718 GT4RS
#2356
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
From Spyder, it seems it will be a convertible.
From RS, it seems it will have the RS treatment the GT4 RS will receive.
?? You think it may mean something different?
#2357
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
For the GT4, I understand much of the draw for the RS treatment is for track use.
For the Spyder version, is there a big desire for a lighter version with 60 more hp and a stiffer suspension?
#2358
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I'm not saying it won't sell. I'm asking what the draw is for such a set up - as I don't get it myself.
For the GT4, I understand much of the draw for the RS treatment is for track use.
For the Spyder version, is there a big desire for a lighter version with 60 more hp and a stiffer suspension?
For the GT4, I understand much of the draw for the RS treatment is for track use.
For the Spyder version, is there a big desire for a lighter version with 60 more hp and a stiffer suspension?
Speedster with a GT3 510ps engine, does it makes sense? Or is the 718 Boxster Spyder all you really want/need in a roofless car.
#2359
Rennlist Member
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I'm not saying it won't sell. I'm asking what the draw is for such a set up - as I don't get it myself.
For the GT4, I understand much of the draw for the RS treatment is for track use.
For the Spyder version, is there a big desire for a lighter version with 60 more hp and a stiffer suspension?
For the GT4, I understand much of the draw for the RS treatment is for track use.
For the Spyder version, is there a big desire for a lighter version with 60 more hp and a stiffer suspension?
- Prestige
- Looks / appearance
- That little bit extra fun factor (dangerously or illegally accessed)
- Dual - purpose : occasional track use
- Collectible / potential for monetary gain (I am not ENDORSING this, but it is a thing, obviously)
Seems like the biggest, obvious ones. Why would *I* want it (assuming I could get one and afford it...)? For a little bit of all the above reasons (except collectability, of course! cough cough)
![Smilie](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/smilies/smile.gif)
Last edited by Adrift; 09-22-2021 at 12:59 PM.
#2360
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I'm not saying it won't sell. I'm asking what the draw is for such a set up - as I don't get it myself.
For the GT4, I understand much of the draw for the RS treatment is for track use.
For the Spyder version, is there a big desire for a lighter version with 60 more hp and a stiffer suspension?
For the GT4, I understand much of the draw for the RS treatment is for track use.
For the Spyder version, is there a big desire for a lighter version with 60 more hp and a stiffer suspension?
The following users liked this post:
9872SpeedYellowCS (09-22-2021)
#2361
RL Community Team
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Spyder vs. Spyder RS -
Just curious, for those considering a Spyder RS vs. a 718 Spyder, what is the draw?
Seems like the RS version is really set up for the track, and I wouldn't consider tracking a convertible with this HP/performance. Plus the Spyder RS wouldn't have the wing.
For street driving, the increased HP/suspension of a Spyder RS doesn't seem as a much needed improvement over the current 718 Spyder.
Again, just curious.
Just curious, for those considering a Spyder RS vs. a 718 Spyder, what is the draw?
Seems like the RS version is really set up for the track, and I wouldn't consider tracking a convertible with this HP/performance. Plus the Spyder RS wouldn't have the wing.
For street driving, the increased HP/suspension of a Spyder RS doesn't seem as a much needed improvement over the current 718 Spyder.
Again, just curious.
Tracking it has nothing to do with it IMHO, I get there a few times a year to practice and test my skills and the capabilities of the car, but I certainly didn't buy it for that, so I see no reason to use the track capabilities as a metric for purchase.
As you know the Boxster has been advancing in power and capabilities since it was introduced, as each improvement came there was always someone who said "why do they need more, it is fine the way it is", heck the 911 is no different yet the improvements continue!
![Wink](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/smilies/wink.gif)
I have had owned each generation of these cars, 986, 987, 981 and now the 982 and enjoyed each step up in power and handling, does that mean the older versions are not worthy of ownership, no, quite the opposite, each has their relative merits but there is no reason not to enjoy the latest version as well, Porsche pushes the performance up little more each time. I agree the the current Spyder 'needs' no improvements to be a great car, in fact I also agree that it is more than most of us can really use, but that doesn't mean it couldn't be more.
I look at the RS as Porsche taking this car to the next level of performance and showing us what it can achieve, that they are willing to do this is so cool and worthy of serious consideration.
![Wink](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/smilies/wink.gif)
The following 2 users liked this post by Westcoast:
Booth9999 (09-25-2021),
very green R (09-25-2021)
#2362
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
The Speedster is NOT a GT3 RS convertible. Hence, my curiosity about the want of a Spyder RS.
I get that some may want a collectible and I get that PAG will sell everyone they make.
I also get that some may want more power - but an RS treatment is more than simply more power.
