Notices
718 GTS 4.0/GT4/GT4RS/Spyder/25th Anniversary Discussions about the 718 version of the GT4RS, GTS 4.0, GT4, Spyder and 25th Anniversary Boxster
Sponsored By:
Sponsored By: Cobb

The 718 Spyder RS Discussion Thread

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-07-2022, 07:06 PM
  #1561  
Adrift
Rennlist Member
 
Adrift's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: North of Dallas
Posts: 3,805
Received 2,489 Likes on 1,277 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Westcoast
With all of these part shortages it makes one wonder about letting go of their "perfectly spec'd" Spyder to perhaps have to make all sorts of concessions going forward.

Everything I have on my current Spyder I would (at a minimum) want on a Spyder RS, including PCCB and PDLS+ lights!
Been thinking the same thing. I would hate to be under all these parts limitations, and not know what ones were still looming. More and more, I feel lucky to have "just" been a part of the original delay situation, gotten a fully as-spec'd spyder, and to not be part of this misc-parts-disappearing-from-builds current situation.

But if the SRS follows the same schedule as the 4RS, and announces in Nov, didn't US allocations only start appearing in like March or something? A lot can change by then.

If only we would actually have the chance to worry about these problems in reality. lol I better work a lot of OT before then, just in case I get a sniff of a $100k+ ADM car. Reality? The front end'll be mangled like the 4RS, it'll be PDK only, it'll have a removable roof, I'll never even get a whiff of a chance at one, and they won't go for less than $350k-$400k in the resale market (my prediction). It's just you and me, my beautiful python green baby. (I should get her back with a new dash, and newly mounted Soul OAPs, early this week.)

Last edited by Adrift; 08-07-2022 at 07:09 PM.
The following 2 users liked this post by Adrift:
ausgang (08-07-2022), TheBeav (08-10-2022)
Old 08-07-2022, 09:35 PM
  #1562  
jmartpr
Rennlist Member
 
jmartpr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Posts: 4,755
Received 1,474 Likes on 918 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Prime
modern JIT makes it the responsibility of suppliers to hold stock on your behalf. The supply chain has visibility of supplier inventory and raises further PO’s as stock is diminished and further demand forecasts are generated.
The supplier replenishing stock and Porsche replenishing their own stock really makes little difference. The suppliers are contractually required to hold X amount of months of stock on hand. Even if you are not running a JIT supply chain, you would have like max 1 -2 months of stock which you would deplete quickly and same result.

Modern JIT at the level PAG deals works on a full forecast model and no one is keeping any significant stock.
With COVID things got even worst......production was stopped or delayed, lack of workforce across the whole supply chain, high demand, etc - a disaster for JIT...so they had a lot of catch up to do and probably none wanted to overestimate production (or couldn't).
Just look at what's happening right now, lots of industries went on a PO rampage in the last 2 years to compensate shortages and now they are facing a huge excess inventory as sales (economy) are taking a dive.
The issue I have is that most suppliers are used to working on forecast, which is Ok, but with all the problems since COVID they have extended the lead-times so far into the future that you have to assume a lot of risks (ask me how I know!).
Porsche, being Porsche and the most profitable Auto manufacturer, probably decided to play it on the safe side, even knowing the high-demand for their cars.
Old 08-10-2022, 08:24 AM
  #1563  
Rennolazine
Rennlist Member
 
Rennolazine's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Chitown, USA
Posts: 3,039
Received 758 Likes on 448 Posts
Default


The following 7 users liked this post by Rennolazine:
Dan Nagy (08-10-2022), geistspyder (08-10-2022), IRM (08-10-2022), JAhmed (08-10-2022), Jonathan19 (08-10-2022), josephr25 (08-10-2022), n4v4nod (08-10-2022) and 2 others liked this post. (Show less...)
Old 08-10-2022, 08:41 AM
  #1564  
Jonathan19
Instructor
 
Jonathan19's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2022
Location: France
Posts: 117
Received 116 Likes on 50 Posts
Default

https://www.motor1.com/news/603507/p...eissach-spied/
The following 2 users liked this post by Jonathan19:
Dan Nagy (08-10-2022), n4v4nod (08-10-2022)
Old 08-10-2022, 08:42 AM
  #1565  
Jonathan19
Instructor
 
Jonathan19's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2022
Location: France
Posts: 117
Received 116 Likes on 50 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Rennolazine
I just can't wait to see this!
Old 08-10-2022, 11:45 AM
  #1566  
Adrift
Rennlist Member
 
