Notices
928 Forum 1978-1995
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: 928 Specialists

New Crankshafts

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-22-2012, 05:05 PM
  #196  
IcemanG17
Race Director
 
IcemanG17's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Stockton, CA
Posts: 16,270
Received 75 Likes on 58 Posts
Default

Back on crankshafts

This has me thinking....I know automatics have an upper RPM limit where the torque converter stops working.....I've heard anything from 6500 to 7000rpm.... SO how fast can a 928 automatic turn and not break the torque converter....a great question for this thread, since we now have the ability to reliaby turn higher RPM...... No sense building an engine that can turn 8k, if the trans can only take 6.5
Old 02-22-2012, 05:13 PM
  #197  
BC
Rennlist Member
 
BC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 25,147
Received 73 Likes on 54 Posts
Default

This comment is in line with the original idea of the thread, so I consider it on topic:

Rational thought tells us that we need to figure out what our goals are. What is our purpose, or business case, if you will, for doing something. What do we want the end result to be?

In Racing, the only goal is to win. There is no other goal. The top racing drivers (in the REAL sports, like F1, Le Mans, and our own DP races, only wish to win. They are not happy with third, or even second.

Only winning.

So - what do we need to do to win? It may be to build a better motor. Or cams, or suspension. It may be to even use a different driving technique. The car is simply a tool. The mechanics are other tools. For a team, a driver is just a tool as well. A tool to be used for the purpose of winning.

The driver's responsibility, as Greg pointed out, is simply to drive, and the mechanics and engineers to build a car that suits their style, as long as that style ends up winning.

If a race is 75 laps, and the driver drives to make it last 76, he is not using his tools properly. If he drives and wins in 75 laps and the car is used up, it does not (or should not) matter. No one wins awards for driving nicely. They win awards for... winning.


Greg is making pieces that are tools for someone that wishes to have the engines last - and in the extremity of the point - to win. That is all. And it is rational and logical to do so. Any superfluous argument about how one or another can make lesser pieces "last" longer does not matter. The point is being missed. All that resides down that path is ego - and ego has no real purpose or place in the true path to winning. It usually simply lays in the middle of the road, distracting and stupidly questioning others - as it has here.

Originally Posted by IcemanG17
Back on crankshafts

This has me thinking....I know automatics have an upper RPM limit where the torque converter stops working.....I've heard anything from 6500 to 7000rpm.... SO how fast can a 928 automatic turn and not break the torque converter....a great question for this thread, since we now have the ability to reliaby turn higher RPM...... No sense building an engine that can turn 8k, if the trans can only take 6.5
No one is racing automatics, really, except you and a few open-roaders.
Old 02-22-2012, 05:48 PM
  #198  
IcemanG17
Race Director
 
IcemanG17's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Stockton, CA
Posts: 16,270
Received 75 Likes on 58 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by BC
No one is racing automatics, really, except you and a few open-roaders.
true....but it is the stronger trans...by a wide margin..... plus automatic just sounds so slow....I prefer "poor mans sequential"..... which it really is
Old 02-22-2012, 05:49 PM
  #199  
BC
Rennlist Member
 
BC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 25,147
Received 73 Likes on 54 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by IcemanG17
true....but it is the stronger trans...by a wide margin..... plus automatic just sounds so slow....I prefer "poor mans sequential"..... which it really is
It just too sloppy for me. I can't stand it on the street, let alone somewhere I actually need to go fast.
Old 02-22-2012, 06:38 PM
  #200  
GregBBRD
Former Sponsor
Thread Starter
 
GregBBRD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Anaheim
Posts: 15,230
Received 2,474 Likes on 1,468 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by IcemanG17
Back on crankshafts

This has me thinking....I know automatics have an upper RPM limit where the torque converter stops working.....I've heard anything from 6500 to 7000rpm.... SO how fast can a 928 automatic turn and not break the torque converter....a great question for this thread, since we now have the ability to reliaby turn higher RPM...... No sense building an engine that can turn 8k, if the trans can only take 6.5
I have no idea about this. I do know that Andy's automatic seems to work fine past 7000.

I have a "street" Nova that has a Powerglide in it that I spin to 7,000. I only stop there because it's a 540 cubic inch Big Block and it just doesn't seem like I need to spin it any harder.

People with "Small Blocks" routinely spin automatics well into the 8,000 rpm range.

