Notices
Taycan 2019-Current The Electric Porsche
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

I may have been wrong about the Taycan

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-11-2021 | 04:27 PM
  #151  
kort677's Avatar
kort677
RL Community Team
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Feb 2021
Posts: 594
Likes: 259
Default

Originally Posted by rodsky
Today - I woke up and decided to go on a spontaneous 2,000 mile road trip - the first time in my whole life I was going to do such a thing. but as I was about to get in the car, I spontaneously decided it wasn't a good idea as I hadn't told my wife or my kids or the office or my doctor, so I spontaneously went to Starbucks instead and came home with a Latte before she woke up. I was just thinking that if I had my Taycan - I wouldnt have been able to do the trip very conveniently anyways. Phew - close call - All's well that ends well. Just had to share.
what inconveniences are you referring to? stopping every couple of hours for less than 30 minutes to charge? planning your route?
Old 11-11-2021 | 06:01 PM
  #152  
flygdchman's Avatar
flygdchman
Instructor
 
Joined: Feb 2021
Posts: 239
Likes: 62
Default

I think that there was a little tongue in cheek regarding the notion of spontaneous 2000 mile trips.

My comment is, this would be a good reason to have a carbon tax. If people had to pay for the carbon differential of an ICE vs a BEV then they might feel like they were getting something for the time spent charging.
Old 11-11-2021 | 09:37 PM
  #153  
DNSGT3's Avatar
DNSGT3
Racer
 
Joined: Oct 2016
Posts: 276
Likes: 117
From: Toronto
Default

Originally Posted by flygdchman
I think that there was a little tongue in cheek regarding the notion of spontaneous 2000 mile trips.

My comment is, this would be a good reason to have a carbon tax. If people had to pay for the carbon differential of an ICE vs a BEV then they might feel like they were getting something for the time spent charging.
LMAO
EV credit isn’t enough for you?
Leave us alone.
Old 11-12-2021 | 12:14 AM
  #154  
Whoopsy's Avatar
Whoopsy
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 2,963
Likes: 1,274
From: Vancouver, BC
Default

Originally Posted by flygdchman
I think that there was a little tongue in cheek regarding the notion of spontaneous 2000 mile trips.

My comment is, this would be a good reason to have a carbon tax. If people had to pay for the carbon differential of an ICE vs a BEV then they might feel like they were getting something for the time spent charging.
That is a great idea. Calculate all the carbon emission from beginning to the end however. First pay the carbon tax when new for the carbon emission during the build process, from mining raw material all the way to how much carbon is emitted at the factory. Then a yearly carbon tax on yearly emissions, for gasoline car, that's the localized emission, for EVs, that's from the power plant supplying the electricity. If the electricity is from a wind farm or solar, then no tax, but if it's from a coal plant or natural gas plant, then there is a tax.


The following users liked this post:
flygdchman (11-12-2021)
Old 11-12-2021 | 11:16 AM
  #155  
flygdchman's Avatar
flygdchman
Instructor
 
Joined: Feb 2021
Posts: 239
Likes: 62
Default

Originally Posted by DNSGT3
LMAO
EV credit isn’t enough for you?
Leave us alone.
An EV credit doesn't clean the atmosphere from C02 emissions. Leave you alone to do what?

Last edited by flygdchman; 11-12-2021 at 11:17 AM.
Old 11-12-2021 | 11:18 AM
  #156  
flygdchman's Avatar
flygdchman
Instructor
 
Joined: Feb 2021
Posts: 239
Likes: 62
Default

Originally Posted by Whoopsy
That is a great idea. Calculate all the carbon emission from beginning to the end however. First pay the carbon tax when new for the carbon emission during the build process, from mining raw material all the way to how much carbon is emitted at the factory. Then a yearly carbon tax on yearly emissions, for gasoline car, that's the localized emission, for EVs, that's from the power plant supplying the electricity. If the electricity is from a wind farm or solar, then no tax, but if it's from a coal plant or natural gas plant, then there is a tax.
Total agreement. Math is math.
Old 11-12-2021 | 02:36 PM
  #157  
rodsky's Avatar
rodsky
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 4,040
Likes: 881
From: West Los Angeles & Truckee, CA
Default

