Notices
GT4/Spyder Discussions about the 981 GT4/Spyder
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: APR

Orthojoe's GT4 track thread and ramblings

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-20-2017, 10:10 PM
  #1051  
ExMB
Rennlist Member
 
ExMB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 8,479
Received 1,355 Likes on 826 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Eric5280
I agree with everything you are saying and run NASA TT in an E36 M3 where 2 seconds is an eternity.

Track conditions were actually worse on the 2 min lap because HPR ground down the hairpin at turn 8 for work. You can see it is a mess in the vid.

Just sharing my personal experience.
So in essence 5 1/2 month between tests. Mile high race track weather would affect performance of the vehicle as well. I think there are several of you that go out there for open track days as well. That brings up the question with all those additional runs between those dates have you become more comfortable in the car and could that be a contributing factor?
Old 02-20-2017, 10:27 PM
  #1052  
Eric5280
Rennlist Member
 
Eric5280's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Posts: 635
Received 189 Likes on 92 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ExMB
So in essence 5 1/2 month between tests. Mile high race track weather would affect performance of the vehicle as well. I think there are several of you that go out there for open track days as well. That brings up the question with all those additional runs between those dates have you become more comfortable in the car and could that be a contributing factor?
No, Sir. Most of summer is spent in E36. My last RE71 2:03 lap was a couple weeks before the RE71 2 min lap with TPC links and springs. Same tires, two weeks apart.
Old 02-20-2017, 11:39 PM
  #1053  
bhk1004
Racer
 
bhk1004's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 383
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by Eric5280
A fellow RL member (DSDDCD) had the idea and I stole it. We both thought rears were already stiff enough. Tom @ TPC agreed it would work well. Saved money, less mods. Love the balance, tire wear is a little better.

Bought on Amazon for $170. Swift part Z60-178-070
is here a ride height difference between this and stock? I don't want to drop ride height and want to see if this will affect rake.
Old 02-20-2017, 11:44 PM
  #1054  
Eric5280
Rennlist Member
 
Eric5280's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Posts: 635
Received 189 Likes on 92 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by bhk1004
is here a ride height difference between this and stock? I don't want to drop ride height and want to see if this will affect rake.
Stock ride height. Did Joe's recommended alignment of 0 toe front, .25 toe rear/side. Camber for me is -2.5 f, -2 r.
Old 02-21-2017, 12:03 AM
  #1055  
orthojoe
Nordschleife Master
Thread Starter
 
orthojoe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Bay Area
Posts: 7,804
Received 191 Likes on 94 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Eric5280
Hey Joe.

I hear ya, but I did 2:01.7 PB (.5 faster than no DSC) with DSC on Dunlops.


Swapped on RE71R's and could not break 2:03 for the life of me. Installed TPC rear links and front springs; 2 min dead in my very session out. Alignment was out a little which is why I credit the mods with approx 2 sec on RE71's.

Just my personal experience on RE71. Car much more stable, higher entry/exit speeds of turns. Very happy.
Old 02-21-2017, 04:44 PM
  #1056  
Yargk
Rennlist Member
 
Yargk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: SF Bay Area, CA
Posts: 2,226
Received 230 Likes on 150 Posts
Default

Lap time improvements due to modifications are difficult to quantify. I have a feeling springs or the DSC module make little difference on the absolute best possible lap time. However, I would guess that they help with predictability and consistency.

Personally, I'm interested in whether wider front wheels and tires lower lap times. I'd guess that this modification would enable later braking and more trail braking, increasing the speeds in the first half of the corner, if it helps at all. Here's video of an S2000 that had a min speed of 75 mph in turn 2 at thunderhill, which is comparable to GT4 min speeds in that corner, however, in turn 1 the S2000 is going 100 mph at the third brake marker and only slows to 89 just before the apex of the turn. I haven't seen GT4s entering 1 that quick, but that may just be because the S2000 driver is superhuman. Still I wonder if there's something to be gained with front grip.



On another note, I think dive planes and a gurney flap would net 0.5 mph in turn 8. A different S2000 than the car mentioned above rolled through 8 with a min speed of 105.5 mph(!) with about 2-2.5x the downforce of the GT4. By my calculations the downforce on this S2000 (again not the one above) is worth about 3-3.5 mph over the GT4, so the GT4 should be able to do 102 mph or 102.5 with dive planes and a gurney flap through 8.

