Notices
924/931/944/951/968 Forum Porsche 924, 924S, 931, 944, 944S, 944S2, 951, and 968 discussion, how-to guides, and technical help. (1976-1995)
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

To those who have done V8 Swaps

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-29-2012, 08:19 AM
  #91  
Fishey
Nordschleife Master
 
Fishey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Lebanon, OH
Posts: 5,801
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Rogue_Ant
Fishey - you have got to be kidding me.

LS F-Bodies are ~100mph cars up here. Your car with a massive N2O shot at sea level is not a comparison. Up here you would have ran ~110mph - which is what my car did with a K27 and stock long-block.

Sid's car is pretty much the exact same speed/time as this supercharged LS2 vette (635hp):

You act like a turbo doesn't loose effectiveness at higher elevation and something with a small turbo like a K27 will start to see boost fade. Even the larger turbos have to spin harder to create the same boost levels and this will effect HP. Now, is its the same amount of loss as an N/A car? No but there is without a doubt loss. I don't think you have any idea on how nitrous works but its not effected by elevation.
Old 08-29-2012, 01:25 PM
  #92  
Rogue_Ant
Addict
Rennlist Member

Rennlist
Small Business Partner

 
Rogue_Ant's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Denver
Posts: 5,252
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

I've explained the effects of altitude more times than I care to remember...
If you think that N2O cars are unaffected by altitude, then good luck with with that
Old 08-29-2012, 05:34 PM
  #93  
LS1Porch
Burning Brakes
 
LS1Porch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Nuke City, NM
Posts: 872
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Rogue_Ant
I guess you didn't bother to read my posts either, instead you just make up what you think I said

I posted a comparison of a budget build 951, to a supercharged LS2. Both cars are similar in weight, both cars run low 120mph at our local track.

Rob posted up a car with a built 7.x motor, which the motor alone costs more then the entire 951 build (including the car)...

Anything can be fast - with enough money. The point LSx guys are always touting is how fast/reliable they are for the $. The funny part is that when someone challenges either point then its a "stupid argument".
That is always the case, though. If someone gave you $30k, there is no question that you could build something that was faster (and handled better) than what you could buy off the showroom floor for the same money.

You could buy an LS1, right now, for $3000, and put $1k in mods into it (cam, headers, air intake, tune) and make 400rwhp without skipping a beat. If you can come up with a more reliable, cheaper way to make 400hp starting from nothing--then by all means....

Originally Posted by refresh951
I will NEVER put a V8 in my 951. Nothing against those who do. Just not my thing. If I go V8 I will just go buy a Vette. My brother has an LS2 and I love that car. My plan is to keep pushing to solve the issues. I guess that is why I love my 951. It has challenges but also amazing potential and character. I love a good challenge especially if I believe it will pay off in a big way. But to each his own.

My brothers LS2 with the Rockies in the background:
I drove my girlfriends' step-fathers LS2 Corvette, and no question it's the way to go if that's what you want. The car itself isn't much nicer (so much plastic on the inside), but the fit, finish, and driveability is miles ahead of where the 944 left off. Have you seen the panel gaps on the 944's?
Old 08-29-2012, 07:02 PM
  #94  
Cole
Drifting
 
Cole's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Colorado
Posts: 3,212
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Talking

Originally Posted by Rogue_Ant
So your comparison is a built 7.x liter with 125-shot...?
Originally Posted by robstah
I'll play.

To be fair, your corvette got its *** handed to him by a Turbocharged pickup
Old 08-29-2012, 07:40 PM
  #95  
Cole
Drifting
 
Cole's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Colorado
Posts: 3,212
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Talking

Originally Posted by robstah
So now we are adding turbo diesel trucks to the mix? Oy.

In before top fuel dragster comparison.

Just pointing out that it was turbo and a friggin tow rig!

Forced induction, even on that diesel, helped that truck at this altitude!

Just funny to post a video of a car losing! Especially to a turbo powered vehicle (which is what you are arguing against).
Old 08-29-2012, 07:55 PM
  #96  
Fishey
Nordschleife Master
 
Fishey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Lebanon, OH
Posts: 5,801
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Rogue_Ant
I've explained the effects of altitude more times than I care to remember...
If you think that N2O cars are unaffected by altitude, then good luck with with that
You fail to understand even if I lost all my N/A HP I could still cover a 120mph pass.
Old 08-29-2012, 08:04 PM
  #97  
Rogue_Ant
Addict
Rennlist Member

