Notices
991 GT3, GT3RS, GT2RS and 911R 2012-2019
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

991 GT3 RS

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-27-2013 | 12:44 AM
  #166  
blake's Avatar
blake
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 3,120
Likes: 5
From: Park City, UT
Default

Originally Posted by Drifting
I think Porsche (and the ego of those in charge) will cause them to position the 960 as a direct competitor to the Ferrari 458 successor and the MP4. The price will be close to both those cars. $225,000 at least. Remember the 911 turbo S is going for $180,000 already.
I agree with this statement 100%. I think the 960 will be a new "class" of car for Porsche to compete head-on in the race series with the mid-engine bunch... I also believe that Porsche will push the 911 in the direction of a street "GT" car rather than a race car...

A good comparison would be BMWs addition of the 1 & 6 series to the 3/5/7, and of course the creation of the A/B/C/CLS/E/S classes at Mercedes. Having a 2 door coupe Cayman then 911 then 960 then 918 (or alternate super car) line-up makes sense for profit maximization...

-B
Old 11-27-2013 | 08:31 AM
  #167  
aussie jimmy's Avatar
aussie jimmy
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 6,222
Likes: 0
From: sydney
Default

Originally Posted by GrantG
Any single-ended directly-heated triode guys here among the audiophiles? I used to design and build my own amps of this type from exotic pre-WWII German and British tubes (thought they sounded better than anything else at any price). Fun stuff, but gave it up to focus on running at the track (could only afford one money pit at a time).
the most notable right now, is allnic, out of korea. dht range is very expensive; around 40k per component. those old valves from telefunken, mullard, siemens.., are very nice.
you are indeed correct that they are both money pits. i started with audio, then went on to tracking, now back to audio. it's definitely cheaper. tracking was costing
too much.
Old 11-27-2013 | 09:45 AM
  #168  
markow's Avatar
markow
Racer
 
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 305
Likes: 0
Default back to RS

new rumors in rennteam.....here is copied over:

--------------------------------------------------------

- 500 hp (3.8 or 4.0 l DFI engine)

- 991 Turbo body

- weight substantially lower than GT3 (not sure what "substantially" means but I heard something about 30-60 kg less)

- CF roof

- Base price around 176-179k EUR (incl. 19% VAT)

- no AWS (all-wheel-steering) due to homologation issues

- availability May/June 2014

There is also a strong rumor that the RS may not get the PDK we know from the GT3 but the rumors are a bit confusing and may even indicate some sort of sequential gearbox instead (which I highly doubt). The "no AWS" thing however seems to be quite sure, which is a big surprise for me.

-----------------------------------------

if the sequential gearbox rumor is true, then i am out. over to GT3 or cabrera or stay with fezza.
peter
Old 11-27-2013 | 10:06 AM
  #169  
GTEE3's Avatar
GTEE3
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,214
Likes: 47
From: Midwest/Southwest USA
Default

what is the comparable EUR base price on the 991GT3?

this seems to be an early availability release of the RS...
In Sept., a 'reliable' PCNA exec told me RS availability was targeted for late Fall '14.
Old 11-27-2013 | 10:22 AM
  #170  
MEM82's Avatar
MEM82
Burning Brakes
 
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 1,023
Likes: 271
From: Hudson Valley, New York
Default

Originally Posted by GTEE3
what is the comparable EUR base price on the 991GT3?

this seems to be an early availability release of the RS...
In Sept., a 'reliable' PCNA exec told me RS availability was targeted for late Fall '14.
137 for gt3
162 turbo
195 turbo s

info from the porsche germany site.
Old 11-27-2013 | 11:05 AM
  #171  
0Q991's Avatar
0Q991
Drifting
 
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 2,743
Likes: 8
From: SoCal
Default

Base price between Turbo and Turbo S would be consistent / make sense.
Old 11-27-2013 | 11:18 AM
  #172  
Jon70's Avatar
Jon70
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 2,594
Likes: 84
Default

With no AWS it may be slower around a circuit than the GT3 given how much Porsche is praising the benefits of AWS.
Old 11-27-2013 | 12:47 PM
  #173  
SamFromTX's Avatar
SamFromTX
Drifting
 
Joined: Jun 2013
Posts: 3,131
Likes: 7
From: Dallas, TX
Default

Originally Posted by Jon70
With no AWS it may be slower around a circuit than the GT3 given how much Porsche is praising the benefits of AWS.
Agreed and that is why I am skeptic about this bit of info. Didn't AP say RWS adds the equivelant of 80 or so HP? If so, adding 25 hp to the RS and removing around 60 Kg may not make it all that faster than the 3.
Old 11-27-2013 | 01:09 PM
  #174  
GrantG's Avatar
GrantG
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 18,298
Likes: 5,233
From: Denver
Default

