Notices
911 Forum 1964-1989
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Intercity Lines, LLC

WRX's are fast [my 3.2 82 911 vs 2002 WRX]

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-08-2003, 03:01 PM
  #31  
GTR 993
Burning Brakes
 
GTR 993's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 857
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

The subaru is a great car and can be modded to be extremely quick. It isn't really the same as saying you can make a Ford Fiesta faster than a TT Porsche. The WRX starts out as a great car. Just about any decent car can be turned into a Porsche Beater in straight line racing and with the AWD of the WRX I would imagine with a little tweaking it could be a great "track" car.

I used to own a C5 Corvette that everyone said "well bring it to the track and we will see how well it can handle against my NSX or S2000", I hate to say it but unless you have driven a Corvette after 97 you have no idea how well they handle,brake and accellerate. 7 out of 10 AutoX at GM wins against so called great handling cars proves that.

Give a great car credit no matter who makes it. But for me there is no other car than Porsche for all out great performance in every area. Jack of all trades. Just my .02
Old 05-08-2003, 03:08 PM
  #32  
adsc4s
Addict
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
adsc4s's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: California
Posts: 2,761
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Post

Our 911's are sports car with timeless lines. The WRX is a very sporty sedan that will change every 5 years. Not fair to compare the two in any way.

It is interesting though that I am always being challenged at stop lights. I guess our P-cars are the standard by which other brand owners measure themselves.
Old 05-08-2003, 03:32 PM
  #33  
JBrown
Rennlist Member
 
JBrown's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: NY
Posts: 1,907
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

YOU SHOULD HAVE BEEN IN THIRD GEAR WHEN YOU RACED THE WRX, YOU STILL WOULD HAVE LOST BUT YOU WOULD PROBABLY NOT HAVE BEEN BLOWN AWAY. AT 65 IN 4TH YOU ARE OUT OF YOUR POWER BAND. MY FREIND HAS A WRX AND WITH MODS THEY ARE SUPER FAST QUARTAR MILE CARS. LOOK AT XCCELERATION.COM FOR 5,000 YOU CAN MAKE THAT CAR DO 0-60 IN 3.4 SEC AND QUATER MILE IN LOW 12'S WHICH IS FAST FOR THE INVESTMENT
Old 05-08-2003, 03:33 PM
  #34  
SleeperWRX
Track Day
 
SleeperWRX's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

</font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana,Tahoma,Helvetica">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana,Tahoma,Helvetica">Originally posted by IWANNAGOFASTER:
<strong>Hmm. Interesting thread. I wonder if these guys put their cars on the track a dozen days a year and constantly pushed them to the limits, who would have maintenance issues in the end? I've watched Mustangs, Mit's GT3000's, Preludes, Acura's and a Camaro (all later cars) lose brakes and melt down at Watkins Glen. Porsche's just kept going. Subaru makes an awesome product, I'll say that.</strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana,Tahoma,Helvetica">At an autox or a rally event the stock WRX brakes are fine, but at a track like watkins or something they would fade after the first turn without cross drilling if you drive it right...wouldn't be fun at all. I'm guessing that track brake pads would help a lot but I haven't played with that. I did a pretty hard stop from 100 a couple days ago, got out, and the rotors were a deep purple . I plan on either cross drilling them or replacing the brakes at some point...that is a known weak point on the WRX.

As far as reliability of the rest of the car on a big road course I can't imagine there would be any problems, but I'm speaking from the experience of a couple friends and not my own... The tires that come on the car stock wouldn't hold up but nobody in their right mind uses crappy all season tires on a big road course. There aren't any other known weakpoints that I can think of...

-Mike
Old 05-08-2003, 03:53 PM
  #35  
SleeperWRX
Track Day
 
SleeperWRX's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

</font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana,Tahoma,Helvetica">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana,Tahoma,Helvetica">Originally posted by adscab911:
<strong>It is interesting though that I am always being challenged at stop lights. I guess our P-cars are the standard by which other brand owners measure themselves.</strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana,Tahoma,Helvetica">To most sport compact owners its not just Porsche's...its any car that's more expensive. We don't have the money for a new carrera or something so we get a cheaper car and make it faster so we can line up with the more expensive car and win. I get special enjoyment when I pull up next to a guy in an S4 and he revs at me then I destroy him, because I know he paid about double for his car. Sure they have leather seats and a great interior but I'm concerned with performance. Of course there is a limit to this way of thinking... My buddy owns an early 90's plymouth laser which is sickly fast, but its a crappy rustbucket and I would never drive one aside from hustling people for money.

The other reason sport compact owners like lining up with owners of expensive cars, and Porsche's in particular, is the snotty and dirty looks we often get from them. That makes beating them so much sweeter. I'm sure none of you are like that but they're out there...and they think because their car says Porsche that they can give you attitude. There's nothing better than pulling up next to a boxster S, having the male driver point and laugh at your car to look hard in front of his girl, and then you both rev up and you crush him so badly the girl starts laughing at him <img border="0" alt="[hiha]" title="" src="graemlins/roflmao.gif" />

peace,
-Mike

edit: I forgot to mention...there is another group of cars that sport compacts love to race...american muscle type cars like mustangs and whatnot. That for a different reason...the technology/forced induction vs. displacement argument.
Old 05-08-2003, 04:13 PM
  #36  
George 911-V8
Pro
 
George 911-V8's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: The Swamp Lands of Louisiana, The Deep Dirty South 2 Miles From Pimp City
Posts: 681
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Who said porsche 911's were fast in the first place? Before I put the small block in my car I was like Fred Flintstone on the hwy. Mike keep up the a$$ busting they hate to lose, good work.

