Notices
996 Forum 1999-2005
Sponsored by:

why is the 993 worth so much more than a 996?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-19-2007, 12:10 AM
  #166  
Steven C.
Rennlist Member
 
Steven C.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: TEXAS
Posts: 2,188
Received 69 Likes on 36 Posts
Default

OK Help me with this. 993 = lower production numbers because fewer people wanted them. 996 = greater production numbers because more people wanted them. People generally want what they can't have so now that there are more people in the world than when it was built, the 993 is looking a lot better and I still do not like them
Old 06-19-2007, 12:16 AM
  #167  
TD in DC
Race Director
 
TD in DC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 10,350
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Steven C.
OK Help me with this. 993 = lower production numbers because fewer people wanted them. 996 = greater production numbers because more people wanted them. People generally want what they can't have so now that there are more people in the world than when it was built, the 993 is looking a lot better and I still do not like them
AFAIK, the production numbers were not based on demand, but rather production choices/limitations by Porsche. The strategy was to make more 996s than 993s. So, I don't think you can equate original production numbers with demand. The reason why production numbers are important is that it determines the supply available on the used market. Quite simply, if you are looking for a 993, you have fewer choices. If you are looking for a 996, you have far greater choices. The fewer the choices, the higher the prices. Not that difficult, really.
Old 06-19-2007, 12:20 AM
  #168  
Tippy
Race Car
 
Tippy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: San Antonio, TX
Posts: 4,978
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

If the 993 had the front fenders from the 964, it would of been the best looking 911, but.........Porsche used the styling queues of the 968 front end.
Old 06-19-2007, 12:23 AM
  #169  
YA911Fan
Burning Brakes
 
YA911Fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 881
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

It's supply AND demand that matters -- supply by itself is irrelevant.

Two interesting examples to consider are the CGT and the Mini. Which one has the higher depreciation?
Old 06-19-2007, 12:26 AM
  #170  
TD in DC
Race Director
 
TD in DC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 10,350
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by YA911Fan
It's supply AND demand that matters -- supply by itself is irrelevant.

Two interesting examples to consider are the CGT and the Mini. Which one has the higher depreciation?
CGT does, but I don't understand what you are trying to get at. If you looked at the pools of buyers for 996s and 993s, I am nearly certain, although I have no facts to back this up, that the pool of buyers for 996s is higher, probably much higher. However, if you look at the ratio of buyers to supply, of course it is lower for the 993 because so many 996s are available. So, of course supply and demand matters, but that doesn't mean that there is a bigger pool of buyers for 993s.
Old 06-19-2007, 12:43 AM
  #171  
N51
Rennlist Member
 
N51's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: behind the Corn Curtain
Posts: 2,314
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by cabrio993
I guess they learned their lesson and they listened to its customers. Proof is that the 987 and 997 fronts are totally different now.
And the 987 got the better of the two. :-)

Noah
Old 06-19-2007, 12:54 AM
  #172  
YA911Fan
Burning Brakes
 
YA911Fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 881
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

OK, I'll restate -- the ratio of 993 buyers to 993 sellers is higher than the ratio of 996 buyers to 996 sellers. The ratio of 993s to 996s manufactured is irrelevant (imo).

The CGT/Mini example was just to point out that the only thing which matters is the supply relative to demand, not the supply itself.

Originally Posted by TD in DC
CGT does, but I don't understand what you are trying to get at. If you looked at the pools of buyers for 996s and 993s, I am nearly certain, although I have no facts to back this up, that the pool of buyers for 996s is higher, probably much higher. However, if you look at the ratio of buyers to supply, of course it is lower for the 993 because so many 996s are available. So, of course supply and demand matters, but that doesn't mean that there is a bigger pool of buyers for 993s.
Old 06-19-2007, 01:00 AM
  #173  
TD in DC
Race Director
 
TD in DC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 10,350
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by YA911Fan
OK, I'll restate -- the ratio of 993 buyers to 993 sellers is higher than the ratio of 996 buyers to 996 sellers. The ratio of 993s to 996s manufactured is irrelevant (imo).

The CGT/Mini example was just to point out that the only thing which matters is the supply relative to demand, not the supply itself.
Well, I agree with you.

I also think that you probably would agree with me that if you manipulated the variables of cars produced (i.e., either increasing the quantity of 993s produced to equal the quantity of 996s produced, or reducing the quantity of 996s produced to equal the quantity of 993s produced), the resale values and depreciation rates of the 993s and 996s mostly likely would be much, much closer.
Old 06-19-2007, 01:12 AM
  #174  
hddude
Racer
 
hddude's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 371
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by cabrio993
They are exactly the same. Guess which one is the 996 and which one is the boxster...
It's obvious. The one in the middle is the Boxster.
Old 06-19-2007, 01:59 AM
  #175  
YA911Fan
Burning Brakes
 
YA911Fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 881
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

No, I don't agree with that. I don't think the quantity of either model accounts for the different depreciation rates. That's the point I'm trying to make.

However, I do think the 993's high resale value is directly attributable to the 996!