Guess we will find out about the Mercedes automatics.
Old 02-22-2012, 07:20 PM
  #201  
John Speake
Rennlist Member
 
John Speake's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Cambridge England
Posts: 7,050
Received 37 Likes on 29 Posts
Default

I don't think there is a particular rpm issue, unless you're assuming more rpm = more power. Then the usual power related failure modes come in, like overheating, blade failure, ballooning etc.

I would think Andy's 928 is probably the highest power ever put through the 928 auto 'box.

Ah ! I forgot Brett's 2000HP 200MPH Euro S2 which is an auto :-)

Originally Posted by IcemanG17
Back on crankshafts

This has me thinking....I know automatics have an upper RPM limit where the torque converter stops working.....I've heard anything from 6500 to 7000rpm.... SO how fast can a 928 automatic turn and not break the torque converter....a great question for this thread, since we now have the ability to reliaby turn higher RPM...... No sense building an engine that can turn 8k, if the trans can only take 6.5
Old 02-22-2012, 07:45 PM
  #202  
hacker-pschorr
Administrator - "Tyson"
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
hacker-pschorr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Up Nort
Posts: 1,549
Received 2,168 Likes on 1,225 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by John Speake
I would think Andy's 928 is probably the highest power ever put through the 928 auto 'box.
It's in the top 3
The other two run on DOT drag radials in the rear.

The only modification Todd has made to his auto's is adjusting them to shift harder.
And fluids from here:
http://www.lelubricants.com/transmission-fluids.html

The turbo doesn't have a gear vendor OD like the supercharged car.

He is looking into upgrading the torque tube.
Old 02-22-2012, 07:53 PM
  #203  
dcrasta
Three Wheelin'
 
dcrasta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Washington "Dc"
Posts: 1,810
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Bill Ball
"A Twist of the Wrist"
Great series of books .. Smooth is fast..
Old 02-22-2012, 08:01 PM
  #204  
blown 87
Rest in Peace
Rennlist Member
 
blown 87's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Bird lover in Sharpsburg
Posts: 9,903
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Greg, what do you see the absolute top RPM of the next version of your 928 motors to be?
Old 02-22-2012, 09:38 PM
  #205  
mark kibort
Rennlist Member
 
mark kibort's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: saratoga, ca
Posts: 29,952
Received 165 Likes on 64 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by BC
This comment is in line with the original idea of the thread, so I consider it on topic:

Rational thought tells us that we need to figure out what our goals are. What is our purpose, or business case, if you will, for doing something. What do we want the end result to be?

In Racing, the only goal is to win. There is no other goal. The top racing drivers (in the REAL sports, like F1, Le Mans, and our own DP races, only wish to win. They are not happy with third, or even second.

Only winning.

So - what do we need to do to win? It may be to build a better motor. Or cams, or suspension. It may be to even use a different driving technique. The car is simply a tool. The mechanics are other tools. For a team, a driver is just a tool as well. A tool to be used for the purpose of winning.

The driver's responsibility, as Greg pointed out, is simply to drive, and the mechanics and engineers to build a car that suits their style, as long as that style ends up winning.

If a race is 75 laps, and the driver drives to make it last 76, he is not using his tools properly. If he drives and wins in 75 laps and the car is used up, it does not (or should not) matter. No one wins awards for driving nicely. They win awards for... winning.


Greg is making pieces that are tools for someone that wishes to have the engines last - and in the extremity of the point - to win. That is all. And it is rational and logical to do so. Any superfluous argument about how one or another can make lesser pieces "last" longer does not matter. The point is being missed. All that resides down that path is ego - and ego has no real purpose or place in the true path to winning. It usually simply lays in the middle of the road, distracting and stupidly questioning others - as it has here.
you must not race. Unfortunately, the sport doesnt pay most drivers to drive their cars to win, most put characters in their cars and they perform as they have during their career. some too agressive, some fast, some consistant, some smart some stupid, its like no other sport. however, the main objective is not to just win, its to survive. survive and win might not be synonomous, but survive, smart and win usually are, just as survive, "not quite the fastest", bu the smartest can win championships. several WCGT race series were won buy guys that never won the race. the goal was the championship. so, winning is releative. plus, most guys out there are so happy to be out there, to finish on the podium, all the time, is more than enough for them. everyone wants to win, but many teams are very happy with strong finishes, expeically if the sponsors are happy.

