Notices
928 Forum 1978-1995
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: 928 Specialists

New Product from 928sRus - Enhanced Intake System

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-18-2010, 11:27 AM
  #121  
dprantl
Race Car
 
dprantl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 4,477
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

I can see a reason why the graph is leaner with more air. Yes, the MAF is registering more air and sending more volts to the LH brain, but how do you know what the LH map looks like? Even if there is enough air for the LH to drop down a row in the table but that row has the same values, the same amount of fuel will be injected even though there is more air present.

It would be very easy to verify this with a SharkTuner.

Dan
'91 928GT S/C 475hp/460lb.ft
Old 04-18-2010, 11:59 AM
  #122  
SeanR
Rennlist Member
 
SeanR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 35,700
Received 500 Likes on 267 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by dprantl
I can see a reason why the graph is leaner with more air. Yes, the MAF is registering more air and sending more volts to the LH brain, but how do you know what the LH map looks like? Even if there is enough air for the LH to drop down a row in the table but that row has the same values, the same amount of fuel will be injected even though there is more air present.

It would be very easy to verify this with a SharkTuner.

Dan
'91 928GT S/C 475hp/460lb.ft
Which will be the next step on this. Just don't know when we will have the time to accomplish that though.
Old 04-18-2010, 12:48 PM
  #123  
PorKen
Inventor
Rennlist Member

 
PorKen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 10,161
Received 395 Likes on 223 Posts
Default

It's leaner because the LH WOT map is flat, using RPM only. (WOT map values are added to the base RPM/MAF scaled map.)

The stock WOT map is very rich at high rpm, (low 12's) so any airflow improvement will pull it closer to 13:1 for higher HP.

Torque is what SharkTuning will help most. The stock low/mid range is already lean (for economy) so the same improvements need more fuel to take full advantage of. A stock+ chip would just need a little tweaking to the WOT map.


The stock 19# injectors are getting flaky at high rpms because they are near max'ed out. Inconsistent or wavy AFRs are an indicator of this. S4+ need a 24# chip...
Old 04-18-2010, 12:56 PM
  #124  
RKD in OKC
Rennlist Member
 
RKD in OKC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: In a tizzy
Posts: 4,987
Likes: 0
Received 14 Likes on 11 Posts
Default

If the ID of the MAF is larger than the ID of the Throttle Body the size is big enough. If the voltage from the MAF reaches above 4.6v at WOT, but never reaches 5v it is the correct calibration range.

From my experience with the 944 Turbo, frankly, I am surprised supercharger users aren't running out of MAF range when running boost. You don't have to crank up the boost very much on the Turbos to run out of metering capability with the stock meter, especially if you are going to bigger injectors. When going to bigger injectors and bigger MAFs we also found the voltage from the MAF combined with throttle position determines when the engine is under load to advance the timing.
Old 04-18-2010, 12:57 PM
  #125  
John Speake
Rennlist Member
 
John Speake's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Cambridge England
Posts: 7,050
Received 37 Likes on 29 Posts
Default

I doubt a bigger MAF would gain any improvement on a 5 or 5.4 engine. The inlet manifold is the main restriction.

Mark Anderson does use a special MAF which has the std MAF sensor and electronics, in a larger housing.
Old 04-18-2010, 01:04 PM
  #126  
John Speake
Rennlist Member
 
John Speake's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Cambridge England
Posts: 7,050
Received 37 Likes on 29 Posts
Default

The inside of the std MAF body is very smooth, no advantage there.

My interpretation of the EIS results is that the MAF is registering LESS volts at a given airflow, volts for any air mass is lower therefore mixture is weaker over the whole range.

This helps at the top end but is making the mid range rpm even weaker than normal.

Ken, LH ECU uses base fuel map (rpm and load) PLUS WOT map values (rpm only) to determine fuelling at WOT. So fuelling is load and RPM based. Std procedure for SharkTuning is to zero out all WOT map values, and tune soley on the base fuel map
Old 04-18-2010, 01:05 PM
  #127  
John Speake
Rennlist Member
 
John Speake's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Cambridge England
Posts: 7,050
Received 37 Likes on 29 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by SeanR
John Speak has one called the Super MAF, I think. Never messed with one though.
SuperMAF is a recalibrated std MAF to enable the fuelling to be correctly mapped above about 430 crank HP where std LH maps max out.
Special maps in the ST to enable correct fuelling
Old 04-18-2010, 01:14 PM
  #128  
SeanR
Rennlist Member
 
SeanR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 35,700
Received 500 Likes on 267 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by John Speake
SuperMAF is a recalibrated std MAF to enable the fuelling to be correctly mapped above about 430 crank HP where std LH maps max out.
Special maps in the ST to enable correct fuelling
Thanks, I've never paid much attention to this stuff since most of what I've done is just getting the cars to run to factory specs. Now that things are advancing more, I'm catching up/learning this now.