Rennlist
Small Business Partner

 
Rogue_Ant's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Denver
Posts: 5,252
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Fishey
You fail to understand even if I lost all my N/A HP I could still cover a 120mph pass.
Unless you did over 130mph at sea-level it isn't happening. So, what mph did you do at sea-level?
Old 08-29-2012, 08:41 PM
  #98  
blown 944
Race Car
 
blown 944's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Firestone, Colorado
Posts: 4,826
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Here is about the closest comparison. There is a swapped 260z with a cam and he just ran a 13.1@107 to my 11.73@123

It's all fun...
Old 08-29-2012, 08:50 PM
  #99  
Fishey
Nordschleife Master
 
Fishey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Lebanon, OH
Posts: 5,801
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Rogue_Ant
Unless you did over 130mph at sea-level it isn't happening. So, what mph did you do at sea-level?
137mph
Old 08-29-2012, 08:55 PM
  #100  
Rogue_Ant
Addict
Rennlist Member

Rennlist
Small Business Partner

 
Rogue_Ant's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Denver
Posts: 5,252
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Fishey
137mph
Lets see the proof then of this 600rwhp S2.

Otherwise all I see is these:

https://rennlist.com/forums/4424465-post99.html

~120mph near sea-level.
Old 08-29-2012, 09:04 PM
  #101  
blown 944
Race Car
 
blown 944's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Firestone, Colorado
Posts: 4,826
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Why bother with this guy. He is full of ****. Always has been. Never any proof of anything other than a photo of a nitrous bottle stuffed inside a dismantled car and some time slips. You're wasting your time.
Old 08-29-2012, 09:12 PM
  #102  
Fishey
Nordschleife Master
 
Fishey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Lebanon, OH
Posts: 5,801
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by blown 944
Why bother with this guy. He is full of ****. Always has been. Never any proof of anything other than a photo of a nitrous bottle stuffed inside a dismantled car and some time slips. You're wasting your time.
Unfortunately your right... that was the life of the car 90% dismantled and endless amounts of rebuilds and 2 blown apart blocks when pushing into those numbers. The **** gets old that is why LS motor is going in... (as it has been since 2008) but I keep selling the ones I buy because people keep offering me more then I have in them before I get them installed..

Also, my best was 10.95 @134.67 not 137.. my bad been awhile since I ran it with the S2 motor. (early 2008) The link to the timeslip is down but I might be able to find it at my house.
Old 08-29-2012, 10:23 PM
  #103  
hopps
Instructor
 
hopps's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Warner Robins, GA
Posts: 194
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Both parties realize that there is no point in arguing as neither side will ever win? This is all very childish and sad.

Yes, you can get 400hp from a turbo 4cyl.
Yes, you can get 400hp from an LSx swap.
Yes, they both cost money.
Yes, they both have good and bad things about them.
No, arguing (again) for 5+ pages will not solve anything.
Yes, I'm starting to like Pelican forums better.

Can we all just call it a draw, and let Cyclone decide now? Ultimately, if cyclone want's to put an LSx engine, it's what he will have to live with. Either way (4cyl vs v8), he will have a really bad *** car. It feels like WW3 in here.

If anyone has a v8 swapped 944, please let cyclone ride so he can get first hand experience before he chooses. Also note:

Originally Posted by Cyclone
"The reason I am interested in the v8 is not because I think its better than the 4cylinder, I'm interested in the longevity and the removal of electronics."

"Even if I do put a v8 in I would still want to keep the 951 motor and to a v8 swap that I can still swap back easily for the simple fact of being able to go original. "
Old 08-30-2012, 12:52 AM
  #104  
xschop
Drifting
 
xschop's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 2,721
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

I'll build a full swap kit for another 951 with blown engine lol.
The point is almost moot, but for the majority of the V8 swappers it all comes down to the CFR rule and IMO my 948 breaks that rule for what it is and what it does DAILY. 37,600 miles to be exact and I can still out run cars that cost 10x as much as what I have done to mine. That new lotus is quick but not 948 quick.
Old 08-30-2012, 01:09 AM
  #105  
blown 944
Race Car
 
blown 944's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Firestone, Colorado
Posts: 4,826
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by xschop
I'll build a full swap kit for another 951 with blown engine lol.
The point is almost moot, but for the majority of the V8 swappers it all comes down to the CFR rule and IMO my 948 breaks that rule for what it is and what it does DAILY. 37,600 miles to be exact and I can still out run cars that cost 10x as much as what I have done to mine. That new lotus is quick but not 948 quick.

Do it!!! It would be cool and I'm sure it'd run good.

I have a little catching up to do in the DD mileage dept. I'm at just over 12k.

But you have some catching up to do in the drag racing dept. I have now over 70 passes on this combo this year. Tonight it was a consistent 11 second bracket car. 7 passes all in the 11's.

I'm pretty happy considering it cost me $3800.


Quick Reply: To those who have done V8 Swaps



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 11:30 PM.