Adrift's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: North of Dallas
Posts: 3,805
Received 2,489 Likes on 1,277 Posts
Default

Is that the standard clamshell rear? It doesn't sit higher right behind the passenger compartment, due to the airbox being there? I am not saying it is or isn't, just asking if people think it looks different. Looks the same to me. I think. lol

Would I get the WP, if I had a chance to get this car? It seems like such a huge price tag for what ends up being badging (weight savings being so minimal for the cost). Do non-WP RS cars suffer in resale for lack of WP? (Obviously I mean by more than just the cost of the package itself)


Last edited by Adrift; 08-10-2022 at 11:48 AM.
The following users liked this post:
Hwy (08-10-2022)
Old 08-10-2022, 12:14 PM
  #1567  
unclemat
Pro
 
unclemat's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2016
Posts: 639
Received 371 Likes on 211 Posts
Default

These scoops frankly look utterly terrible.
The following users liked this post:
worf928 (08-10-2022)
Old 08-10-2022, 12:19 PM
  #1568  
JAhmed
Rennlist Member
 
JAhmed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: CHICAGOLAND!!!
Posts: 2,773
Received 1,872 Likes on 783 Posts
Default

Scoops look pretty finished...

I do like the little release hoops on each side
The following users liked this post:
n4v4nod (08-10-2022)
Old 08-10-2022, 12:23 PM
  #1569  
TXshaggy
RL Community Team
Rennlist Member
 
TXshaggy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2018
Location: Texas Hill Country
Posts: 5,719
Received 3,634 Likes on 2,067 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by JAhmed
Scoops look pretty finished...

I do like the little release hoops on each side
God I hope not…they look like hell.

Huge cowbell for that little cross hatched intake?

I think it’s all fake; hope for a nearly flush NACA duct.




The following users liked this post:
Dan Nagy (08-10-2022)
Old 08-10-2022, 12:28 PM
  #1570  
Adrift
Rennlist Member
 
Adrift's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: North of Dallas
Posts: 3,805
Received 2,489 Likes on 1,277 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by TXshaggy
God I hope not…they look like hell.

Huge cowbell for that little cross hatched intake?

I think it’s all fake; hope for a nearly flush NACA duct.
+1
Old 08-10-2022, 12:30 PM
  #1571  
Westcoast
RL Community Team
Rennlist Member
 
Westcoast's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2019
Location: Victoria, BC, Canada
Posts: 9,131
Received 4,647 Likes on 2,708 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Adrift
Is that the standard clamshell rear? It doesn't sit higher right behind the passenger compartment, due to the airbox being there? I am not saying it is or isn't, just asking if people think it looks different. Looks the same to me. I think. lol

Would I get the WP, if I had a chance to get this car? It seems like such a huge price tag for what ends up being badging (weight savings being so minimal for the cost). Do non-WP RS cars suffer in resale for lack of WP? (Obviously I mean by more than just the cost of the package itself)
Look normal height to me.


Old 08-10-2022, 12:32 PM
  #1572  
Westcoast
RL Community Team
Rennlist Member
 
Westcoast's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2019
Location: Victoria, BC, Canada
Posts: 9,131
Received 4,647 Likes on 2,708 Posts
Default

So are these additional attachment points for the infamous 987-type bikini top?



Old 08-10-2022, 12:50 PM
  #1573  
JAhmed
Rennlist Member
 
JAhmed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: CHICAGOLAND!!!
Posts: 2,773
Received 1,872 Likes on 783 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by TXshaggy
God I hope not…they look like hell.

Huge cowbell for that little cross hatched intake?

I think it’s all fake; hope for a nearly flush NACA duct.
Maybe WP will be scoop and non WP will be flush NACA?
Old 08-10-2022, 12:51 PM
  #1574  
chapmans
Rennlist Member
 
chapmans's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: WA
Posts: 413
Received 234 Likes on 117 Posts
Default

Seems to me scoop would be for all versions due to location of the roof attachment.
The following users liked this post:
n4v4nod (08-10-2022)
Old 08-10-2022, 12:53 PM
  #1575  
JAhmed
Rennlist Member
 
JAhmed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: CHICAGOLAND!!!
Posts: 2,773
Received 1,872 Likes on 783 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by chapmans
Seems to me scoop would be for all versions due to location of the roof attachment.
They might have a flush version of the mount underneath? Either way that entire assembly is integrated into the area where it says "spyder" on a normal one.


Quick Reply: The 718 Spyder RS Discussion Thread



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 07:27 PM.