Notices
911 Forum 1964-1989
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Intercity Lines, LLC

Engine upgrade

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-14-2011, 09:35 AM
  #16  
theiceman
Team Owner
 
theiceman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Cambridge Ontario Canada
Posts: 26,985
Received 1,116 Likes on 798 Posts
Default

Sam for the costs involved would it not be just better to go buy a Turbo and sell yours . That looks to be beautiful unmolested example. Why not keep it that way ?
Old 01-14-2011, 09:49 AM
  #17  
ivangene
Parts Specialist
Rennlist Member
 
ivangene's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 16,326
Likes: 0
Received 24 Likes on 17 Posts
Default

nice video Ice!!

I could watch that all day....
Old 01-14-2011, 09:59 AM
  #18  
User 4221
Addict
Rennlist Member
 
User 4221's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Posts: 7,031
Received 47 Likes on 29 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by theiceman
Sam for the costs involved would it not be just better to go buy a Turbo and sell yours . That looks to be beautiful unmolested example. Why not keep it that way ?
Or...... Buy a Turbo and keep the SC! The more the merrier
Old 01-14-2011, 10:45 AM
  #19  
UberXY
Burning Brakes
 
UberXY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Shadow of Monticello
Posts: 795
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

FWIW, my 3.2 was sent to Andial some years ago and was converted to a 3.4 with some sportier cams, a better MAF, and some chip work. It perked it up a bit and has a nice sound at idle. Much easier than doing an engine swap, but less gain as well.
Old 01-14-2011, 11:10 AM
  #20  
2specs
Instructor
Thread Starter
 
2specs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Edmonton, Canada
Posts: 229
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Smile

Originally Posted by theiceman
Sam for the costs involved would it not be just better to go buy a Turbo and sell yours . That looks to be beautiful unmolested example. Why not keep it that way ?
I like the look of the SC more than the turbo and do not plan on butchering it. The body and paint is all original and I plan on maintaining that. A few rock chips here and there adds character as well . The only addition I will have to make to the body is a tea tray. I've seen it on other SC's and can live with it.

The 3.0 is ok but can't keep up to the newer generation cars. The 3.6 is newer than the 3.3 but I like the fact that I can add on to the 3.3 without too much difficulty.

Actually, the 3.6VR would have cost me more than the 3.3 to convert. My net cost after selling my 3.0 hopefully will end up around 10-11k. Would have been cheaper if I knew how to do it or if you guys were nearby but attempting this for the first time myself would be a mess I'm sure.
Old 01-14-2011, 12:43 PM
  #21  
Amber Gramps
Addict
 
Amber Gramps's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Alta Loma Alone
Posts: 37,770
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes on 12 Posts
Default

This may have already been covered in other threads, but I gotta ask it anyway...

What have you done, or what will you do to stop this monster?

If I had $10,000 to blow on go fast the first $5,000 I'd spend would be on really big brakes and the suspension to handle it.

Horsepower would be way down my list. Sorry, but speed kills.

....and my 3.2 is scary quick to the point that I always come home with a sore neck....are the 3.0's dogs???
Old 01-14-2011, 12:49 PM
  #22  
Brads911sc
Racer
 
Brads911sc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 477
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I wouldnt put a Turbo in a stock SC unless your improving brakes and suspension and maybe even the trans/clutch. probably need at least 5-7k on those items and thats if you do it yourself. Half the battle on these cars is balance. Need to think through this abit more in my opinion... The Stock SC is just not equiped to handle 300hp...
Old 01-14-2011, 01:02 PM
  #23  
race911
Rennlist Member
 
race911's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Roseville, CA
Posts: 12,311
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 8 Posts
Default

The above two comments are why I posted my recent experience with my old car. The engine part of it is only half the deal. And that's with a self-build. I think we know here that a "go fast in a straight line" 911 (or any car for that matter is pretty boring after the third or fourth time you wind it out to............maybe 120? Then what?

In any case, I've got a bunch of 3.3 (and 3.0) 930 engine parts around.
Old 01-14-2011, 01:13 PM
  #24  
Ed Hughes
Rennlist Member
 
Ed Hughes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Bend, OR
Posts: 16,518
Received 79 Likes on 53 Posts
Default

All great points. This is a $20K+ project by the end. That 930 may not be a bad idea after all...

I love seeing other people dump gobs of cash in their cars!
Old 01-14-2011, 01:24 PM
  #25  
500
RL Community Team
Rennlist Member
 
500's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Toronto
Posts: 3,324
Received 155 Likes on 98 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 2specs
I like the look of the SC more than the turbo and do not plan on butchering it. The body and paint is all original and I plan on maintaining that. A few rock chips here and there adds character as well . The only addition I will have to make to the body is a tea tray. I've seen it on other SC's and can live with it.

