Notices
991 GT3, GT3RS, GT2RS and 911R 2012-2019
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Road and Track first drive: 991 GT3

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-01-2013, 08:24 PM
  #121  
blake
Rennlist Member
 
blake's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Park City, UT
Posts: 3,120
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Veloce Raptor
But again, many of us (whether we currently own a GT3 or not) viewed/view the GT3 as probably THE most involving, awesome sports car/quasi watered down race car there ever has been. A lot of that comes (IMHO) from the high skill levels needed to drive one well...and this includes the beauty of perfect 3-pedal heel & toe downshifts. I recognize that others don't share this love of perfecting this skill, which is why I truly wish Porsche was offering a choice.
This is the root of the issue in my opinion. Well said VR.
Old 05-01-2013, 08:36 PM
  #122  
NJ-GT
Addict
Rennlist Member
 
NJ-GT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Los Everglades
Posts: 6,583
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

A couple of weeks ago, I drove a 2008 GT3 RS that is pretty well setup for track-day use. I was driving my Fiat as well. The GT3 felt a little disconnected and numb compared to the Fiat, the Fiat felt sharp and alive. This is the reason I chose the Fiat over the 997 GT2, and canceled the 997.2 GT3 RS 3.8 order (plus other things like PCNA arrogance, PCNA lack of support, warranty hassles). I like fun cars, light, with high rev engines. Also the reason why after having driven 3 458 Italias, I cannot make the jump to the 458.

4 years later, we have Andreas Preuninger converted to marketing. Good for him and job stability, but the arrogance to mandate what customers wants is not right.

Yes, the 991 GT3 will sell better, because it now brings an auto-box to the car, so market is drastically larger.

However, I have driven all these DCT and they are all tame, they cause the car to lose the mechanical interaction with the driver (458, MP4-12C, M3, Cayman, Boxster, 991, 997, Golf, and other I have tried at track, autoX and street). Yes, they are fast, but tame too.

This 991 GT3 is losing connectivity to the driver in the following ends:
- Steering. Even the 991 GT3 version of the steering has been documented to lack the 997 GT3 response and feedback, and my experience is that my Cayman and previous Boxsters have better steering than my former 996 and 997RS GT3s.
- Gas pedal (drive a PDK and experience the gap between input to pedal and car reaction), especially on quick transitions.
- Sofa Seats isolate the driver even more.
- Whatever the RWS causes on driving dynamics at the limit of adhesion (if RWS was any good, why is VW not racing on this?)
- Added weight
- Not interacting with a shifter and a clutch pedal

It will be faster than the 997.2 GT3, but so is the Nissan GTR, and a few of us that have driven or owned the Nissan still prefer the 997.2 GT3 by a nautical mile, because a 997.2 GT3 is more rewarding to drive.

I said that the press release on the 991 GT3 was going to help resale on the 997.2 GT3 by $10k, $25k on the 3.8RS, and $50k on the 4.0RS. Rather than the usual depreciation on the previous model when a new GT3 is announced, we are seeing appreciation. Clean 4.0RS are moving in the $240k-$270k range, the GT2 RS went up, clean 3.8RS and low miles are in the $135k-$155k range.

I think the 991 Wannabe-GT3 is overpriced, this used to be a $100k car, now it sits almost 40% more expensive than a few years ago. This is not good for VW, as they are dangerously positioning themselves far away from the competitors. The 450Hp, 7-speed manual, race seats equipped C7-Z51 MSRP is near 1/3 the price of this new 991. Things are looking overpriced on the VW end.

I don't think resale on this new 991 is going to be as good as the 997 version. Resale on the 991 is already really bad. When it is cheaper to own a 430 Scuderia than a 991, you can better understand how expensive it is becoming to own a 991.

Faster is not better. Otherwise, we would be all driving Godzilla.
Old 05-01-2013, 08:56 PM
  #123  
Mike in CA
Race Director
 
Mike in CA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: North Bay Area, CA
Posts: 11,969
Received 128 Likes on 67 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Veloce Raptor
Fair enough. I have never autocrossed, so have no perspective. I agree that it will be easier to go fast with the granny paddles. But again, many of us (whether we currently own a GT3 or not) viewed/view the GT3 as probably THE most involving, awesome sports car/quasi watered down race car there ever has been. A lot of that comes (IMHO) from the high skill levels needed to drive one well...and this includes the beauty of perfect 3-pedal heel & toe downshifts. I recognize that others don't share this love of perfecting this skill, which is why I truly wish Porsche was offering a choice.

Again, I hear ya, though.
VR, I hear you as well and we're getting closer to a common ground.

