Notices
928 Forum 1978-1995
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: 928 Specialists

Gain 100HP with an intake manifold change?? - Cross post from Ferrari Chat

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-28-2016, 03:20 PM
  #421  
mark kibort
Rennlist Member
 
mark kibort's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: saratoga, ca
Posts: 29,952
Received 166 Likes on 65 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by V2Rocket
maybe this still counts as a patch to you, but...

some Japanese cars (RX7 turbo, MR2, etc) have a "fuel pump resistor pack"...runs the pump at 9v or so for most driving and then goes full 12-14V at a certain TPS/MAP point.

their way of getting long life and better economy from a high-flow pump,. at low load.

and, they're pretty small (grey thing) so they could fit anywhere, even in a 928 engine bay



and here's a wiring diagram...looks like a relay+resistor combo...pump normally gets powered through resistor, until the relay coil trips and closes the 'direct' current path.

http://www.rx7club.com/attachments/g...p_resistor.jpg
I always had a vision (maybe a little blurred ill admit ) of 8 ITBs, but really tiny, attached at the intake ports of each cylinder port of the stock intake. at WOT, they would open and provide additional air and fuel beyond what the stock intake would provide. only a WOT event, kind of like NOS, but without the bottle.
Old 03-28-2016, 03:31 PM
  #422  
Strosek Ultra
Rennlist Member
 
Strosek Ultra's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Mostly in my workshop located in Sweden.
Posts: 2,235
Received 467 Likes on 250 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by mark kibort
I always had a vision (maybe a little blurred ill admit ) of 8 ITBs, but really tiny, attached at the intake ports of each cylinder port of the stock intake. at WOT, they would open and provide additional air and fuel beyond what the stock intake would provide. only a WOT event, kind of like NOS, but without the bottle.
Go for it!!!
Åke
Old 03-28-2016, 03:33 PM
  #423  
mark kibort
Rennlist Member
 
mark kibort's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: saratoga, ca
Posts: 29,952
Received 166 Likes on 65 Posts
Default

maybe the easy solution is to just bolt on the NOS system again. there is 50-100hp and the only inconvenience is filling the bottle before each race.
Now, if I could just get it legalized in SCCA/NASA/ PCA competition.
Old 03-28-2016, 05:03 PM
  #424  
dr bob
Chronic Tool Dropper
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
dr bob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Bend, Oregon
Posts: 20,506
Received 547 Likes on 410 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by mark kibort


why not just relocate a RRFR to the rear of the car as its not located, but further out of the way with some custom fittings. (and then dampers where needed as well.)
Simple hydraulics. There's a pressure drop due to the length of, diameter of, and flow rate through the return line. Obviously the pressure drop isn't constant as engine load changes, so finding the right setting for every engine load would be impossible. There's a reason the FPR is close-coupled with the pressure-regulated zone.

And definitely you don't want a rising-rate regulator. Sharktuning takes that out of the picture, such that "field adjustments" of any pressure regulator would be , um, counterproductive.

Start shopping now for the pieces of wiring harness you'll need for Sharktuning. Mark A is currently or has recently parted a 1989 car so the later bits might be available for that upgrade. I had my "spare" LH controller upgraded to 1989 diagnostic smarts so it could be a drop-in for my car. You'll likely need to have your early controllers similarly upgraded for full functionality. Jim C can tell you what will be needed. You'll also be upgrading to Alpha N so your MAF will be removed. There are some sensors needed for that upgrade too. MAP and inlet air temp would be my guess, but Jim will tell you. They will also tell you what injectors to buy. You'll probably want an air cleaner too. The list goes on!
Old 03-28-2016, 05:12 PM
  #425  
V2Rocket
Rainman
Rennlist Member
 
V2Rocket's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Nashville, TN
Posts: 45,553
Received 651 Likes on 505 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by mark kibort
I always had a vision (maybe a little blurred ill admit ) of 8 ITBs, but really tiny, attached at the intake ports of each cylinder port of the stock intake. at WOT, they would open and provide additional air and fuel beyond what the stock intake would provide. only a WOT event, kind of like NOS, but without the bottle.
You mean like Ford/Yamaha did 25 years ago

Old 03-28-2016, 05:29 PM
  #426  
dr bob
Chronic Tool Dropper
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
dr bob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Bend, Oregon
Posts: 20,506
Received 547 Likes on 410 Posts
Default

You mean like a separate Y-shape pipe over each port, one side of the Y with a separate throttle and injector and an air cleaner on it, the other from the more conventional longer-runner intake and its own throttle and injectors? Maybe a different-length stack over the "full-throttle" throttles.

