Notices
944 Turbo and Turbo-S Forum 1982-1991
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Clore Automotive

3ltr twincam engine, coming together

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-11-2013, 06:11 AM
  #196  
JET951
Drifting
Thread Starter
 
JET951's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Sydney Australia
Posts: 2,642
Received 98 Likes on 49 Posts
Default

Hi Duke,
Actually it is cylinder 2 and 3 that have the wear on the Cometic gasket. cylinders 1 and 4 are still intact. The car is almost back together, just need to plug in the ECU's and the exhaust. May be going to the drags soon, Also Patrick has his Drift box at our work. I presume i can use that for some acceleration readings.
Old 02-11-2013, 06:42 AM
  #197  
333pg333
Rennlist Member
 
333pg333's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 18,920
Received 97 Likes on 80 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by JET951
You dont have faith in my wiring skills Patrick? Im glad we got around to doing this, all of the injector harness wires were frayed, the knock sensor plug was barely holding on. It was just crumbling to bits.



I think its head movement and cylinder movement. In the past with the 2.5ltr engines we could run almost double the events on 1.1 bar compared to 1.5 bar. The more boost we run the faster the Cometic gaskets would wear on that sealing ring. I think we are getting slight cylinder lift with the boost, not enough to break the seal, but enough so that the vibrations caused by the moving pistons cause this "rubbing" effect on the Cometics.

Even if the cometic does not last any longer then a stock gasket, they are still worth it in our opinion. Even when they do breach they seal up when not on boost. meaning we can drive the car home or back to the shop for replacement.
Sean
Ha, no, it actually looks like a new factory harness. Just all those wires would create a hazzard for me if I were doing it.

Have to assume that the siamesed bores have played a part in the cometic lasting longer.
Old 02-11-2013, 05:55 PM
  #198  
blown 944
Race Car
 
blown 944's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Firestone, Colorado
Posts: 4,826
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

That gasket certainly looks like a small amount of movement going on.

I hope I read that right that you're going to do some drag racing soon? I'm really looking forward to seeing your trap speeds.


This build is quite a success story. Congrats!!!
Old 02-13-2013, 09:37 AM
  #199  
KSira
Racer
 
KSira's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 392
Received 40 Likes on 18 Posts
Default

Thanks for posting this useful info! My build will be very similar, and seeing how well it performs eased some of my concerns about reliability.

What do you think about the HMR stronger head studs and main stud kits? They are supposed to have a tensile strength of 240,000 PSI and 280,000PSI. This is as far as I understand a huge improvement over the original bolts, and might be worth it in the long run, even if they are very expensive.
Old 02-13-2013, 05:57 PM
  #200  
JET951
Drifting
Thread Starter
 
JET951's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Sydney Australia
Posts: 2,642
Received 98 Likes on 49 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by KSira
Thanks for posting this useful info! My build will be very similar, and seeing how well it performs eased some of my concerns about reliability.

What do you think about the HMR stronger head studs and main stud kits? They are supposed to have a tensile strength of 240,000 PSI and 280,000PSI. This is as far as I understand a huge improvement over the original bolts, and might be worth it in the long run, even if they are very expensive.
I think they sound great. Just for reference back when we ran a 2.5ltr we used stock studs and at 1.5bar boost we would get about 7-10 track days before the cometics breached. On Patricks 2.5ltr we ran ARP studs and from memory we even tried to over tightened them up to 100 ft lbs. but we still only got 7-10 track days. There are a few guys out there running larger studs, these require modifications to the block, these could possible be a better solution.

