Notices
991 GT3, GT3RS, GT2RS and 911R 2012-2019
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Consolidated 991RS thread

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-23-2014, 05:43 PM
  #1591  
Ronan
Rennlist Member
 
Ronan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Canada
Posts: 4,727
Received 110 Likes on 66 Posts
Default

Minor update fact: roof of the RS is definitely magnesium. Subcontracted out and being constructed currently. I got this from someone close to it who is credible to me.
Old 08-23-2014, 05:47 PM
  #1592  
consolidated
Drifting
 
consolidated's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Texas
Posts: 2,587
Received 11 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Mg, interesting choice. It'll be a giant sparkler when sliding on it's roof.
Old 08-23-2014, 05:51 PM
  #1593  
Zeus
Rennlist Member
 
Zeus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Washington State
Posts: 382
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Benefits of Magnesium over Carbon Fiber or Aluminum? Anyone know?

New ZO6 will have a Carbon Fiber roof option. Hmm...
Old 08-23-2014, 06:43 PM
  #1594  
race7117
Burning Brakes
 
race7117's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 1,101
Received 91 Likes on 51 Posts
Default

Porsche uses magnesium for the roof of the Cabrio and Targa, I assume they have invested heavily in its production and thus decreases cost for them, making it more cost effective as a company. Also Magnesium not as brittle yet still very light, I think light as aluminum but still stronger more stiff without being brittle. There is currently a battle between Mg and Carbon wheels for motorcycles
Old 08-23-2014, 06:48 PM
  #1595  
Tre
Racer
 
Tre's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 370
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Race, it's from my understanding from motorcycle wheels is that cf is much lighter (~50%) and stronger than magnesium. It's just that magnesium is more "flexible" hence more forgiving with potholes compared to cf. But in the case of a car's roof, I'd think that scenario is irrelevant and you'd want the lightest and strongest material, hence the use of cf. There's a reason why high performance cars use cf tubs and/or components and not moving towards magnesium. Maybe this is a cop out for Porsche to go after profit margins vice making the lightest possible RS.
Old 08-23-2014, 09:30 PM
  #1596  
race7117
Burning Brakes
 
race7117's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 1,101
Received 91 Likes on 51 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Tre
Race, it's from my understanding from motorcycle wheels is that cf is much lighter (~50%) and stronger than magnesium. It's just that magnesium is more "flexible" hence more forgiving with potholes compared to cf. But in the case of a car's roof, I'd think that scenario is irrelevant and you'd want the lightest and strongest material, hence the use of cf. There's a reason why high performance cars use cf tubs and/or components and not moving towards magnesium. Maybe this is a cop out for Porsche to go after profit margins vice making the lightest possible RS.
Completely agree, more than likely a cheaper alternative
Old 08-23-2014, 09:55 PM
  #1597  
Macca
Rennlist Member
 
Macca's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 14,140
Received 14 Likes on 13 Posts
Default

Mg is typically alloyed with Au. Infact many alloy wheels have a small Mg component. I cant see any structural or weight benefits of a higher content Mg alloy for the roof over CF or alloy other than perhaps a benefit when producing the double bubble pressing and a margin weight benefit which may offset what I believe to be a higher roof line (for the bubble components) from what I have studied from the patent drawings which could be a measure to offset what would be a fractionally higher COG if in fact my observations are true. Of course there is also the marketing angle in using a "more exotic" manufacturing and material process. Infact too high Mg component will made for a more "brittle" and fracture prone end result so I guess they will be alloying with something clever to counter this....just my 0.2 on the subject.
Old 08-23-2014, 10:02 PM
  #1598  
Nizer
Rennlist Member
 
Nizer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Wishing I Was At The Track
Posts: 13,627
Received 1,863 Likes on 963 Posts
Default

I suspect the choice was more engineering than cost driven given location as structural component of the tub/passenger cell (unlike bolt on hood and front fenders).