Originally Posted by kort677
what inconveniences are you referring to? stopping every couple of hours for less than 30 minutes to charge? planning your route?
It was tongue in cheek
Old 11-12-2021 | 07:44 PM
  #158  
DNSGT3's Avatar
DNSGT3
Racer
 
Joined: Oct 2016
Posts: 276
Likes: 117
From: Toronto
Default

Originally Posted by flygdchman
An EV credit doesn't clean the atmosphere from C02 emissions. Leave you alone to do what?
Give me a break. I was joking.
Are you really that naive to believe battery is good for the environment? don’t get me started.
Old 11-14-2021 | 01:31 PM
  #159  
flygdchman's Avatar
flygdchman
Instructor
 
Joined: Feb 2021
Posts: 239
Likes: 62
Default

Originally Posted by DNSGT3
Give me a break. I was joking.
Are you really that naive to believe battery is good for the environment? don’t get me started.
I agree we should pay the true costs for each technology. In addition the the carbon removal tax we can add a battery material remediation fee.

Last edited by flygdchman; 11-14-2021 at 01:34 PM.
Old 11-14-2021 | 04:21 PM
  #160  
whiz944's Avatar
whiz944
Burning Brakes
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,027
Likes: 427
From: Northern California
Default

Originally Posted by flygdchman
I agree we should pay the true costs for each technology. In addition the the carbon removal tax we can add a battery material remediation fee.
Batteries can be recycled. Not as easy as recovering lead from the lead-acid batteries we are all used to. But the metals like nickel and cobalt are simply too valuable to throw in a landfill. Elon calls them "high grade ore". (See J.B. Straubels Redwood Materials for an example of a company that is doing it now.)
The following users liked this post:
flygdchman (11-14-2021)
Old 11-14-2021 | 06:19 PM
  #161  
daveo4porsche's Avatar
daveo4porsche
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 5,656
Likes: 4,006
From: Santa Cruz, CA
Default

Originally Posted by DNSGT3
Give me a break. I was joking.
Are you really that naive to believe battery is good for the environment? don’t get me started.
shall we detail the impact of extracting, transporting, refining, distributing, pumping, consuming fossil fuels? That isn't exactly a light tough either…and batteries are a one and done affair once manufactures and reusable/and recycled at end of life…fossils fuels are a continuous and ongoing impact…

there is no free lunch here - but let's not assume batteries are actually worse than deep sea oil extraction or other heavy handed extraction techniques…
The following 3 users liked this post by daveo4porsche:
Drifting (04-11-2022), flygdchman (11-14-2021), Zcd1 (11-14-2021)
Old 11-14-2021 | 08:25 PM
  #162  
flygdchman's Avatar
flygdchman
Instructor
 
Joined: Feb 2021
Posts: 239
Likes: 62
Default

Originally Posted by whiz944
Batteries can be recycled. Not as easy as recovering lead from the lead-acid batteries we are all used to. But the metals like nickel and cobalt are simply too valuable to throw in a landfill. Elon calls them "high grade ore". (See J.B. Straubels Redwood Materials for an example of a company that is doing it now.)
Good point.
The following users liked this post:
gnop1950 (11-14-2021)
Old 11-14-2021 | 08:40 PM
  #163  
gnop1950's Avatar
gnop1950
Advanced
 
Joined: Nov 2021
Posts: 68
Likes: 43
Default

Plus Porsche seems to be setting up processes to reuse/recycle batteries in addition to individual cells being replaceable. All in all my take is it is at least better than using fossil fuels. I'm also assuming that battery improvements will be pretty much constant, both efficiency and recycling, as EVs become the norm.
The following 2 users liked this post by gnop1950:
Der-Schwabe (11-15-2021), flygdchman (11-14-2021)



Quick Reply: I may have been wrong about the Taycan



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 09:40 AM.