Notices
991 GT3, GT3RS, GT2RS and 911R 2012-2019
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

MAJOR FAIL! No Sport Bucket Set Option (6 point harness seats) WOW!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-14-2013, 03:22 PM
  #211  
Alan Smithee
Rennlist Member
 
Alan Smithee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 5,291
Received 286 Likes on 143 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by StirlingMoss
What is so special about US crash testing then? I mean, the seats have been approved for all markets except the US and I doubt Porsche is carrying out crash testing in every single country.
Airbags for the US are different. Everywhere else in the world, airbags are designed with the assumption of a belted passenger. Here, because of the need to protect ourselves from ourselves, airbags have historically been considered a 'passive restraint', and therefore required to protect unbelted passengers. However, due to the greater force required, smaller/lighter passengers have been injured. So airbag technology evolved into 'smart' or 'advanced' airbags that deploy with varying force depending on the size of the occupant, whether he/she is belted, and possibly position of the seat. This is nothing new for 2014 - I believe it was required in 2007 - so the sport buckets in the 987/997 had this feature. However, as I mentioned in a previous post, because the interior of the 991 is otherwise completely different, the electronic communication between seat sensors and airbags are not plug-n-play.
Old 03-14-2013, 03:25 PM
  #212  
Alan Smithee
Rennlist Member
 
Alan Smithee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 5,291
Received 286 Likes on 143 Posts
Default

...and this still may be a US dealer issue. As I suspect was the case with mandatory sunroofs on the 997.1, if US dealers lobby PCNA not to import the car configured a certain way, they will not bother to certify them.
Old 03-14-2013, 03:29 PM
  #213  
StirlingMoss
Racer
 
StirlingMoss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 338
Received 8 Likes on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by Alan Smithee
Airbags for the US are different. Everywhere else in the world, airbags are designed with the assumption of a belted passenger. Here, because of the need to protect ourselves from ourselves, airbags have historically been considered a 'passive restraint', and therefore required to protect unbelted passengers. However, due to the greater force required, smaller/lighter passengers have been injured. So airbag technology evolved into 'smart' or 'advanced' airbags that deploy with varying force depending on the size of the occupant, whether he/she is belted, and possibly position of the seat. This is nothing new for 2014 - I believe it was required in 2007 - so the sport buckets in the 987/997 had this feature. However, as I mentioned in a previous post, because the interior of the 991 is otherwise completely different, the electronic communication between seat sensors and airbags are not plug-n-play.
Thanks for the explanation
Old 03-14-2013, 03:30 PM
  #214  
mike2727
Rennlist Member
 
mike2727's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Hollywood, FL
Posts: 316
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Alan Smithee
Airbags for the US are different. Everywhere else in the world, airbags are designed with the assumption of a belted passenger. Here, because of the need to protect ourselves from ourselves, airbags have historically been considered a 'passive restraint', and therefore required to protect unbelted passengers. However, due to the greater force required, smaller/lighter passengers have been injured. So airbag technology evolved into 'smart' or 'advanced' airbags that deploy with varying force depending on the size of the occupant, whether he/she is belted, and possibly position of the seat. This is nothing new for 2014 - I believe it was required in 2007 - so the sport buckets in the 987/997 had this feature. However, as I mentioned in a previous post, because the interior of the 991 is otherwise completely different, the electronic communication between seat sensors and airbags are not plug-n-play.
Good point, further confirms that Porsche did not bother to certify the 991 for the buckets
We are just a good audience for their track car marketing videos and interviews, but if we actually want to use it on the track and hence need these buckets, they say NO

SAD , SAD, SAD
Mike
Old 03-14-2013, 03:37 PM
  #215  
Alan Smithee
Rennlist Member
 
Alan Smithee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 5,291
Received 286 Likes on 143 Posts
Default

As others have pointed out, we may yet see them. For instance, if the RS has carbon fenders, they probably have to crash one. Would conceivably save them a wrecked car by putting the sport buckets designed for the 991 in at that time.

While most people here are track-oriented, the take rate for the sport buckets in the US has not been great on any model.
Old 03-15-2013, 02:14 AM
  #216  
montoya
Rennlist Member
 
montoya's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 3,555
Received 299 Likes on 174 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Mike in CA
For whatever reason, maybe the new seats aren't ready yet for production or certification. That means the "old" GT2 buckets would have to be crash tested in the 991 for use in the current GT3, and then the process would have to be repeated with the "new" buckets. I think that's what Montoya was getting at.
Exactly! The new sports buckets in the soon to released in the new 918 are one possibility IMHO. Have to be released in the new 918 first, then maybe in the RS. Pure speculation, but because of the cost of US certification, totally logical.
Old 03-15-2013, 12:08 PM
  #217  
mike2727
Rennlist Member
 
mike2727's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Hollywood, FL
Posts: 316
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by montoya
Exactly! The new sports buckets in the soon to released in the new 918 are one possibility IMHO. Have to be released in the new 918 first, then maybe in the RS. Pure speculation, but because of the cost of US certification, totally logical.
Certification has to be done for the 991 chassis, that a seat is certified for the 918 does not mean it is certified for the 991
Also they might have received an exemption for the 918 due to low production like what was the case for the CGT

They should have certified a bucket when they released the 991 C2, in that way we would not have the issue at hand and Porsche could have offered it as an option for any 991

Mike
Old 03-15-2013, 01:01 PM
  #218  
montoya
Rennlist Member
 
montoya's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 3,555
Received 299 Likes on 174 Posts
Default

^ No kidding, obviously a seat in one vehicle is not certified in another.

