Notices
996 Forum 1999-2005
Sponsored by:

Fuil comsumtion is killing me 996 Y2003

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-29-2024, 02:53 AM
  #16  
Ben8jam
Racer
 
Ben8jam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 411
Received 143 Likes on 75 Posts
Default

Owned mine for 17 months and have really only used it for very high revving canyon drives once a week or every two weeks. About 80 miles round trip. I dare say I've never calculated the MPG. And probably shouldn't But I do have to get gas pretty much before each drive up
The following 2 users liked this post by Ben8jam:
GC996 (04-29-2024), JohnCA58 (04-29-2024)
Old 04-29-2024, 01:13 PM
  #17  
wyovino
Rennlist Member
 
wyovino's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 3,519
Received 612 Likes on 329 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Porschetech3
A good friend of mine and a Rennlister here told me his 4.0 FSI got 34 MPG on a cross country trip recently...That's pretty impressive...

I have specialized in engine management even before fuel injection and emission controls were mainstream, and I can tell you that with modern cars 95% of the time when fuel mileage is a real concern ( and no fault codes) the 02 Sensors are responsible for the wasted fuel...Their main job is to monitor and help control fuel mixtures. They used to be mandated to last 80k miles, with the reduction of ZDDP they were hoping for 120K miles , but they often get lazy way before this...
Is there a specific measurement or test for the O2 sensors?
Old 04-29-2024, 03:33 PM
  #18  
smith365film
Track Day
 
smith365film's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: Long Beach, CA
Posts: 21
Received 3 Likes on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by wyovino
Is there a specific measurement or test for the O2 sensors?
I would like to know this as well. I'm still trying to solve my fuel economy issue (currently 11.8 mpg city) in a 4.0L FSI engine.
Old 04-29-2024, 05:14 PM
  #19  
yelcab
Three Wheelin'
 
yelcab's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 1,818
Received 654 Likes on 409 Posts
Default

You did not buy the Porsche for its fuel economy, did you?
The following users liked this post:
GC996 (04-30-2024)
Old 04-29-2024, 05:23 PM
  #20  
smith365film
Track Day
 
smith365film's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: Long Beach, CA
Posts: 21
Received 3 Likes on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by yelcab
You did not buy the Porsche for its fuel economy, did you?
I don't know what specific mpg numbers OP is getting, but when it's approaching single digits there's clearly an issue going on with the car. This shouldn't be ignored.
Old 04-29-2024, 05:49 PM
  #21  
GC996
Rennlist Member
 
GC996's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2019
Location: Illinois
Posts: 5,230
Received 3,526 Likes on 2,031 Posts
Default

Good thread to read on the topic of which Skip explains the what and how's of oxy sensors. Good read.

https://rennlist.com/forums/996-foru...s-mileage.html
The following users liked this post:
Porschetech3 (04-29-2024)
Old 04-29-2024, 06:02 PM
  #22  
peterp
Three Wheelin'
 
peterp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: NJ/NY area
Posts: 1,968
Received 665 Likes on 408 Posts
Default

Might be worth it for the OP (and others with poor mileage) to try Redline SI-1 Fuel System cleaner -- the references to it in the DI40 thread makes it sound like it walks on water and is better than Techron and others (based upon what's it contains). The posts discussing it start here (https://rennlist.com/forums/996-foru...l#post19181932) -- there are only a few posts on the fuel cleaner, since it's an oil thread), but it sounds quite good. I've used Techron and Sea Foam in the past, but am going to give Redline SI-1 a try based upon the comments.
The following users liked this post:
plpete84 (05-02-2024)
Old 04-29-2024, 07:41 PM
  #23  
theprf
Race Car
 
theprf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: Central MA
Posts: 3,511
Received 1,656 Likes on 1,053 Posts
Default

My guy that cleans fuel injectors (hurst injector service) swears by the SL-1 cleaner, says none of the others are worth anything.

I doubt the injector cleaner will help, it's much more likely to be a MAF or an O2 sensor problem.
The following 2 users liked this post by theprf:
peterp (04-29-2024), plpete84 (05-02-2024)
Old 04-29-2024, 09:42 PM
  #24  
Porschetech3
Rennlist Member
 
Porschetech3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Alabama USA
Posts: 6,114
Received 4,422 Likes on 1,995 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by GC996
Good thread to read on the topic of which Skip explains the what and how's of oxy sensors. Good read.

https://rennlist.com/forums/996-foru...s-mileage.html
thanks Glenn, I can't add any more to the subject than I did in that thread, unfortuantly many will read it and not believe it, or it will go over their head. I'll just recap by saying that the 02 Sensors are the judge/jury/and executioner of fuel mixtures when at "closed loop cruising" for MPG...

