FINALLY Dropping The Engine
#46
I know them both personally. Jake Raby is credited with the invention of the IMS Solution. Charles' name is on the patent documentation. They both partnered in the development of the IMS Solution along with other IMS Retrofit products offered by LN Engineering.
#47
The motor in my 02 C2 was rebuilt prior to me buying it and reused the IMS Solution, which was installed several years earlier to when the head developed a crack under one of the valve guides. Both top and bottom end were rebuilt. So at least in the case of my car the IMS Solution was reusable.
In 2021 we had 13 of our builds that previously had been fitted with the IMS Solution, and 100% of them were reused without requiring replacement. This saved every one of those owners the cost of a new IMS Solution, since the costs were discounted from the proposed cost the engine would have had otherwise if the Solution had not been fitted. Of these 13 people, 2 of them didn't even know they had the IMS Solution fitted previously. They bought the car, and believed that the IMS issues had not been rectified, so getting this news was a big surprise for their wallet. Unfortunately both of them had been previously ripped off by the seller when they ended up with cars that had bore scoring, and of course- they didn't opt for an invasive PPI.
Of these 13 reused Solutions, 4 of them had bore scoring bring them this way, the remainder were elective big- bore builds. I just finished my 2021 stats last week, and found this interesting, along with the continued elevation of early 996s that fill our schedule.
#48
Thread Starter
Rennlist Member
Joined: Feb 2021
Posts: 796
Likes: 610
From: Satan's Armpit, aka Houston, TX
That's the idea, and a great benefit. The IMS Solution bushing doesn't even have to be removed from the IMS shaft assembly.
In 2021 we had 13 of our builds that previously had been fitted with the IMS Solution, and 100% of them were reused without requiring replacement. This saved every one of those owners the cost of a new IMS Solution, since the costs were discounted from the proposed cost the engine would have had otherwise if the Solution had not been fitted. Of these 13 people, 2 of them didn't even know they had the IMS Solution fitted previously. They bought the car, and believed that the IMS issues had not been rectified, so getting this news was a big surprise for their wallet. Unfortunately both of them had been previously ripped off by the seller when they ended up with cars that had bore scoring, and of course- they didn't opt for an invasive PPI.
Of these 13 reused Solutions, 4 of them had bore scoring bring them this way, the remainder were elective big- bore builds. I just finished my 2021 stats last week, and found this interesting, along with the continued elevation of early 996s that fill our schedule.
In 2021 we had 13 of our builds that previously had been fitted with the IMS Solution, and 100% of them were reused without requiring replacement. This saved every one of those owners the cost of a new IMS Solution, since the costs were discounted from the proposed cost the engine would have had otherwise if the Solution had not been fitted. Of these 13 people, 2 of them didn't even know they had the IMS Solution fitted previously. They bought the car, and believed that the IMS issues had not been rectified, so getting this news was a big surprise for their wallet. Unfortunately both of them had been previously ripped off by the seller when they ended up with cars that had bore scoring, and of course- they didn't opt for an invasive PPI.
Of these 13 reused Solutions, 4 of them had bore scoring bring them this way, the remainder were elective big- bore builds. I just finished my 2021 stats last week, and found this interesting, along with the continued elevation of early 996s that fill our schedule.
#50
Never a discount on FSI engines, that I do know :-)
#51
It took me more than two months to finally get the HF heavy lift table, had to keep calling the HF around my area till they knew one was arriving to that store, finally got confirmation one was arriving and was waiting at store for it, at that price it was worth waiting for it. its great to have around. I read L&N was having a 20% off on the solution bearing next week. need to pick up another one for second car.
I modified the handle on the HF lift table to drop all the way down, it allowed the engine and trans to fit on the table with no need for trans jack, I use a small motorcycle scissor lift to support trans on lift table, even with the handle in the down position it is easy to move around with engine and trans on it.
I modified the handle on the HF lift table to drop all the way down, it allowed the engine and trans to fit on the table with no need for trans jack, I use a small motorcycle scissor lift to support trans on lift table, even with the handle in the down position it is easy to move around with engine and trans on it.
