Notices
997 GT2/GT3 Forum 2005-2012
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Porsche North Houston

The question is: Keep my '07 GT3 or go for the '10 GT3?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-23-2010, 12:31 PM
  #31  
bobbyd
Advanced
 
bobbyd's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 77
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

If the money does't mean much to you, go for it. If money is a factor, don't. 5% more performance for $50K is not a great deal, IMHO.
Old 02-23-2010, 12:40 PM
  #32  
RollingArt
Drifting
 
RollingArt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Oregon
Posts: 2,017
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes on 9 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Larry Cable

1) my car will only continue to depreciate

I'm still on the fence ... sigh .... help!
And you think the new car will not depreciate?

Wake up pal, you'll take a bigger bath switching cars. Every time.

You have muddled thinking. You just really WANT the new car.

If you can afford it, DO IT! That maritime GT3 is incredible.



Phil
Old 02-23-2010, 12:44 PM
  #33  
Larry Cable
Rennlist Member
 
Larry Cable's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: S.F Bay Area
Posts: 25,807
Received 3,621 Likes on 2,352 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by RollingArt
And you think the new car will not depreciate?

Wake up pal, you'll take a bigger bath switching cars. Every time.

You have muddled thinking. You just really WANT the new car.

If you can afford it, DO IT! That maritime GT3 is incredible.



Phil
Did you intend to be offensive?
Old 02-23-2010, 12:48 PM
  #34  
RollingArt
Drifting
 
RollingArt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Oregon
Posts: 2,017
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes on 9 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Larry Cable
Did you intend to be offensive?
No, sorry.

This is just the way interventions go sometimes!




Phil
Old 02-23-2010, 12:59 PM
  #35  
Larry Cable
Rennlist Member
 
Larry Cable's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: S.F Bay Area
Posts: 25,807
Received 3,621 Likes on 2,352 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by RollingArt
No, sorry.

This is just the way interventions go sometimes!




Phil
But you are supposed to stop me getting a new car!

I am tempted by the maritime blue ... I guess I will just have to see if I can sell or accept the trade in ...

I agree both cars will (continue) to depreciate as do they all ...

I'm thinking of leasing the new car (if I get it) that way I will be less likely to coset it in the garage (which explains why I have only done 2500mi in the last 2 years)

watch this space!

Old 02-23-2010, 01:02 PM
  #36  
Snowboarder54
Rennlist Member
 
Snowboarder54's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Gualala
Posts: 1,230
Received 12 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by bobbyd
If the money does't mean much to you, go for it. If money is a factor, don't. 5% more performance for $50K is not a great deal, IMHO.
Consider this: You can get the SW 3.9 conversion with over 500 "perfect" HP for half of the $50K!!
Old 02-23-2010, 01:11 PM
  #37  
Larry Cable
Rennlist Member
 
Larry Cable's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: S.F Bay Area
Posts: 25,807
Received 3,621 Likes on 2,352 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Snowboarder54
Consider this: You can get the SW 3.9 conversion with over 500 "perfect" HP for half of the $50K!!
Yup, I completely agree, but as I mentioned in an earlier post, I've been down the route of such modifications (on my 993C2S) and would not repeat it on another car.

it's not really about getting a faster car ... cant really explain why ... I guess I should get "car therapy" ...

Old 02-23-2010, 01:28 PM
  #38  
stout
Rennlist Member
 
stout's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: ^ The Bay Bridge
Posts: 4,900
Received 1,314 Likes on 611 Posts
Default

Leif: FWIW, I'd keep the car you have —Strekesp. if it is set up how you like it and it has been reliable.

2010 GT3 is nice(r) enough to justify the change up, but not enough to make changing up from the 2007-2008 a no-brainer. Then again, if PCM is in both cars, the old system would be enough to have me down at the dealer with a jar of Vaseline handy.

pete
Old 02-23-2010, 01:29 PM
  #39  
stout
Rennlist Member
 
stout's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: ^ The Bay Bridge
Posts: 4,900
Received 1,314 Likes on 611 Posts
Default

Larry, your dilemma is far tougher, as both of those GT3s are unexpectedly, and achingly, good in their respective blues.

pete
Old 02-23-2010, 01:30 PM
  #40  
Larry Cable
Rennlist Member
 
Larry Cable's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: S.F Bay Area
Posts: 25,807
Received 3,621 Likes on 2,352 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by excmag
Leif: FWIW, I'd keep the car you have —Strekesp. if it is set up how you like it and it has been reliable.

