Notices
Spec Boxsters For info sharing on this exciting new class

Calling all SpecBoxers...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-26-2012 | 07:07 PM
  #241  
eric523's Avatar
eric523
Pro
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 651
Likes: 5
Default

Originally Posted by onefastviking
Personally, I agree with you Eric, but I'm picking my battles carefully, the current rules are stock ECU.
Your point of who knows what is in the ECU is valid, but that CAN be checked, and also that really wasn't the purpose of you changing your ECU to begin with.

Truth is that those that want to cheat via an ECU will do it thru the ECU or externally, the rules really don't matter. Better to spec the gas, and plugs, do the ECU also if you must, then test the gas and check the plugs. If you don't have proper fuel, timing, and spark an ECU won't help but a couple hp at best.

The immobilizer is a whole new issue but also not a battle worth fighting for me, or maybe I should say not a battle worth fracturing the class into different groups over, IMHO.
Oh I hear you. I'm not recommending it as a battle worth fighting on your end or situation. With the resources in our group, we CAN'T check them. So if we can't check them, what difference does having the rule make. At least opening it up makes it possible for those with good morals the possibility to equal those with lesser ones. Again, we're looking at a couple HP at best and making it less of an issue than it is now.
Old 02-26-2012 | 07:16 PM
  #242  
eric523's Avatar
eric523
Pro
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 651
Likes: 5
Default

Originally Posted by Carrera51
Interesting about the cars seem to naturally run lean. I guess they were tuned that way out of the box for emissions and fuel economy standards.
Well, most all of our cars are running straight pipes without mufflers or cats, and have the rear oxygen sensors out of the exhaust stream so it is not a 100% stock condition. Those items will certainly change the air/fuel ratio.
Old 02-26-2012 | 07:22 PM
  #243  
eric523's Avatar
eric523
Pro
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 651
Likes: 5
Default

Originally Posted by J richard
Eric,

Agreed that if it is a reflash that does not involve opening the ecu case it can ily be read electronically. Swapping out chips however is pretty simple the swedges on the case have to be pried open. To be honest I have not looked at the boxsters box in detail but on my other cars Bosch puts at least one tag over the seam. On the cup car (mines an 00) there is one paper seal over the seam and another inspection seal over the pin connector. Obviously that's the way the factory monitors it.
I can show you the factory seals on the cup car ecu.
I'm familiar with the cup seals. My family shop ran cups for years and have been involved Grand-Am and Supercup races. At one point, we were pushing our cars to grid and handed the ECU just before heading out.

These '97-'99 cars are different than the rest of the modern Porsche cars as they can not be ''reflashed''. They MUST be chipped. They come with no factory seals on them, or tape of any kind. If you do the research, you will find that there are a select few individuals that can work on, chip, tune, or read these ECU's. The 2000- cars are very easy to work on, flash, tune, and read.
Old 02-26-2012 | 07:46 PM
  #244  
trygve's Avatar
trygve
Instructor
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 163
Likes: 33
From: San Francisco, CA
Default

Allowing ECU mods just seems like opening a can of worms. Has it ever been a real issue, other than the immobilizer thing on the two HRG cars? It may work for POC as a way to easily declare a specific existing car legal (the pink HRG car, as Eric's car is moving to another class anyway), but I don't think it's a good change in the general Spec Boxster rules just to accomplish that.
Old 02-26-2012 | 11:27 PM
  #245  
onefastviking's Avatar
onefastviking
Race Car
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,549
Likes: 2
From: Texas
Default

Originally Posted by Carrera51
Interesting about the cars seem to naturally run lean. I guess they were tuned that way out of the box for emissions and fuel economy standards.
There are ways of adding more air and fuel to the cars if you know what to do. Add both and, well, it is just a simple air pump so you do the math on what happens.
Old 02-26-2012 | 11:33 PM
  #246  
onefastviking's Avatar
onefastviking
Race Car
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,549
Likes: 2
From: Texas
Default

Originally Posted by eric523
Oh I hear you. I'm not recommending it as a battle worth fighting on your end or situation. With the resources in our group, we CAN'T check them. So if we can't check them, what difference does having the rule make. At least opening it up makes it possible for those with good morals the possibility to equal those with lesser ones. Again, we're looking at a couple HP at best and making it less of an issue than it is now.
I understand, I see both sides of this coin, pros and cons both ways.

It seems the majority prefer the stock unaltered ECU box rule so I am guessing that will be what NASA will come back as a proposed rule set, but who knows.