Last edited by JohnCA58; 11-18-2021 at 02:39 PM.
#52
That's the idea, and a great benefit. The IMS Solution bushing doesn't even have to be removed from the IMS shaft assembly.
In 2021 we had 13 of our builds that previously had been fitted with the IMS Solution, and 100% of them were reused without requiring replacement. This saved every one of those owners the cost of a new IMS Solution, since the costs were discounted from the proposed cost the engine would have had otherwise if the Solution had not been fitted. Of these 13 people, 2 of them didn't even know they had the IMS Solution fitted previously. They bought the car, and believed that the IMS issues had not been rectified, so getting this news was a big surprise for their wallet. Unfortunately both of them had been previously ripped off by the seller when they ended up with cars that had bore scoring, and of course- they didn't opt for an invasive PPI.
Of these 13 reused Solutions, 4 of them had bore scoring bring them this way, the remainder were elective big- bore builds. I just finished my 2021 stats last week, and found this interesting, along with the continued elevation of early 996s that fill our schedule.
In 2021 we had 13 of our builds that previously had been fitted with the IMS Solution, and 100% of them were reused without requiring replacement. This saved every one of those owners the cost of a new IMS Solution, since the costs were discounted from the proposed cost the engine would have had otherwise if the Solution had not been fitted. Of these 13 people, 2 of them didn't even know they had the IMS Solution fitted previously. They bought the car, and believed that the IMS issues had not been rectified, so getting this news was a big surprise for their wallet. Unfortunately both of them had been previously ripped off by the seller when they ended up with cars that had bore scoring, and of course- they didn't opt for an invasive PPI.
Of these 13 reused Solutions, 4 of them had bore scoring bring them this way, the remainder were elective big- bore builds. I just finished my 2021 stats last week, and found this interesting, along with the continued elevation of early 996s that fill our schedule.
The following 9 users liked this post by Yogibara:
Boff (11-22-2021),
dporto (11-23-2021),
Emefef (11-23-2021),
Harry_sz (11-24-2021),
James_03C4S (11-29-2021),
and 4 others liked this post.
#54
Thread Starter
Rennlist Member
Joined: Feb 2021
Posts: 796
Likes: 610
From: Satan's Armpit, aka Houston, TX
EPS IMS Solution Found!
Well despite all the crap I’ve given the two previous owners of this car on how poorly they took care of it, it appears they at least upgraded their IMS at some point to an EPS. I’m not familiar with this brand. Anyone?
#55
I've had this bearing in my car too. I actually thought it was the original version 1 of LN retrofit but previous owner did a crappy job documenting. With that, it came out in near perfect condition (to my and my mechanic's surprise) after around 7 years of service time. It's a roller type bearing. I know it's not a popular choice on here but I have no problems with it and it clearly did well in my engine. Here is what it looked like after 7 years and 50k ish miles:
The following users liked this post:
DSC800 (11-25-2021)
#56
Thread Starter
Rennlist Member
Joined: Feb 2021
Posts: 796
Likes: 610
From: Satan's Armpit, aka Houston, TX
I've had this bearing in my car too. I actually thought it was the original version 1 of LN retrofit but previous owner did a crappy job documenting. With that, it came out in near perfect condition (to my and my mechanic's surprise) after around 7 years of service time. It's a roller type bearing. I know it's not a popular choice on here but I have no problems with it and it clearly did well in my engine. Here is what it looked like after 7 years and 50k ish miles:
It appears they "upgraded" their RMS to the EPS bearing seal as well. It's leaking so I think I'll be yanking that out. Anyone use that?
The following users liked this post:
DSC800 (11-25-2021)
#58
Not a lot of objectivity here on LN/Rennlist though with many parrots and echoers. EPS was booted from the forum long ago with threads deleted. I mean "Solution" = zero failures and "Cylindrical" = zero failures, who can say which is better, right, objectively speaking that is. I'm not pumping any brand here either, I can't find ANY cylindrical failures.