2010 GT3 is nice(r) enough to justify the change up, but not enough to make changing up from the 2007-2008 a no-brainer. Then again, if PCM is in both cars, the old system would be enough to have me down at the dealer with a jar of Vaseline handy.

pete
No PCM in my '07 ... always thought these were overpriced and unnecessary, of course it's (near?) impossible to find a car without it on a dealer lot as they all seem to get specced with it ...
Old 02-23-2010, 01:32 PM
  #41  
Larry Cable
Rennlist Member
 
Larry Cable's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: S.F Bay Area
Posts: 25,807
Received 3,621 Likes on 2,352 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by excmag
Larry, your dilemma is far tougher, as both of those GT3s are unexpectedly, and achingly, good in their respective blues.

pete
I hear ya ... it all now depends on trade-in/sale of the '07 ... the maritime blue car is not my ideal spec (I'd drop the PCM, probably spec PCCB, and a little carbon fibre bling inside, along with speed yellow belts) but it's damn close
to perfect ... and I dont expect there to be another production run of the .2.
Old 02-23-2010, 01:49 PM
  #42  
YearOne
Racer
 
YearOne's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: London UK
Posts: 424
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

You are in the same place I am but my trade up would be from my 2007 GT3 to the new RS. The value of my car is around £62,000 and the RS list is £104,000 before any options so the minimum it would cost me would be £42,000 (approx. $65,000)!!

Now the RS is clearly a great car but its not £42k better so the GT3 stays and the RS will be sold on hopefully netting me a little profit
Old 02-23-2010, 02:03 PM
  #43  
Nizer
Rennlist Member
 
Nizer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Wishing I Was At The Track
Posts: 13,655
Received 1,882 Likes on 970 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Larry Cable
this is the object of my irrational desire:

http://pioneer.porschedealer.com/201...26839/info.php
I would be all over this car if I didn't have an RS on the way. The color really is a standout and they did a decent job with the options.
Old 02-23-2010, 02:09 PM
  #44  
NJ-GT
Addict
Rennlist Member
 
NJ-GT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Los Everglades
Posts: 6,583
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

I drove the 2010 GT3 and could not notice a difference in feeling, steering, power or brakes with my 2007 GT3 RS.

I have asked other people that have driven it, and they don't notice the difference between a 997.1 GT3 and a 997.2 GT3 either.

At the Nurburgring, the 2007 GT3 lapped in 7:45 and the 2007 RS in 7:43, the 2 secs difference was mostly due to Aero (the RS has plenty more downforce).

The 2010 GT3 has even more downforce than the 2007 RS, so the 7:40 lap has plenty to do with the new high speed grip. A difference of 5 seconds over such long distance is nothing, something like 0.6 secs per 60 secs of lap time (0.6 secs at Lime Rock, 1 second at Laguna Seca if you can pass the sound meter).

So, yes the 2010 GT3 is just a hair faster, but is it worth $130k when you can find clean 2007 now on the 70s, not in my opinion.

The 2010 GT3 is a nice upgrade if you come from a 996 GT3, but coming from a 2007 GT3, I can only see the 2010 GT3 RS as a marginal upgrade (the media has not found significant differences between the 2010 GT3 and 2010 GT3 RS).

Test drive a 2010 GT3 and you'll see. In California, sales tax + Reg is another 10%, 997 GT3 are moving at $75k from their asking prices in the low 80s. The difference to a 2010 GT3 in your garage is close to $70k.

Take those $70k, and buy a second nice car, and there are many sweet cars in this price range, used and new.
Old 02-23-2010, 02:10 PM
  #45  
Larry Cable
Rennlist Member
 
Larry Cable's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: S.F Bay Area
Posts: 25,807
Received 3,621 Likes on 2,352 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by NJ-GT
I drove the 2010 GT3 and could not notice a difference in feeling, steering, power or brakes with my 2007 GT3 RS.

I have asked other people that have driven it, and they don't notice the difference between a 997.1 GT3 and a 997.2 GT3 either.

At the Nurburgring, the 2007 GT3 lapped in 7:45 and the 2007 RS in 7:43, the 2 secs difference was mostly due to Aero (the RS has plenty more downforce).

The 2010 GT3 has even more downforce than the 2007 RS, so the 7:40 lap has plenty to do with the new high speed grip. A difference of 5 seconds over such long distance is nothing, something like 0.6 secs per 60 secs of lap time (0.6 secs at Lime Rock, 1 second at Laguna Seca if you can pass the sound meter).

So, yes the 2010 GT3 is just a hair faster, but is it worth $130k when you can find clean 2007 now on the 70s, not in my opinion.

The 2010 GT3 is a nice upgrade if you come from a 996 GT3, but coming from a 2007 GT3, I can only see the 2010 GT3 RS as a marginal upgrade (the media has not found significant differences between the 2010 GT3 and 2010 GT3 RS).

Test drive a 2010 GT3 and you'll see. In California, sales tax + Reg is another 10%, 997 GT3 are moving at $75k from their asking prices in the low 80s. The difference to a 2010 GT3 in your garage is close to $70k.

Take those $70k, and buy a second nice car, and there are many sweet cars in this price range, used and new.
good points!


Quick Reply: The question is: Keep my '07 GT3 or go for the '10 GT3?



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 03:25 PM.