Green Hunter dyno - 514 rwhp @ 17 psi
10-08-2010, 01:00 PM
#91
Professional Hoon
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 7,090
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes
on
4 Posts
There was no other cars dynoed at the same time. It's the latest model Dynojet, 424.
Now with my first dyno at Dynojet it's better to dyno at the same place next time to get comparable results s so not much use for me to dyno at Rototest. But maybe Corleone could join in, that would be great. But he has a new, faster toy now...
Now with my first dyno at Dynojet it's better to dyno at the same place next time to get comparable results s so not much use for me to dyno at Rototest. But maybe Corleone could join in, that would be great. But he has a new, faster toy now...
10-08-2010, 01:09 PM
#92
When I refered to Corleone's car it was naturally his 951.
The idea is to compare engines of the same capacity, with a CR higher than 8, running the same turbo, on E85, with similar peak boost, the only major differing part I can spot between the two being the head, 8V against 16V.
The idea is to compare engines of the same capacity, with a CR higher than 8, running the same turbo, on E85, with similar peak boost, the only major differing part I can spot between the two being the head, 8V against 16V.
10-08-2010, 01:19 PM
#93
Nordschleife Master
Thread Starter
im pretty sure you would give his GTR a good run for its money, plus arnt they limited to xxx speed? plus with our cars you dont have to worry about what buttons your going to push before a race, ABS..dont have it, traction control..dont have it, suspension setting...none
10-08-2010, 01:36 PM
#94
Drive-by provocation guy
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: NAS PAX River, by way of Orlando
Posts: 10,439
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Knock is usually traced back, assuming proper tune, to excessive back pressure. So if you have twice the valves, you get twice the flow?
Maybe a 20v head would be the best for us. 2 intake and 3 exhaust. ???
10-08-2010, 06:01 PM
#96
Nordschleife Master
Thread Starter
Yes, the 6-puck disc usually shatter during take off. No signs of slippage at all.
It's spec'ed to 500 ft/lbs which I'm below so it should be fine. For now
It's spec'ed to 500 ft/lbs which I'm below so it should be fine. For now
10-08-2010, 10:32 PM
#97
Rennlist Member
When I refered to Corleone's car it was naturally his 951.
The idea is to compare engines of the same capacity, with a CR higher than 8, running the same turbo, on E85, with similar peak boost, the only major differing part I can spot between the two being the head, 8V against 16V.
The idea is to compare engines of the same capacity, with a CR higher than 8, running the same turbo, on E85, with similar peak boost, the only major differing part I can spot between the two being the head, 8V against 16V.
I think they have different turbine wheels; Corleone's is smaller.
10-09-2010, 05:26 AM
#99
Nordschleife Master
Thread Starter
Yep, we have the exact same turbo except for my smaller (0.82) turbine housing.
I'm changing turbine housing this winter to a Tial SS but will stick with the current a/r.
I'm changing turbine housing this winter to a Tial SS but will stick with the current a/r.
10-09-2010, 02:15 PM
#101
Rennlist Member
I'm just talking wheel size, here; nevermind about the housing.
10-09-2010, 06:43 PM
#102
Nordschleife Master
Thread Starter
10-09-2010, 06:45 PM
#103
Nordschleife Master
Thread Starter
My is 68mm. Corleone bought his turbo through me so it should be the same (unless he changed it which I cannot remember hearing anything of).
10-09-2010, 06:49 PM
#104
Nordschleife Master
Thread Starter
Another thing, this should be the highest rwhp dynoed for a 944/968 engine on pump gas?
I've never seen a chart or heard about a higher chart for pump gas...
I've never seen a chart or heard about a higher chart for pump gas...
