Notices
928 Forum 1978-1995
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: 928 Specialists

Gain 100HP with an intake manifold change?? - Cross post from Ferrari Chat

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-24-2016, 02:27 PM
  #316  
mark kibort
Rennlist Member
 
mark kibort's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: saratoga, ca
Posts: 29,952
Received 166 Likes on 65 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by GregBBRD
And options for smaller plenums, different plenum "tops" for the smaller runners, smaller intake stubs to accept the smaller runners, and smaller throttle body openings.

Nothing to it!
not needed.. just keep it simple... if the mis matched mess worked on the GT, im sure the S4 will have good gains as well... 60hp for a mismatched intake im sure will work fine on an S4 or 6.4 liter. optimal is not a luxury most of us can afford.
lets take the first step and get SOMETHING rolling for replacing the stock intake!
Old 03-24-2016, 02:29 PM
  #317  
Mongo
Official Bay Area Patriot
Fuse 24 Assassin
Rennlist Member
 
Mongo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 31,653
Received 119 Likes on 62 Posts
Default

I think runner size and diameter is very important for the velocity of air flow in the cylinders. Assuming that Greg's manifold uses bigger runners because the intake side of the heads were ported, there will be flow issues when adapting this to stock, un-ported heads.

Greg is correct that the runners may need to be smaller if they are for a 5.0 motor, and should match the intake ports. For the taper, I don't see any reason to change it.
Old 03-24-2016, 02:43 PM
  #318  
GregBBRD
Former Sponsor
 
GregBBRD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Anaheim
Posts: 15,230
Received 2,476 Likes on 1,468 Posts
Default

Enough fricking dreaming!

Just for ***** and giggles, let's go through the financial reality of a new intake, just for the dreamers....so everyone can understand what is involved.

The numbers are the costs to produce....some of which are still just estimates, but certainly with-in 20%, either way. These prices are for pieces produced in the volume required for CNC people to program, design the tool paths, get the material, and turn on their machines.....a minimum of an initial run of approximately 10 units.

Intake stubs to heads: $1200.00

Injectors: $400-$600

Dampers, fuel pressure regulator: $500

Fuel rails and mounts for rails: $250.00

Plumbing: $250

Throttle body: $500

Idle stabilizer $350

Throttle bellcrank, attachment, and cable mount, with new cable $500.

Throttle switch and mounting for switch: $150+

Runners: $1000.00

Plenum "roof" $1200

Lower plenum: $750

Air filter system, with "Y" to throttle body $1000

Total estimate to produce (cost): $8150ea. Total investment $81,000.

Add in an incredibly low profit margin of 30% (incredibly low by any manufacturing standards....with zero ceiling for resellers) Cost to consumers: $11,750.

Note that this initial cost to produce and sell does not include any time to engineer, test, draw, solid model, etc.

How many of you would like to order one and place a deposit? It sure would help my cash flow in making the first 10 units! And since I will be using your dollars for production costs, I can certainly reduce the profit margin to a meager 20%....so call the initial buy in at $10,000.

Exactly!

Now you should understand the problem.

Like Jim Bailey said, he questions my sanity in doing this.

I certainly would not be undertaking this project if I didn't have my own agenda and my own goals....the payback for all the engineering, design, and test time is....well.....

NEVER!
Old 03-24-2016, 02:54 PM
  #319  
bureau13
Rennlist Member
 
bureau13's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: South Florida
Posts: 3,487
Received 57 Likes on 43 Posts
Default

Just for grins, how fast does that come down with more units? Say 100 units, same profit margin?

(I'm not suggesting that it's practical to find 100 people who would pay for this, but while we're here in fantasyland... )

Originally Posted by GregBBRD
Enough fricking dreaming!

Just for ***** and giggles, let's go through the financial reality of a new intake, just for the dreamers....so everyone can understand what is involved.

The numbers are the costs to produce....some of which are still just estimates, but certainly with-in 20%, either way. These prices are for pieces produced in the volume required for CNC people to program, design the tool paths, get the material, and turn on their machines.....a minimum of an initial run of approximately 10 units.

Intake stubs to heads: $1200.00

Injectors: $400-$600

Dampers, fuel pressure regulator: $500

Fuel rails and mounts for rails: $250.00

Plumbing: $250

Throttle body: $500

Idle stabilizer $350

Throttle bellcrank, attachment, and cable mount, with new cable $500.