I am just genuinely interested to know what aspects of the RS improvement are people wanting for the Spyder.
#2363
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
@raymort I am not sure what Porsche you have but from the look of the photo in the Avatar not a mid-engine convertible... so perhaps that is part of the understanding or in this case not-understanding the journey to the possibility of a Spyder RS.
Tracking it has nothing to do with it IMHO, I get there a few times a year to practice and test my skills and the capabilities of the car, but I certainly didn't buy it for that, so I see no reason to use the track capabilities as a metric for purchase.
As you know the Boxster has been advancing in power and capabilities since it was introduced, as each improvement came there was always someone who said "why do they need more, it is fine the way it is", heck the 911 is no different yet the improvements continue!![Wink](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/smilies/wink.gif)
I have had owned each generation of these cars, 986, 987, 981 and now the 982 and enjoyed each step up in power and handling, does that mean the older versions are not worthy of ownership, no, quite the opposite, each has their relative merits but there is no reason not to enjoy the latest version as well, Porsche pushes the performance up little more each time. I agree the the current Spyder 'needs' no improvements to be a great car, in fact I also agree that it is more than most of us can really use, but that doesn't mean it couldn't be more.
I look at the RS as Porsche taking this car to the next level of performance and showing us what it can achieve, that they are willing to do this is so cool and worthy of serious consideration.![Wink](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/smilies/wink.gif)
Tracking it has nothing to do with it IMHO, I get there a few times a year to practice and test my skills and the capabilities of the car, but I certainly didn't buy it for that, so I see no reason to use the track capabilities as a metric for purchase.
As you know the Boxster has been advancing in power and capabilities since it was introduced, as each improvement came there was always someone who said "why do they need more, it is fine the way it is", heck the 911 is no different yet the improvements continue!
![Wink](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/smilies/wink.gif)
I have had owned each generation of these cars, 986, 987, 981 and now the 982 and enjoyed each step up in power and handling, does that mean the older versions are not worthy of ownership, no, quite the opposite, each has their relative merits but there is no reason not to enjoy the latest version as well, Porsche pushes the performance up little more each time. I agree the the current Spyder 'needs' no improvements to be a great car, in fact I also agree that it is more than most of us can really use, but that doesn't mean it couldn't be more.
I look at the RS as Porsche taking this car to the next level of performance and showing us what it can achieve, that they are willing to do this is so cool and worthy of serious consideration.
![Wink](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/smilies/wink.gif)
Yep - my question is rooted in not understanding what aspects of the RS package are people wanting for a convertible. From my perspective, I can understand more power - but for a convertible, I don't think I would enjoy rock hard suspension and aero treatments much.
Again, I'm just curious to understand more. I am definitely not judging here.
#2364
RL Community Team
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
It's a GT3.
Yep - my question is rooted in not understanding what aspects of the RS package are people wanting for a convertible. From my perspective, I can understand more power - but for a convertible, I don't think I would enjoy rock hard suspension and aero treatments much.
Again, I'm just curious to understand more. I am definitely not judging here.
Yep - my question is rooted in not understanding what aspects of the RS package are people wanting for a convertible. From my perspective, I can understand more power - but for a convertible, I don't think I would enjoy rock hard suspension and aero treatments much.
Again, I'm just curious to understand more. I am definitely not judging here.
Perhaps the sticking point for some is the 'RS' moniker, normally reserved for serious track focused versions of a model, but Porsche has used it before and maybe now it is simply to differentiate the 'new' top model in the 982 cabriolet range?
#2365
Rennlist Member
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Interesting - car and driver is claiming Porsche will go all electric with a revised 718 platform after 2025 and keep the 911 ICE. If so, a lot of collectors would be interested in these and they’d be harder to get.
I think at the latest we’ll know when we see the platform. If it’s all new and fully BEV optimized, that’s the answer. If the design also suits ICEs, there’s no reason Porsche couldn’t put special gas motors in the next gen cars alongside EVs.
https:/www.caranddriver.com/news/a37692178/2025-porsche-718-electric-future-details/
I think at the latest we’ll know when we see the platform. If it’s all new and fully BEV optimized, that’s the answer. If the design also suits ICEs, there’s no reason Porsche couldn’t put special gas motors in the next gen cars alongside EVs.
https:/www.caranddriver.com/news/a37692178/2025-porsche-718-electric-future-details/
#2366
Rennlist Member
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I was told yesterday that dealers are being offered 100K by customers and people calling in. So that sounds like the starting point.
#2368
Addict
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Gone. On the Open Road
Posts: 16,448
Received 1,614 Likes
on
1,053 Posts
#2369
Rennlist Member
#2370
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
![evilgrin](https://rennlist.com/forums/graemlins/evilgrin.gif)