Where are the Kimi detractors 08
#92
Addict
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
#93
Formula One Spin Doctor
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
#95
Formula One Spin Doctor
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
Ms was beaten to WDC by these drivers ,
1. Hakkinen
2. Damon Hill
3. JV
4. Alonso
By your numbnut opinion none of these where any good, means schumacher where beaten by Hacks, only a hack could be beaten by other hacks ........
with that we are now in agreement ....
1. Hakkinen
2. Damon Hill
3. JV
4. Alonso
By your numbnut opinion none of these where any good, means schumacher where beaten by Hacks, only a hack could be beaten by other hacks ........
with that we are now in agreement ....
#96
Addict
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
JV-- Hack
Hill - Semi Hack
Hakkinen -- Good
Alonso -- story is yet to be finalized. Equipment was good at Renault and then was outshined by a rookie. 2008 will define what he can do. I personally expect more from Renault with him back and he will NOT allow Renault to give Pinky equal status as McLaren did with Hamilton.
As far as my comment as Alonso being levelheaded, his cracking under pressure when he loses point leads is well documented and tends to lash out at everyone. Don't cry to the media.
Hill - Semi Hack
Hakkinen -- Good
Alonso -- story is yet to be finalized. Equipment was good at Renault and then was outshined by a rookie. 2008 will define what he can do. I personally expect more from Renault with him back and he will NOT allow Renault to give Pinky equal status as McLaren did with Hamilton.
As far as my comment as Alonso being levelheaded, his cracking under pressure when he loses point leads is well documented and tends to lash out at everyone. Don't cry to the media.
#97
Formula One Spin Doctor
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
So Schumacher was beaten by 1 hack, a semi-hack and a driver that was good , LOL, this would make schumacher a good driver himself at best , as he had a full team . mgr /tire supplier etc, etc ,, behind him. I would agree with this , schumacher was a good driver , at best , hence he was beaten by a hack and a semi-hack.....
Amazing as all the above where good drivers and When JV had a car he made schumacher look stupid more than once , Mika did it pretty often and who can forget damon's victory in japan 94 in the wet , putting it to schumacher , hacks don't put in drives like that or win WDC against someone who is worthy. You constantly demean other WDC and promote schumacher , in the end he is as good as the hacks that beat him or the one's that he beat , if Alonso after putting the hurting on Schumacher 2 yrs in a row is a hack or just good , then schumacher himself is at best one himself.....as all he has ever beaten to a wdc are average joe's or just plain hacks....
Amazing as all the above where good drivers and When JV had a car he made schumacher look stupid more than once , Mika did it pretty often and who can forget damon's victory in japan 94 in the wet , putting it to schumacher , hacks don't put in drives like that or win WDC against someone who is worthy. You constantly demean other WDC and promote schumacher , in the end he is as good as the hacks that beat him or the one's that he beat , if Alonso after putting the hurting on Schumacher 2 yrs in a row is a hack or just good , then schumacher himself is at best one himself.....as all he has ever beaten to a wdc are average joe's or just plain hacks....
Last edited by A.Wayne; 03-04-2008 at 09:21 PM.
#98
Addict
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
Grow up Wayne, you know there is more to the equation than the driver. You know JV walked into a situation where he had the best equipment. Ask Alonso about having the best tires or luck. There are other variables. Did MS have good equipment, yes, but not always. He took **** equipment to begin with and with a team of very good people made it smell like a rose, but he had a hand in the entire process and did what is extremely difficult, maintained the dominance for a long period of time until the many rule changes finally stopped the Ferrari locomotive.
Don't drag me down this road again, we've talked about this at length. By your logic, or lack thereof, Hamilton is better than MS because he beat Alonso who beat MS, etc. etc.
Don't drag me down this road again, we've talked about this at length. By your logic, or lack thereof, Hamilton is better than MS because he beat Alonso who beat MS, etc. etc.
#99
Formula One Spin Doctor
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
Grow up Wayne, you know there is more to the equation than the driver. You know JV walked into a situation where he had the best equipment. Ask Alonso about having the best tires or luck. There are other variables. Did MS have good equipment, yes, but not always. He took **** equipment to begin with and with a team of very good people made it smell like a rose, but he had a hand in the entire process and did what is extremely difficult, maintained the dominance for a long period of time until the many rule changes finally stopped the Ferrari locomotive.
Don't drag me down this road again, we've talked about this at length.
Don't drag me down this road again, we've talked about this at length.
1. the fiiinggg Bs penalty against renault causing a complete redesign mid season
2, Phantom penalties against renault and alonso , gave him a look in as Alonso struggled with a poor end of season chassis.
Schumacher threw away valauble points when his dark side showed it's head again at Monaco , it was a well won championship by Alonso and to all that have beaten him in the past. they where not just good , they where great drivers in their own right and to demean them would be to demean schumachers accomplishments also.
#100
Ironman 140.6
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
#102
Addict
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
If Ferrari had been on Michelin tires in 2005, can one argue that he could not use tires, but all Bridgestone runners were f'ed up that year because of the equipment. Everyone knew that. Yet MS never threw Bridgestone under the bus. I could only image what Alonso would have done in the same situation.
Did Ferrari have a good car consistantly after 2000. Yes, I said that. When did MS come to F... in the late 90's to build that car. Best team leader in the history of F1 and all the hardware to prove it. Try looking at the scoreboard Wayne, it doesn't lie.
Did Ferrari have a good car consistantly after 2000. Yes, I said that. When did MS come to F... in the late 90's to build that car. Best team leader in the history of F1 and all the hardware to prove it. Try looking at the scoreboard Wayne, it doesn't lie.
#103
Addict
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
You know it had been quiet in the F1 threads. Wayne comes in throws the same crap around and uses the same arguments.
I'm going to sit back and see Alonso implode and laugh my *** off like I did last year God save wayne if another rookie comes in and cleans his clock.
I'm going to sit back and see Alonso implode and laugh my *** off like I did last year God save wayne if another rookie comes in and cleans his clock.
#104
Ironman 140.6
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
Why is Alo screaming Clarice? Maybe the slaughter of the spring lambs is about to begin.....
In Australia no less.
Do you still hear the awful Alo screaming from '07 in your sleep Wayne?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CfrHehFzVtk
In Australia no less.
Do you still hear the awful Alo screaming from '07 in your sleep Wayne?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CfrHehFzVtk
#105
Addict
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member