Notices
GT4/Spyder Discussions about the 981 GT4/Spyder
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: APR

strut tower failure

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-22-2019, 08:50 PM
  #1096  
trkshoe
Racer
 
trkshoe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2019
Location: SoCal
Posts: 251
Received 31 Likes on 24 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by gbeaty
Some people on this thread are stating the front struts have no bump-stops. If true, this would be 1) really dumb, and 2) present an easy fix for this problem.

Bump-stops in inverted struts are usually internal. Has anyone disassembled a factory strut to see if it has a bump stop?
I finally got around to removing a strut (yeah... I know) and it does in fact have a bump stop.
I think stiffer sprigs are very necessary... and don't freakin lower the car.
Old 06-22-2019, 10:04 PM
  #1097  
gbeaty
Cruisin'
 
gbeaty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2019
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by trkshoe
I finally got around to removing a strut (yeah... I know) and it does in fact have a bump stop.
I think stiffer sprigs are very necessary... and don't freakin lower the car.
Great info, thanks. Does the front suffer from a lack of bump travel? This is, does the shock bottom out a long time before the tire or wheel would hit anything? On race cars with steel strut mounts, I usually remove the string and modify or re-position the upper mount so the strut bottoms just before the tire starts to dig into anything.
Old 06-23-2019, 11:41 AM
  #1098  
trkshoe
Racer
 
trkshoe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2019
Location: SoCal
Posts: 251
Received 31 Likes on 24 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by gbeaty
Great info, thanks. Does the front suffer from a lack of bump travel? This is, does the shock bottom out a long time before the tire or wheel would hit anything? On race cars with steel strut mounts, I usually remove the string and modify or re-position the upper mount so the strut bottoms just before the tire starts to dig into anything.
I imagine any mfg would do the same... once I have the spring off, I'll compress to see where the strut bottoms (tops) out.
I was spit-wadding ides, and a top hat with an extra inch or half of travel would be helpful as well, along with a longer bump stop.
Old 06-23-2019, 12:30 PM
  #1099  
G-forceGT4
Rennlist Member
 
G-forceGT4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Ontario & California
Posts: 438
Likes: 0
Received 57 Likes on 32 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by trkshoe
I finally got around to removing a strut (yeah... I know) and it does in fact have a bump stop.
I think stiffer sprigs are very necessary... and don't freakin lower the car.
^^ Thanks for doing that & sharing the info. I'd like to get some idea as to how much the Swift springs alter ride quality. I could see a real advantage of switching them for track purposes, & if the ride isn't bad with them to use for street as well for added protection.
Old 06-24-2019, 02:14 PM
  #1100  
switchface
Burning Brakes
 
switchface's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 755
Received 83 Likes on 44 Posts
Default

Regardless of how pervasive this failure might be, wouldn't stiffer springs only exacerbate the issue? By nature, wouldn't a progressive spring help alleviate the initial transferring jolt?
Old 06-24-2019, 02:29 PM
  #1101  
chapmans
Rennlist Member
 
chapmans's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: WA
Posts: 418
Received 237 Likes on 118 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by switchface
Regardless of how pervasive this failure might be, wouldn't stiffer springs only exacerbate the issue? By nature, wouldn't a progressive spring help alleviate the initial transferring jolt?
I think the goal is that the stiffer spring won't bottom out as easily and will avoid the big shocks to the tower.
Old 06-24-2019, 03:16 PM
  #1102  
trkshoe
Racer
 
trkshoe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2019
Location: SoCal
Posts: 251
Received 31 Likes on 24 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by chapmans
I think the goal is that the stiffer spring won't bottom out as easily and will avoid the big shocks to the tower.
Exactly... that's the 'jolt' we need to avoid, so the stiffer springs further dissuade the shock bottoming out and transferring the 'impact' force to the hat.
The bump stop does the same, but in a less progressive space (distance).
Old 06-24-2019, 03:38 PM
  #1103  
911F1
Rennlist Member
 
911F1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 2,050
Received 322 Likes on 196 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by trkshoe
Exactly... that's the 'jolt' we need to avoid, so the stiffer springs further dissuade the shock bottoming out and transferring the 'impact' force to the hat.
The bump stop does the same, but in a less progressive space (distance).
Is this the actual cause? The shock bottoming out. Has anyone identified this?
Old 06-24-2019, 06:56 PM
  #1104  
chapmans
Rennlist Member
 
chapmans's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: WA
Posts: 418
Received 237 Likes on 118 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 911F1
Is this the actual cause? The shock bottoming out. Has anyone identified this?
Noone has actually real time documented a failure so the exact mode of failure isn't really known.
I think a reasonable assumption is that big impacts bottoms out the shock, from there that force travels directly through the top mount into the aluminum strut tower.

