Notices
928 Forum 1978-1995
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: 928 Specialists

Whacking the wing?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-10-2007, 12:50 PM
  #226  
Ninespub
Three Wheelin'
Thread Starter
 
Ninespub's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Saginaw, MI
Posts: 1,384
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Hey Doc, I gotta tell you; from what I've read of your posts you really have your S--T down! It takes a long time to articulate in written form areodynamic theory (or fact) as comprehensive as what youv'e done and still allow a layman like myself to reasonably understand it. Thanks for your participation in this fascinating forum.

Paul Barrera
'91 $4 (with a whacked wing)
The following users liked this post:
Magnus Rostadmo (02-05-2022)
Old 08-10-2007, 12:55 PM
  #227  
docmirror
Shameful Thread Killer
Rennlist Member
 
docmirror's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Rep of Texas, N NM, Rockies, SoCal
Posts: 19,831
Received 100 Likes on 65 Posts
Default

Er - Chazz is the aero engineer, mine's in EE. I just fly the darn things occasionally, but thanks.
Old 08-10-2007, 02:31 PM
  #228  
Kaz
Three Wheelin'
 
Kaz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Los Angeles/Honolulu
Posts: 1,298
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Talking

Originally Posted by NeverLateInMyNineTwoEight
Do you mean on public roads, or on the track?

If people are going beyond 120 or so on public highways, or even beyond 100 or so from time to time - wow. I must be a slow poke.

On the track, no problem - that is assuming your car is prepped, and the driver has had some DE under their belt.

For my purposes, up to 100 is about my limit on wide open, great visibility, no one else around highways. I think I've topped out around 120 or so in my '85 once on a public highway.

So, for me, I don't believe the wing delete would be an issue on my S4. Now if I was going to hit the track, it would be a different story. The wing would go back on, just because I wouldn't want to take any chances at those speeds.
Having gone in excess of 130mph on public highways in a wingless 92 Mercedes Benz 500E, I can assure you that even having a wing or rear spoiler was THE LEAST of my worries. Especially after I got pulled over.
Old 08-10-2007, 03:00 PM
  #229  
Bill Ball
Under the Lift
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
Bill Ball's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Buckeye, AZ
Posts: 18,647
Received 49 Likes on 36 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by docmirror
Well lets see if I can confuse folks a bit more. The Wing is a good thing, if it's used for high speed stability. By that I mean speeds above 140 or so.
Good, I think I'll leave it alone then.
Old 08-10-2007, 03:21 PM
  #230  
Ron_H
928 Barrister
Rennlist Member

 
Ron_H's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Sunnyvale, CA
Posts: 4,772
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

I have been in a 928S with belly pan, spoiler and rear spoiler at 160ish and it was as stable as a rock....for a relatively long period of continuous time. Must have been the air or the inclination of the sun relative to some other planet or what ever gobblygook reason. But it was dead solid. The reason it was traveling at that speed was to escape from mediocreville and the loony-ites with their imaginary misconceptions and oppressiveness. It achieved that purpose quite well and made the truth appear for a brief period in time.

FWIW, I like the S4 wing.
Old 08-10-2007, 03:38 PM
  #231  
Richard S
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
Richard S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Elk Grove, Ca
Posts: 3,695
Received 123 Likes on 76 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by docmirror
Well lets see if I can confuse folks a bit more. The Wing is a good thing, if it's used for high speed stability. By that I mean speeds above 140 or so. Below that, on the roads we have in the US the Wing won't make much difference either way, on or off. As I mentioned, aerodynamic drag increases at the square of the velocity. Thankfully, other aerodynamic forces like lift operate the same way. That means an increase from 130 to 150MPH means a great deal in terms of aerodynamic instability.

This area is what pilots and flight engineers call the edge of the envelope. You can be tootling along just fine at 120-130, then punch it up to 150 and things will feel kinda funky. Then punch it up into the 160 range and things will definantly feel squirelly. The 928, like most production GTs could handle the lift generated up through the 140MPH range which was the limit of the OBs. then, as engines increased, and top potential speeds increased, Horst und Viktor had to re-engineer the aerodynamic package to deal with the higher speeds. Even though they were only about 10-15MPH higher, it was just enough for the incremental effects of the lift to rear it's ugly head - or tail so to speak.
.....

this is why I said the car is pretty safe sans Wing at speeds up to around 140-ish, cause that's what the OBs were capable of sans Wing. That doesn't mean that there isn't detrimental effects from no Wing, it just means that the effects are manageable.

So here's a cookbook for you. OB, no Wing no belly pan: limit your top speed to around 140. Spoiler cars: Limit your speed to around 155. Big wing, belly pan, fender skirt treatment limit to 175. If you take stuff off your car, limit your top speeds to those of the next lower rated car.

.
Great points Doc, and I agree with the speed recommendations based on my experiences in ORR with OB's up to 140mph and S4's up to 189mph. Manageable speed is what we need to keep in mind.