Point remains that there is a chance (logically) that another variant of the 991 chassis will introduce a new sport seat that will be certified through out the range.
We just have to wait until then.
Old 03-15-2013, 01:13 PM
  #219  
mike2727
Rennlist Member
 
mike2727's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Hollywood, FL
Posts: 316
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by montoya
^ No kidding, obviously a seat in one vehicle is not certified in another.

Point remains that there is a chance (logically) that another variant of the 991 chassis will introduce a new sport seat that will be certified through out the range.
We just have to wait until then.
Not sure where the "no kidding" was aimed at, but I interpreted your 918 seat as becoming the seat to be used for the 991 as well
If that would/could have been the case we could/would have had the CGT seat s in the 997

Mike
Old 03-15-2013, 01:20 PM
  #220  
mike2727
Rennlist Member
 
mike2727's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Hollywood, FL
Posts: 316
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

If Porsche wanted us in the US to have bucket seats, they should have had them certified when they introduced the 991 C2, so in that sense I call it a fail on the part of Porsche, that they "might" still be in the process to certify them for the 991, which IMO does not make a lot of sense, because it would be cheaper to wreck a 991 C2 opposed to a 991 GT3RS, besides the fact they could have sold more bucket seats, and could have preventedbthis whole discussion

I know I am trying to use logic, which seems far fetched these days

Mike
Old 03-15-2013, 01:22 PM
  #221  
montoya
Rennlist Member
 
montoya's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 3,555
Received 299 Likes on 174 Posts
Default

I don't know if the 918 seats have side airbags or not. Sorry to confuse the whole issue with what seat is going to be certified. It doesn't matter, just that something is different causing PCNA to wait for certification until that something is released to the market. That could be:

- Subtle chassis differences on future models0- such as wider fenders or different door structures

- Different seat than what is currently available due to be released with a new 991 variant.

Again this is all my speculation, but it makes perfect sense that this is the case given the hundreds of thousands of dollars to certify new seats.
Old 03-15-2013, 02:01 PM
  #222  
Z356
Nordschleife Master
 
Z356's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 6,955
Likes: 0
Received 111 Likes on 73 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by montoya
The new sports buckets in the soon to released in the new 918 are one possibility IMHO. Have to be released in the new 918 first, then maybe in the RS. Pure speculation, but because of the cost of US certification, totally logical.
If you think the very 'special' 918 sport bucket seats will be offered in the upcoming 991 gt3 RS or any other 'pedestrian' 911 model...I could give you 845,000 reasons why you would be dead wrong!

Originally Posted by mike2727
If Porsche wanted us in the US to have bucket seats, they should have had them certified when they introduced the 991 C2, so in that sense I call it a fail on the part of Porsche, that they "might" still be in the process to certify them for the 991, which IMO does not make a lot of sense, because it would be cheaper to wreck a 991 C2 opposed to a 991 GT3RS, besides the fact they could have sold more bucket seats, and could have prevented this whole discussion
Correctamundo!

Originally Posted by montoya
I don't know if the 918 seats have side airbags or not.
It will have air bags! They don't want to risk the life of such a precious customer, who has shown a predisposition to spend $845,000 base plus options on a production Porsche! They need these rare specimens to be safe & sound so they can ante-up for the next 'special' million dollar model developed by Weissach's 'skunk werkes'! Many (or most) of the US prospects with deposits on the 918 Spyder are present or former Carrera GT owners! There is a method to this madness, you know!


Originally Posted by montoya
Sorry to confuse the whole issue with what seat is going to be certified. It doesn't matter, just that something is different causing PCNA to wait for certification until that something is released to the market. That could be:

- Subtle chassis differences on future models0- such as wider fenders or different door structures

- Different seat than what is currently available due to be released with a new 991 variant.

Again this is all my speculation, but it makes perfect sense that this is the case given the hundreds of thousands of dollars to certify new seats.
Or it could simply be that they just don't want to encourage US customers to employ the car for recreational track use (not racing)!

Saludos,
Eduardo
Attached Images  
Old 03-15-2013, 02:07 PM
  #223  
montoya
Rennlist Member
 
montoya's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 3,555
Received 299 Likes on 174 Posts
Default

Well Eduardo you are clearly glass half empty as to why the new GT3 doesn't have the option for sport buckets.

I (glass half full) am just trying to propose a logical reason why they may still be coming.
Old 03-15-2013, 02:29 PM
  #224  
LotF
Advanced
 
LotF's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 81
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Or it could simply be that they just don't want to encourage US customers to employ the car for recreational track use (not racing)!
Winner

1) No race derived engine
2) No factory sport buckets
3) PDK only
4) Race Track button for show


Definite slap in the face. The bond has been broken. Time to vote with the wallet. That will get their attention.
Old 03-15-2013, 02:29 PM
  #225  
Z356
Nordschleife Master
 
Z356's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 6,955
Likes: 0
Received 111 Likes on 73 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by montoya
Well Eduardo you are clearly glass half empty as to why the new GT3 doesn't have the option for sport buckets. I (glass half full) am just trying to propose a logical reason why they may still be coming.
I am hoping I am totally wrong! Sir Peter Ustinov used to say that 'The point of living, and of being an optimist, is to be foolish enough to believe that the best is yet to come'. I am afraid I am getting a little jaded in my old age, especially with regards to Porsche! Being associated with the hobby since I graduated from college in 1972 has been one of the high points in my life and something that has kept me seriously involved for over 40 years! It pains me to even say it. Yes, I hope I am mistaken...and that you are right re: sport bucket seats!

Saludos,
Eduardo


Quick Reply: MAJOR FAIL! No Sport Bucket Set Option (6 point harness seats) WOW!



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 09:19 PM.