GT4 RS Driving Impressions
#1111
Every time somebody struggles with that roof, they laugh. Every time somebody gets rained on, they laugh. Every time somebody leaves the car at home because they're concerned that it might rain, they ... make a long face and deliver a solemn lecture about how "Our cars are meant to be driven." Then they crack up and laugh some more.
#1112
Rennlist Member
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Mid-Atlantic (on land, not in the middle of the ocean)
Posts: 13,059
Received 4,366 Likes
on
2,485 Posts
In the main SRS thread, someone made a point along the lines that having to deal with the top can make one bond with the car more and savor the driving experience more. Sort of like how a car which is more challenging to drive can be more rewarding to drive. For me, I'm just too lazy and impatient to deal with the top.
#1113
Three Wheelin'
In the main SRS thread, someone made a point along the lines that having to deal with the top can make one bond with the car more and savor the driving experience more. Sort of like how a car which is more challenging to drive can be more rewarding to drive. For me, I'm just too lazy and impatient to deal with the top.
#1114
RL Community Team
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
I’ll say it again, top best feature.
No additional time than regular Spyder, without weather protector.
No additional time than regular Spyder, without weather protector.
#1115
Who said the top ruins anything? I just did a search for "ruin" and nothing came up about the top. 🤔
#1116
Rennlist Member
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Mid-Atlantic (on land, not in the middle of the ocean)
Posts: 13,059
Received 4,366 Likes
on
2,485 Posts
Not that you couldn't deal with the roof, you just don't want to, which is fine. But you don't strike me as someone who would knock someone who are ok with dealing with the top and recognize they have a really great car. I just find it comical when there are comments about the car being ruined because of the top. If that's all it takes to ruin a car I don't know how these folks find any car they like to drive/own.
Discussions in car forums are as much about comparing our subjective perceptions, expectations, experience, preferences, etc. as they are about objective characteristics of the cars, but the two categories are frequently mixed up. "The car is too loud" is NOT the same thing as "the sound level measures X dB at this location when the car is at redline"; we can't disagree about the latter, but we can disagree about the former and there's no right or wrong about it.
Last edited by Manifold; 05-18-2024 at 03:27 PM.
#1117
RL Community Team
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
Question for those with a 4RS and other cars: What do you think is a perfect pairing to take the other garage spot if you already have a 4RS? I'm selling my Ferrari 458 tomorrow and now have an open garage spot to pair with my 4RS. I was thinking of a manual 991.2 GT3 but many friends have commented how the GT3 feels "soft" compared to the 4RS and I may not enjoy that with the RS. There's also the 991.2 GT3RS but it seems very redundant with two PDK cars and the same engine.
#1118
Three Wheelin'
#1119
The problem I have with the top is that they know how to build an automatic top for Boxster-derived cars that is basically perfect. It looks just fine, it has proven reliable over 10+ years (a few glitchy microswitches notwithstanding), and it weighs inconsequentially more than the manual top. Yet to get the best engine and the best chassis tuning, you are required to get the worst top.
Disagree? Imagine if the configurator offered both tops as options. How many people would check the manual top option to save 10 pounds or whatever?
OK, now fast forward 10 years. What is the average odometer reading on those cars versus the ones that got the automatic tops?
Which cars actually got driven, as opposed to parked at Cars & Coffee?
You don't have to condemn the whole car, or rant about how it is "ruined," in order to criticize the triumph of marketing over engineering, of fashion over substance, of form over function.
Disagree? Imagine if the configurator offered both tops as options. How many people would check the manual top option to save 10 pounds or whatever?
OK, now fast forward 10 years. What is the average odometer reading on those cars versus the ones that got the automatic tops?
Which cars actually got driven, as opposed to parked at Cars & Coffee?
You don't have to condemn the whole car, or rant about how it is "ruined," in order to criticize the triumph of marketing over engineering, of fashion over substance, of form over function.
#1120
The problem I have with the top is that they know how to build an automatic top for Boxster-derived cars that is basically perfect. It looks just fine, it has proven reliable over 10+ years (a few glitchy microswitches notwithstanding), and it weighs inconsequentially more than the manual top. Yet to get the best engine and the best chassis tuning, you are required to get the worst top.
Disagree? Imagine if the configurator offered both tops as options. How many people would check the manual top option to save 10 pounds or whatever?
OK, now fast forward 10 years. What is the average odometer reading on those cars versus the ones that got the automatic tops?
Which cars actually got driven, as opposed to parked at Cars & Coffee?
You don't have to condemn the whole car, or rant about how it is "ruined," in order to criticize the triumph of marketing over engineering, of fashion over substance, of form over function.
Disagree? Imagine if the configurator offered both tops as options. How many people would check the manual top option to save 10 pounds or whatever?
OK, now fast forward 10 years. What is the average odometer reading on those cars versus the ones that got the automatic tops?
Which cars actually got driven, as opposed to parked at Cars & Coffee?
