991.2 is 3.8 and RS.2???
#183
It is much different in the BMW/Audi/Volvo turbo cars, plenty of lag.
I am looking forward to the .2 GT3, but I really can't wait for the GT2 RS.
#184
Porsche tested a completely electric Boxster too.
Testing something doesn't mean Porsche will actually produced them you know?
FSW and AP told us 918 owners face to face that the .2 GT3 will be a 4.0L.
Also there will not be a hybrid in a 991 body. There is no room for the system, straight from Walliser's mouth when I asked him in Geneva. The 'reported' hybrid front axle car is a 992 mule if you must know. When I discussed the hybrid system with Walliser, I even described how the system could be packaged. Battery in the center tunnel as it is freed up by the lack of a driveshaft, the e-motor will be placed in the same places the front differential. He only smiled.
Whose your source again? Pretty sure our sources are quite a bit more reliable than yours.
This is a NA Porsche engine, highly strung 3.8L 9000rpm one, HP doesn't magically appeared with a 'tuned' ECU and a exhaust. Do you think it will be like those magically big tube Honda Civic exhaust that will give a magically 25HP from a 1.6L 140HP engine?
Testing something doesn't mean Porsche will actually produced them you know?
FSW and AP told us 918 owners face to face that the .2 GT3 will be a 4.0L.
Also there will not be a hybrid in a 991 body. There is no room for the system, straight from Walliser's mouth when I asked him in Geneva. The 'reported' hybrid front axle car is a 992 mule if you must know. When I discussed the hybrid system with Walliser, I even described how the system could be packaged. Battery in the center tunnel as it is freed up by the lack of a driveshaft, the e-motor will be placed in the same places the front differential. He only smiled.
Whose your source again? Pretty sure our sources are quite a bit more reliable than yours.
This is a NA Porsche engine, highly strung 3.8L 9000rpm one, HP doesn't magically appeared with a 'tuned' ECU and a exhaust. Do you think it will be like those magically big tube Honda Civic exhaust that will give a magically 25HP from a 1.6L 140HP engine?
#185
Race Car
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 4,486
Likes: 441
From: The way to hell is paved by good intentions “Wenn ich Purist höre...entsichere ich meinen Browning” "Myths are fuel for marketing (and nowadays for flippers too,,,)" time to time is not sufficient to be a saint, you must be also an Hero
All know the GT3 street and GT3 Cup relation
The only reason to downgrade the .2 GT3 (from already presented GT3 Cup engine in Paris) to a 3.8
would be to intenionally kill the GT3 product to leave sales room
only for RS and R (both a GT3 parts bin sold at much higher MSRP)
As also stated publicly by AP in Geneva '16 the next future might not see a GT3 but RS and R (a more margin business option)
I' d (as most here) prefer to believe what i prefer
so a 4L all the way
but i don t think Walliser, in case of any plan roadmap change, would be so kind to call all
1 by 1 these mega vips to correct an opportunity spoken 1 year ago
so calm down there s room here as for any RS or R parts bin
in the hope .2RS might be a REAL lighter GT3 version
*or a real different product as it was 997 RS 4.0 or the first R*
otherwise GT3 all the way and all RS R parts bin to the hipsters
The only reason to downgrade the .2 GT3 (from already presented GT3 Cup engine in Paris) to a 3.8
would be to intenionally kill the GT3 product to leave sales room
only for RS and R (both a GT3 parts bin sold at much higher MSRP)
As also stated publicly by AP in Geneva '16 the next future might not see a GT3 but RS and R (a more margin business option)
I' d (as most here) prefer to believe what i prefer
so a 4L all the way
but i don t think Walliser, in case of any plan roadmap change, would be so kind to call all
1 by 1 these mega vips to correct an opportunity spoken 1 year ago
so calm down there s room here as for any RS or R parts bin
in the hope .2RS might be a REAL lighter GT3 version
*or a real different product as it was 997 RS 4.0 or the first R*
otherwise GT3 all the way and all RS R parts bin to the hipsters
Last edited by fxz; 11-29-2016 at 11:18 PM.
#186
Hmmm, is Saudi going to cut or not? Is the .2gt3 a 3.8 or 4.0? Both fun to speculate on but I don't think anyone really knows unless they are at the meeting (factory). At least we'll know OPEC tomorrow. Then all we'll have is 3.8 or 4.0 to speculate with no real information.
I won't believe anything 100% until Geneva in March.
Fun stuff. 🤔
I won't believe anything 100% until Geneva in March.
Fun stuff. 🤔
#188
#189
Killing off the GT3 doesn't need to down grade the engine to 3.8L. If Porsche needs to kill it, it can be killed even at 4.2L. You make absolutely no sense.