Rich
Old 08-10-2007, 04:03 PM
  #232  
heinrich
928 Collector
Rennlist Member

 
heinrich's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Seattle
Posts: 17,269
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Ed, it's all about what your level of comfort is. I would never exceed the posted speed limits no matter what. Personally I think 100mph anywhere is asking for a ticket Now, where do you draw the line? 100? 140? 180? 85? How far above legal is still OK?
Originally Posted by NeverLateInMyNineTwoEight
Do you mean on public roads, ... ...
If people are going beyond 120 or so on public highways, or even beyond 100 or so from time to time - wow. I must be a slow poke. ...For my purposes, up to 100 is about my limit on wide open, great visibility, no one else around highways. I think I've topped out around 120 or so in my '85 once on a public highway. ....
Old 08-10-2007, 04:04 PM
  #233  
docmirror
Shameful Thread Killer
Rennlist Member
 
docmirror's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Rep of Texas, N NM, Rockies, SoCal
Posts: 19,831
Received 100 Likes on 65 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Ron_H
I have been in a 928S with belly pan, spoiler and rear spoiler at 160ish and it was as stable as a rock....for a relatively long period of continuous time. Must have been the air or the inclination of the sun relative to some other planet or what ever gobblygook reason. But it was dead solid.
Yep - dead solid is a good explaination. You'll be bustling along, la-de-da, 'oh look, 160' then catch a gust from the side, or a slight upset from passing a truck, or even a rise in the road. Then when that nice stable flow of air over the car is modified, you correct, and the airflow over the side, or tail is changed, then you correct again, and poof!

In the airplane business it's called PIO - pilot induced oscillation and you're alway behind the plane/car. You can never correct in time to stop it. Usually two cycles and it's unrecoverable. Chazz can 'splain better. Sure, it can be done, and guys with extra-big cojones will get away with it, most of the time. However, Ron, I hope you will agree that the margin for error is ceertainly reduced at those speeds.
Old 08-10-2007, 04:19 PM
  #234  
dr bob
Chronic Tool Dropper
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
dr bob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Bend, Oregon
Posts: 20,506
Received 546 Likes on 409 Posts
Default

The good news is that most well-designed planes (and probably the cars) have enough forgiveness at design speeds to "recover" on their own if you let them. Overcorrecton at higher speeds is generally worse than no correction, since the effects of the 'correction' are amplified and the effects of the 'problem' are not. It takes a very gentle touch at high speeds; more can quickly be trouble. Generally, the car will save me if I let it.
Old 08-10-2007, 06:21 PM
  #235  
docmirror
Shameful Thread Killer
Rennlist Member
 
docmirror's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Rep of Texas, N NM, Rockies, SoCal
Posts: 19,831
Received 100 Likes on 65 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by dr bob
The good news is that most well-designed planes (and probably the cars) have enough forgiveness at design speeds to "recover" on their own if you let them. Overcorrecton at higher speeds is generally worse than no correction, since the effects of the 'correction' are amplified and the effects of the 'problem' are not. It takes a very gentle touch at high speeds; more can quickly be trouble. Generally, the car will save me if I let it.
Don't mess with Vne and everything is wunderbar. Did you know Vne is based on CAS and not IAS? Not many folks do, and it occasionally gets them into trouble. At the molecular level, the air doesn't know if it's at STP or something else, but the interaction with the control surfaces sure becomes relevant.

Generally, a decent plane will save a ham-fisted pilot, but start modifying the aero package, and you now become - Chuck Yeager, test pilot extrodinare!
Old 08-10-2007, 06:24 PM
  #236  
dr bob
Chronic Tool Dropper
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
dr bob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Bend, Oregon
Posts: 20,506
Received 546 Likes on 409 Posts
Default

It seems like I'm always correcting something to STP. Is there such a thing as a true ISO day? Mythology, I tell you!
Old 08-10-2007, 08:38 PM
  #237  
docmirror
Shameful Thread Killer
Rennlist Member
 
docmirror's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Rep of Texas, N NM, Rockies, SoCal
Posts: 19,831
Received 100 Likes on 65 Posts
Default

I've had a true ISO day. It was March 14th 1985, from 13:15 to 14:40 PST, San Diego, CA. I calibrated everything I could touch during that +1 hour. Ya know, most folks on this board think we've gone looney - they could just be correct.
Old 08-10-2007, 08:44 PM
  #238  
dr bob
Chronic Tool Dropper
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
dr bob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Bend, Oregon
Posts: 20,506
Received 546 Likes on 409 Posts
Default

They just don't know the pressure we've been under! You must have been near Balboa Park on Mission Bay that day. In the shade under the SeaWorld sign, right? Or on one of those big grey motorboats over by the airport....?
Old 08-10-2007, 09:15 PM
  #239  
ew928
Owns the Streets
Needs Camber
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
ew928's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: New York
Posts: 10,292
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Waah! I've drifted into Twilight Zone because I've not got my tail to keep me from veering astray.

So how many S owners are going double decker after all this.
Combine the S lip, the S4 wing and the Xr4Ti upper strut wing and you've got a Porsche Tri-Plane. Sorta like the nose of a current F1 car but in reverse.
Couldn't find a nice F1 triple decker nose but found this:



Wing. No wing. Wing. No wing. Wing. No wing.
Taste great. Less filling . . .
Old 08-11-2007, 12:39 PM
  #240  
kiesan
Rennlist Member
 
kiesan's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Seattle
Posts: 1,020
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

This thread inspired me so much I went wingless in Seattle. As a plus an annoying rattle/squeaking went away as well. Turquoise metallic '91 S4:


http://www.redlabelmoto.com/details....srImageID=1209


Quick Reply: Whacking the wing?



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 01:23 PM.