hans device. first impression
#33
Race Car
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Joe,
So you don't think the Hans Device is well engineered for sports car cockpits?
Even though though the Hans Device was initially designed for race cars with more upright seating position than Formula cars? Even though they have models specifically designed for sports car cockpits?
Scott
So you don't think the Hans Device is well engineered for sports car cockpits?
Even though though the Hans Device was initially designed for race cars with more upright seating position than Formula cars? Even though they have models specifically designed for sports car cockpits?
Scott
#34
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Mark,
Opposite? Really? You do know that Dr. Robert Hubbard, a professor of biomechanical engineering at Michigan State University, designed the Hans Device. Read that again: a biomechanical engineer designed the Hans Device.
Yes, the Hans Device is so badly designed that it is mandatory in Formula One.
Scott
Opposite? Really? You do know that Dr. Robert Hubbard, a professor of biomechanical engineering at Michigan State University, designed the Hans Device. Read that again: a biomechanical engineer designed the Hans Device.
Yes, the Hans Device is so badly designed that it is mandatory in Formula One.
Scott
now the concept is great, as i said, i had a head and neck restraint system , that i sometimes used, but it was a major hassle to get on. this device, has some fundamental problem wtih the belts , in that when you are belted in with only belts, the friction on your suit and skin is tremendous. you cant move. with the hans, you are free to slide frontwards as the belt slids on the low friction surface of the hans surface. becuase i have to modify my belts that meet the specs of the Hans design, i have to say, its not a good design. any good design, doesnt need help impoving.
Now, just because folks here are either used to it or it doesnt bother them, doesnt make it ideal. maybe, the fact that i can move, doesnt make that much of a differnce in a frontal crash. maybe that movement is part of the design. i dont know, thats why im posting here about it , to discuss. it.
#35
Rennlist Member
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Wow.
Last edited by Veloce Raptor; 03-09-2013 at 06:57 PM.
#36
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I wouldnt buy a used one from anyone. it was a fellow racer that bought it for him and his wife and they immediately stopped racing. so the stuff is in good shape, and I know the owners . not a big chance . in retrospect, i wishi i spent the extra few hundred bucks for the newer version
![Smilie](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/smilies/smile.gif)
Exactly!
Unless you have owned the helmet or HANS since new--a total 100% closed chain of custody--you have no idea just how safe the device is. Helmets get dropped. Helmets hit roll cages in accidents. HANS devices get run over by trailers. HANS devices are involved in accidents.
Why risk it? I don't get it.
Not to mention, in this case, getting a CLEARLY ancient & hard to use HANS.
Wow.
Unless you have owned the helmet or HANS since new--a total 100% closed chain of custody--you have no idea just how safe the device is. Helmets get dropped. Helmets hit roll cages in accidents. HANS devices get run over by trailers. HANS devices are involved in accidents.
Why risk it? I don't get it.
Not to mention, in this case, getting a CLEARLY ancient & hard to use HANS.
Wow.
#39
Race Car
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
this device, has some fundamental problem wtih the belts , in that when you are belted in with only belts, the friction on your suit and skin is tremendous. you cant move. with the hans, you are free to slide frontwards as the belt slids on the low friction surface of the hans surface.
Scott
#40
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
i wish i had video of the movement the body can take with the HANS in my car. correct angles, correct distances, correct sized belts, new helmet with 2010 hans predrilled holes, and i strap myself in as tight as possible and its night and day compared to without the hans., not to mention that the belts want to slide off to the sides. yeah, great design!! Im actually pretty disappointed . seems pretty obvious that they knew that the belts coming off the sides is a big problem, thats why there are little stupid velcro straps that are supposed to attach to some velcro on the belts to keep them in position. the entire design should have a guide rail from top to bottom to make it fit properly
Ill post the pictures when i download them in a few mins.
Ill post the pictures when i download them in a few mins.
#41
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
thanks
Mark
#42
Rennlist Member
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Mark, we've been informed that NASA will start inspecting HNR just like helmets SFI/Fia certs. One issue is that any device involved in an accident has to be sent back to the MFGr for inspection and at the very least the tethers replaced. The other important point of inspection is the friction surface on the top of the shoulders that provides the mechanical grip to the belts. If yours is really slipping around I would seriously consider sending it back for recertification. I think it's pretty cheap insurance.
#43
Rennlist Member
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
![Roll Eyes (Sarcastic)](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/smilies/rolleyes.gif)
#44
Addict
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Small
Business Sponsor
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Small
Business Sponsor
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Joe,
So you don't think the Hans Device is well engineered for sports car cockpits?
Even though though the Hans Device was initially designed for race cars with more upright seating position than Formula cars? Even though they have models specifically designed for sports car cockpits?
Scott
So you don't think the Hans Device is well engineered for sports car cockpits?
Even though though the Hans Device was initially designed for race cars with more upright seating position than Formula cars? Even though they have models specifically designed for sports car cockpits?
Scott
1. Belt mounting architecture greatly helps the system. HANS recommend the belts are ideally 6-8" behind the driver. Easy in a formula car, not so much in most tin tops.
2. Belt mount width. As Mark did mention earlier. If using 3" belts you should have a 3" gap between them so the belts come around the yoke of the device, not just on the runners. Show me a sports car seat that has shoulder harness holes that close together.
3. The level of protection afforded by offset impacts is signifcantly less than it is for head on. In a formula one car you have a full cockpit surround that doesn't allow the head to move laterally. Halo seats don't give as much coverage and side nets are a bandaid (of which most are incorrectly mounted). NASCAR gets aroudn this by having HUGE helmet surrounds and people on the radio telling them about the cars they can't see because of them.
4. Belts stretch in an impact. What happens in teh second impact. I know people who have had belts come off their HANS after an intial impact. The next impact the device would have been useless. Negative for both open wheel and tintop but it's an engineering issue that HANS hasn't really worked towards it would seem. I think while in many cases the 'connection' of HANS is fine, it sure would be nice to have something that is positively connected.
#45
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
when i post the pictures , you will see what im talking about.