Sean
Old 02-13-2013, 06:44 PM
  #201  
333pg333
Rennlist Member
 
333pg333's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 18,920
Received 97 Likes on 80 Posts
Default

From memory I thought we got an extended period with those larger headstuds?
Old 02-13-2013, 07:28 PM
  #202  
Dutch944
Three Wheelin'
 
Dutch944's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Hollandaaaa
Posts: 1,786
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Isn't it better to run a larger turbo at lower boost to get more filling in the chambers than running higher boost from a small turbo?
Old 02-13-2013, 08:04 PM
  #203  
JET951
Drifting
Thread Starter
 
JET951's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Sydney Australia
Posts: 2,642
Received 98 Likes on 49 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 333pg333
From memory I thought we got an extended period with those larger headstuds?
We ran the ARP's on your car Patrick, they are standard in size but can hold more pressure, your big engine has the larger studs but not too much testing has been put on them yet. Even with more torque on the ARP's we still had the same wear rates on the gasket. maybe its the threads in the block that flex?

Originally Posted by Dutch944
Isn't it better to run a larger turbo at lower boost to get more filling in the chambers than running higher boost from a small turbo?
Depends on the turbo and compression ratio. Turbo's have different efficiency ranges and work better(produce less heat) at certain boost pressures

Sean
Old 02-13-2013, 08:39 PM
  #204  
333pg333
Rennlist Member
 
333pg333's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 18,920
Received 97 Likes on 80 Posts
Default

For some reason my recollection was that the new headstuds were an improvement in terms of track days vs headgasket replacement. I certainly agree that the Cometics are the way to go if you drive to and from the track...especially if the track is miles away. Being towed from Wakefield Park is noooo fun!
Old 02-14-2013, 03:07 AM
  #205  
fred27
Instructor
 
fred27's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Sydney Australia
Posts: 128
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

yes, Wakefield to Sydney is a long way......
Old 02-14-2013, 04:56 AM
  #206  
KSira
Racer
 
KSira's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 392
Received 40 Likes on 18 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by JET951

We ran the ARP's on your car Patrick, they are standard in size but can hold more pressure, your big engine has the larger studs but not too much testing has been put on them yet. Even with more torque on the ARP's we still had the same wear rates on the gasket. maybe its the threads in the block that flex?

Depends on the turbo and compression ratio. Turbo's have different efficiency ranges and work better(produce less heat) at certain boost pressures

Sean
The ARP studs has a psi rating of 200 000 only 20% higher than the original ones. Maybe the thread flex or the clamping area of the nut is to smale? It could also be the block twisting and an upgrade of the girdle bolts combined with the larger head studs will do the trick?


I have a 1.5 hour drive to the closest track and being towed home is not realy an option...
Old 02-14-2013, 07:06 AM
  #207  
964-C2
Racer
 
964-C2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 288
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Have you been using stock head studs in the 3-liter engine, Sean?
Old 02-14-2013, 09:29 AM
  #208  
gruhsy
Drifting
 
gruhsy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Calgary
Posts: 2,559
Received 51 Likes on 38 Posts
Default

Interesting reference about head studs

http://www.heritagemotorcar.com/research/index.htm

http://www.heritagemotorcar.com/research/index.htm
Old 02-14-2013, 03:09 PM
  #209  
mudbuddha
Rennlist Member
 
mudbuddha's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Clarksburg, Maryland
Posts: 953
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes on 9 Posts
Default

Have you been using stock head studs in the 3-liter engine, Sean?
Have you been using stock head studs in the 3-liter engine, Sean?
I know the question is not direct at me but thought I would chime in with a little info: For my 3L built, my shop did use factory head studs and Cometic MLS combo and the bottom end uses MID Darton sleeves. While the clamping force of the OEM studs are not as strong as says ARP, with this combination of a MID bottom end, the combo provides for a very stable and forgiving environment. I regularly run 18+ psi on 93 pump. On simulated occasions, I'd turn it up to 21 psi to go after high horsepower cars with unsuspected drivers- the combo mentioned above do work well together.
Old 02-14-2013, 03:58 PM
  #210  
333pg333
Rennlist Member
 
333pg333's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 18,920
Received 97 Likes on 80 Posts
Default

What pistons are you using Muddy?


Quick Reply: 3ltr twincam engine, coming together



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 10:16 AM.