If you are splitting the case without removing the bearing from the IMS, I'd inspect it and ask the company about reusing it (they are very responsive). If you pull the bearing I would not reuse it. It would be good to ask the prior owner when it was installed too. You might be able to match it to work shown on a carfax report.
Looking forward to more YT on this subject.
*zbomb - even for Porsche, value is relative
The following users liked this post:
Yogibara (11-28-2021)
#59
Thread Starter
Rennlist Member
Joined: Feb 2021
Posts: 796
Likes: 610
From: Satan's Armpit, aka Houston, TX
Yogi - I installed the EPS bearing almost a year ago now with 5k miles driven. The most popular cylindrical, at $579 with over 5k installs reported and with zero reported or found failures (extensive searching) I found it to be the best value*. PM me if you want more info about my experience with the company and installation.
Not a lot of objectivity here on LN/Rennlist though with many parrots and echoers. EPS was booted from the forum long ago with threads deleted. I mean "Solution" = zero failures and "Cylindrical" = zero failures, who can say which is better, right, objectively speaking that is. I'm not pumping any brand here either, I can't find ANY cylindrical failures.
If you are splitting the case without removing the bearing from the IMS, I'd inspect it and ask the company about reusing it (they are very responsive). If you pull the bearing I would not reuse it. It would be good to ask the prior owner when it was installed too. You might be able to match it to work shown on a carfax report.
Looking forward to more YT on this subject.
*zbomb - even for Porsche, value is relative
Not a lot of objectivity here on LN/Rennlist though with many parrots and echoers. EPS was booted from the forum long ago with threads deleted. I mean "Solution" = zero failures and "Cylindrical" = zero failures, who can say which is better, right, objectively speaking that is. I'm not pumping any brand here either, I can't find ANY cylindrical failures.
If you are splitting the case without removing the bearing from the IMS, I'd inspect it and ask the company about reusing it (they are very responsive). If you pull the bearing I would not reuse it. It would be good to ask the prior owner when it was installed too. You might be able to match it to work shown on a carfax report.
Looking forward to more YT on this subject.
*zbomb - even for Porsche, value is relative
The following users liked this post:
work_truck (11-28-2021)
#60
Yogi - I installed the EPS bearing almost a year ago now with 5k miles driven. The most popular cylindrical, at $579 with over 5k installs reported and with zero reported or found failures (extensive searching) I found it to be the best value*. PM me if you want more info about my experience with the company and installation.
Not a lot of objectivity here on LN/Rennlist though with many parrots and echoers. EPS was booted from the forum long ago with threads deleted. I mean "Solution" = zero failures and "Cylindrical" = zero failures, who can say which is better, right, objectively speaking that is. I'm not pumping any brand here either, I can't find ANY cylindrical failures.
If you are splitting the case without removing the bearing from the IMS, I'd inspect it and ask the company about reusing it (they are very responsive). If you pull the bearing I would not reuse it. It would be good to ask the prior owner when it was installed too. You might be able to match it to work shown on a carfax report.
Looking forward to more YT on this subject.
*zbomb - even for Porsche, value is relative
Not a lot of objectivity here on LN/Rennlist though with many parrots and echoers. EPS was booted from the forum long ago with threads deleted. I mean "Solution" = zero failures and "Cylindrical" = zero failures, who can say which is better, right, objectively speaking that is. I'm not pumping any brand here either, I can't find ANY cylindrical failures.
If you are splitting the case without removing the bearing from the IMS, I'd inspect it and ask the company about reusing it (they are very responsive). If you pull the bearing I would not reuse it. It would be good to ask the prior owner when it was installed too. You might be able to match it to work shown on a carfax report.
Looking forward to more YT on this subject.
*zbomb - even for Porsche, value is relative
Now. if you will just post a pic of the LN IMS "Solution" that has failed???
I'm not a fan of the EPS roller bearing " thrust control"..... IF you MUST save a few bucks go with LN's roller bearing ie "RND roller bearing" , it's an NUP204E type and has the "factory thrust control", a much better design...