Notices
718 GTS 4.0/GT4/GT4RS/Spyder/25th Anniversary Discussions about the 718 version of the GT4RS, GTS 4.0, GT4, Spyder and 25th Anniversary Boxster
Sponsored By:
Sponsored By: Cobb

Dundon "Making the 718 GT4 Faster"

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-02-2020, 08:31 PM
  #76  
lovetoturn
Burning Brakes
 
lovetoturn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: Dallas
Posts: 1,238
Received 1,010 Likes on 505 Posts
Default

Maybe retest both cars on the same day together, and see what happens?

Any pictures of the parts on the car? Is there a need for some heat shielding around the cat which gets hotter than a GPF?

Last edited by lovetoturn; 11-02-2020 at 08:33 PM.
Old 11-02-2020, 10:10 PM
  #77  
Rennolazine
Rennlist Member
 
Rennolazine's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Chitown, USA
Posts: 3,039
Received 758 Likes on 448 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Jamie@dundonmotorsports
. The OPF sensors are just differential pressure, so when the ECU senses pressure drop across the OPF it will know to do a cleaning cycle. We're working on a solution for the 991.3 GT3RS and Speedster (and soon to be 992 GT3). That ECU adds an EGT sensor.





This is honestly why we only worry with WHP on our own dyno. We know how it was controlled, we keep the cars in rolling road mode with a PIWIS so the car knows it's on a dyno (no all wheel drive dynos driving the front wheels etc...), we monitor the Intake Air Temps, atmospheric pressure etc... And as important we have a library of Porsche GT cars run on the same dyno under similarly controlled conditions going all the way back to the 996 GT3. It is interesting to see the SAE standards change over the years and how a 444hp 997.2 GT3RS and a 468 hp 991.1 GT3 both make the same power on our dyno...

Once the development is finished, I agree that getting 1/4mile traps or 60-130 is a good indicator of the power, just have to get a lot of them as there is definitely some technique required to make them consistent.
For the gt4 since the ratios are long you can also do in gear pulls. 40 or 50-80 mph in 2nd. 60 or 70-100 in 3rd. Just slam the gas compare slope/DA. No shift required.
Old 11-02-2020, 11:01 PM
  #78  
Jamie@dundonmotorsports
Basic Sponsor
Rennlist
Site Sponsor

Thread Starter
 
Jamie@dundonmotorsports's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: Gig Harbor, Wa
Posts: 1,954
Received 369 Likes on 204 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by hf1
Seriously, what is going on here? How can Porsche be so much off with their official numbers? If these numbers are correct, then this is scandalous. Anyone has an explanation?
SAE changes their certification requirements for OEM's to say what the power of an engine is. For a while it was sea level elevation for example, now it may be higher elevation where a NA engine will make less power but at sea level It makes more. We showing the engine making more than the "accepted" 15% drive train loss (which is kind of bull...). Hence the reason we compare them against one another using the WHP and wLBFT measurements we have on our dyno

Originally Posted by lovetoturn
Maybe retest both cars on the same day together, and see what happens?

Any pictures of the parts on the car? Is there a need for some heat shielding around the cat which gets hotter than a GPF?
We control things tightly and doing on the same car is ideal as there is car to car variation as well. There isn't as the Cat is the same distance from the tire as our 991 GT3/GT3RS street header setup and there have been exactly ZERO issues...

Originally Posted by Rennolazine
For the gt4 since the ratios are long you can also do in gear pulls. 40 or 50-80 mph in 2nd. 60 or 70-100 in 3rd. Just slam the gas compare slope/DA. No shift required.
Yes possible but the rpm range is pretty restricted...
__________________
Dundon Motorsports
Gig Harbor, WA
253-200-4454
jamie@dundonmotorsports.com

www.dundonmotorsports.com
Facebook.com/dundonmotorsports
Instagram @dundon_motorsports
Old 11-02-2020, 11:19 PM
  #79  
911therapy
Rennlist Member
 
911therapy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Little Rock, Arkansas
Posts: 987
Received 84 Likes on 56 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by JonathanWalker
Who's not giving real world results?
dont know, dont care. I only use dundon because I have seen their products perform at the track on fellow track rats' cars and I have used their products on my last 3 cars. Those are the real world results I am talking about.
The following 3 users liked this post by 911therapy:
DFW01TT (11-03-2020), LZRD GRN (11-19-2020), mr965 (11-02-2020)
Old 11-03-2020, 12:30 AM
  #80  
hf1
Rennlist Member
 
hf1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Northeast
Posts: 10,392
Likes: 0
Received 1,639 Likes on 1,122 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Jamie@dundonmotorsports
SAE changes their certification requirements for OEM's to say what the power of an engine is. For a while it was sea level elevation for example, now it may be higher elevation where a NA engine will make less power but at sea level It makes more. We showing the engine making more than the "accepted" 15% drive train loss (which is kind of bull...). Hence the reason we compare them against one another using the WHP and wLBFT measurements we have on our dyno.
Do you know that this SAE cert change has happened btw the two car models or are you guessing? What altitude diff would explain the diff btw your dyno and the official Porsche hp numbers? You’re getting the same rwhp numbers for cars that Porsche rates to be whole 85hp apart! Has anyone else confirmed this discrepancy? Why isn’t this all over the internet and media? It’s huge, if true.


