Notices
996 Forum 1999-2005
Sponsored by:

Does anything actually solve the oil pressure drop in corners?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-18-2020, 02:40 PM
  #61  
Flat6 Innovations
Former Vendor
 
Flat6 Innovations's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Cleveland Georgia
Posts: 6,968
Received 2,290 Likes on 902 Posts
Default

I also notice bigger pressure drops, and issues with 3 chain engines. This is due to the difference in the cam adjuster on the 5 chain, and the vane cell adjuster on the 3 chain engine. Others have yet to connect those dots. I did when working with Lake at Driven Racing Oil on the development of oil for the Ford Coyote engines. The primary oil system didn't change enough between the 5 and 3 chain engines, despite a huge difference in the way the engine uses volumes of oil, and pressure to actuate VV and Variocam+.
Adding a 25% larger oil pump will open your eyes, if you know what to look for.
Old 09-18-2020, 03:44 PM
  #62  
Noz1974
Burning Brakes
 
Noz1974's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 774
Likes: 0
Received 59 Likes on 40 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Flat6 Innovations
I break every rule. This engine ran 14:1 CR, among other things. It revved like a motorcycle. It's my job to break things before anyone else does, and to experience the things that others never get the opportunity to.
The engine that I used as a "core" for this 4.0 that failed due to the drive snapping was a brand new, Porsche factory crate engine with zero miles on it. Back when these engines were cheap, and cores were not plentiful, I used to buy brand new ones, and take them apart, to make them my way..

That said, I've had two people in my hands- on classes experience this, and have assisted at least 2-3 other people who have had this occur. The other engines were stock, where mine was insanely modified.

I'll find the pics of the failed drive over the weekend. They are stored online in an archive, and they are pretty deep in there.

Also, you never answered my questions about your direct experience with building these engines. I guess I'll keep waiting for that.
Yes Jake I think you probably compromised that part in the assembly process because you haven't got a scooby Doo what your doing have you lol
Old 09-18-2020, 04:40 PM
  #63  
Nick_L
Racer
 
Nick_L's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: cote du rhone
Posts: 357
Received 89 Likes on 60 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Porschetech3
As a data point, the 996's were used at the Porsche Sport Driving School in that period when they were new at Barber Motorsport park. I was lead Porsche Technician at the Porsche Birmingham Dealership 5 miles away and was in charge of repairs to the fleet of 996's at that time (later changed out for 997's, 991's ect as new models were released.) These cars were tracked daily 7 days week by Instructors and Students of the Driving School and none had oil pressure drops on turns using Mobil 1 0w-40 and running on "N" spec tires of Pirelli, Michelin, Continental.
That is interesting, thanks for sharing. Do you remember if you followed the Porsche standard 15,000mil on oil changes or did you have an internal oil change interval? My look in to the pressure drop issues so far points very much to the use of too thick oils.

You wrote
..The oil pump is large enough to handle the extra flow without any pressure loss, but the extra flow..
That's not correct. The pump(positive displacement pump, google) has a fixed flow directly in proportion to RPM. If there was any increase of clearances/leak this would show up as a pressure drop.

I had a discussion with my wife over lunch today, she is an hydraulic engineers. Completely un-interested in engines until I brought up baffling in a tank, hydraulic stuff. She told me the main reason for using baffles is to lower the highest level in the tank....that would mean in our case they are there to prevent oil pushing up in to the crank/cylinder area. After looking at the dimensions on the X51 baffles inlet ports, it is most likely design for this purpose. It's not design for keeping more oil at the pick up, it's just a short lived side effect (1-2 seconds).

Also, you never answered my questions about your direct experience with building these engines. I guess I'll keep waiting for that.
I'm waiting for your answer of your direct experience with rolling bearing elements...or engineering for that matter....guess we will wait forever on each other.

Old 09-18-2020, 04:44 PM
  #64  
jandackson
Racer
 
jandackson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: Woodland, CA
Posts: 454
Received 168 Likes on 96 Posts
Default

As Jake pointed out “keep the oil cool”. This makes sense to me and seems to be supported by anecdotal evidence: I never loose oil pressure in turns (on ramps as an example) when the oil is cooler. Once it gets up to operating temp, I see drops.