Thanks for the educamating me.
Old 04-18-2010, 01:18 PM
  #129  
inactiveuser1
Burning Brakes
 
inactiveuser1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: NY
Posts: 909
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by John Speake
I doubt a bigger MAF would gain any improvement on a 5 or 5.4 engine. The inlet manifold is the main restriction.

Mark Anderson does use a special MAF which has the std MAF sensor and electronics, in a larger housing.
Thanks John,
So unless intake is extrude honed or someone comes up with different intake
no gains on bigger MAF on 5 or 5.4liter.
Old 04-18-2010, 01:23 PM
  #130  
John Speake
Rennlist Member
 
John Speake's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Cambridge England
Posts: 7,050
Received 37 Likes on 29 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by M928
Thanks John,
So unless intake is extrude honed or someone comes up with different intake
no gains on bigger MAF on 5 or 5.4liter.
Certainly strokers with stock manifolds are severely limited by the intake. But I don't believe the MAF is the problem.

However I have never measured the pressure drop across a MAF when it is breathing 350HP or so.....
Old 04-18-2010, 01:27 PM
  #131  
PorKen
Inventor
Rennlist Member

 
PorKen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 10,161
Received 395 Likes on 223 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by John Speake
Ken, LH ECU uses base fuel map (rpm and load) PLUS WOT map values (rpm only) to determine fuelling at WOT. So fuelling is load and RPM based. Std procedure for SharkTuning is to zero out all WOT map values, and tune soley on the base fuel map
As I said (in brackets).

For a basic companion (stock+) chip to the EIS, a minor revision to the WOT map would be sufficient.
Old 04-18-2010, 01:47 PM
  #132  
PorKen
Inventor
Rennlist Member

 
PorKen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 10,161
Received 395 Likes on 223 Posts
Default

I was wrong about the WOT map fueling at high rpm, though. The WOT map values get smaller at high rpm because the base map is quite rich at the highest rpms. Most of the low/mid-range enrichment comes from the WOT map.


Some of the AFR change could be attributed to heat soak on the dyno (while the intake was changed).

As the engine compartment, intake, MAF, fuel, etc. heats up, AFRs will start getting leaner.
Old 04-18-2010, 03:42 PM
  #133  
John Speake
Rennlist Member
 
John Speake's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Cambridge England
Posts: 7,050
Received 37 Likes on 29 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by PorKen
I was wrong about the WOT map fueling at high rpm, though. The WOT map values get smaller at high rpm because the base map is quite rich at the highest rpms. Most of the low/mid-range enrichment comes from the WOT map.


Some of the AFR change could be attributed to heat soak on the dyno (while the intake was changed).

As the engine compartment, intake, MAF, fuel, etc. heats up, AFRs will start getting leaner.
I just did a quick calculation from a typical LH WOT map. Value = 18 with 0.6% per unit so typical mid range enrichment added by WOT map to base map is about 10% in the mid range falling to 5% additional at 5k rpm and bugger all at 6200rpm.

The main point I was trying to make is that at the top end the load value from the MAf is dominant so fuelling is not just rpm based.

The mid range with this intake is interesting as there is more power even with the weaker than optimum mixture. Some figures before an after Sharktuning will be very interesting. Should also be extra potential by remapping the igntion as well.
Old 04-20-2010, 07:00 PM
  #134  
tleaf321
Instructor
 
tleaf321's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 139
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ROG100
"It looks awfully similar to 928 specialists "Blackbird" to me"

Good question and I am happy to provide an answer.

Yes it does have some similar traits to the Blackbird. Unfortunately the Blackbird is not available and has not been available for nearly two years. I had 6 on order - one for myself and the rest for local 928 owners here in DFW. DR told Jim M and me that we would have ours in July 09 at the OCIC - for some reason that did not happen. Not my business to know why they are not available - they just are not. I have stated publically that I wanted a Blackbird on my GTS. Everything was done on my car apart from the intake kit soooo after some others put together their own kits and the numerous emails asking me to put together a kit - we did.
Already sold 8 kits plus the 3 we have on test at the moment.
Dyno runs next week to see if any gains can be made power wise.

Would have loved to have a "Blackbird" but !!!!
I have been on the waiting list for the Blackbird for 2 yaers as well. I'm ready now. John, can you tell me how to get on the waitign list? I don't see these on the web site.
Old 04-20-2010, 07:03 PM
  #135  
ROG100
Basic Sponsor
Rennlist
Site Sponsor

Thread Starter
 
ROG100's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Double Oak, TX
Posts: 16,834
Received 893 Likes on 340 Posts
Default

Terry,
Just email me at Roger@928sRus.com and I will add you to the list for the second batch.

We will be doing a further two cars on the Dyno on Thursday.
Roger
__________________

Does it have the "Do It Yourself" manual transmission, or the superior "Fully Equipped by Porsche" Automatic Transmission? George Layton March 2014

928 Owners are ".....a secret sect of quietly assured Porsche pragmatists who in near anonymity appreciate the prodigious, easy going prowess of the 928."








Quick Reply: New Product from 928sRus - Enhanced Intake System



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 06:19 PM.