Gt2 numbers before/after Orton flash
#137
Originally Posted by Stummel
please enlighten us, I can not see the obvious...
If I hear one more time the POS dynojet and its magic formula shop created "correction factor".......
The ONLY chassis dyno that counts is a MAHA, PERIOD, and all the GT2's or 996tt's or the notoriously "underrated" GT3 I have seen dynod within 5-7 hp of their advertised rating...............Porsche ,Daimler , BMW or Audi, hell even Borgward, NSU or DKW in the old days never ever gave away hp/tq for free. Why some people follow that thought is beyond me .
So, if the GT2/996tt are underated by this at around 30-50 hp myth then the Carr GT must be at least a 100 hp off its advertised rating...............LOL
#139
Pole,
O.T.: how about Ford and Chevy in 1969 for Trans Am Racing?
Ford 302 c.in. 290 hp/290 lbft of torque
Chevy 302 (ala 1969 z-28 of which I had in High School) == same 290/290.
Underrated or Not??
BTW, I agree with Porsche and Modern Manus: Not underrated and my PSI 480 kit...
it performs like it has about 480 hp???
MK
O.T.: how about Ford and Chevy in 1969 for Trans Am Racing?
Ford 302 c.in. 290 hp/290 lbft of torque
Chevy 302 (ala 1969 z-28 of which I had in High School) == same 290/290.
Underrated or Not??
BTW, I agree with Porsche and Modern Manus: Not underrated and my PSI 480 kit...
it performs like it has about 480 hp???
MK
#140
Originally Posted by KPG
PP, do you know the locations of any US MAHA dynos? Kevin
#141
Call this guy, he should know
http://www.maha.de/datenbank/gb_h_no...d=USA&Staat=MI
I know their is one in California, I have it written down somewhere and I have a
copy of a PSI 480 before and after on Maha dyno.
turbo Kevin knows where the Maha is...
http://www.maha.de/datenbank/gb_h_no...d=USA&Staat=MI
I know their is one in California, I have it written down somewhere and I have a
copy of a PSI 480 before and after on Maha dyno.
turbo Kevin knows where the Maha is...
#142
Originally Posted by Woodster
Pole,
O.T.: how about Ford and Chevy in 1969 for Trans Am Racing?
Ford 302 c.in. 290 hp/290 lbft of torque
Chevy 302 (ala 1969 z-28 of which I had in High School) == same 290/290.
Underrated or Not??
BTW, I agree with Porsche and Modern Manus: Not underrated and my PSI 480 kit...
it performs like it has about 480 hp???
MK
O.T.: how about Ford and Chevy in 1969 for Trans Am Racing?
Ford 302 c.in. 290 hp/290 lbft of torque
Chevy 302 (ala 1969 z-28 of which I had in High School) == same 290/290.
Underrated or Not??
BTW, I agree with Porsche and Modern Manus: Not underrated and my PSI 480 kit...
it performs like it has about 480 hp???
MK
#143
Originally Posted by pole position
There is one at AMS in Carson, CA and Brabus had one in Orange County but not available to the general public. I was told there is on in Florida but cannot remember where/who .
#145
Originally Posted by pole position
#146
I was just reading the November issue of Road and Track, which includes a test of the 3,610 lb curb weight, 480 HP 997TT manual and automatic models. Included in the data is 1/4 mile ET and trap speeds for both models.
The R&T test results are as follows:
6 speed manual
11.8 @ 116.2
Tiptronic
11.6 @ 118.3
Using a 1/4 mile HP calculator and a weight of 3,800 lbs (includes driver), this is what it calculates:
Manual transmission:
Trap Speed Method: approx. 465 HP
ET Method: approx. 457 HP
Tiptronic transmission:
Trap Speed Method: approx. 491 HP
ET Method: approx. 481 HP
This is pretty close to the Porsche claimed 480 HP, especially on the quicker tiptronic transmission.
The R&T test results are as follows:
6 speed manual
11.8 @ 116.2
Tiptronic
11.6 @ 118.3
Using a 1/4 mile HP calculator and a weight of 3,800 lbs (includes driver), this is what it calculates:
Manual transmission:
Trap Speed Method: approx. 465 HP
ET Method: approx. 457 HP
Tiptronic transmission:
Trap Speed Method: approx. 491 HP
ET Method: approx. 481 HP
This is pretty close to the Porsche claimed 480 HP, especially on the quicker tiptronic transmission.
__________________
991.2 GT3 RS Weissach Racing Yellow
991.2 Turbo S GT Silver
991.2 GT3 Chalk (Manual)
2022 Cayenne White
former 1972 911T white, 1984 911 3.2 Targa black, 993 cab white, 993TT arena red, 993TT silver, 996TT speed yellow, 991.1 GT3 white
www.speedtechexhausts.com
info@speedtechexhausts.com
Testimonials SpeedTech Exhaust Videos facebook
991.2 GT3 RS Weissach Racing Yellow
991.2 Turbo S GT Silver
991.2 GT3 Chalk (Manual)
2022 Cayenne White
former 1972 911T white, 1984 911 3.2 Targa black, 993 cab white, 993TT arena red, 993TT silver, 996TT speed yellow, 991.1 GT3 white
www.speedtechexhausts.com
info@speedtechexhausts.com
Testimonials SpeedTech Exhaust Videos facebook
#147
Originally Posted by wross996tt
No to nit pick, but you guys are using the wrong word...accuracy deals with the AVERAGE deviation from a known value (like an acceptance standard, e.g., NIST, BSI, TUV...). The measurement system can be accurate and not be able to measure the hp on a vehicle at all. The more interesting question is precision (which deals with the variability of the measurement system e.g., repeatability and reproducibility). Without knowledge of the measurement system's precision (which I have yet to see studied or reported for any dyno or other speed/hp measurement system) most of the claims are just that...claims.
Last edited by Dock; 07-25-2007 at 02:24 PM.
#148
Originally Posted by Rickard 993 Turbo
Im going to get Raelogic info on my car as soon the summer comes back but that is 6 month until that, im hopening for better or hte same figures then yours and im only att 520-520Fwhp