I am going to install an oil temp gage to document at what temps I notice this. If oil temps are high, then I can investigate as to why.
Old 09-18-2020, 04:49 PM
  #65  
Nick_L
Racer
 
Nick_L's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: cote du rhone
Posts: 357
Received 89 Likes on 60 Posts
Default

Written by an MIT student, interesting read(p12-25): https://dspace.mit.edu/bitstream/han...=2&isAllowed=y

Last edited by Nick_L; 09-18-2020 at 04:50 PM.
Old 09-18-2020, 05:20 PM
  #66  
Mike Murphy
Rennlist Member
 
Mike Murphy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 8,893
Received 1,707 Likes on 1,057 Posts
Default

I tried to explain the correlation of oil temp and lubrication problems to Nick in a different thread.

I was a miserable failure on that objective.

Now the real experts have weighed in, but there’s still disagreement.

Sometimes when everyone else is wrong, it means that you are either:

1.) Jesus
2.) Wrong

Either way, I’m sorry.
The following users liked this post:
Zuffwerks (10-05-2022)
Old 09-18-2020, 05:36 PM
  #67  
Porschetech3
Rennlist Member
 
Porschetech3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Alabama USA
Posts: 6,247
Received 4,579 Likes on 2,074 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Nick_L
That is interesting, thanks for sharing. Do you remember if you followed the Porsche standard 15,000mil on oil changes or did you have an internal oil change interval? My look in to the pressure drop issues so far points very much to the use of too thick oils.
Yes, standard Porsche protocol was maintained at 15k on 996 and 20k on 997 as stated in owners manual. I begged them to service sooner than that, but they conferred with Porsche and was told to go strickly by the protocol, and that also meant on center lock wheels used on the track to replace wheel bearings at 4k track miles and replace the wheel carrier and center lock mount and nuts at 8k track miles, quite an expensive maintenance item.

Thicker oil does not cause a pressure drop, it does cause less flow though. Simple physics.
Originally Posted by Nick_L
You wrote

That's not correct. The pump(positive displacement pump, google) has a fixed flow directly in proportion to RPM. If there was any increase of clearances/leak this would show up as a pressure drop.
Your incorrect, Yes I know the oil pump is a positive displacement pump, but it does displace more volume than the engine actually needs as a wear/safety/longevity factor, and hence one of the reasons for the pressure relief/by-pass valve of the oil pump, to limit the upper pressure to 5 bar and by-pass unneeded volume. Again simple physics.

An increase in clearance (smallish) will lower the pressure at certain RPM's , but the volume of the oil pump is still over designed enough to reach full pressure of 5bar when the relief/by-pass valve opens. Of course if the clearance/leak is too severe , it cannot reach full pressure of 5 bar.

There was an issue with the 986 m96 engines with a vibration/rattle noise. The cause was too much clearance between the crank carrier and the cases (machined fit). Test procedure was to connect a manual oil pressure gauge to the port on the head, engine at operating temperature, rev engine to 4k, engine should have above 4 bar pressure oil pressure, if not replace engine..

Originally Posted by Nick_L
I had a discussion with my wife over lunch today, she is an hydraulic engineers. Completely un-interested in engines until I brought up baffling in a tank, hydraulic stuff. She told me the main reason for using baffles is to lower the highest level in the tank....that would mean in our case they are there to prevent oil pushing up in to the crank/cylinder area. After looking at the dimensions on the X51 baffles inlet ports, it is most likely design for this purpose. It's not design for keeping more oil at the pick up, it's just a short lived side effect (1-2 seconds).
Your just saying the same thing in a different way, ( and your wife)..lowering the highest level in the sump also keeps more oil at the pickup tube like every one says.(with same oil volume) Think about it, simple..
The following users liked this post:
Nick_L (09-18-2020)
Old 09-18-2020, 06:25 PM
  #68  
Silk
Pro
 
Silk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 625
Received 47 Likes on 37 Posts
Default

But can the extra oil column affect supply to the oil pump? Maybe just less aereated oil because of the extra (positive) push it gets. Communicating vessels.
Old 09-18-2020, 06:35 PM
  #69  
Porschetech3
Rennlist Member
 
Porschetech3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Alabama USA
Posts: 6,247
Received 4,579 Likes on 2,074 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Silk
But can the extra oil column affect supply to the oil pump? Maybe just less aereated oil because of the extra (positive) push it gets. Communicating vessels.
Yes !! The oil is always aerated to a degree, the closer to the oil surface the higher the degree of aeration. With the location of the pickup near the sump wall on the g-force side, it will be further from the surface during turns and will receive the lowest aerated oil.