It seems that most people will change plugs and coils as a first start to MPG concerns even when no missfires are recorded...Even though plugs and coils also age as time and mileage passes,( plugs will wear and collect carbon deposits and coils will develope small cracks) but if they don't missfire they don't effect MPG...If someone were trying to be "thrifty" and were merely concerned with MPG, the money would be better spent on upstream 02 Sensors..
The following 2 users liked this post by Porschetech3:
golock911 (04-29-2024), wyovino (04-30-2024)
Old 04-29-2024, 10:18 PM
  #25  
peterp
Three Wheelin'
 
peterp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: NJ/NY area
Posts: 1,968
Received 665 Likes on 408 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Porschetech3
thanks Glenn, I can't add any more to the subject than I did in that thread, unfortuantly many will read it and not believe it, or it will go over their head. I'll just recap by saying that the 02 Sensors are the judge/jury/and executioner of fuel mixtures when at "closed loop cruising" for MPG...

It seems that most people will change plugs and coils as a first start to MPG concerns even when no missfires are recorded...Even though plugs and coils also age as time and mileage passes,( plugs will wear and collect carbon deposits and coils will develope small cracks) but if they don't missfire they don't effect MPG...If someone were trying to be "thrifty" and were merely concerned with MPG, the money would be better spent on upstream 02 Sensors..
Thanks for the info. It looks like there are a total of four O2 sensors -- pre-cat and post-cat on each side. Do all four need to be replaced, and is OEM better than the Bosch equivalent?
Old 04-29-2024, 11:42 PM
  #26  
c didy
Three Wheelin'
 
c didy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: yoou -tah
Posts: 1,749
Received 232 Likes on 167 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Porschetech3
... 02 Sensors are the judge/jury/and executioner of fuel mixtures ...

If someone were trying to be "thrifty" and were merely concerned with MPG, the money would be better spent on upstream 02 Sensors...

This is the essence of it.
Upstream controls fuel mixtures. Downstream sensors just confirm catalytic function.

Last edited by c didy; 04-29-2024 at 11:44 PM.
Old 04-29-2024, 11:57 PM
  #27  
GC996
Rennlist Member
 
GC996's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2019
Location: Illinois
Posts: 5,230
Received 3,526 Likes on 2,031 Posts
Default

After this thread there may be a run on upstream oxy sensors.
The following 3 users liked this post by GC996:
beermanpete (05-04-2024), peterp (04-30-2024), smith365film (04-30-2024)
Old 04-30-2024, 01:06 AM
  #28  
peterp
Three Wheelin'
 
peterp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: NJ/NY area
Posts: 1,968
Received 665 Likes on 408 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by GC996
After this thread there may be a run on upstream oxy sensors.
Also not a bad idea to short Exxon
The following 2 users liked this post by peterp:
GC996 (04-30-2024), wyovino (04-30-2024)
Old 05-01-2024, 06:01 PM
  #29  
168Sierra
Rennlist Member
 
168Sierra's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2022
Location: Signal Mtn TN
Posts: 240
Received 291 Likes on 107 Posts
Default

I am the Renn lister with he 996.2 that Skip referred to in post 12. My car has a 4.0 FSI Stage II+ engine. It is the m9Experience engine that I worked with Jake Raby to build. My wife and I actually went to Jake’s Skunkworks facility last July and assembled the engine with Jake coaching us. We installed the engine, ran it for 1900 miles to break it in and then drove it to Rennsport Reunion at Laguna Seca last September. After Rennsport, we drove up the coast to Seattle and then back across the northern US. We drove approx 9200 miles total and averaged 30 mpg for the trip. We drove. 400 mile + stretch across Wyoming and South Dakota at 85 mph and got 34 mpg. Photo of trip computer attached. It is a very nice engine!
Mark

The following 6 users liked this post by 168Sierra:
beermanpete (05-04-2024), blacksquid (05-03-2024), EVOMMM (05-01-2024), Mike Murphy (05-01-2024), Porschetech3 (05-01-2024), smith365film (05-01-2024) and 1 others liked this post. (Show less...)
Old 05-02-2024, 01:16 PM
  #30  
plpete84
Drifting
 
plpete84's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2020
Location: Washington DC
Posts: 2,033
Received 1,723 Likes on 882 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by peterp
Might be worth it for the OP (and others with poor mileage) to try Redline SI-1 Fuel System cleaner -- the references to it in the DI40 thread makes it sound like it walks on water and is better than Techron and others (based upon what's it contains). The posts discussing it start here (https://rennlist.com/forums/996-foru...l#post19181932) -- there are only a few posts on the fuel cleaner, since it's an oil thread), but it sounds quite good. I've used Techron and Sea Foam in the past, but am going to give Redline SI-1 a try based upon the comments.
Originally Posted by theprf
My guy that cleans fuel injectors (hurst injector service) swears by the SL-1 cleaner, says none of the others are worth anything.

I doubt the injector cleaner will help, it's much more likely to be a MAF or an O2 sensor problem.
This. I've used this product numerous times and not only did it help produce some very low fuel contamination numbers in my UOA but also cleaned out a lot of the carbon build up from the tops of the pistons. Nothing else produced the same results. I've posted photos from a borescope in one of the threads. I accredit it to helping me find some piston damage that led to an engine rebuild. With a piston coated in black carbon I wouldn't have found it.
The following users liked this post:
peterp (05-02-2024)


Quick Reply: Fuil comsumtion is killing me 996 Y2003



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 12:23 PM.