Notices
992 2019-Present The Forum for the Non-Turbo 911
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

992 Carrera T Club

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-25-2023, 01:57 PM
  #17131  
reggie2234
Track Day
 
reggie2234's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2023
Posts: 18
Received 45 Likes on 17 Posts
Default

Hi All,

What do you think of this build? This would be my first 911, the dealer called and let me know this was on the way. It has many options and is a bit more than I had originally planned for, but looking for any advice if it’s over optioned at $154k.

The following users liked this post:
Vernin (08-28-2023)
Old 08-25-2023, 02:43 PM
  #17132  
Schn3ll
Burning Brakes
 
Schn3ll's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2019
Location: Upstate SC
Posts: 904
Received 1,079 Likes on 449 Posts
Default

Only you can answer that, the value is what you decide it is.

My T build was $144k trying to restrain myself and it's very close to this one in spec. I think with the cost increases it's not unreasonable and you won't have the highest specced T as others are doing PTS colors and will probably come in a good bit higher. If you can swing it and no markup, do it.

I find it funny that the 8VH option on the build sheet is pulling the Taycan glacier blue tail light description. That's correct for the 911 option code, just wrong description.
The following users liked this post:
Vernin (08-28-2023)
Old 08-25-2023, 03:17 PM
  #17133  
RatherJaded
Rennlist Member
 
RatherJaded's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2021
Posts: 2,133
Received 1,612 Likes on 919 Posts
Default

I have recently been considering changing my Shark Blue build to White with Shark Blue belts. That way I still get a little bit of the SB. Who knows… good thing I have about a month left to decide.
The following 3 users liked this post by RatherJaded:
dreamin11 (08-28-2023), Macboy (08-28-2023), Vernin (08-28-2023)
Old 08-25-2023, 03:26 PM
  #17134  
tourenwagen
Three Wheelin'
 
tourenwagen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2019
Location: NJ
Posts: 1,852
Received 4,391 Likes on 1,198 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by TUD
I have recently been considering changing my Shark Blue build to White with Shark Blue belts. That way I still get a little bit of the SB. Who knows… good thing I have about a month left to decide.
White and SB would look great together. Maybe even calipers powder coated SB down the road...


The following 9 users liked this post by tourenwagen:
dreamin11 (08-26-2023), ECNJ (08-26-2023), Edward911 (08-27-2023), HerrDr (08-25-2023), Hulley (08-28-2023), Macboy (08-28-2023), Oileater (08-25-2023), RatherJaded (08-25-2023), Vernin (08-28-2023) and 4 others liked this post. (Show less...)
Old 08-25-2023, 03:30 PM
  #17135  
RatherJaded
Rennlist Member
 
RatherJaded's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2021
Posts: 2,133
Received 1,612 Likes on 919 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by tourenwagen
White and SB would look great together. Maybe even calipers powder coated SB down the road...


Another option would be White and the base Lizard Green package. I just think it will take a special buyer to want Lizard Green at resale. While many of us like it, must do not and yes I always take into account resale as I have spec’ed many of new vehicles my way and then I struggle to sell them years later. Actually dealing with it now... Anyways, I could go traditional and just do silver grey belts with the base interior as well. Kind of boring though. Ugh… lol

Edit: White w/ SB belts. https://configurator.porsche.com/porsche-code/PRH79TA0

Last edited by RatherJaded; 08-25-2023 at 03:39 PM.
Old 08-25-2023, 03:34 PM
  #17136  
Wilder
Rennlist Member
 
Wilder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Somewhere in Mexico
Posts: 6,579
Received 5,027 Likes on 1,786 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by reggie2234
Hi All,

What do you think of this build? This would be my first 911, the dealer called and let me know this was on the way. It has many options and is a bit more than I had originally planned for, but looking for any advice if it’s over optioned at $154k.
Welcome!

Having a lot of bling options and skipping leather doesn't make sense to me.
I would question if you really need FAL, as most of us don't.
992 suffer from wind buffering at speed. Instead of the $500 CF window triangles, I'd get these: https://awe-tuning.com/products/awe-...or-porsche-992
The rest is personal taste.
The following 2 users liked this post by Wilder:
arrivederci (08-25-2023), Vernin (08-28-2023)
Old 08-25-2023, 03:36 PM
  #17137  
DSC48
Rennlist Member
 
DSC48's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2020
Location: Readington, NJ
Posts: 571
Received 553 Likes on 230 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by reggie2234
Hi All,

What do you think of this build? This would be my first 911, the dealer called and let me know this was on the way. It has many options and is a bit more than I had originally planned for, but looking for any advice if it’s over optioned at $154k.

I agree that it's really your decision. It's got a lot of stuff on it that will not effect how the car drives, so to me, it's a bit expensive. At 150+, I think I would be looking for a C2S.
The following 2 users liked this post by DSC48:
RatherJaded (08-25-2023), Vernin (08-28-2023)
Old 08-25-2023, 04:05 PM
  #17138  
arrivederci
Addict
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
arrivederci's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 819
Received 1,197 Likes on 425 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by reggie2234
Hi All,

What do you think of this build? This would be my first 911, the dealer called and let me know this was on the way. It has many options and is a bit more than I had originally planned for, but looking for any advice if it’s over optioned at $154k.
As others have said it looks like a really nice car that has a lot of options. You aren't missing anything critical IMO. And just so I'm clear, this is built already and arriving at your dealer shortly - so no chance of changing anything unless you wait for another allocation?


