Notices
928 Forum 1978-1995
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: 928 Specialists

ZDDP in oil

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-14-2012, 11:05 AM
  #76  
hacker-pschorr
Administrator - "Tyson"
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
hacker-pschorr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Up Nort
Posts: 1,549
Received 2,167 Likes on 1,225 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Kiln_Red
I'm not trying to be argumentative here but I worry about the validity of this statement.

It appears to me that Mobil 1 dropped 15w-50, for a short time, when they reduced the ZDDP of other viscosities. They did so considering the formula outdated since flat tappet cams have become a engineering design of the past. I am not finding any information that they reduced ZDDP in 15w-50. That would abandon what knowledge they had already gained in that flat tappet engines require higher ZDDP oils.
You do realize that this was over 10 years ago and asking Mobil to disclose such information is like asking Coke to share their secret formula?

The only reason why they answer the question now is for marketing. Before 2004 less than .00001% of "car guys" had ever heard of "ZDDP".

So unless you are finding 10+ year old motor oil on the store shelves, why does it even matter?
hacker-pschorr is offline  
Old 11-14-2012, 11:17 AM
  #77  
Kiln_Red
Rennlist Member
 
Kiln_Red's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Bowling Green, KY
Posts: 1,494
Received 216 Likes on 112 Posts
Default

I'm struggling with the possibility that they would restructure a formula specifically designed for our engines in such a way that would contradict the reasons for the original makeup. Whether it was 10 years ago or 2 years ago does not matter to me. Roger suggested the changes were recent.
Kiln_Red is offline  
Old 11-14-2012, 11:25 AM
  #78  
hacker-pschorr
Administrator - "Tyson"
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
hacker-pschorr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Up Nort
Posts: 1,549
Received 2,167 Likes on 1,225 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Kiln_Red
I'm struggling with the possibility that they would restructure a formula specifically designed for our engines in such a way that would contradict the reasons for the original makeup. Whether it was 10 years ago or 2 years ago does not matter to me. Roger suggested the changes were recent.
The GL-4 standard was supposed to protect the same way, it didn't so they went back.

It's that simple. Saving the planet rules over engine longevity, ZDDP lowered to save catalytic converters. The EPA and company could care less if your vintage 30 year old engine suffers cam failure because of it.

ZDDP wasn't "designed for our cars" it's just Zinc and Phosphorus which is known to protect in high pressure areas (flat tappet cams). The new formula package was supposed to protect just as well (some claim it still does). So there you go, that's how this whole ball got rolling.

Did Mobil 1 change their formula since that first fiasco? I have no idea and I don't care since the only Mobil 1 I ever use is 5w-40 Turbo Diesel Truck in my two winter vehicles.

This isn't Mobil 1's first go-round with formula changes. Do a search on the Mobil 1 / Castrol lawsuit over what "Synthetic" really means - which is the real reason why many of us will never use either in our 928's.
hacker-pschorr is offline  
Old 11-14-2012, 11:52 AM
  #79  
Kiln_Red
Rennlist Member
 
Kiln_Red's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Bowling Green, KY
Posts: 1,494
Received 216 Likes on 112 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Hacker-Pschorr
The GL-4 standard was supposed to protect the same way, it didn't so they went back.

It's that simple. Saving the planet rules over engine longevity, ZDDP lowered to save catalytic converters. The EPA and company could care less if your vintage 30 year old engine suffers cam failure because of it.

ZDDP wasn't "designed for our cars" it's just Zinc and Phosphorus which is known to protect in high pressure areas (flat tappet cams). The new formula package was supposed to protect just as well (some claim it still does). So there you go, that's how this whole ball got rolling.

Did Mobil 1 change their formula since that first fiasco? I have no idea and I don't care since the only Mobil 1 I ever use is 5w-40 Turbo Diesel Truck in my two winter vehicles.

This isn't Mobil 1's first go-round with formula changes. Do a search on the Mobil 1 / Castrol lawsuit over what "Synthetic" really means - which is the real reason why many of us will never use either in our 928's.
These statements don't provide any news. At least not for me, though I thank you for sharing. I'm well aware of the fact that Mobil has changed their formulas for other viscosities. I'm still not convinced that Mobil 1 15w-50 has ever gotten a reduced level of ZDDP. It appears obvious that people will still make the claim regardless of whether they can support it factually or not.

