Notices
991 GT3, GT3RS, GT2RS and 911R 2012-2019
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

BMW M4GTS faster around the Ring as the 991GT3? (or even faster than RS?)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-24-2015, 11:20 AM
  #46  
Hothonda
Burning Brakes
 
Hothonda's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: PNW
Posts: 1,194
Received 34 Likes on 17 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Banango
Very interesting. Thank you for that. I recently went to a local dealer as male ballast with a newly divorced female friend who was interested in an X3 and the general manager - no less - was telling her that the 4-year plan was discontinued except as a chargeable option. I didn't question it. I foresee a call to BMWNA.
The second owner doesn't get whatever is left...only original buyer.
Old 12-24-2015, 11:59 AM
  #47  
Maverick787
Nordschleife Master
 
Maverick787's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 5,304
Received 2,099 Likes on 1,011 Posts
Default

Sorry GTS^
Old 12-24-2015, 12:04 PM
  #48  
Banango
Burning Brakes
 
Banango's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: NY
Posts: 832
Received 7 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Hothonda
The second owner doesn't get whatever is left...only original buyer.
Indeed. Thanks. I went and read the literature online after posting and realised I may not have been paying sufficient attention generally that day. He could have been talking to her about a CPO at the time. The X3 had been really disappointing to drive - aside from when we were very lightly rear-ended by a slightly dotty old dear at a traffic light - and I was at the time being amused by the fact that my '02 M3 DD was getting the most attention of any car on the lot while we were outside chatting. (This is a car with 144K mi, now in need of some exterior TLC.) That rather sadly sums up my own POV on BMW at the moment.

That change to the t&c on the maintenance program is IMO not a brilliant move on their part and suggests a clash of overconfidence and weakness amongst brand managers. I would hope Porsche doesn't suffer similarly since (1) I just got my first one and (2) I see a good deal of concern about it on Rennlist.
Old 12-24-2015, 12:12 PM
  #49  
neanicu
Nordschleife Master
 
neanicu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Ny
Posts: 9,986
Received 377 Likes on 226 Posts
Default

BMW's maintenance program is part of the purchase price. You're paying for it.
Old 12-24-2015, 12:14 PM
  #50  
Hothonda
Burning Brakes
 
Hothonda's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: PNW
Posts: 1,194
Received 34 Likes on 17 Posts
Default

Here's a link that explains...BMW is shooting themselves in the foot w/this decision.

http://www.autoblog.com/2014/08/12/b...-to-2nd-owner/
Old 12-24-2015, 12:21 PM
  #51  
chillindrdude
Burning Brakes
 
chillindrdude's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Virginia
Posts: 923
Received 61 Likes on 39 Posts
Default

i've been enjoying my M3 at the track this past season.

it's a great DD, kiddie errands, part-time track, do-it-all car. i'm committed until my lease is up in 28months. then it's on to an used 991 GT3RS, 570S, 458, or huracan. Also considering the ACR and Gen6 Z28
Old 12-24-2015, 02:11 PM
  #52  
Manifold
Rennlist Member
 
Manifold's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Mid-Atlantic (on land, not in the middle of the ocean)
Posts: 13,324
Received 4,505 Likes on 2,563 Posts
Default

The thought of a sedanish car that handles well and can just about hang with the GT3 sounds pretty cool to me. Would love to see some of these showing up at the track and embarrassing all sorts of Porsches.
Old 12-24-2015, 05:40 PM
  #53  
jo_ker
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
jo_ker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: Germany/Austria
Posts: 2,064
Received 498 Likes on 202 Posts
Default

chassis/steering/feeling on E46M and E92M are great! so predictable. such a good playable thing. i missed it a lot in other sportscars (C6Z06 for example).

owned E46M's and E92M's in all versions. minimum 150.000km quick country roads in the last 8 years. i didn't bought a M4 up till now. (current M3 is the best daily saloon. sure.)

but may you can prefer on some days a M4 GTS more than a 991 GT3. way more torque. engine in the front, drive in the back and a lucky piece of meat in the middle.
i could imagine it. to hoon full opposite lock around.

and it is cheaper. 144k€ for a M4GTS; 137k€ (154k€ same spec) for the 991GT3.
huge fanbase. fastest BMW ever. limited to 700 ww. should further lead to more than price stability.
Old 12-24-2015, 10:46 PM
  #54  
Macca
Rennlist Member
 
Macca's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 14,140
Received 14 Likes on 13 Posts
Default

The SportAuto time for the 991 GT3 is poor. There are already two amateurs on youtube beat this time with 250kmph geo fence in place (emanuelle - plowerslidelover). They should have managed 7.28. I recall they had some issue with the car?

The 991GT3 they need to do the times again at Spa & ring as both are wrong.

BMW made a good product in the past. I have had e39 M5 many years and driven e36 M3. The 1M is fun too. I tried new M4 hit didn't like it. I think e92 would be sweet spot. I tried CSL but did not like SMG. Horrible. But everything else about that car wax good!
Old 12-24-2015, 10:54 PM
  #55  
ShakeNBake
Rennlist Member
 
ShakeNBake's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 5,659
Received 961 Likes on 555 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Macca
The SportAuto time for the 991 GT3 is poor. There are already two amateurs on youtube beat this time with 250kmph geo fence in place (emanuelle - plowerslidelover). They should have managed 7.28. I recall they had some issue with the car?