The following users liked this post:
Vernin (08-28-2023)
Old 08-25-2023, 04:34 PM
  #17139  
merrion13
Rennlist Member
 
merrion13's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2022
Location: Denver
Posts: 119
Received 368 Likes on 71 Posts
Default

Got pics recently when my wife took the T to the Ladies Track Day hosted by Rocky Mountain Region PCA...I know I'm a little partial to my build, but damn does the T look good in her element! Now I just need to get vinyl numbers...






The following 17 users liked this post by merrion13:
arrivederci (08-25-2023), Cartod (08-27-2023), cbboarder (08-25-2023), ECNJ (08-26-2023), Edward911 (08-27-2023), HerrDr (08-25-2023), Hulley (08-28-2023), Icegrill (08-25-2023), Macboy (08-28-2023), mashoutposse (08-27-2023), RatherJaded (08-25-2023), Stespa (08-25-2023), tourenwagen (08-25-2023), Twisty_911T (08-25-2023), Uhu (08-25-2023), Vernin (08-28-2023), Wilder (08-25-2023) and 12 others liked this post. (Show less...)
Old 08-25-2023, 04:39 PM
  #17140  
Icegrill
Burning Brakes
 
Icegrill's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2023
Posts: 929
Received 953 Likes on 450 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by merrion13
Got pics recently when my wife took the T to the Ladies Track Day hosted by Rocky Mountain Region PCA...I know I'm a little partial to my build, but damn does the T look good in her element! Now I just need to get vinyl numbers...





Nice example IGM looking good!
The following 3 users liked this post by Icegrill:
DSC48 (08-26-2023), merrion13 (08-25-2023), Vernin (08-28-2023)
Old 08-25-2023, 04:42 PM
  #17141  
Wilder
Rennlist Member
 
Wilder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Somewhere in Mexico
Posts: 6,579
Received 5,027 Likes on 1,786 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Flat6Motorsports
Porsche underrates the base model for sure. We usually see about 360whp for a base, 380-390whp on the S, and 390-397whp on the GTS. We find them to lose about 15-18% in the drivetrain depending on C2 vs C4. It's not a perfect science, we mostly pay attention to the deltas. For reference, a stock 992 Turbo S puts down around 545-555whp on our dyno.
I found this rather interesting and thought I'd share here. 30-37WHP delta is a lot less than the 94 crank HP delta between the base and the GTS published by PAG.
The following 4 users liked this post by Wilder:
ECNJ (08-26-2023), Macboy (08-28-2023), Oileater (08-26-2023), Vernin (08-28-2023)
Old 08-25-2023, 04:48 PM
  #17142  
reggie2234
Track Day
 
reggie2234's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2023
Posts: 18
Received 45 Likes on 17 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by arrivederci
As others have said it looks like a really nice car that has a lot of options. You aren't missing anything critical IMO. And just so I'm clear, this is built already and arriving at your dealer shortly - so no chance of changing anything unless you wait for another allocation?
That’s correct. It’s already on the way from port. No markup from MSRP.
The following users liked this post:
Vernin (08-28-2023)
Old 08-25-2023, 05:14 PM
  #17143  
arrivederci
Addict
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
arrivederci's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 819
Received 1,197 Likes on 425 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Wilder
I found this rather interesting and thought I'd share here. 30-37WHP delta is a lot less than the 94 crank HP delta between the base and the GTS published by PAG.
Weird that those numbers are low for the S and GTS compared to what M Engineering shows on their website (doesn't Flat6 use their tunes?). On their stage 1 dyno charts, m engineering claims 358/425/436 stock whp for base/S/GTS.
The following 2 users liked this post by arrivederci:
Oileater (08-26-2023), Vernin (08-28-2023)
Old 08-25-2023, 05:30 PM
  #17144  
Wilder
Rennlist Member
 
Wilder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Somewhere in Mexico
Posts: 6,579
Received 5,027 Likes on 1,786 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by arrivederci
Weird that those numbers are low for the S and GTS compared to what M Engineering shows on their website (doesn't Flat6 use their tunes?). For stage 1 m engineering claims 358/425/436 whp for base/S/GTS.
Are those stage 1 or stock numbers? Flat6's #s are stock. 358 for the base seems low for stage 1.
As for the deltas, yes, power for the S and GTS seem low which is why I posted. The M Engineering deltas are more in line with PAG numbers.
Any variance would be attributed to dyno more than anything.
The following users liked this post:
Oileater (08-26-2023)
Old 08-25-2023, 05:42 PM
  #17145  
arrivederci
Addict
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
arrivederci's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 819
Received 1,197 Likes on 425 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Wilder
Are those stage 1 or stock numbers? Flat6's #s are stock. 358 for the base seems low for stage 1.
As for the deltas, yes, power for the S and GTS seem low which is why I posted. The M Engineering deltas are more in line with PAG numbers.
Any variance would be attributed to dyno more than anything.
Err those are their stock numbers, but listed on their stage 1 dyno sheets. My bad - I'll edit my prior post to clarify.
The following users liked this post:
Wilder (08-25-2023)


Quick Reply: 992 Carrera T Club



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 06:47 AM.