You don't have to condemn the whole car, or rant about how it is "ruined," in order to criticize the triumph of marketing over engineering, of fashion over substance, of form over function.
#1122
Three Wheelin'
The problem I have with the top is that they know how to build an automatic top for Boxster-derived cars that is basically perfect. It looks just fine, it has proven reliable over 10+ years (a few glitchy microswitches notwithstanding), and it weighs inconsequentially more than the manual top. Yet to get the best engine and the best chassis tuning, you are required to get the worst top.
Disagree? Imagine if the configurator offered both tops as options. How many people would check the manual top option to save 10 pounds or whatever?
OK, now fast forward 10 years. What is the average odometer reading on those cars versus the ones that got the automatic tops?
Which cars actually got driven, as opposed to parked at Cars & Coffee?
You don't have to condemn the whole car, or rant about how it is "ruined," in order to criticize the triumph of marketing over engineering, of fashion over substance, of form over function.
Disagree? Imagine if the configurator offered both tops as options. How many people would check the manual top option to save 10 pounds or whatever?
OK, now fast forward 10 years. What is the average odometer reading on those cars versus the ones that got the automatic tops?
Which cars actually got driven, as opposed to parked at Cars & Coffee?
You don't have to condemn the whole car, or rant about how it is "ruined," in order to criticize the triumph of marketing over engineering, of fashion over substance, of form over function.
The following users liked this post:
TXshaggy (05-18-2024)
The following 2 users liked this post by manouk:
TOporschefan (05-18-2024),
TXshaggy (05-18-2024)
#1124
Rennlist Member
The problem I have with the top is that they know how to build an automatic top for Boxster-derived cars that is basically perfect. It looks just fine, it has proven reliable over 10+ years (a few glitchy microswitches notwithstanding), and it weighs inconsequentially more than the manual top. Yet to get the best engine and the best chassis tuning, you are required to get the worst top.
Disagree? Imagine if the configurator offered both tops as options. How many people would check the manual top option to save 10 pounds or whatever?
OK, now fast forward 10 years. What is the average odometer reading on those cars versus the ones that got the automatic tops?
Which cars actually got driven, as opposed to parked at Cars & Coffee?
You don't have to condemn the whole car, or rant about how it is "ruined," in order to criticize the triumph of marketing over engineering, of fashion over substance, of form over function.
Disagree? Imagine if the configurator offered both tops as options. How many people would check the manual top option to save 10 pounds or whatever?
OK, now fast forward 10 years. What is the average odometer reading on those cars versus the ones that got the automatic tops?
Which cars actually got driven, as opposed to parked at Cars & Coffee?
You don't have to condemn the whole car, or rant about how it is "ruined," in order to criticize the triumph of marketing over engineering, of fashion over substance, of form over function.
1- Blind spot visibility. I never felt completely safe driving in heavy freeway traffic with the Boxster top up. The Spyder Bimini top provides weather protection for non winter/hurricaine drives without limiting visibility.
1b- I’ve had similar experiences in other ragtop two seat roadsters. Blind spot visibility is terrible with the roof up.
2- A Bimini top gives you many more chances/ways to enjoy a convertible car by providing shelter from the sun and light-moderate rain, but you can still take in all the sights, sounds, and smells of the experience.
3- It saves real weight. If you live in a reliable climate, then driving a Spyder RS (with the top left at home) saves you 55lbs compared to the powered top in a Boxster.
I have several friends who spent many thousands to just drop 15 lbs from their porsche. Here the Spyder RS drops triple that weight while improving visibility/safety, and driving dynamics.
4- the Spyder RS is damn sexy, 10x sexier than a regular Boxster. I choose sexy over convenience when driving a 2 seat roadster.
Also from a practical standpoint, there truly isn’t space for a powered top with the 4.0L GT3 engine, and the beautiful double bubble tonneau cover.
Last edited by Drifting; 05-18-2024 at 10:51 PM.
The following 2 users liked this post by Drifting:
Mike981S (06-04-2024),
TOporschefan (05-18-2024)
#1125
Rennlist Member
It’s amazing how little people think before they start whining.
Not only do the gt3 engine intakes take up more space, but the motorized boxster roofs have a huge cutout behind the seat where the top stows. Are you going to sacrifice the absolutely sublime spyder humps so the top can plop down and stow behind you?
Or maybe you want a full on targa / MC-20 setup?
If this top is a non-starter for you, then relax; they didn’t build this for you.
Not only do the gt3 engine intakes take up more space, but the motorized boxster roofs have a huge cutout behind the seat where the top stows. Are you going to sacrifice the absolutely sublime spyder humps so the top can plop down and stow behind you?
Or maybe you want a full on targa / MC-20 setup?
If this top is a non-starter for you, then relax; they didn’t build this for you.
Last edited by Adrift; 05-18-2024 at 10:46 PM.
The following users liked this post:
Drifting (05-18-2024)