Throttle switch and mounting for switch: $150+

Runners: $1000.00

Plenum "roof" $1200

Lower plenum: $750

Air filter system, with "Y" to throttle body $1000

Total estimate to produce (cost): $8150ea. Total investment $81,000.

Add in an incredibly low profit margin of 30% (incredibly low by any manufacturing standards....with zero ceiling for resellers) Cost to consumers: $11,750.

Note that this initial cost to produce and sell does not include any time to engineer, test, draw, solid model, etc.

How many of you would like to order one and place a deposit? It sure would help my cash flow in making the first 10 units! And since I will be using your dollars for production costs, I can certainly reduce the profit margin to a meager 20%....so call the initial buy in at $10,000.

Exactly!

Now you should understand the problem.

Like Jim Bailey said, he questions my sanity in doing this.

I certainly would not be undertaking this project if I didn't have my own agenda and my own goals....the payback for all the engineering, design, and test time is....well.....

NEVER!
Old 03-24-2016, 02:55 PM
  #320  
Imo000
Captain Obvious
Super User
 
Imo000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Cambridge, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 22,846
Received 339 Likes on 245 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by mark kibort
regardless if you like what i do with the 928, there are plenty that take a little pride in the fact that its impressed a lot of people on the track and many that own them like the fact that the platform can do so much with so little modification.
so "we" might just mean "us" and not YOU!
Using the "we" and "might" in the same sentence? It's either we or not we....there is no might.

If there is a we, whom exactly are these "we" s? Or are you hiding behind the "we" because you are too embarrassed to say "I"? You know, like a " We don't like your kind" statement.
Old 03-24-2016, 03:29 PM
  #321  
GregBBRD
Former Sponsor
 
GregBBRD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Anaheim
Posts: 15,230
Received 2,476 Likes on 1,468 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by bureau13
Just for grins, how fast does that come down with more units? Say 100 units, same profit margin?

(I'm not suggesting that it's practical to find 100 people who would pay for this, but while we're here in fantasyland... )
No idea...wouldn't even bother to think along these terms or ask.

I don't have the capital to invest in 100 units....even if the costs dropped by $400%.

I'm a mechanic, not a trader....
Old 03-24-2016, 05:38 PM
  #322  
mark kibort
Rennlist Member
 
mark kibort's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: saratoga, ca
Posts: 29,952
Received 166 Likes on 65 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by GregBBRD
No idea...wouldn't even bother to think along these terms or ask.

I don't have the capital to invest in 100 units....even if the costs dropped by $400%.

I'm a mechanic, not a trader....
obviously, not a mathematician either.
Old 03-24-2016, 05:40 PM
  #323  
mark kibort
Rennlist Member
 
mark kibort's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: saratoga, ca
Posts: 29,952
Received 166 Likes on 65 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Imo000
Using the "we" and "might" in the same sentence? It's either we or not we....there is no might.

If there is a we, whom exactly are these "we" s? Or are you hiding behind the "we" because you are too embarrassed to say "I"? You know, like a " We don't like your kind" statement.
im proud to say, "I".. but there is a we... you just need to open your eyes and stop being such a D--K!
Old 03-24-2016, 05:46 PM
  #324  
mark kibort
Rennlist Member
 
mark kibort's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: saratoga, ca
Posts: 29,952
Received 166 Likes on 65 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by GregBBRD
Enough fricking dreaming!

Just for ***** and giggles, let's go through the financial reality of a new intake, just for the dreamers....so everyone can understand what is involved.

The numbers are the costs to produce....some of which are still just estimates, but certainly with-in 20%, either way. These prices are for pieces produced in the volume required for CNC people to program, design the tool paths, get the material, and turn on their machines.....a minimum of an initial run of approximately 10 units.

Intake stubs to heads: $1200.00

Injectors: $400-$600

Dampers, fuel pressure regulator: $500

Fuel rails and mounts for rails: $250.00

Plumbing: $250

Throttle body: $500

Idle stabilizer $350

Throttle bellcrank, attachment, and cable mount, with new cable $500.