As also stated publicly by AP in Geneva '16 the next future might not see a GT3 but RS and R (a more margin business option)
but i don t think Walliser, in case of any plan roadmap change, would be so kind to call all
1 by 1 these mega vips to correct an opportunity spoken 1 year ago
1 by 1 these mega vips to correct an opportunity spoken 1 year ago
#190
Race Car
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 4,486
Likes: 441
From: The way to hell is paved by good intentions “Wenn ich Purist höre...entsichere ich meinen Browning” "Myths are fuel for marketing (and nowadays for flippers too,,,)" time to time is not sufficient to be a saint, you must be also an Hero
^Killing a product is quiet simple
1 you stop producing it
2 or you make it less attractive keeping a 3.8 "minor" displacement
RS carbon parts overcharged price makes more margin
not to mention green R stripes...
I am also sure Walliser won't call you just in case they changed their minds...
1 you stop producing it
2 or you make it less attractive keeping a 3.8 "minor" displacement
RS carbon parts overcharged price makes more margin
not to mention green R stripes...
I am also sure Walliser won't call you just in case they changed their minds...
#191
^Killing a product is quiet simple
1 you stop producing it
2 or you make it less attractive keeping a 3.8 "minor" displacement
RS carbon parts overcharged price makes more margin
not to mention green R stripes...
I am also sure Walliser won't call you just in case they changed their minds...
1 you stop producing it
2 or you make it less attractive keeping a 3.8 "minor" displacement
RS carbon parts overcharged price makes more margin
not to mention green R stripes...
I am also sure Walliser won't call you just in case they changed their minds...
Only reason Porsche would kill the GT3 is when they kill the 4.0L NA engine. Which seems highly unlike as those are in al their race cars and skunk works had something going with that engine...............
A 4.0L GT3 with manual option is soooooooooo attractive, especially to those that wanted an R and couldn't get one. There is a boatload of sales to be had. It WILL be a successful product, you know? Actually it won't to those that only wanted an R just to flip it....................
*unlock my phone to see Dr. Walliser's number on speed dial*
*in between Andy Preuninger's and Joe Lawrence's*
*oh I have Alexander Pollich and Andre Oosthuizen's numbers too*
*still have Detlev von Platen's old US number*
I am on a first name basis with all of them and many more. How tight you are with Porsche?
#192
You really don't want to underestimate how much a typical 918 owner knows. There are many many more stuff that cannot be posted on a public board, one reason why we moved to a private group.
Things we don't say doesn't mean we don't know, it just means it's not for public consumption.
I am already one of the most vocal and public one, I could just as well shut up and leave everything in the dark.
Things we don't say doesn't mean we don't know, it just means it's not for public consumption.
I am already one of the most vocal and public one, I could just as well shut up and leave everything in the dark.
#193
Originally Posted by fxz
^Killing a product is quiet simple
1 you stop producing it
2 or you make it less attractive keeping a 3.8 "minor" displacement
RS carbon parts overcharged price makes more margin
not to mention green R stripes...
I am also sure Walliser won't call you just in case they changed their minds...
1 you stop producing it
2 or you make it less attractive keeping a 3.8 "minor" displacement
RS carbon parts overcharged price makes more margin
not to mention green R stripes...
I am also sure Walliser won't call you just in case they changed their minds...
#194
You really don't want to underestimate how much a typical 918 owner knows. There are many many more stuff that cannot be posted on a public board, one reason why we moved to a private group.
Things we don't say doesn't mean we don't know, it just means it's not for public consumption.
I am already one of the most vocal and public one, I could just as well shut up and leave everything in the dark.
Things we don't say doesn't mean we don't know, it just means it's not for public consumption.
I am already one of the most vocal and public one, I could just as well shut up and leave everything in the dark.
No one here takes fxz seriously, he/she's like a crazy grandaunt that always says random crazy things at family events, and everyone just ignores her because her ramblings make no sense and her predictions are never correct.........
#195
If the RS.2 has no turbos how could it be competitive without hybridization. But if it has turbos, is this still a GT3 RS? That means for Porsche the end of a line of products !?
Of course, we can think of a 4.2 engine displacement, but that will not exceed 550 horsepower, which is far below the powers of Ferrari and McLaren.
So I think that Porsche is going to have the temptation to release an RS.2 with a hybrid system with flywheel, to have a momentary surplus of power and remained competitive.
Of course, we can think of a 4.2 engine displacement, but that will not exceed 550 horsepower, which is far below the powers of Ferrari and McLaren.
So I think that Porsche is going to have the temptation to release an RS.2 with a hybrid system with flywheel, to have a momentary surplus of power and remained competitive.