Last edited by Yargk; 02-21-2017 at 08:49 PM.
Old 02-21-2017, 08:24 PM
  #1057  
orthojoe
Nordschleife Master
Thread Starter
 
orthojoe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Bay Area
Posts: 7,804
Received 191 Likes on 94 Posts
Default

FWIW, I'm not convinced that 265 up front does anything and might actually be slower. Here is why:

1) Potter's first day at thill he ran 1:58 on oem tires. After he switched to 265, he was no faster.
2) Potter's best time at Sonoma is 1:48.2 on 265, which matches my best time there of 1:48.2 on 245s. Potter is a better driver than me.
3) A pro driver (hartanto) bought a GT4 with 265s and is planning on downsizing because he thinks the tires are too wide for 9" wheels and didn't like the way they performed.
Old 02-21-2017, 08:41 PM
  #1058  
laranja
Pro
 
laranja's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Posts: 651
Received 15 Likes on 15 Posts
Default

So we can say that 265s "might be" slower, but
we really don't know. It's more of a feeling.

It'd be nice to test, same driver, same day.
Old 02-21-2017, 08:47 PM
  #1059  
Yargk
Rennlist Member
 
Yargk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: SF Bay Area, CA
Posts: 2,226
Received 230 Likes on 150 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by orthojoe
FWIW, I'm not convinced that 265 up front does anything and might actually be slower. Here is why:

1) Potter's first day at thill he ran 1:58 on oem tires. After he switched to 265, he was no faster.
2) Potter's best time at Sonoma is 1:48.2 on 265, which matches my best time there of 1:48.2 on 245s. Potter is a better driver than me.
3) A pro driver (hartanto) bought a GT4 with 265s and is planning on downsizing because he thinks the tires are too wide for 9" wheels and didn't like the way they performed.
Thanks for the data points, I was aware of 1 and 2, but 3 is new to me. Makes sense though, 265 is a bit wide for 9s. 9s were fitted by many people without camber plates (that actually bring the tire in.) I always thought that 9.5s could fit with the perfect offset, trimming of the brake duct, and camber plates, and perhaps 265s on 9.5s would be optimal, but this is just a guess and doesn't follow from point 1 and 2 above. (heck maybe they won't fit and if they do 9.5s wouldn't be faster either )

245 is a tad wide for 8.5s too actually. Probably wouldn't change much against the stopwatch, but stock tires with 9X20 in the front might feel a bit better...
Old 02-21-2017, 08:58 PM
  #1060  
RDCR
Rennlist Member
 
RDCR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Santa Cruz - Norcal
Posts: 2,052
Received 527 Likes on 333 Posts
Default

Joe, for some reason I thought you went with the 265s because they were lasting longer? (or you thought they would).
Old 02-21-2017, 09:10 PM
  #1061  
orthojoe
Nordschleife Master
Thread Starter
 
orthojoe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Bay Area
Posts: 7,804
Received 191 Likes on 94 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by RDCR
Joe, for some reason I thought you went with the 265s because they were lasting longer? (or you thought they would).
Nope. Never did 265 because both sets of wheels are 8.5" and too narrow.
Old 02-21-2017, 09:12 PM
  #1062  
orthojoe
Nordschleife Master
Thread Starter
 
orthojoe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Bay Area
Posts: 7,804
Received 191 Likes on 94 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Yargk
Thanks for the data points, I was aware of 1 and 2, but 3 is new to me. Makes sense though, 265 is a bit wide for 9s. 9s were fitted by many people without camber plates (that actually bring the tire in.) I always thought that 9.5s could fit with the perfect offset, trimming of the brake duct, and camber plates, and perhaps 265s on 9.5s would be optimal, but this is just a guess and doesn't follow from point 1 and 2 above. (heck maybe they won't fit and if they do 9.5s wouldn't be faster either )

245 is a tad wide for 8.5s too actually. Probably wouldn't change much against the stopwatch, but stock tires with 9X20 in the front might feel a bit better...
Based on my convo with Andrie, I think you are right that 9" with 245 would be better.

991RS runs 265 with 9.5", fwiw
Old 02-21-2017, 10:28 PM
  #1063  
ExMB
Rennlist Member
 
ExMB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 8,479
Received 1,355 Likes on 826 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Yargk
245 is a tad wide for 8.5s too actually. Probably wouldn't change much against the stopwatch, but stock tires with 9X20 in the front might feel a bit better...
Originally Posted by orthojoe
Based on my convo with Andrie, I think you are right that 9" with 245 would be better.

991RS runs 265 with 9.5", fwiw
Porsche had to do something to slow the GT4 down. GT3 wheels are 20x9 with 245 tire.
Old 02-21-2017, 11:08 PM
  #1064  
Shockwave
Three Wheelin'
 
Shockwave's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 1,570
Received 99 Likes on 36 Posts
Default

Andrie bought a GT4! Thats amazing. He is well known in the S2000 community. Very fast!
Old 02-21-2017, 11:30 PM
  #1065  
orthojoe
Nordschleife Master
Thread Starter
 
orthojoe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Bay Area
Posts: 7,804
Received 191 Likes on 94 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Shockwave
Andrie bought a GT4! Thats amazing. He is well known in the S2000 community. Very fast!
Yeah, I'm waiting for him to put down some benchmark times!


Quick Reply: Orthojoe's GT4 track thread and ramblings



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 05:25 PM.