I learned over the years how to execute a perfect 3 pedal HT downshift, (with some exceptions), so like you I have an appreciation for mastering this skill. But I also like the idea of seeing what modern technology, functionally similar to what every modern racing series uses (I don't count NASCAR), brings to the experience. If it turns out to be an unexpected flop, I'll sell the car and move on to something different. There are lots of choices out there, including 60 years of older Porsches and over a decade's worth of GT3's, so no reason to constantly lament the fact that a current one doesn't quite fit the bill. Maybe something with carbs and ignition I can constantly fiddle with, no ABS, no power steering or brakes, relatively skinny tires etc. etc.; or even swing axles!
Old 05-01-2013, 08:58 PM
  #124  
Porscheholic
Pro
 
Porscheholic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Cotati, California
Posts: 525
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Don't intend to start an argument here, but from my personal experience with several different Ferraris (Maranello, 360, 430) there is NO WAY the ownership costs of a Ferrari are less than that of a Porsche.

I could only describe the servicing costs of Ferraris (again, only from personal experience) as insane. Porsche servicing costs are expensive, but not insane.
Old 05-01-2013, 09:00 PM
  #125  
destaccado
Rennlist Member
 
destaccado's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 2,285
Received 414 Likes on 258 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by NJ-GT
Faster is not better. Otherwise, we would be all driving Godzilla.
Old 05-01-2013, 09:33 PM
  #126  
Mike in CA
Race Director
 
Mike in CA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: North Bay Area, CA
Posts: 11,969
Received 128 Likes on 67 Posts
Default

The issue brought up here of "mandating what the customer wants" as opposed to "giving the customer what they want" is interesting. My understanding is that in the European market buyers of high end sports cars overwhelmingly demand automanuals, to the point where demand for MT's is near zero. In the US, the percentage of those buying manuals is higher but has still been declining steadily.

The often repeated response to this is that the cars have gotten so expensive and have brought so many "bling" buyers into the market, that the statistics are being skewed as real MT "purists" are squeezed out of the market or make other choices. Fine. But whether true or not, the point is that Porsche and other European manufacturers ARE giving customers in general the car they want. It just may not be the car that YOU want.

Without being judgemental or getting into the argument (again) about whether Porsche should be offering a choice, I'm just saying that "mandating what the customer wants" is not what Porsche is doing; in fact, faced with certain knowledge of what the vast majority of their customers are requesting, the opposite is happening. I understand, that's hard for some to swallow.
Old 05-01-2013, 10:10 PM
  #127  
Mike in CA
Race Director
 
Mike in CA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: North Bay Area, CA
Posts: 11,969
Received 128 Likes on 67 Posts
Default

sorry, edit
Old 05-02-2013, 12:06 AM
  #128  
LotF
Advanced
 
LotF's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 81
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

It's not that hard to drive a manual. Takes practice, but is it really all that hard, no. So the solution to a not so hard problem for the masses is an auto shift transmission. The auto shift transmission is designed for comfort. So when does a comfort option become a performance option ... when it's a solution to a problem that doesn't exist.
Old 05-02-2013, 12:13 AM
  #129  
stevecolletti
Three Wheelin'
 
stevecolletti's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Southern California
Posts: 1,262
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Mike in CA
The issue brought up here of "mandating what the customer wants" as opposed to "giving the customer what they want" is interesting. My understanding is that in the European market buyers of high end sports cars overwhelmingly demand automanuals, to the point where demand for MT's is near zero. In the US, the percentage of those buying manuals is higher but has still been declining steadily.

The often repeated response to this is that the cars have gotten so expensive and have brought so many "bling" buyers into the market, that the statistics are being skewed as real MT "purists" are squeezed out of the market or make other choices. Fine. But whether true or not, the point is that Porsche and other European manufacturers ARE giving customers in general the car they want. It just may not be the car that YOU want.

Without being judgemental or getting into the argument (again) about whether Porsche should be offering a choice, I'm just saying that "mandating what the customer wants" is not what Porsche is doing; in fact, faced with certain knowledge of what the vast majority of their customers are requesting, the opposite is happening. I understand, that's hard for some to swallow.
In America, over half of Porsche's sports cars have been ordered with manuals - 911 is about 50:50, Cayman/Boxster are a higher percentage.

Those Panameras and Cayennes heavily skew the numbers, especailly since the US gets little or no choice with them.
Old 05-02-2013, 03:31 AM
  #130  
ChrisF
Rennlist Member
 
ChrisF's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: La La Land
Posts: 4,199
Received 1,002 Likes on 374 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by NJ-GT
Faster is not better. Otherwise, we would be all driving Godzilla.
^^This! I was within a day of buying a 2012 GT-R. I'd rented one and loved it on the street and in the mountains. Then I rented one on track. It was so boring and uninvolved that I changed my focus immediately back to the GT3. Very glad I did. For the first time in 10 years of automotive A.D.D, I'm still in love with this car and don't want to sell it.