Magnesium is more expensive than aluminum but has well established advantages over the latter. See this comparison from bike building website: http://www.precisiontandems.com/cat_...amagnesium.htm)

The issues of connecting mg and steel - a factor in this location - also seem to have been solved. See: http://www1.eere.energy.gov/vehicles...eng_2011_o.pdf
Old 08-23-2014, 11:04 PM
  #1599  
nash
Racer
 
nash's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Frisco, TX
Posts: 260
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by SamFromTX
Is the seat belt mounting point not strong enough in case of a rollover? Reading through this thread make me think they are not. Has there been any instances were a car equipped with such roll cage rolled over and did not protect the cabin well? Is a plate mounted roll cage significantly better for a fact or just theoretical? I am debating whether to put a bolt on roll cage. I realize it providers anchor points for a harness.
In all honesty I consider my "roll bar" to really just be a harness bar for this reason. It may provide some relief in a roll situation, but you can imagine the seat belt mounting points are probably pretty easy to shear. I'd say it has some benefit, but certainly nothing like a true welded-in cage. And it's certainly not providing much in the way of extra rigidity...

Bottom line, if you are putting in harnesses then absolutely get one, but otherwise I'd probably skip it. Just extra weight and squeaks otherwise
Old 08-23-2014, 11:43 PM
  #1600  
24Chromium
Drifting
 
24Chromium's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Black Sheep Racing World HQ
Posts: 3,278
Likes: 0
Received 25 Likes on 14 Posts
Default

I tracked my RS for 3 seasons with just a harness bar. I'd seen first hand how well a 911 survived a nasty head-on and roll over without a roll bar. The fact that both driver and passenger walk away unscathed was quite comforting to me.
Old 08-24-2014, 12:27 PM
  #1601  
SamFromTX
Drifting
 
SamFromTX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 3,131
Received 7 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by nash
In all honesty I consider my "roll bar" to really just be a harness bar for this reason. It may provide some relief in a roll situation, but you can imagine the seat belt mounting points are probably pretty easy to shear. I'd say it has some benefit, but certainly nothing like a true welded-in cage. And it's certainly not providing much in the way of extra rigidity...

Bottom line, if you are putting in harnesses then absolutely get one, but otherwise I'd probably skip it. Just extra weight and squeaks otherwise
Thanks. The car is very fast and it wants to be driven very hard so I'm always worried that something can happen and I'm not adequately protected. I certainly need a harness and a Hans so I'll get it done. I also learnt of a 911 that flipped several times at MSR a few years ago and both passenger and driver walked afterwards. It had a bolt on cage, FWIW.
Old 08-24-2014, 12:28 PM
  #1602  
SamFromTX
Drifting
 
SamFromTX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 3,131
Received 7 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 24Chromium
I tracked my RS for 3 seasons with just a harness bar. I'd seen first hand how well a 911 survived a nasty head-on and roll over without a roll bar. The fact that both driver and passenger walk away unscathed was quite comforting to me.
Wow, I just posted a similar scenario, just because I missed your post.
Old 08-24-2014, 12:40 PM
  #1603  
SamFromTX
Drifting
 
SamFromTX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 3,131
Received 7 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Nizer
I suspect the choice was more engineering than cost driven given location as structural component of the tub/passenger cell (unlike bolt on hood and front fenders).

Magnesium is more expensive than aluminum but has well established advantages over the latter. See this comparison from bike building website: http://www.precisiontandems.com/cat_...amagnesium.htm)

The issues of connecting mg and steel - a factor in this location - also seem to have been solved. See: http://www1.eere.energy.gov/vehicles...eng_2011_o.pdf
Thank you for posting this, very informative. I knew Mg is stronger than Al but your post elaborates on many more aspects that I didn't know about. I did not believe Porsche would use Mg vs CF for maximizing profit (they're jacking the price to achieve that) so this makes sense, provided this bit of info about the RS roof material is indeed factual.
Old 08-24-2014, 01:06 PM
  #1604  
TrackFan
Banned
 
TrackFan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 411
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

If you're going to track your car, and drive at your limit. You should set it up like a race car. Which means a roll bar. One guy walking away from a roll without a roll bar doesn't mean you'll be as lucky.
Old 08-24-2014, 01:10 PM
  #1605  
mooty
GT3 player par excellence
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
mooty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: san francisco
Posts: 43,421
Received 5,660 Likes on 2,327 Posts
Default

at min., I put a rear roll bar in with hans


Quick Reply: Consolidated 991RS thread



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 02:28 AM.