Originally Posted by SamFromTX
Agreed and that is why I am skeptic about this bit of info. Didn't AP say RWS adds the equivelant of 80 or so HP? If so, adding 25 hp to the RS and removing around 60 Kg may not make it all that faster than the 3.
The RS is definitely going to be faster on circuit than GT3. I think the benefit of RWS is over hyped. The RS is gonna be a track monster and maybe fairly annoying to drive on the road.
Old 11-27-2013 | 01:41 PM
  #175  
GrantG's Avatar
GrantG
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 18,298
Likes: 5,233
From: Denver
Default

Originally Posted by aussie jimmy
the most notable right now, is allnic, out of korea. dht range is very expensive; around 40k per component. those old valves from telefunken, mullard, siemens.., are very nice.
you are indeed correct that they are both money pits. i started with audio, then went on to tracking, now back to audio. it's definitely cheaper. tracking was costing
too much.
Yep, the Allnic DHT phono preamp sounds excellent in particular.
Old 11-27-2013 | 05:36 PM
  #176  
SamFromTX's Avatar
SamFromTX
Drifting
 
Joined: Jun 2013
Posts: 3,131
Likes: 7
From: Dallas, TX
Default

Originally Posted by GrantG
The RS is definitely going to be faster on circuit than GT3. I think the benefit of RWS is over hyped. The RS is gonna be a track monster and maybe fairly annoying to drive on the road.
I definitely hope so
Old 11-27-2013 | 07:31 PM
  #177  
Alan Smithee's Avatar
Alan Smithee
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 5,309
Likes: 305
From: Los Angeles
Default

Originally Posted by Drifting
I don't think that VW is worried about the Porsche 960 taking away Lamborghini sales as the Lambo brand attracts a different buyer than most Ferrari and Mclaren owners. All these cars have power, but Ferrari and Mclaren attract true performance drivers and those attracted to the pedigree and passion of the cars.

Sorry, but your average Lamborghini drive is compensating for small personal equipment by buying a large, loud, "look at me" car.

Of course that description does apply to some Ferrari,Mclaren, Porsche owners, but not 90% of them as with Lamborghini owners.
With Lamborghini being the only one currently offering a truly analog supercar (though not for much longer, as Gallardo production ended this week), more than a few of us have jumped over there. But, yes, your percentages are probably accurate.

I agree that it will be very interesting to see how VW markets the 960/Huracan (won't be the Cabrera)/R8 triplets against the high end 991s and upcoming baby Mac and AMG GT. The $200k niche market is going to be quite crowded...
Old 11-28-2013 | 02:51 AM
  #178  
BBMGT3's Avatar
BBMGT3
Addict
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 1,233
Likes: 4
Default

Originally Posted by SamFromTX
Agreed and that is why I am skeptic about this bit of info. Didn't AP say RWS adds the equivelant of 80 or so HP? If so, adding 25 hp to the RS and removing around 60 Kg may not make it all that faster than the 3.
I think what he said is that having RWS was like removing 40kg or adding 40hp or something, but I don't think it was 80hp that would mean that a non-rws 555hP RS would be equal to a RWS 475hp gt3. Unlikely. At the end of the day you can get creative with trick stuff but if same chassis same tires basically same car 80hP is going to stamp its authority (almost 15% more power!!!)
Old 11-28-2013 | 03:18 AM
  #179  
Mike in CA's Avatar
Mike in CA
Race Director
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 12,083
Likes: 244
From: North Bay Area, CA
Default

Originally Posted by BBMGT3
I think what he said is that having RWS was like removing 40kg or adding 40hp or something, but I don't think it was 80hp that would mean that a non-rws 555hP RS would be equal to a RWS 475hp gt3. Unlikely. At the end of the day you can get creative with trick stuff but if same chassis same tires basically same car 80hP is going to stamp its authority (almost 15% more power!!!)
I think you're right; it wasn't 80HP. IIRC, the statement was that you'd need an extra 50 HP to get the same time at the Ring with the GT3 that you can get by adding RWS.
Old 11-28-2013 | 07:19 AM
  #180  
Bill_C4S's Avatar
Bill_C4S
Burning Brakes
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 1,134
Likes: 1
From: London, UK
Default

Originally Posted by Alan Smithee
With Lamborghini being the only one currently offering a truly analog supercar (though not for much longer, as Gallardo production ended this week), more than a few of us have jumped over there. But, yes, your percentages are probably accurate.

I agree that it will be very interesting to see how VW markets the 960/Huracan (won't be the Cabrera)/R8 triplets against the high end 991s and upcoming baby Mac and AMG GT. The $200k niche market is going to be quite crowded...
Ahh the Audi R8 V10 Plus still available with that analogue remnant....namely, 3rd pedal and metal gated shifter....or am I missing the definition of truly analogue?


Quick Reply: 991 GT3 RS



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 10:04 PM.