Now, there is nothing wrong with making stuff better. Im not arguing that point in my rants before, i was only stating that if the 928 is taken care of, it can be rung out at the track, using all that it has and by the way, that can be done in a way that leaves some car left over for the next weekend. coicidnetaly enough, most the time the fastest drivers are the ones that are the easiest on the equipment. (not always, sometimes). Ior should i say, they can be easier on the equipment than a driver that is wasting time being rough on it.
Old 02-22-2012, 09:43 PM
  #206  
IcemanG17
Race Director
 
IcemanG17's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Stockton, CA
Posts: 16,270
Received 75 Likes on 58 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by BC
It just too sloppy for me. I can't stand it on the street, let alone somewhere I actually need to go fast.
BRANDON

Okay seriously............here is my offer to YOU..... COME DRIVE MY AUTOMATIC RACE 928.... YES automatics have all this "drama" around them....but the reality is they WORK...

FLY up to Sacramento.....sign up for a track day, say the NCRC track weekend April 7-8, with a few other race 928's and you can DRIVE my 928 on track....I am 100% sure you will be impressed and walk away with a Everyone who ever has driven my car loves it....nearly every race 928 owner on the west coast can't be wrong.... I stand by my prior comment of any driver-any track...keep it under 6000 and it will live...

My only caveat is you must have prior DE-track day experience, since my car has no passenger seat or otherwise known as no instructor....

Don't knock the slushbox until you try it....
Old 02-22-2012, 09:47 PM
  #207  
BC
Rennlist Member
 
BC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 25,147
Received 73 Likes on 54 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by IcemanG17
BRANDON

Okay seriously............here is my offer to YOU..... COME DRIVE MY AUTOMATIC RACE 928.... YES automatics have all this "drama" around them....but the reality is they WORK...

FLY up to Sacramento.....sign up for a track day, say the NCRC track weekend April 7-8, with a few other race 928's and you can DRIVE my 928 on track....I am 100% sure you will be impressed and walk away with a Everyone who ever has driven my car loves it....nearly every race 928 owner on the west coast can't be wrong.... I stand by my prior comment of any driver-any track...keep it under 6000 and it will live...

My only caveat is you must have prior DE-track day experience, since my car has no passenger seat or otherwise known as no instructor....

Don't knock the slushbox until you try it....
You have no idea what you just signed up for.

Seriously - I had purchased an auto for racing another 928 I had on the side - like a cheap one that would be a throw away. I had all the parts to do so. But I had not driven an auto for a while. During that time, I bought/sold an automatic S4, and boy - it reminded me how much I hate autos. Truly hate them - on the street. Obviously I have no driven them on track since I have only had 5spds to go to willow springs (big and Streets) as well as fontana and (cough) parking lot auto-x.

Originally Posted by mark kibort
you must not race.
Professionally? No Mark, and neither do you.
Old 02-22-2012, 10:15 PM
  #208  
GregBBRD
Former Sponsor
Thread Starter
 
GregBBRD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Anaheim
Posts: 15,230
Received 2,474 Likes on 1,468 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by blown 87
Greg, what do you see the absolute top RPM of the next version of your 928 motors to be?
I'll be trying to move the power range up 800 to 1000 rpms. Not a big change, but it does require changing things around, a bit.

I'm guessing an "active" shift point at 7,600-7,800 and a limiter at 8,000-8,200.
Old 02-22-2012, 11:38 PM
  #209  
Ninespub
Three Wheelin'
 
Ninespub's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Saginaw, MI
Posts: 1,384
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mark kibort
you must not race.
Quote:
Orginally Posted by BC
Professionally? No Mark, and neither do you.

Whooooooooo........Slice AND Dice!
Old 02-22-2012, 11:40 PM
  #210  
blown 87
Rest in Peace
Rennlist Member
 
blown 87's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Bird lover in Sharpsburg
Posts: 9,903
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by GregBBRD
I'll be trying to move the power range up 800 to 1000 rpms. Not a big change, but it does require changing things around, a bit.

I'm guessing an "active" shift point at 7,600-7,800 and a limiter at 8,000-8,200.
Cool, looking forward to seeing the end results.


Quick Reply: New Crankshafts



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 02:53 PM.