MAF value = Horsepower potential
#196
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
I see fabspeed responding on the exhaust sound thread, and I'm sure they have lots of flow data (?) when designing the intake, but the guy responding on the threads may not be a designer with answers to our questions.
#198
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
Using MAF value to evaluate IDP plenum, GT3 TB, camshaft design, or just air filter, or even exhaust systems, for flow gains or losses is very straightforward.
But using the fabspeed intake/MAF housing to evaluate "itself" is quite a conundrum, with the only supporting data is the physical measurements and fuel trims indicate that it is not "over-reporting" or "under-reporting" except by 3% according to their ID information of 3.6 x 3.1 oval shape housing.
#199
Rennlist Member
I'd sure like to see the inside that FS collector.
#200
Burning Brakes
Perhaps i will put my OE housing back in over the weekend to see what the difference will be. Truth be told i am lazy and don't want too. But if they don't join the discussion maybe that data can help something.
#201
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
I have visioned it in my head, and to be honest it causes me more questions than answers. But I am pulling for it to all be supported by the Math/Science and be more actual Mhpp. I want to find as much Mhpp and in as many places as possible ...
#202
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
Yes, it would be important data !!
#205
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
#206
Rennlist Member
Excellent, thanks for taking the time Mbren1979. I look forward to seeing more testing!
#207
Rennlist Member
2003 C4S 59k miles. Bone stock. I got a chance to do a pull yesterday and recorded a max of 232 g/s in 2nd.
I didn't think to get other variables at the time and wasn't in a position to go any faster or do more than that one, but it's a data point.
I didn't think to get other variables at the time and wasn't in a position to go any faster or do more than that one, but it's a data point.
#208
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
Thanks for posting your data !!
#209
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
Did a pull today on my 99 3.4 using Durametric instead of Torque Pro.(was waiting on a new laptop battery, long story).
Logged 721 kg/hr at 6840rpm, 107F IAT, 79F ambient, 660 altitude
721 kg/hr = 200.27 g/s
200.27g/s / .75 = 267.02Mhpp
267.02Mhpp x 1.134 = 302.84Mhpp ( corrected for weather and alt.)
Logged 721 kg/hr at 6840rpm, 107F IAT, 79F ambient, 660 altitude
721 kg/hr = 200.27 g/s
200.27g/s / .75 = 267.02Mhpp
267.02Mhpp x 1.134 = 302.84Mhpp ( corrected for weather and alt.)
Last edited by Porschetech3; 04-17-2019 at 07:10 PM. Reason: removed a "zero" !!
#210
Burning Brakes
Did a pull today on my 99 3.4 using Durametric instead of Torque Pro.(was waiting on a new laptop battery, long story).
Logged 721 kg/hr at 68400rpm, 107F IAT, 79F ambient, 660 altitude
721 kg/hr = 200.27 g/s
200.27g/s / .75 = 267.02Mhpp
267.02Mhpp x 1.134 = 302.84Mhpp ( corrected for weather and alt.)
Logged 721 kg/hr at 68400rpm, 107F IAT, 79F ambient, 660 altitude
721 kg/hr = 200.27 g/s
200.27g/s / .75 = 267.02Mhpp
267.02Mhpp x 1.134 = 302.84Mhpp ( corrected for weather and alt.)