The aerated oil is always lighter and the bubbles take at least 10 seconds to reach the surface and burst. These bubbles are less than 1mm in size.

Last edited by Porschetech3; 09-18-2020 at 06:40 PM.
Old 09-18-2020, 06:52 PM
  #70  
Nick_L
Racer
 
Nick_L's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: cote du rhone
Posts: 357
Received 89 Likes on 60 Posts
Default

Your incorrect, Yes I know the oil pump is a positive displacement pump, but it does displace more volume than the engine actually needs as a wear/safety/longevity factor, and hence one of the reasons for the pressure relief/by-pass valve of the oil pump, to limit the upper pressure to 5 bar and by-pass unneeded volume. Again simple physics.
Yes, most cars utilise this effect, just bypassing unneeded flow(check page 23 in the MIT document for example, fig 1-7....already at 3k rpm ). I think the 996 is not meant to be run like this, it's in the owners manual that you should have approx. 3.5 bar at 5k rpm....thus never really run in to constant bypass. Bypasses are known to cause aeration.

Your just saying the same thing in a different way, ( and your wife)..lowering the highest level in the sump also keeps more oil at the pickup tube like every one says.(with same oil volume) Think about it, simple..
I don't think it's that simple. You are blocking oil volume in pockets at each baffle step, that's where the lowering comes from. These pockets are made bigger on the X51 by moving the inlet ports up by circa 5mm.

Everywhere on the internet when you read about baffles they show a nice picture where the doors/flaps are closed on one side. Initially it makes sense and is easy to understand. But, in an engine your pick-up will empty that 'high oil level' space in probably less than 2 seconds and new oil have to flow in.

Imagine the oil level decreasing in that chamber, where does the new oil flow in from? and what do the levels look like in an equilibrium state? You really don't get a higher level more than just momentarily 1-2 seconds (depending on RPM). If these trap doors also introduce flow restriction there might even be lower oil in the chamber at high RPM. Remember, the flow can be roughly 1 liter per second, that's quite a lot. If you look at the inner chamber where the pick-up sits on our engines, it's very small. The engine case is marked by the black "V" in the cross section picture, taking up a large part of the inner chamber space.


Last edited by Nick_L; 09-18-2020 at 06:58 PM.
Old 09-18-2020, 07:57 PM
  #71  
Porschetech3
Rennlist Member
 
Porschetech3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Alabama USA
Posts: 6,247
Received 4,579 Likes on 2,074 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Nick_L
Yes, most cars utilise this effect, just bypassing unneeded flow(check page 23 in the MIT document for example, fig 1-7....already at 3k rpm ). I think the 996 is not meant to be run like this, it's in the owners manual that you should have approx. 3.5 bar at 5k rpm....thus never really run in to constant bypass. Bypasses are known to cause aeration.
The Technical Service Bulletins from Porsche trump the owners manual. Don't take everything you read in the owners manuals to be absolute fact.

I
Originally Posted by Nick_L
don't think it's that simple. You are blocking oil volume in pockets at each baffle step, that's where the lowering comes from. These pockets are made bigger on the X51 by moving the inlet ports up by circa 5mm.

Everywhere on the internet when you read about baffles they show a nice picture where the doors/flaps are closed on one side. Initially it makes sense and is easy to understand. But, in an engine your pick-up will empty that 'high oil level' space in probably less than 2 seconds and new oil have to flow in.

Imagine the oil level decreasing in that chamber, where does the new oil flow in from? and what do the levels look like in an equilibrium state? You really don't get a higher level more than just momentarily 1-2 seconds (depending on RPM). If these trap doors also introduce flow restriction there might even be lower oil in the chamber at high RPM. Remember, the flow can be roughly 1 liter per second, that's quite a lot. If you look at the inner chamber where the pick-up sits on our engines, it's very small. The engine case is marked by the black "V" in the cross section picture, taking up a large part of the inner chamber space.
I give up, your like when my oldest son was at the inquisitive mind stage, no matter what or how I answered his question he would always say "why?"..