I'm sure for the market, people like me are the anomaly. But for those of us who love to drive our cars, we prize feel and feedback above all else. The 991 GT3 will be a fantastic car I'm sure. I just won't be looking to buy one. Well, maybe when they take a huge depreciation hit and I can afford one as a DD
Old 05-02-2013, 05:27 AM
  #131  
Alan Smithee
Rennlist Member
 
Alan Smithee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 5,296
Received 295 Likes on 146 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Mike in CA
The issue brought up here of "mandating what the customer wants" as opposed to "giving the customer what they want" is interesting. My understanding is that in the European market buyers of high end sports cars overwhelmingly demand automanuals, to the point where demand for MT's is near zero. In the US, the percentage of those buying manuals is higher but has still been declining steadily.

...the point is that Porsche and other European manufacturers ARE giving customers in general the car they want. It just may not be the car that YOU want.

Without being judgemental or getting into the argument (again) about whether Porsche should be offering a choice, I'm just saying that "mandating what the customer wants" is not what Porsche is doing; in fact, faced with certain knowledge of what the vast majority of their customers are requesting, the opposite is happening. I understand, that's hard for some to swallow.
Except that 100% of GT2s and GT3s sold to date have manual transmissions, and as has been noted, these cars are rock steady in resale at $100-250k for 2-4 year old cars. So there clearly is a market for a manual 991GT3. With 20+ 911 models in very recent history, and as the most profitable auto manufacturer, clearly Porsche has the means to offer that car to its customers.

Personally, I get bored with automatics, so I am voting with my wallet and getting something other than a new Porsche this year.
Old 05-02-2013, 08:12 AM
  #132  
Slowekistan
Intermediate
 
Slowekistan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 47
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by Alan Smithee
Except that 100% of GT2s and GT3s sold to date have manual transmissions, and as has been noted, these cars are rock steady in resale at $100-250k for 2-4 year old cars. So there clearly is a market for a manual 991GT3.
There is a marketing aspect to the "no manual" stance: This car is so advanced an antiquated manual takes away from the experience, because this is a pure race-inspired car and every half of a car-length counts...

I think they miscalculated.
Old 05-02-2013, 08:22 AM
  #133  
Macca
Rennlist Member
 
Macca's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 14,140
Received 14 Likes on 13 Posts
Default

Its natural you should lament the passing of the manual gearbox. We all did the same with the air cooled engine (some of us have stayed with it).

Why is everyone acting surprised. The writing was on the wall when they launched the 7 speed manual in the same transfer case as the PDK. It was a half assed attempt and probably the worst manual box they have come up with to date.

The new 991TT is announced PDK only (we predicted this months ago on this board) the new GT2 will be PDK, the GT3 is PDK-S and the GT3RS will almost certainly be also.

I dont think we can change progress but if anyone can do it the Amercian market can (just look at the last two generations of M5 offered manual in US market only). The simple fact is that from here on in if they do a manual it probably wont be much cop. Their product plan doesnt focus resources on developing a manual any further.

Like the passing of aircooled we will lament for a while. Eventually we will get on board I have no doubt...and some are even savouring it!
Old 05-02-2013, 08:28 AM
  #134  
Manifold
Rennlist Member
 
Manifold's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Mid-Atlantic (on land, not in the middle of the ocean)
Posts: 13,060
Received 4,371 Likes on 2,487 Posts
Default

I suspect that another reason they didn't offer manual is that the torque curve really favors high revs, and it's more work to keep the revs up with manual. The current generation of M3 is similar, to the extent that it feels weak on the street with manual, but peppy with DCT (especially with the more aggressive settings).
Old 05-02-2013, 09:46 AM
  #135  
neanicu
Nordschleife Master
 
neanicu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Ny
Posts: 9,974
Received 360 Likes on 217 Posts
Default

I'm looking forward to AP's statement in 10 years(if he'll still be with Porsche) for the launch of the exquisite 992 GT3 :
'' The Mezger and DFI engines are for grandmas,the torquey electric motor is the future for the new generation of baby boomers ''.
'' PDK-S is in the past,it is too slow and not involving enough,the new retina controlled transmission shifts literally at the blink of an eye. A center console sensor is reading your eye movement and shifts accordingly ''.
'' Need to relax on the way to the track or going home? The new 992 GT3 has a computer programmed destination input. Set your destination,lay back and enjoy!
Want to do 5 minutes at the Ring? Just select Nürburgring Super Fast Map and the car will take you around the track faster than you've ever been before! ''.
Responding to criticism from Auto journalists,AP's new statement will be '' Shut up and let the car drive you around! ''


Last edited by neanicu; 05-02-2013 at 10:17 AM.


Quick Reply: Road and Track first drive: 991 GT3



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 10:43 AM.