Yep, that would simplify things a lot! Maybe the logical extension of that would be a version of Daniel's multi-section mailbox manifold illustrated in post 408 above, each with its own throttle plate and injector. Just pick the calliope pipe that sounds the best.
Old 03-28-2016, 05:38 PM
  #427  
James Bailey
Addict
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
James Bailey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 18,061
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

It all comes back to the Salsbury 4850 D....the perfect plenum design !!
Old 03-28-2016, 05:59 PM
  #428  
MjRocket
Drifting
 
MjRocket's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Fort Wayne IN.
Posts: 2,157
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by V2Rocket
maybe this still counts as a patch to you, but...

some Japanese cars (RX7 turbo, MR2, etc) have a "fuel pump resistor pack"...runs the pump at 9v or so for most driving and then goes full 12-14V at a certain TPS/MAP point.

their way of getting long life and better economy from a high-flow pump,. at low load.

and, they're pretty small (grey thing) so they could fit anywhere, even in a 928 engine bay



and here's a wiring diagram...looks like a relay+resistor combo...pump normally gets powered through resistor, until the relay coil trips and closes the 'direct' current path.

http://www.rx7club.com/attachments/g...p_resistor.jpg
This sounds something along the lines of the Kenny Bell "Boost a pump" intresting indeed.
Old 03-28-2016, 06:27 PM
  #429  
V2Rocket
Rainman
Rennlist Member
 
V2Rocket's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Nashville, TN
Posts: 45,553
Received 651 Likes on 505 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by MjRocket
This sounds something along the lines of the Kenny Bell "Boost a pump" intresting indeed.
Just looked that up, interesting.
Boost-a-pump makes the voltage to pump higher than stock, looks like from 14v to 17-18V to "overdrive" it, rather than cutting voltage until full power needed like the Japanese.

I was wondering about something like that to drive an electric radiator fan...
Old 03-28-2016, 06:39 PM
  #430  
Lizard928
Nordschleife Master
 
Lizard928's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Abbotsford B.C.
Posts: 9,600
Received 34 Likes on 25 Posts
Default

There is risk with dropping voltage on a pump.
Far better to PWM it with on/off 12V to achieve say 50% output.
Old 03-28-2016, 07:18 PM
  #431  
V2Rocket
Rainman
Rennlist Member
 
V2Rocket's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Nashville, TN
Posts: 45,553
Received 651 Likes on 505 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Lizard928
There is risk with dropping voltage on a pump.
Far better to PWM it with on/off 12V to achieve say 50% output.
thinking about it some more, wouldn't a resistor/relay setup leave voltage constant but only knock down current?

V = I/R...but if powered/grounded by the battery it's 12-14V no matter what...say at 10 amps to run the pump.

V = I/R
VR = I
R = I/V

add a 1.5 ohm (high watt) resistor, would make it 6 amps @ 12V?
Old 03-28-2016, 08:08 PM
  #432  
GregBBRD
Former Sponsor
 
GregBBRD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Anaheim
Posts: 15,230
Received 2,476 Likes on 1,468 Posts
Default

Lots of different ways to solve this problem.

The simple way, for me, is to match the return capacity of the FPR (or two FPRs) to the fuel pump.

Keeps the pump from struggling and keeps the fuel cooler without changing somethng else.
Old 03-28-2016, 08:38 PM
  #433  
mark kibort
Rennlist Member
 
mark kibort's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: saratoga, ca
Posts: 29,952
Received 166 Likes on 65 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Lizard928
There is risk with dropping voltage on a pump.
Far better to PWM it with on/off 12V to achieve say 50% output.
that depends on the motor being used. the switching losses of a high frequency chopper drive, will cause heat , but certainly would be more efficient that using a dropping resistor. (as 50 % of the power would be coming out of the resistor and the other out of the motor). only some motors will have risk associated with running half current at lower voltages.

Originally Posted by V2Rocket
thinking about it some more, wouldn't a resistor/relay setup leave voltage constant but only knock down current?

V = I/R...but if powered/grounded by the battery it's 12-14V no matter what...say at 10 amps to run the pump.

V = I/R
VR = I
R = I/V

add a 1.5 ohm (high watt) resistor, would make it 6 amps @ 12V?
you can have 10amps to run the pump, but if you have a 1.5ohm resistor added to the pump in series , you have a voltage drop across that resistor that will limit current through the motor
if you were running 10amps to start at full voltage, that means the effective resistance of the motor is 1.2ohms and 10amps flow. (120watts) add the 1.5ohm resistance, and suddenly the motor is only seeing 4.4 amps
both the motor and the resistor are producing I^2R or 29 or 23 watts.
you have just quartered the power of the pump with the 1.5ohm resistor.
Old 03-28-2016, 08:42 PM
  #434  
mark kibort
Rennlist Member
 
mark kibort's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: saratoga, ca
Posts: 29,952
Received 166 Likes on 65 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by V2Rocket
You mean like Ford/Yamaha did 25 years ago

someone already sole my invention!!!! grrrrr
yes, i think thats the idea! let me research it a little!
Old 03-28-2016, 08:44 PM
  #435  
mark kibort
Rennlist Member
 
mark kibort's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: saratoga, ca
Posts: 29,952
Received 166 Likes on 65 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by dr bob
You mean like a separate Y-shape pipe over each port, one side of the Y with a separate throttle and injector and an air cleaner on it, the other from the more conventional longer-runner intake and its own throttle and injectors? Maybe a different-length stack over the "full-throttle" throttles.

Yep, that would simplify things a lot! Maybe the logical extension of that would be a version of Daniel's multi-section mailbox manifold illustrated in post 408 above, each with its own throttle plate and injector. Just pick the calliope pipe that sounds the best.
yeah.. just like the mailbox but with out the flag ..... and with a few other things.


Quick Reply: Gain 100HP with an intake manifold change?? - Cross post from Ferrari Chat



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 07:39 AM.