Originally Posted by TD in DC
I also think that you probably would agree with me that if you manipulated the variables of cars produced (i.e., either increasing the quantity of 993s produced to equal the quantity of 996s produced, or reducing the quantity of 996s produced to equal the quantity of 993s produced), the resale values and depreciation rates of the 993s and 996s mostly likely would be much, much closer.
Old 06-19-2007, 03:47 AM
  #176  
2ndof2
Three Wheelin'
 
2ndof2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Westlake Village, CA
Posts: 1,915
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

di·a·tribe (dī'ə-trīb') Pronunciation Key
n. A bitter, abusive denunciation.

de·nun·ci·a·tion /dɪˌnʌnsiˈeɪʃən, -ʃi-/ Pronunciation Key - Show Spelled Pronunciation[di-nuhn-see-ey-shuhn, -shee-] Pronunciation Key - Show IPA Pronunciation
–noun 1. an act or instance of denouncing; public censure or condemnation.
2. an accusation of crime before a public prosecutor or tribunal.
3. notice of the termination or the renouncement of an international agreement or part thereof.
4. Archaic. warning of impending evil; threat.

Ok, now that I understand the word "diatribe" I'll give you my thoughts:
1. 993 looks cooler (I could give a sh*t what anyone else thinks as long as I like the looks)
2. basic supply & demand dictates the values and apparently 993 supply is thin; demand strong.
3. 993 is more fun to drive. And yes, I have driven several 996's including a 996 GT3. Not worth the extra money for "smile factor" in my book.

I rest my case.
Old 06-19-2007, 04:04 AM
  #177  
2ndof2
Three Wheelin'
 
2ndof2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Westlake Village, CA
Posts: 1,915
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by care4era
993 is old. I do not get it either. I like new stuff because technology progresses. It is pure nostalgia and peeps repeating the mantra about air cooled. Who gives a ****. I have seen inside a 993 and it is well, just old looking.

I always look for the newest car that I can afford and would never look backwards. 997 or 993?, you would have to be a fool to take the oldie mouldie one.
Yeah, we'd all take the 997 if we don't mind spending 80 large on a fast depreciating asset. C'mon bro, pull your head out of the sand....would you rather have a mint 69 Camaro or one from the mid 80's? Which is a cooler ride? If you can't answer that then you are missing the whole point of what "demand" and ultimately retention of value is all about. And the 917 in my avitar? How about that? Looks old right? Its absolutely sick looking. Who cares how it stacks up performance-wise against newer cars. I'd love to have one for the track and if a guy shows up with something more modern and faster who cares? There are speed limits here in the states last I checked and I don't want to lose my license and be relegated to walking the bus or my bicycle. Performance and latest technology is not all things to all people. Enjoy your --6!
p.s. the correct answer is the 69' and few of us 993 owners care about oil+water vs. oil cooling. I could have had a 996 but would by far rather have the last model M3 if it came right down to it.
Old 06-19-2007, 07:54 AM
  #178  
Kevin H. in Atl..
Burning Brakes
 
Kevin H. in Atl..'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 902
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 2ndof2
Yeah, we'd all take the 997 if we don't mind spending 80 large on a fast depreciating asset. C'mon bro, pull your head out of the sand....would you rather have a mint 69 Camaro or one from the mid 80's? Which is a cooler ride? If you can't answer that then you are missing the whole point of what "demand" and ultimately retention of value is all about. And the 917 in my avitar? How about that? Looks old right? Its absolutely sick looking. Who cares how it stacks up performance-wise against newer cars. I'd love to have one for the track and if a guy shows up with something more modern and faster who cares? There are speed limits here in the states last I checked and I don't want to lose my license and be relegated to walking the bus or my bicycle. Performance and latest technology is not all things to all people. Enjoy your --6!
p.s. the correct answer is the 69' and few of us 993 owners care about oil+water vs. oil cooling. I could have had a 996 but would by far rather have the last model M3 if it came right down to it.
Comparing a 997 to an 80's Camaro?

The Chevrolet that is normally compared to the 911 is the Corvette.
And 997 being the latest model of 911, most would think the latest Corvette would be the best model for comparison, unless of course, one's intent is to insult the 997.

Maybe someone should post in the 997 forum that there is a thread in the 996 forum where 993 guys are referring to 997s as 80's Camaros.
Old 06-19-2007, 08:02 AM
  #179  
LVDell
Nordschleife Master
 
LVDell's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Tobacco Road, NC
Posts: 5,225
Likes: 0
Received 28 Likes on 23 Posts
Default

Time for me to unsubscribe to this thread. Have fun y'all
Old 06-19-2007, 08:09 AM
  #180  
Steven C.
Rennlist Member
 
Steven C.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: TEXAS
Posts: 2,188
Received 69 Likes on 36 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by TD in DC
AFAIK, the production numbers were not based on demand,
WHAT? I guess I better get a job in the auto buisness since I can design what ever I want and just make a bunch of them or not make a bunch of them no matter what the customers are buying


Quick Reply: why is the 993 worth so much more than a 996?



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 11:51 PM.