Throttle switch and mounting for switch: $150+

Runners: $1000.00

Plenum "roof" $1200

Lower plenum: $750

Air filter system, with "Y" to throttle body $1000

Total estimate to produce (cost): $8150ea. Total investment $81,000.

Add in an incredibly low profit margin of 30% (incredibly low by any manufacturing standards....with zero ceiling for resellers) Cost to consumers: $11,750.

Note that this initial cost to produce and sell does not include any time to engineer, test, draw, solid model, etc.

How many of you would like to order one and place a deposit? It sure would help my cash flow in making the first 10 units! And since I will be using your dollars for production costs, I can certainly reduce the profit margin to a meager 20%....so call the initial buy in at $10,000.

Exactly!

Now you should understand the problem.

Like Jim Bailey said, he questions my sanity in doing this.

I certainly would not be undertaking this project if I didn't have my own agenda and my own goals....the payback for all the engineering, design, and test time is....well.....

NEVER!
there might be a lower cost direction.

and my idea of using carl's type of lower intake
$1200
his trumpets
$500
his fuel rails (or finding a way to use the stock fuel rail would be good)
$500
fabrication of a box around it al
$1500 (for labor and material)
used lower plennum, throttle body and MAF and airbox
(free)
use existing throttle cable (free) (anderson /fan used a lot of the stock stuff)
(marginal costs)

for a 30 second look total of about $4k
Old 03-24-2016, 05:48 PM
  #325  
Mongo
Official Bay Area Patriot
Fuse 24 Assassin
Rennlist Member
 
Mongo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 31,653
Received 119 Likes on 62 Posts
Default

You may want to look at other options for a TB. Perhaps even something from GM or Ford that can be adapted using some aluminum tubing to our factory airboxes.
Old 03-24-2016, 05:58 PM
  #326  
mark kibort
Rennlist Member
 
mark kibort's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: saratoga, ca
Posts: 29,952
Received 166 Likes on 65 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Mongo
You may want to look at other options for a TB. Perhaps even something from GM or Ford that can be adapted using some aluminum tubing to our factory airboxes.
i agree. could work
Old 03-24-2016, 05:59 PM
  #327  
Mongo
Official Bay Area Patriot
Fuse 24 Assassin
Rennlist Member
 
Mongo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 31,653
Received 119 Likes on 62 Posts
Default

I think a TB with 85-90mm diameter may be sufficient flow for a stock 5.0. I don't know about anything larger like a 6.5L stroker 928.
Old 03-24-2016, 06:04 PM
  #328  
mark kibort
Rennlist Member
 
mark kibort's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: saratoga, ca
Posts: 29,952
Received 166 Likes on 65 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Mongo
I think a TB with 85-90mm diameter may be sufficient flow for a stock 5.0. I don't know about anything larger like a 6.5L stroker 928.
stock throttle body is 85-90mm.
anderson hogged out his stock throttle body and hogged out the intake and got 0 gains. the losses are ALL in the intake plennum and runners.
i remember when the 500hp vets of wcgt were given 40% restrictors. their straight line speed was only reduced by 3mph at sears point ( Mclclure's vet)
the gains are in the intake.. lots to be made there!
Old 03-24-2016, 07:38 PM
  #329  
Mongo
Official Bay Area Patriot
Fuse 24 Assassin
Rennlist Member
 
Mongo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 31,653
Received 119 Likes on 62 Posts
Default

God I know I am going to get flamed for this, but there are universal 90mm throttle bodies on ebay. Could be worth a try for a prototype. Of course, by default, an adapter will need to be made to fit the 928 TPS.
Old 03-24-2016, 07:43 PM
  #330  
GregBBRD
Former Sponsor
 
GregBBRD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Anaheim
Posts: 15,230
Received 2,476 Likes on 1,468 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Mongo
You may want to look at other options for a TB. Perhaps even something from GM or Ford that can be adapted using some aluminum tubing to our factory airboxes.

That $500 is for an "off the shelf" throttle body. My cost. If I purchase $5000 worth, I can get a 20% discount.

I'm doubting I'll need 10 throttle bodies anytime soon....and I'd like to do some more testing before jumping off that ledge.


Quick Reply: Gain 100HP with an intake manifold change?? - Cross post from Ferrari Chat



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 02:51 PM.