Notices
718 GTS 4.0/GT4/GT4RS/Spyder/25th Anniversary Discussions about the 718 version of the GT4RS, GTS 4.0, GT4, Spyder and 25th Anniversary Boxster
Sponsored By:
Sponsored By: Cobb

Cobb Tuning Accessport for 718 (982) 4.0L NA Engines

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-27-2022, 09:27 PM
  #16  
BGB Motorsports
Basic Sponsor
Rennlist
Site Sponsor

Thread Starter
 
BGB Motorsports's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Ormond Beach, FL
Posts: 2,787
Received 608 Likes on 271 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by wistful
how come the cobb redline is lower than the stock?
The redline is the same. I think i may have lifted off a smidge early on that run because i was looking down at the odometer on my customer's car that said 2500 miles and i may have experienced a moment of weakness knowing the stress i was putting on her!

Originally Posted by Trj
So since there are no numbers, how does this compare with the other tunes you have tested?
The tune is much like the exhaust; lots of people will tell you they have the missing chunks that others don't but these guys are all good and they're all going to squeeze out every drop there is.

Originally Posted by Holdens
Curious about comparisons as well


assume most tunes are pretty close to same?

what makes on any different than another? The amount they push the “enevelope”?
See note above. A good example is how a few years back we had a tuner that had a file that made a lot of power...for a few minutes. Most of these folks jack up a bunch of IGN timing which makes power until things get hot quickly and if you don't have decent gas, you can't even use the power. It makes good power for 3 pulls and then for the next 3 it makes crap. If they're good, the car will make the same number on the dyno over and over and over again and this is what i have seen from the two i have tested. At the end of the day, the hardware and the software should dictate your decision.

Originally Posted by nothingman
What a tease!
I swear i am not trying to be! I'm just like this with all of the guys...let's just take it slow through Memorial Day!

Originally Posted by 85Gold
Need the 3rd trace that says John waved his hand over it.

Peter
They will not let me have the keys to the kingdom just yet!

Originally Posted by 0-Day
I understand that Cobb does not want measured HP and torque numbers. But these graphs are meaningless without the scale.

Can you please provide the HP and torque gains as percentages instead? Maybe what is the max gain and the min gain on each curve as a percentage gain?
I wouldn't say they're "meaningless." It tells a story. Just because you don't have scaling on the side and don't have numbers, you have a pencil and a ruler. If you assumed that the car made 350rwhp, 375whp, 400rwhp, you could divide up the blocks and make a guestimate as to how much it makes.

Originally Posted by 0-Day
Also, why is the fuel cut at 7800 rpm and not at least 8000rpm like a stock GT4? Is this just a feature of the baseline Cobb 4.0 tune?
I think i did that by lifting off a tick early. And since i did it on the Cobb run, it doesnt look like i'm sandbagging since it would be helping to run it higher!

Originally Posted by sinking
Looks like about 35 HP gain around 7500 RPM which is pretty decent.
Can you do me a favor please? Can you show that person two posts up how you did your homework? lol..

Originally Posted by c1pher
I think they gave him a GTS tune to play with.
I think that this file started life as a hot rod GTS file. I am sure i have this wrong but if GT4=Spyder and Cayman GTS 4.0L > Boxster GTS 4.0L, then the Boxster GTS 4.0L owner is going to see the biggest gain since they're driving around on a modified GT4 file unlocked for their torque limited Boxster 4.0L GTS. With exhaust mods of the headers and OPFs that person could conceivably see 60rwhp gains from exhaust and a flash.
__________________
BGB Motorsports Group
The following 3 users liked this post by BGB Motorsports:
JCviggen (05-29-2022), N3RVOUSGT4 (05-27-2022), TXshaggy (10-04-2022)
Old 05-27-2022, 10:39 PM
  #17  
c1pher
Rennlist Member
 
c1pher's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2020
Posts: 1,591
Received 809 Likes on 463 Posts
Default

I’m pretty sure CGTS=BGTS in the power department, just like GT4 and Spyder are equal.
Old 05-27-2022, 11:44 PM
  #18  
N3RVOUSGT4
Rennlist Member
 
N3RVOUSGT4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2021
Posts: 30
Received 15 Likes on 9 Posts
Default

Hey John,

​You mentioned headers. What are your thoughts on the CG catless headers? I sent you a PM a while ago asking your opinion on them, but haven't heard back yet. Thanks!
Old 05-28-2022, 08:26 AM
  #19  
VVG
Rennlist Member
 
VVG's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 1,448
Received 1,126 Likes on 555 Posts
Default

The numbers are relatively easy to approximate since there is a graph underlying the plots.

Peak hp occurs at about 7500-8000 rpm and the gain is 8/7.5

Peak torque occurs at about 5500 rpm and the gain is 6.25/5.75

This translates to 440hp and 335lb-ft, assuming stock figures of 414hp and 309lb-ft.

Last edited by VVG; 05-28-2022 at 10:17 AM.
Old 05-28-2022, 10:44 AM
  #20  
DC021
Rennlist Member
 
DC021's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2020
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 428
Likes: 0
Received 275 Likes on 135 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by VVG
The numbers are relatively easy to approximate since there is a graph underlying the plots.

