Mass Air Flow / gas mileage
#1
Mass Air Flow / gas mileage
My '01 996 is running fine but seems to be getting lousy mileage. Is the mass air flow sensor a likely suspect? If it is, is a careful cleaning likely to solve the problem, or should I replace it? 2nd, the Porsche MAF on Pelican is listed at $753, while Ebay offers a range of manufacturers with prices from $250 all the way down to the low $20's - and even $16. Opinions? Last question; where the hell is it, on the engine... the videos...
(continued at bottom of photo)
on Youtube must be Boxters or 997's or the earlier model 996, because I don't see it where they show it. (I suspect it's in, or near the throttle body - still can't find it.) Thanks. PS. Dumb question of the day: I think I have the original radio, but can't find the **** letting me adjust the balance between front and rear speakers. The **** on the right side doesn't seem to affect it.
(continued at bottom of photo)
on Youtube must be Boxters or 997's or the earlier model 996, because I don't see it where they show it. (I suspect it's in, or near the throttle body - still can't find it.) Thanks. PS. Dumb question of the day: I think I have the original radio, but can't find the **** letting me adjust the balance between front and rear speakers. The **** on the right side doesn't seem to affect it.
#2
Drifting
Middle right edge of your picture.
#4
Rennlist Member
If you just gonna throw parts on 19 year old car to get better gas mileage, throw 2 new Bosch upstream 02 sensors on it. It will probably do more for fuel mileage than anything else.
#5
Instructor
- FRA ~ 1.07 on both banks
- RKAT is ~1.3 on Bank 1 and 0.15 on Bank 2
- MAF is ~20kg/h at idle
- Idle is ~800 rpm
- Camshaft deviations are about -3 degrees on each bank (working on bringing this down to 0)
- I have a KN CAI
#6
Rennlist Member
Hmm, that seems really low. For reference, I get around 23 mpg with a fair amount of acceleration mixed in with every tank. 2002 C2 3.6 MT not sure what to look for but am interested to hear what others have to say.
#7
Rennlist Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Ormond Beach, FL
Posts: 5,811
Likes: 0
Received 1,091 Likes
on
701 Posts
Just as a point of reference, my engine runs great. I typically get 14-15 mpg around town, stop and go traffic, and 23-24 steady on the highway. I have gotten as much as 26-27 on the open road. I do tend to accelerate rapidly from traffic signals in first gear up to around 4000 rpm (after I'm warmed up). Just leaving the traffic behind. I really don't care too much about fuel mileage....it just is what it is.
Trending Topics
#8
I consistently get 14mpg no matter how I drive and am looking for ways to diagnose. I have a durametric. Is there a value I can watch that would indicate new upstream 02 sensors are old/bad and replacing them would help? I monitored the data and saw the typical sine wave. Other data:
- I have a KN CAI
#9
Instructor
Makes sense. I've been keeping an eye out for one since I got the car. I guess I should be able to verify this is the cause though by monitoring my air intake temperature. I'll see if I can get some data and compare with whatever references I can find on the forums.
#10
Read your first sentence again slowly.
Try it with me... say it,
"My '01 996 is running fine" Good good...
again... "My '01 996 is running fine" Getting better...
AGAIN, "My '01 996 is running fine"
ONE MORE TIME LOUDLY! "My '01 996 is running fine"!!!!!
Now, how does that feel? Get off the computer and go drive and enjoy the car. You're sippin' the hypersensitivity kool aid. You don't buy a Porsche concerned about the fuel efficiency.
Try it with me... say it,
"My '01 996 is running fine" Good good...
again... "My '01 996 is running fine" Getting better...
AGAIN, "My '01 996 is running fine"
ONE MORE TIME LOUDLY! "My '01 996 is running fine"!!!!!
Now, how does that feel? Get off the computer and go drive and enjoy the car. You're sippin' the hypersensitivity kool aid. You don't buy a Porsche concerned about the fuel efficiency.
#11
Instructor
Read your first sentence again slowly.
Try it with me... say it,
"My '01 996 is running fine" Good good...
again... "My '01 996 is running fine" Getting better...
AGAIN, "My '01 996 is running fine"
ONE MORE TIME LOUDLY! "My '01 996 is running fine"!!!!!
Now, how does that feel? Get off the computer and go drive and enjoy the car. You're sippin' the hypersensitivity kool aid. You don't buy a Porsche concerned about the fuel efficiency.
Try it with me... say it,
"My '01 996 is running fine" Good good...
again... "My '01 996 is running fine" Getting better...
AGAIN, "My '01 996 is running fine"
ONE MORE TIME LOUDLY! "My '01 996 is running fine"!!!!!
Now, how does that feel? Get off the computer and go drive and enjoy the car. You're sippin' the hypersensitivity kool aid. You don't buy a Porsche concerned about the fuel efficiency.
If I am being hypersensitive, then the data should confirm, and I'll go on my merry way filling up every 200 miles.
#13
Rennlist Member
I consistently get 14mpg no matter how I drive and am looking for ways to diagnose. I have a durametric. Is there a value I can watch that would indicate new upstream 02 sensors are old/bad and replacing them would help? I monitored the data and saw the typical sine wave. Other data:
- FRA ~ 1.07 on both banks
- RKAT is ~1.3 on Bank 1 and 0.15 on Bank 2
- MAF is ~20kg/h at idle
- Idle is ~800 rpm
- Camshaft deviations are about -3 degrees on each bank (working on bringing this down to 0)
- I have a KN CAI
Do same test for Bank 2...
#14
Rennlist Member
Makes sense. I've been keeping an eye out for one since I got the car. I guess I should be able to verify this is the cause though by monitoring my air intake temperature. I'll see if I can get some data and compare with whatever references I can find on the forums.