The 991GT3 they need to do the times again at Spa & ring as both are wrong.

BMW made a good product in the past. I have had e39 M5 many years and driven e36 M3. The 1M is fun too. I tried new M4 hit didn't like it. I think e92 would be sweet spot. I tried CSL but did not like SMG. Horrible. But everything else about that car wax good!
I think a better way to look a ring times from Auto motor und Sport is that they are great drivers, but are not spending hundreds of laps in the car - so a better indication of what mortals will be able to get out of the car. The faster laps times from them tend to be in cars that inspire more confidence - one of the major reasons the GT3 has rear wheel steering. you have to have huge ***** to drive a 911 at 11/10ths on the ring. Few people have them, and even fewer have them and also know how to drive front engine or AWD cars around. What we need is an autonomous ring driver who can....wait...lost the plot.
Old 12-25-2015, 05:54 AM
  #56  
Mika911
Racer
 
Mika911's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: London
Posts: 487
Received 34 Likes on 25 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Macca
The SportAuto time for the 991 GT3 is poor. There are already two amateurs on youtube beat this time with 250kmph geo fence in place (emanuelle - plowerslidelover). They should have managed 7.28. I recall they had some issue with the car?

The 991GT3 they need to do the times again at Spa & ring as both are wrong!
I agree that Porsche need to set some official times in the RS. Sportauto get very little seat time and their journos are capable but about 10s off the pace.

At first I assumed that powerslidelover would have set bridge to gantry times, which are about 15 seconds less than the Sportauto lap (which at 20.6km is 200m less than the full lap which BMW did), but I can see at least one full lap at 7:35s from powerslidelover. And I believe he has done 7:28 as well, which is incredible for someone who does not race there.

That does show that a top driver should manage the 20.8km lap under 7:20 (Porsche sources suggest 7:17 is feasible in the RS). But until they issue a video it's all hearsay.
Old 12-25-2015, 07:16 AM
  #57  
Macca
Rennlist Member
 
Macca's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 14,140
Received 14 Likes on 13 Posts
Default

Powerslide lover did 7.35 in a rented RSR 991 GT3 (fully stock) first day he ever drive the car on the Ring and that was 14 months ago. I think it may have been with a passenger.

He did a 7.14 BTG with limited 250kmph geo fence in his own car with Trofeo R a few months back on adjusted geo and has data to support this translates to a 7.28 time. I have no doubt on the right day with zero traffic he could achieve very close to 7.25 factory time in his own car.

It shows the factory times are aggressive and must occur with perfect conditions and support on the day. Even wind can be an issue and definitely humidity and road surface temperature when setting a hero lap.

It would be great to see an official RS factory full lap now the 250kmph limit is lifted. I think 7.18/19 is possible with Timo on the right day.....but it wont be easily replicated by an amateur not even someone as skilled as Emanuelle.
Old 12-25-2015, 07:29 AM
  #58  
993RR
Burning Brakes
 
993RR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 784
Received 260 Likes on 158 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Macca

He did a 7.14 BTG with limited 250kmph geo fence in his own car with Trofeo R a few months back on adjusted geo and has data to support this translates to a 7.28 time. I have no doubt on the right day with zero traffic he could achieve very close to 7.25 factory time in his own car.

It shows the factory times are aggressive and must occur with perfect conditions and support on the day. Even wind can be an issue and definitely humidity and road surface temperature when setting a hero lap.

It would be great to see an official RS factory full lap now the 250kmph limit is lifted. I think 7.18/19 is possible with Timo on the right day.....but it wont be easily replicated by an amateur not even someone as skilled as Emanuelle.
That sums it up well. Hardly anything on the table. Anyone know how fast the top N24 Manthey cars go round in?
Old 12-25-2015, 08:46 AM
  #59  
Earlierapex
Three Wheelin'
 
Earlierapex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: USA
Posts: 1,944
Received 119 Likes on 57 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Nizer
E46 CSL was last great M3. E92 and F80 were/are quick but left me a little cold; neither lasted long in my garage.
I agree. I had an e90. Incredible engine, sweet chassis, but it just felt generic somehow. Not sure how else to describe it. The low torque/high rev V8 just didn't fit the heavy car I guess.
Old 12-25-2015, 08:59 AM
  #60  
Nizer
Rennlist Member
 
Nizer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Wishing I Was At The Track
Posts: 13,663
Received 1,889 Likes on 973 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Earlierapex
I agree. I had an e90. Incredible engine, sweet chassis, but it just felt generic somehow. Not sure how else to describe it. The low torque/high rev V8 just didn't fit the heavy car I guess.
Yes, but agree with others who reminded of the SMG shortcomings. Selective memory at work again....


Quick Reply: BMW M4GTS faster around the Ring as the 991GT3? (or even faster than RS?)



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 09:25 PM.