I don't see anything wrong with saying that Mobil 1 15w-50 was formulated for our engines. Even the MSDS makes a mention of flat tappet engines. To me, that suggests Mobil specifically formulated it for our engine and any similar engine design. This is quite different than saying ZDDP was designed for our engines, which I did not say.
Kiln_Red is offline  
Old 11-14-2012, 11:59 AM
  #80  
SeanR
Rennlist Member
 
SeanR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 35,700
Received 500 Likes on 267 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Kiln_Red
These statements don't provide any news. At least not for me, though I thank you for sharing. I'm well aware of the fact that Mobil has changed their formulas for other viscosities. I'm still not convinced that Mobil 1 15w-50 has ever gotten a reduced level of ZDDP. It appears obvious that people will still make the claim regardless of whether they can support it factually or not.

I don't see anything wrong with saying that Mobil 1 15w-50 was formulated for our engines. Even the MSDS makes a mention of flat tappet engines. To me, that suggests Mobil specifically formulated it for our engine and any similar engine design. This is quite different than saying ZDDP was designed for our engines, which I did not say.
Austin, you are being overly hard headed for no reason at all. Mobile 1 started resupplying the 15w-50 with the proper ZDDP after much consumer concern. That was why the the formula Hacker is talking about was pulled off the shelves last year and then the good stuff was back as of last April. I don't know why you keep questioning those that watched it happen. If you are looking for links and specific tech articles about this, then go out and find them.
SeanR is offline  
Old 11-14-2012, 12:14 PM
  #81  
Kiln_Red
Rennlist Member
 
Kiln_Red's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Bowling Green, KY
Posts: 1,494
Received 216 Likes on 112 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by SeanR
Austin, you are being overly hard headed for no reason at all. Mobile 1 started resupplying the 15w-50 with the proper ZDDP after much consumer concern. That was why the the formula Hacker is talking about was pulled off the shelves last year and then the good stuff was back as of last April. I don't know why you keep questioning those that watched it happen. If you are looking for links and specific tech articles about this, then go out and find them.
I was worried about that judgment. I had hoped I hadn't appeared stubborn, but now I realize I have to at least one person. My motivation behind my interaction in this thread is to get to the same conclusion as the rest of the folks here who suggest Mobil 1 15w-50 recently dropped ZDDP levels to a level deemed unacceptable for our cars.

I don't think it is unfair to ask the people who make this claim for some kind of evidence that supports their theory
Kiln_Red is offline  
Old 11-14-2012, 12:36 PM
  #82  
Lizard928
Nordschleife Master
 
Lizard928's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Abbotsford B.C.
Posts: 9,600
Received 34 Likes on 25 Posts
Default

Why not do your own research and run what oil makes you happy?

I run shell rotella triple T diesel oil in 15w40. I confirmed it had 1200ppm of ZDDP prior to starting to use it. And I do a check every 6 months or so to confirm that the formula is still the same.
Lizard928 is offline  
Old 11-14-2012, 12:46 PM
  #83  
Kiln_Red
Rennlist Member
 
Kiln_Red's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Bowling Green, KY
Posts: 1,494
Received 216 Likes on 112 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Lizard931
Why not do your own research and run what oil makes you happy?
Colin, I am comfortable with the oil I use.

I have done my own research, also. Mobil 1 15w-50 is just one of those oils that I have looked into. I have been unable to reach the same conclusion that Mobil has changed their ZDDP levels of Mobil 1 15w-50. That is why I wonder how they have reached their conclusion.
Kiln_Red is offline  
Old 11-14-2012, 12:51 PM
  #84  
Kiln_Red
Rennlist Member
 
Kiln_Red's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Bowling Green, KY
Posts: 1,494
Received 216 Likes on 112 Posts
Default

I'll shut up now as I see that my comments are well stated and beginning to sound redundant. I appreciate the conversation though, guys and gals. Perhaps this thread might become the birth of a broader consensus with regard to one oil brand.
Kiln_Red is offline  
Old 11-14-2012, 01:26 PM
  #85  
SeanR
Rennlist Member
 
SeanR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 35,700
Received 500 Likes on 267 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Kiln_Red
I was worried about that judgment. I had hoped I hadn't appeared stubborn, but now I realize I have to at least one person. My motivation behind my interaction in this thread is to get to the same conclusion as the rest of the folks here who suggest Mobil 1 15w-50 recently dropped ZDDP levels to a level deemed unacceptable for our cars.

I don't think it is unfair to ask the people who make this claim for some kind of evidence that supports their theory
They didn't "recently" drop the ZDDP, they reformulated to what Hacker stated, then changed it back to what we needed. It really is that simple. It's also something that we discussed at length last year. Right now, 15w-50 M1 is a good oil, good for our cars. There was a formulation number stamped on the bottle that showed it was a different formula and it was deemed one stamping was the improper formula. Right off hand I don't remember what the two different stampings were, but its all good currently.