Remember that they are trying to keep the rule set as much the same as possible with any changes being little to no cost and very easy changes so racers will be able to race with multiple sanctioning bodies (PCA,NASA, POC, PBOC,SCCA, etc etc)
Old 02-27-2012 | 12:38 PM
  #247  
mjj0000's Avatar
mjj0000
Instructor
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 113
Likes: 5
From: Minnesota
Default

My .02 on the ECU issue. My big concern is moisture. Last summer we drove through a torrential downpour on our way to Road America. The whole time I was thinking about the immobilizer ECU, still in its stock location under the seat. Given that we don’t have windows, I was thinking how nice it would be to not have that ECU. Of course, I could buy a closed trailer, or have a custom cover fabricated that can withstand the buffeting of towing. Either way I’m spending a bunch of money on (for me) non-value add items.

Except for the immobilizer, my car is pretty rain proof. It would be nice if there was an approved way to address this.

Michael
Old 02-27-2012 | 12:43 PM
  #248  
consolidated's Avatar
consolidated
Drifting
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 2,587
Likes: 12
From: Texas
Default

Originally Posted by mjj0000
My .02 on the ECU issue. My big concern is moisture. Last summer we drove through a torrential downpour on our way to Road America. The whole time I was thinking about the immobilizer ECU, still in its stock location under the seat. Given that we don’t have windows, I was thinking how nice it would be to not have that ECU. Of course, I could buy a closed trailer, or have a custom cover fabricated that can withstand the buffeting of towing. Either way I’m spending a bunch of money on (for me) non-value add items.

Except for the immobilizer, my car is pretty rain proof. It would be nice if there was an approved way to address this.

Michael
Move the immoblizer under the dash, I recall the harness allows for this w/o splicing. This is pretty much SBR SOP.
Old 02-27-2012 | 02:32 PM
  #249  
onefastviking's Avatar
onefastviking
Race Car
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,549
Likes: 2
From: Texas
Default

Originally Posted by mjj0000
My .02 on the ECU issue. My big concern is moisture. Last summer we drove through a torrential downpour on our way to Road America. The whole time I was thinking about the immobilizer ECU, still in its stock location under the seat. Given that we don’t have windows, I was thinking how nice it would be to not have that ECU. Of course, I could buy a closed trailer, or have a custom cover fabricated that can withstand the buffeting of towing. Either way I’m spending a bunch of money on (for me) non-value add items.

Except for the immobilizer, my car is pretty rain proof. It would be nice if there was an approved way to address this.

Michael
Move the Immobilizer under the dash, the wires allow it, cover it with a plastic bag, and make plastic trailer only transport windows cut out of lexan. I can do all 3 of these things for less than $100. and in about 3 hrs of time which makes it both quicker and cheaper than reprogramming your ECU to remove the immobilizer.
Any one of the 3 addresses your concern, do all of them and you are very well taken care of.
Not to mention you then have a car you can race or resell someday to someone that wants to race in any of the groups with a legal car.

Just my thoughts.
Old 02-29-2012 | 01:48 AM
  #250  
Paul 996's Avatar
Paul 996
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 1,945
Likes: 5
From: Northern Virginia
Default

Draft of NASA 2012 Spec Boxster Rules is posted here..

http://www.nasaforums.com/viewtopic....350359#p350359
Old 02-29-2012 | 02:38 AM
  #251  
onefastviking's Avatar
onefastviking
Race Car
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,549
Likes: 2
From: Texas
Default

At NASA Nationals with 30+ cars, TOYO pays $4000 CASH to the winner, $3000 to 2nd, $2000 to 3rd, $1000 to 4th, $750 to 5th. Now there is some incentive to go to NASA Nationals !

http://www.nasaproracing.com/conting...ency_Info2.pdf
Old 02-29-2012 | 03:19 PM
  #252  
Streak's Avatar
Streak
Perfect Angel
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 7,899
Likes: 168
From: Beyond the Pale
Default

Commented! Looks good!
Old 03-01-2012 | 01:49 PM
  #253  
Paul 996's Avatar
Paul 996
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 1,945
Likes: 5
From: Northern Virginia
Default

Revision #4 to the NASA SPB 2012 Rules are posted at...

http://www.nasaforums.com/viewtopic.php?f=76&t=55260
Old 03-01-2012 | 08:45 PM
  #254  
mglobe's Avatar
mglobe
The Penguin King
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 9,839
Likes: 120
From: Houston
Default

Any interest in adding Spec 996 to the NASA classes?
Old 03-02-2012 | 12:25 AM
  #255  
Waco Racer's Avatar
Waco Racer
Track Day
 
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by mglobe
Any interest in adding Spec 996 to the NASA classes?
Maybe


Quick Reply: Calling all SpecBoxers...



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 10:34 AM.