George
Old 05-08-2003, 04:29 PM
  #37  
Carlos
Banned
 
Carlos's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Chattanooga TN
Posts: 1,050
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Somebody needs to search the archives. I remember a post where some purist was describing the proper technique to sneer with disdain at another driver (to avoid an *** whipping). That would certainly seem to fit here. Bottom line, there are lots of cars that will abuse a N/A 911. Not long after I got my 928 I abused a 996. Excuses where numerous, the guy couldnt drive, the car was sick, etc. Maybe all of that was true. Regardless, I wore the guy out 3 times in a straight line & once around a big sweeper.

Mike be careful out there the American car guys know about forced induction & technology too. I know a guy with a streetable Mustang running 8.80's.
Old 05-08-2003, 04:33 PM
  #38  
adsc4s
Addict
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
adsc4s's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: California
Posts: 2,761
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Post

SleeperWRX, I agree with your reasoning. When I was much younger and very financially challenged, I had a Mazda 626 Turbo that was a complete sleeper. I had many successful stop light drag races against more pricey competition.

Now that I am older and supposedly wiser, I do not participate in any stop light drag races.
Old 05-08-2003, 04:34 PM
  #39  
special tool
Banned
 
special tool's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: limbo....
Posts: 8,599
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Post

Oh boy - here we go again.
George, now I have one of the new 6.0 liter modern overhead cam chevys in my pickup - now you and I both know that you couldn't get 630 hp out of a 383 even if you had two of 'em. Now quit foolin around with those silly numbers.

<img border="0" alt="[bigbye]" title="" src="graemlins/xyxwave.gif" /> <img border="0" alt="[burnout]" title="" src="graemlins/burnout.gif" />
Old 05-08-2003, 04:51 PM
  #40  
Carlos
Banned
 
Carlos's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Chattanooga TN
Posts: 1,050
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Hey tool, if 630 bothers you what woulf you say to 1800? Your statement indicates a severe lack of information.
Old 05-08-2003, 05:00 PM
  #41  
special tool
Banned
 
special tool's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: limbo....
Posts: 8,599
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Post

forced only

<img border="0" alt="[bigbye]" title="" src="graemlins/xyxwave.gif" /> <img border="0" alt="[burnout]" title="" src="graemlins/burnout.gif" />
Old 05-08-2003, 05:26 PM
  #42  
nut11
Intermediate
 
nut11's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Albany, NY
Posts: 38
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Great thread. Gives Pelican a run for its money. Enjoy both, though.

85' Carrera Coupe 3.2
Old 05-08-2003, 05:46 PM
  #43  
GTR 993
Burning Brakes
 
GTR 993's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 857
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

SleeprWRX there is a flipside to pulling up next to a car you think is stock and grinning with a smile like you just won the lottery. Especially the American Muscle Cars. <img border="0" title="" alt="[Eek!]" src="eek.gif" />

Every so often I would get a kid in an Import , WRX,Civic, Integra,Supra or whatever where he thought he was extremely modded. And in my past 98 C5 with a 383 stroker,LS6 Intake, Borla Exhaust / B&B headers ,80mm TB, 100 shot,Hypertech Programmed and tuned "right" 6 speed and the list goes on and on. He became a very tiny image in my rear view mirror. <img border="0" alt="[burnout]" title="" src="graemlins/burnout.gif" />

Don't assume everyone you pull up next to is stock. <img border="0" alt="[nono]" title="" src="graemlins/nono.gif" /> There are plenty of Supercharged 993's and TT's I think you would be hard pressed to beat. My next step is SC. The good thing is my days of racing stoplight to stoplight are over. Like I said before WRX is a great car but I realize someone is always faster.

BTW some of the smart cocky looks from Porsche Drivers or whatever a lot of times it isn't the car that gives them that attitude it's the kid in the buzzing Honda etc. that continually revs next to him at lights. That can get old real fast.
<img border="0" alt="[icon107]" title="" src="graemlins/icon107.gif" />
Old 05-08-2003, 06:39 PM
  #44  
86NOH2O
Instructor
 
86NOH2O's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Carmel Valley CA
Posts: 249
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Post

I only go 0-60 in + or - six seconds. But when I get to the nice resorts or restaurants in my area they park my car right out front. Always. So even if I get beat by a WRX or some other newer, faster car, I'll still get to the bar first cause the other driver has to walk from the parking lot.

All in fun, I actually like the WRX.
Old 05-08-2003, 07:16 PM
  #45  
Fahrvergnuugen
Instructor
Thread Starter
 
Fahrvergnuugen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Galway NY
Posts: 141
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Post

I only have one thing to say in my defense. chicks dig my car


Quick Reply: WRX's are fast [my 3.2 82 911 vs 2002 WRX]



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 07:08 PM.