MAF value = Horsepower potential
#166
#167
Burning Brakes
I have brought home my Snap On Verus. I can get screen shots with it. It has a much higher sample rate and amazing graphing. The only problem is for some reason with porsche it wont put all the pids on one screen so i cant always get what we want to see at the same time. It puts them into like 4 different groups.
#168
I have brought home my Snap On Verus. I can get screen shots with it. It has a much higher sample rate and amazing graphing. The only problem is for some reason with porsche it wont put all the pids on one screen so i cant always get what we want to see at the same time. It puts them into like 4 different groups.
#170
Burning Brakes
Realized thoses pics might be confusing. Both have the measuring tape inserted where the MAF goes in. Stock box has a rubber boot so i could remove it and easily get a pic of the cross section. Because of the design of the fabspeed it is impossibe to get an inside view of the cross section so the pic is taken from where the maf goes in.
#173
Burning Brakes
Happy to see my camshaft deviation @ 3.31 bank 1 and 1.43 bank 2.
And oddly enough i can only measure the MAF in voltage and kg/hr. No g/s and snap on
And oddly enough i can only measure the MAF in voltage and kg/hr. No g/s and snap on
#174
Very healthy. Yes, Porsche DME only reports the MAF in voltage and kg/hr natively if queried by a Porsche/equivalent scanner. You can see my plots in post #134 are also in kg/hr. Mine is a 3.8 and yours is pulling 280g/s or 1,000 kg/hr!
#175
Burning Brakes
Ok. This data provided by snap on.
RPM: 7294
MAF: 994 kg/h (276 g/s)
IAT : 96.8
ALTITUDE CORRECTION FACTOR : 1.01
OUTSIDE AIR TEMP : 74F
COOLANT : 188F
OIL TEMP : 194F
Graph was smooth as can be and the highest recorded MAF was just before closed throttle @ 7294 rpms.
also monitored on torque pro and results were very very close.
and as previously posted - highest numbers were obtained at the 2nd to 3rd shift not 1st to 2nd.
RPM: 7294
MAF: 994 kg/h (276 g/s)
IAT : 96.8
ALTITUDE CORRECTION FACTOR : 1.01
OUTSIDE AIR TEMP : 74F
COOLANT : 188F
OIL TEMP : 194F
Graph was smooth as can be and the highest recorded MAF was just before closed throttle @ 7294 rpms.
also monitored on torque pro and results were very very close.
and as previously posted - highest numbers were obtained at the 2nd to 3rd shift not 1st to 2nd.
#176
Ok. This data provided by snap on.
RPM: 7294
MAF: 994 kg/h (276 g/s)
IAT : 96.8
ALTITUDE CORRECTION FACTOR : 1.01
OUTSIDE AIT TEMP : 74F
COOLANT : 188F
OIL TEMP : 194F
Graph was smooth as can be and the highest recorded MAF was just before closed throttle @ 7294 rpms.
also monitored on torque pro and results were very very close.
and as previously posted - highest numbers were obtained at the 2nd to 3rd shift not 1st to 2nd.
RPM: 7294
MAF: 994 kg/h (276 g/s)
IAT : 96.8
ALTITUDE CORRECTION FACTOR : 1.01
OUTSIDE AIT TEMP : 74F
COOLANT : 188F
OIL TEMP : 194F
Graph was smooth as can be and the highest recorded MAF was just before closed throttle @ 7294 rpms.
also monitored on torque pro and results were very very close.
and as previously posted - highest numbers were obtained at the 2nd to 3rd shift not 1st to 2nd.
You mentioned you had Feebspeed intake and exhaust. Do you have the stock headers?
#177
Burning Brakes
Im just confused though. The purpose of this thread was horse power possibility. Doing the math. That put my car 360 to 370hp unless i am missunderstanding this thread. While i agree my car is quick. Its still a factory 04 c4s cab built with around 320 horse. Yes i got fabspeed maxflow mufflers, fabspeed comp intake and RSS underdrive pulley. But potentially 40hp from that?
#178
Burning Brakes
#179
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
Im just confused though. The purpose of this thread was horse power possibility. Doing the math. That put my car 360 to 370hp unless i am missunderstanding this thread. While i agree my car is quick. Its still a factory 04 c4s cab built with around 320 horse. Yes i got fabspeed maxflow mufflers, fabspeed comp intake and RSS underdrive pulley. But potentially 40hp from that?
So the bone stock 3.6 M96 with factory rating of 320hp will have a Mhpp of 336Mhpp because there are no "mechanical power loss" and only "thermal power loss".
Your Mass air flow of 282g/s / .75 = 376Mhpp, that's a 40hp increase and is why we are very interested in evaluating the fabspeed intake as to how much is actual increase in Mass air flow and how much is "over-reporting" due to smaller cross-section and not being calibrated to the MAF sensor.
Is that metal sleeve on the fabspeed intake going all the way down to the cross-section? Due to the design and position of the sensor hole, it may be difficult to measure the cross-section.
It's just like coming off a chassis Dyno with an impressive number on a near stock car and wondering where that number came from !!
#180
Burning Brakes