The GT strut mounts don't have the rubber isolation that base cars do and thus lack additional absorption that mitigates this. Base cars have both longer bump stops (I assume?) and rubber isolated top mounts to absorb and spread out the impact jolt which seems to keep everything under that critical force value that causes failure. This is in addition to the extra ride height on base cars that gives the suspension more time and space to decelerate and absorb impacts. That's my guess as to why you don't see it on anything but GT cars.

The lingering question that I have is, is this a cumulative fatigue problem or a catastrophic failure from a single impact? Or both?
I think some people said theirs failed on smaller impacts that likely didn't bottom out the suspension so that would lend credibility to the fatigue idea.

If the bottoming out hypothesis is right then stiffer springs should help. If it's a issue of fatigue failure due to a series of smaller impacts then they probably won't.

I think the best thing you can do is run some lightweight 18s to add some impact absorption back in until some vendor comes out with a good reinforcement solution.
The following 2 users liked this post by chapmans:
bertram928 (07-07-2019), unclemat (08-18-2021)
Old 07-30-2019, 12:14 PM
  #1105  
Michaelpickett
Cruisin'
 
Michaelpickett's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2019
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Strut tower failure

I have a deposit on a GT4 and after seeing this am thinking of cancelling purchase for safety reasons related to this failure Porsche does not seem to stand by this and repair under warranty any thoughts?
Old 07-30-2019, 12:43 PM
  #1106  
HelpMeHelpU
Rennlist Member
 
HelpMeHelpU's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Posts: 3,526
Received 631 Likes on 393 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Michaelpickett
I have a deposit on a GT4 and after seeing this am thinking of cancelling purchase for safety reasons related to this failure Porsche does not seem to stand by this and repair under warranty any thoughts?

Immediate thought is that your concern is overrated and an incident is highly unlikely. GT4s have driven hundreds of thousands, if not millions, of track miles and the number of incidents is very small as well as being unconfirmed in many cases if there was damage prior to entering the track. YMMV.
Old 07-30-2019, 12:44 PM
  #1107  
Yargk
Rennlist Member
 
Yargk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: SF Bay Area, CA
Posts: 2,227
Received 232 Likes on 151 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Michaelpickett
I have a deposit on a GT4 and after seeing this am thinking of cancelling purchase for safety reasons related to this failure Porsche does not seem to stand by this and repair under warranty any thoughts?
It's an issue, but it's still a minority of cars. Not sure I'd base a decision on it, but the ones who have had the failure might beg to differ
Old 07-30-2019, 12:51 PM
  #1108  
mcomet
Rennlist Member
 
mcomet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 203
Received 13 Likes on 10 Posts
Default

You should absolutely cancel your deposit and then send me the allocation spot... on second thought I'll keep my 981 GT4....
The following users liked this post:
Diablo Dude (07-30-2019)
Old 07-30-2019, 03:13 PM
  #1109  
Michaelpickett
Cruisin'
 
Michaelpickett's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2019
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I may not have been clear, my deposit is on a 981 GT 4 with 12,000 miles. Very concerned about the shock tower failure and assume it is s stress related issue so the older the car the greater the chance of failure. I understand that one failure was on the freeway with no track use ever.
Old 07-30-2019, 05:46 PM
  #1110  
d00d
Rennlist Member
 
d00d's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2015
Location: 4MB, HYA
Posts: 1,689
Received 280 Likes on 184 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Michaelpickett
I may not have been clear, my deposit is on a 981 GT 4 with 12,000 miles. Very concerned about the shock tower failure and assume it is s stress related issue so the older the car the greater the chance of failure. I understand that one failure was on the freeway with no track use ever.
I'm assuming most or all fail completely without an intermediate hard to see failure, but use Zyglow and a black light to confirm there's no damage.


Quick Reply: strut tower failure



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 10:56 AM.