We came to that conclusion because we looked at it, had samples sent to blackstone, talked to Mobil etc.

I'm out, pointless discussion.
SeanR is offline  
Old 11-14-2012, 01:33 PM
  #86  
hacker-pschorr
Administrator - "Tyson"
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
hacker-pschorr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Up Nort
Posts: 1,549
Received 2,167 Likes on 1,225 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Kiln_Red
Perhaps this thread might become the birth of a broader consensus with regard to one oil brand.
Right along with all these:

https://rennlist.com/forums/928-foru...uch-pro-r.html

https://rennlist.com/forums/928-foru...o-you-use.html

https://rennlist.com/forums/928-foru...e-comment.html

https://rennlist.com/forums/928-foru...1-15-50-a.html

https://rennlist.com/forums/928-foru...-additive.html

https://rennlist.com/forums/928-foru...you-using.html

https://rennlist.com/forums/928-foru...periences.html

https://rennlist.com/forums/928-foru...nd-oiling.html

https://rennlist.com/forums/928-foru...-autozone.html

That's only a portion from the first page of doing a search (out of 5+ pages).

Don't worry, the next person with the same question will not do a search either
hacker-pschorr is offline  
Old 11-14-2012, 02:18 PM
  #87  
Jadz928
Rennlist Member
 
Jadz928's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Frankenmuth, Michigan
Posts: 8,690
Received 127 Likes on 77 Posts
Default

Hell, it give us something to talk about. Never a shortage of opinions re. oil.
Jadz928 is offline  
Old 11-14-2012, 02:21 PM
  #88  
Kiln_Red
Rennlist Member
 
Kiln_Red's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Bowling Green, KY
Posts: 1,494
Received 216 Likes on 112 Posts
Default

Thanks, Hacker. I just read every post from the search results you provided. I was surprised that I didn't even find one similar suggestion that M1 has *ever* reduced its ZDDP in 15w-50 to an unacceptable level for our cars. I did manage to find a couple of posts of particular interest..

Originally Posted by Bill Ball
No kidding. This is totally incorrect. Mobil 1 15W/50 still has plenty of zinc (1300 PPM) and phosphorous (1200 PPM). It has not been reduced at all. It's all I have ever used in my 928, and I beat the living crap out of my car all the time and the engine still has perfect compression and less than 3% leakdown and produces the same power it always has while remaining untouched at 246K miles. I change the oil no more than once a year or every 12-15K miles, just as Porsche prescribes.

Brian, you ought to be ashamed of yourself for saying this.

http://www.mobiloil.com/USA-English/...duct_Guide.pdf
Originally Posted by Hacker-Pschorr
Oh boy, an oil thread


That depends greatly on weight.

The new modern standard with lower ZDDP is targeted towards the lighter weight oils in most modern cars.
This does not apply to the 928.

I have not found any 15-20w/50 oils that are lower than 1100ppm ZDDP - which is the "old" standard our cars were built around.

Even Mobil 1:
http://www.mobiloil.com/usa-english/...duct_guide.pdf

If you drive your 928 in a cold climate that would call for 5w-40, there are options like Mobil 1 Turbo Diesel Truck, Redline, Amsoil etc......



Quite a few non-synthetic oils still have higher ZDDP standards since they are not produced for or marketed towards new car owners. You simply need to look at the bottle.

Every oil with GF-4/GF-5 in the bottle will be 800ppm ZDDP which is the new "environmental friendly" amount, and not what you want.

The issue of low ZDDP levels is 100% related to camshaft wear in engines with flat tappet lifters (like the 928).
Kiln_Red is offline  
Old 11-14-2012, 02:26 PM
  #89  
depami
Rennlist Member
 
depami's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Cleveland, MN
Posts: 2,815
Received 238 Likes on 127 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by linderpat
I have yet to see a jug of oil that lists the ZDDP content on it. I buy at the retail auto parts stores. I have never once seen this listing on a label, no matter which store I go to. How do you know what the content is when you buy your oil (unless you special order a royal purple or amsoil or whatever). I am only talking about retail.
And now, back to our originally scheduled programming.

Who can, from here on in this tread, avoid "oil discussion" and simply state "brand x - ZDDP content on label - yes/no"?
depami is online now  
Old 11-14-2012, 02:39 PM
  #90  
jayc67
Rennlist Member
 
jayc67's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Mansfield, TX
Posts: 669
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by depami
Who can, from here on in this tread, avoid "oil discussion" and simply state "brand x - ZDDP content on label - yes/no"?
Where's the fun in that?
jayc67 is offline  


Quick Reply: ZDDP in oil



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 02:32 PM.