Old 11-03-2020, 12:58 PM
  #81  
mr gregash
Banned
 
mr gregash's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: Westport, CT
Posts: 345
Received 74 Likes on 45 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Jamie@dundonmotorsports
SAE changes their certification requirements for OEM's to say what the power of an engine is. For a while it was sea level elevation for example, now it may be higher elevation where a NA engine will make less power but at sea level It makes more. We showing the engine making more than the "accepted" 15% drive train loss (which is kind of bull...). Hence the reason we compare them against one another using the WHP and wLBFT measurements we have on our dyno



We control things tightly and doing on the same car is ideal as there is car to car variation as well. There isn't as the Cat is the same distance from the tire as our 991 GT3/GT3RS street header setup and there have been exactly ZERO issues...



Yes possible but the rpm range is pretty restricted...
Any ETA on a back box - X pipe perhaps?
Old 11-03-2020, 01:29 PM
  #82  
mrd_spy
Pro
 
mrd_spy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 684
Received 167 Likes on 104 Posts
Default

we just need a 100-200 time now.
Old 11-05-2020, 10:07 PM
  #83  
Jamie@dundonmotorsports
Basic Sponsor
Rennlist
Site Sponsor

Thread Starter
 
Jamie@dundonmotorsports's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: Gig Harbor, Wa
Posts: 1,954
Received 369 Likes on 204 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by mr gregash
Any ETA on a back box - X pipe perhaps?
In CAD still working to optimize the megaphones, Xpipe and connections for OEM and for our header/overaxles.
Old 11-05-2020, 10:08 PM
  #84  
Jamie@dundonmotorsports
Basic Sponsor
Rennlist
Site Sponsor

Thread Starter
 
Jamie@dundonmotorsports's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: Gig Harbor, Wa
Posts: 1,954
Received 369 Likes on 204 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by mrd_spy
we just need a 100-200 time now.
best to wait for a pdk car so I don't have to hear about the manual trans shift speed being the reason for the gains...
The following 2 users liked this post by Jamie@dundonmotorsports:
9872SpeedYellowCS (11-19-2020), whojoemama (01-03-2021)
Old 11-05-2020, 10:24 PM
  #85  
ForeverCar
Burning Brakes
 
ForeverCar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2018
Posts: 835
Received 454 Likes on 199 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Jamie@dundonmotorsports
In CAD still working to optimize the megaphones, Xpipe and connections for OEM and for our header/overaxles.
Can’t wait to hear the result!
Old 11-09-2020, 09:25 PM
  #86  
rooster17
Pro
 
rooster17's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2020
Location: TX
Posts: 564
Received 595 Likes on 235 Posts
Default

Deleted. Wrong guys. My bad.

Thanks Renn.

Last edited by rooster17; 11-09-2020 at 09:35 PM.
The following users liked this post:
Rennolazine (11-09-2020)
Old 11-09-2020, 09:33 PM
  #87  
Rennolazine
Rennlist Member
 
Rennolazine's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Chitown, USA
Posts: 3,039
Received 758 Likes on 448 Posts
Default

Wrong guys
Old 11-09-2020, 09:40 PM
  #88  
hf1
Rennlist Member
 
hf1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Northeast
Posts: 10,392
Likes: 0
Received 1,639 Likes on 1,122 Posts
Default

^ Awesome driving! He could have passed them all with a Spec Boxster, too.
Old 11-10-2020, 12:47 AM
  #89  
dnimi123
Rennlist Member
 
dnimi123's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2020
Location: Santa Monica
Posts: 1,998
Received 1,111 Likes on 672 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ForeverCar
Can’t wait to hear the result!
+1
Old 11-18-2020, 11:16 PM
  #90  
horns
Pro
 
horns's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 565
Received 197 Likes on 105 Posts
Default

Are there additional gains to be had with a different muffler? Is that in the works?

How does the sound level compare to your 991 GT3 street headers paired with OE center muffler? Similar sound volume? I assume the 718 muffler reduces volume more than the 991 center muffler since the 991 OE setup also relies on side mufflers to do some work whereas the 718 doesn't have a true side muffler.


Quick Reply: Dundon "Making the 718 GT4 Faster"



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 11:02 AM.