MAF value = Horsepower potential
#346
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
^^^^ that is surprising, from jdbornem's data it looked like there would be a measurable difference...
Last edited by Porschetech3; 11-14-2023 at 04:35 PM.
#347
Rennlist Member
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Thanks for clarification. So what will it take to improve it. Tune?
#348
Rennlist Member
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
#349
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
#350
Rennlist Member
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Think about all the money that folks will save if it comes down to the snorkel tube.
The following users liked this post:
Porschetech3 (11-14-2023)
#351
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I think the story has been that they provide benefit to larger capacity engines. I have a 4.0 which is why I went with it. Plus it looks better.
I was hoping you'd have insights regarding the diffuser location and/or larger inlet. Those are the two significant upstream differences I saw. For example it could be that the 996 3.6 airbox has plenty of extra capacity, and that the larger snorkel on the 997 airbox takes more advantage of it. Hopefully @jdbornem will be able to add something.
I was hoping you'd have insights regarding the diffuser location and/or larger inlet. Those are the two significant upstream differences I saw. For example it could be that the 996 3.6 airbox has plenty of extra capacity, and that the larger snorkel on the 997 airbox takes more advantage of it. Hopefully @jdbornem will be able to add something.
And then as I have always said....." If the test results differ from the theory, believe the test results, and invent a new theory"...
Last edited by Porschetech3; 11-14-2023 at 05:33 PM.
The following users liked this post:
EVOMMM (11-14-2023)