The 3.0 is ok but can't keep up to the newer generation cars. The 3.6 is newer than the 3.3 but I like the fact that I can add on to the 3.3 without too much difficulty.

Actually, the 3.6VR would have cost me more than the 3.3 to convert. My net cost after selling my 3.0 hopefully will end up around 10-11k. Would have been cheaper if I knew how to do it or if you guys were nearby but attempting this for the first time myself would be a mess I'm sure.
First, I would echo the advice about brake and chassis upgrades that are pretty much mandatory in my mind.

Second, ask yourself if you will really want to keep this car a LOOONG time because it will be expensive... More expensive than most would likely estimate.

The case of James' car is very instructive (the one Iceman posted the video on). That car was VERY reasonably priced when James tried to sell it and he followed up with some significant further price drops. I really couldn't believe how inexpensive it ended up being. This was a car that was done right, top-to-bottom, had an EXCELLENT local reputation and was still hard-to-sell, even at a bargain price. Fact seems to be, people don't pay well for extensive mods.

So, what do I mean?

Well, if this is a long-term dream project of your ultimate 911, then go for it.

However, if you can imagine yourself driving this for a few years and then hankering after a new experience... then you will be much better off putting up with the flares of a real 911 Turbo... Pouring a lot of money (and it will be a LOT of money) into a project, and then realzing that, if you want to sell it, you will get very, very little back can make you reach for the razor blades!

Summary: Evaluate dispassionately how long you will want to keep this car. Everyone thinks forever, but that is often not the case...
Old 01-14-2011, 01:36 PM
  #26  
Brads911sc
Racer
 
Brads911sc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 477
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

20k is conservative.

I did alot of this to my SC.. Its not a Turbo but a complete engine overhaul with some goodies which will be comparable to what you will spend turning your 3.0 into a 3.3...
83 SC Targa -- 3.2SS, GT2-108 Dougherty Cams, 9.5:1 JE Pistons, Supertec Studs, PMO ITB's, MS2 ECU, SSI's, Recurved Dizzy, Backdated Dansk Sport Stainless 2 in 1 out, Elephant Polybronze, Turbo Tie Rods, Bilstein HD's, Hollow 21-27 TBs, Pirelli PZeros...
I havent touched the brakes other than to overhaul them with all new stock parts. Also havent touched the Trans / installed LSD, etc. I also did 90% of the work myself with no labor costs. Id say this ran me 27k to date plus the price of the car... I have another unrelated 7-8k in the car. If you really want a turbo... Buy a turbo. Can get a great example for 30-35k that will have all the upgrades... youll never get back your money on an SC when your dropping 3-6k at a time on things like brakes, induction, suspension, exhaust, etc.

Last edited by Brads911sc; 01-14-2011 at 02:05 PM.
Old 01-14-2011, 01:56 PM
  #27  
Ed Hughes
Rennlist Member
 
Ed Hughes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Bend, OR
Posts: 16,518
Received 79 Likes on 53 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Brads911sc
20k is conservative.
No doubt on that, hence my "+". I'm using rough numbers based on his $10-11K estimate on the engine. I think that low for starters.

<---------
See the Red number next door? I've got almost $20K in the motor alone, and it's not exotic. I've got another $3 or 4K in brakes, and probably $6K in suspension. It is ludicrous, how the $ fly at you faster than a starfield in the Millenium Falcon at "hyperspeed".
Old 01-14-2011, 01:57 PM
  #28  
Amber Gramps
Addict
 
Amber Gramps's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Alta Loma Alone
Posts: 37,770
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes on 12 Posts
Default

Here is a 3.2 turbo look that has had a turbo added a few years back. Seems Spencer was happy with the results...:rock_on:

https://rennlist.com/forums/911-foru...ml#post5383907
Old 01-14-2011, 02:02 PM
  #29  
Brads911sc
Racer
 
Brads911sc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 477
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Dont you love how people will drop a turbo or high HP engine in a car and then complain when they dont get the results they are looking for?


Originally Posted by Ed Hughes
No doubt on that, hence my "+". I'm using rough numbers based on his $10-11K estimate on the engine. I think that low for starters.

<---------
See the Red number next door? I've got almost $20K in the motor alone, and it's not exotic. I've got another $3 or 4K in brakes, and probably $6K in suspension. It is ludicrous, how the $ fly at you faster than a starfield in the Millenium Falcon at "hyperspeed".
Old 01-14-2011, 02:03 PM
  #30  
Ed Hughes
Rennlist Member
 
Ed Hughes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Bend, OR
Posts: 16,518
Received 79 Likes on 53 Posts
Default

Exactly. I may not have the fastest to the next stoplight, but as a package, it is very capable.


Quick Reply: Engine upgrade



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 07:48 PM.