Peak hp occurs at about 7500-8000 rpm and the gain is 8/7.5

Peak torque occurs at about 5500 rpm and the gain is 6.25/5.75

This translates to 440hp and 335lb-ft, assuming stock figures of 414hp and 309lb-ft.
I printed off the Dyno sheet and broke out a pair of calipers. Arrived at similar gains.
The following users liked this post:
Alpha Ice (05-28-2022)
Old 05-28-2022, 12:47 PM
  #21  
cooler2442
Rennlist Member
 
cooler2442's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 2,485
Received 1,584 Likes on 842 Posts
Default

Is there a bigger benefit if you delete the OAP's but then run 91? Sadly in CA so no 93 here.
Old 05-30-2022, 01:08 PM
  #22  
c1pher
Rennlist Member
 
c1pher's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2020
Posts: 1,591
Received 809 Likes on 463 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by cooler2442
Is there a bigger benefit if you delete the OAP's but then run 91? Sadly in CA so no 93 here.
I wonder if you lose a little torque by removing them, less back pressure.
The following users liked this post:
Larry Cable (07-27-2022)
Old 06-01-2022, 01:18 PM
  #23  
BGB Motorsports
Basic Sponsor
Rennlist
Site Sponsor

Thread Starter
 
BGB Motorsports's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Ormond Beach, FL
Posts: 2,787
Received 608 Likes on 271 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by N3RVOUSGT4
Hey John,

​You mentioned headers. What are your thoughts on the CG catless headers? I sent you a PM a while ago asking your opinion on them, but haven't heard back yet. Thanks!
You know me...I'm Cargraphic til i die. They're not as expensive as some of the other offerings but that's probably because people are charging more for the same thing based on over inflated numbers! If you call AJ at the shop we can get you some coming!
The following users liked this post:
N3RVOUSGT4 (06-01-2022)
Old 06-01-2022, 01:22 PM
  #24  
BGB Motorsports
Basic Sponsor
Rennlist
Site Sponsor

Thread Starter
 
BGB Motorsports's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Ormond Beach, FL
Posts: 2,787
Received 608 Likes on 271 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by cooler2442
Is there a bigger benefit if you delete the OAP's but then run 91? Sadly in CA so no 93 here.
I think it's the other way around. I could be wrong because this is total conjecture but the OAP's being further downstream make it secondary as far as a blockage. The primary catalytic is right in the manifold and that's the primary restriction. The OAP delete is going to reduce the exhaust gas temp which will allow a car stuck running 91 octane to breathe better. It will be an improvement for sure.

Originally Posted by c1pher
I wonder if you lose a little torque by removing them, less back pressure.
When we dumped the OAPs we saw a difference up top mostly because it let out the hot exhaust gas and allowed the engine to make more power. It's going to be a gain for sure.
Old 06-02-2022, 11:40 AM
  #25  
85Gold
Rennlist Member
 
85Gold's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: 92 miles from Sebring
Posts: 5,091
Received 814 Likes on 467 Posts
Default

Damn it John you now have me looking at GT4's.

Peter
Old 06-02-2022, 12:18 PM
  #26  
jwr9152
Burning Brakes
 
jwr9152's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Posts: 864
Received 353 Likes on 228 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 85Gold
Damn it John you now have me looking at GT4's.

Peter
now you've been enabled by two John's. Do it.
Old 06-10-2022, 02:59 PM
  #27  
2PUTT
Rennlist Member
 
2PUTT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2021
Posts: 459
Received 408 Likes on 190 Posts
Default

Whatever happened to this? I thought Cobb was going to launch this tune for the 718 GT4? Have the numbers and cost been posted?
Old 06-10-2022, 04:08 PM
  #28  
85Gold
Rennlist Member
 
85Gold's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: 92 miles from Sebring
Posts: 5,091
Received 814 Likes on 467 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 2PUTT
Whatever happened to this? I thought Cobb was going to launch this tune for the 718 GT4? Have the numbers and cost been posted?
Cobb is infamous for talking up new products and then taking forever to get them out. Classic case of over promise and under deliver. I guarantee BGB is just as frustrated as you are.

Peter
Old 06-10-2022, 04:25 PM
  #29  
N3RVOUSGT4
Rennlist Member
 
N3RVOUSGT4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2021
Posts: 30
Received 15 Likes on 9 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 85Gold
Cobb is infamous for talking up new products and then taking forever to get them out. Classic case of over promise and under deliver. I guarantee BGB is just as frustrated as you are.

Peter
Cobb has been very open and communicative regarding the development of the access port for the 718 4.0, as seen in this thread: https://rennlist.com/forums/718-gts-...-0-tuning.html

Looks like they're waiting for EPA approval, so it is out of their hands at this point. We all know how slowly government agencies move...
Old 07-27-2022, 12:47 PM
  #30  
TXshaggy
RL Community Team
Rennlist Member
 
TXshaggy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2018
Location: Texas Hill Country
Posts: 5,955
Received 3,864 Likes on 2,181 Posts
Default

Bump


Quick Reply: Cobb Tuning Accessport for 718 (982) 4.0L NA Engines



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 12:50 AM.