PM.