Except you are more educated and don't really understand the complexities of the dynamic forces and the trumping of some theories by simple laws of physics.
The following 4 users liked this post by Porschetech3:
jobyt (09-19-2020), JohnCA58 (09-18-2020), moburki (09-20-2020), yaz996 (09-18-2020)
Old 09-18-2020, 08:50 PM
  #72  
AnthonyGS
Rennlist Member
 
AnthonyGS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: near Jackson, MS
Posts: 1,024
Received 144 Likes on 90 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Mike Murphy
I wonder if modern tire technology (improvements in grip) could be partially responsible for an increase in pressure losses in the turns for street tires over the last 10 years or so? I was able to get pressure loss in turn 9-10 (Carousel) at Road America with just Michelin All Seasons (AS3+)!
Yes. Tire tech has increased dramatically in the past 20 years.

Also like it or not there are just inherent design concerns with a horizontally opposed engine. Unlike a V engine, gravity doesn’t help oil get back to the sump as quickly. The horizontal design also exacerbates bore scoring issues.

These are the consequences of choosing Porsche for your fun car. Yes a flat design has better balance, a lower CG, but it has drawbacks too.

The following users liked this post:
Mike Murphy (09-19-2020)
Old 09-20-2020, 03:58 PM
  #73  
Nick_L
Racer
 
Nick_L's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: cote du rhone
Posts: 357
Received 89 Likes on 60 Posts
Default

The Technical Service Bulletins from Porsche trump the owners manual
So, which relevant TSB have I missed? I will look it up.
Old 09-20-2020, 04:17 PM
  #74  
Porschetech3
Rennlist Member
 
Porschetech3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Alabama USA
Posts: 6,247
Received 4,579 Likes on 2,074 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Nick_L
So, which relevant TSB have I missed? I will look it up.
The one I described above, for engine noise on the M96 engine in the 986.

Since I have retired I don't have access to TBS's anymore. But there was a service you could buy access for a year, month, day, or even by the hour for like $8 an hour. I don't know if the serivce is still available, I did a post on it a few years ago and gave the link to it. Be forewarned that the TSB's are Porsche property, and some have been lost/deleted if they feel they are no loner necessary or beneficial.
Old 09-20-2020, 05:23 PM
  #75  
Nick_L
Racer
 
Nick_L's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: cote du rhone
Posts: 357
Received 89 Likes on 60 Posts
Default

There was an issue with the 986 m96 engines with a vibration/rattle noise. The cause was too much clearance between the crank carrier and the cases (machined fit). Test procedure was to connect a manual oil pressure gauge to the port on the head, engine at operating temperature, rev engine to 4k, engine should have above 4 bar pressure oil pressure, if not replace engine..
Was there one for the 996? While lots of parts are the same, the cylinder halfs and heads are not the same part number(what I can see). There could be a simple restriction(smaller passages for example) somewhere in there giving the Boxster higher oil pressure. Since this is for the 986, I believe the manual is still ok in this instance. If some one can find a TSB pointing the other way, do post.

The M1 0w40 is a thin 40wt oil, it's 12.9cst when new. 12.5 to 16.3 cst is 40wt and 12.5 - 9.3 cst is 30wt. Reading UOAs the M1 0w40 in 996s, it is at 11.5-12 already around 3-4000mils, thus sheared to 30wt. If you follow the 15,000mil service, the actual oil weight in the engine would be mid to low 30wt at that time. When you change oil, there is some left in the engine. When doing a new fill of 0w40 after 15,000 mil you dilute your new oil with some old. Basically if following Porsche's oil and change interval recommendation, you run 30wt in you car.

To all contributors to this thread, I'm trying to find the solution to this. Some times I will push you a little to get more/correct information. Sorry Porschetech3(and others) if you find it offensive, I'm not here to put anyone in a corner.


Quick Reply: Does anything actually solve the oil pressure drop in corners?



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 01:14 PM.