Notices
993 Turbo Forum 1995-1998
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

60-130 MPH: New performance measurement!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-01-2007, 10:33 AM
  #1306  
gary11
Instructor
 
gary11's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: essex england
Posts: 182
Received 19 Likes on 6 Posts
Thumbs up

Nice reply Felix. Forgive my rantings!
Oil problem with my car improved ,getting 0.7- 0.8 bar of boost,have covered 200 miles still seems to be a lot of oil blowing around the rear of car and some leakage at intercooler pipe I suppose its residual oil from syphoning problem,not much smoke on startup now even after a hard drive so fingers crossed.
On the performance note I think the 993tt is still today a true supercar I dont have many cars keep up with mine!.
Cheers Felix.
Old 11-01-2007, 10:36 AM
  #1307  
gary11
Instructor
 
gary11's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: essex england
Posts: 182
Received 19 Likes on 6 Posts
Thumbs up

JJayB Lovely car!! Are they Krone 3 piece I have a front hub in my garage if its any good to you,brand new.
Gary
Old 11-01-2007, 11:07 AM
  #1308  
Jean
Addict
Lifetime Rennlist
Member

 
Jean's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 5,450
Received 172 Likes on 104 Posts
Default

IMO, the main reason why the 993TT was single plug was because it served for FIA homologation purposes of the 993GT2 race car for the 1995 season.. Twin-plug was not allowed back then in GTS1 class and Le Mans among other.
Old 11-02-2007, 06:16 PM
  #1309  
Stummel
Pro
 
Stummel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Germany
Posts: 677
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Jean
The R Turbo of Bill has a consistent output of 490-500BHP during these 9 second runs based on the long Gs...
Maybe this is complete bull**** but I think I read that we have some kind of law in Germany that accepts a 10% increase in power without going through all this regulations and stuff.

450hp * 1,1 = 495hp.

Maybe this is why ruf has chosen 490hp as a baseline?
Old 12-17-2007, 09:25 AM
  #1310  
MOD500
Racer
 
MOD500's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Yorkshire, UK
Posts: 449
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

With 1/4 tank of fuel, and slicker shifts got 8.7 secs for the 60 - 130 mph on Saturday at Bruntingthorpe With tank full, was seeing 9.1 to 9.3 secs.
Old 12-17-2007, 09:35 AM
  #1311  
bb993tt
Three Wheelin'
 
bb993tt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Here & There
Posts: 1,368
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by MOD500
With 1/4 tank of fuel, and slicker shifts got 8.7 secs for the 60 - 130 mph on Saturday at Bruntingthorpe With tank full, was seeing 9.1 to 9.3 secs.
Good time, Martyn. And no James Bond/Goldfinger experiences this time? And the car sounds absolutely fabulous on one of the PH videos I saw.

Last edited by bb993tt; 12-17-2007 at 09:49 AM. Reason: Edited to add sound comment.
Old 02-02-2008, 08:33 PM
  #1312  
eclou
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
eclou's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 7,052
Received 1,228 Likes on 600 Posts
Default

Some charts from today 2/2/08. Temp 73F, headwind 10mph. All runs made on the same Driftbox unit

My friend Rob's totally stock Ferrari 430F1. This was in Race mode and check out how quick the shifts are. Despite 2 shifts, the time is good. His car was chirping the 3-4 shift.




TTGasman's 997TT with Tubi exhaust. This was a 3 shift run which I think would be able to cut alot of time off by starting from 3rd and extending the stock redline to allow hitting 130 in 4th. The 4-5 shift added almost 1.5 seconds to the time. The Tubi sounded really, really good on his TT!




My Stage II 997TT, on a 93/104 octane 50/50 blend. I had 3 almost identical runs
Old 02-03-2008, 02:37 PM
  #1313  
Bill S.
Addict
Rennlist Member

Thread Starter
 
Bill S.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 649
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by eclou
Some charts from today 2/2/08. Temp 73F, headwind 10mph. All runs made on the same Driftbox unit

My friend Rob's totally stock Ferrari 430F1. This was in Race mode and check out how quick the shifts are. Despite 2 shifts, the time is good. His car was chirping the 3-4 shift.
eclou, thanks so much for posting! I've been hoping to see a 430F1 in action! Here's the 430 vs a CS. Contrary to popular belief, the shift times are about the same. The 430 is about 1 second faster from 60 to 130. However, I did 2 shifts and you did 3, so the comparison there is not apples-to-apples. I'll see if I have any 3-shift runs somewhere.

Great time on your 997 TT! It looks like 60 to 130 in about 7.9 seconds!
Attached Images  
Old 02-03-2008, 03:09 PM
  #1314  
Sprintrider
Rennlist Member
 
Sprintrider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Northern Nevada
Posts: 306
Received 54 Likes on 27 Posts
Default

Out of curiosity, what times can one expect from a stock 993 TT setup?
Old 02-03-2008, 04:07 PM
  #1315  
Felix
Addict
Rennlist Lifetime Member
 
Felix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: UK
Posts: 1,750
Received 15 Likes on 14 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Sprintrider
Out of curiosity, what times can one expect from a stock 993 TT setup?
11.5-12.0
Old 03-03-2008, 10:38 PM
  #1316  
Bill S.
Addict
Rennlist Member

Thread Starter
 
Bill S.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 649
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Default New CGT times

I had a chance to run many 60 to 130s in a CGT with 91 octane (2-3 and 3-4 shift). Most times were near 7.7 seconds. Has anyone else done this?
Attached Images  
Old 03-04-2008, 04:52 AM
  #1317  
TB993tt
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
TB993tt's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 4,441
Received 108 Likes on 68 Posts
Default

I did loads of runs to 300kph at the airstrip - the 60-130 came out around 8s most of the time -being two people, slightly uphill and with a rough surface probably robbed a few tenths. 993RSR posted a 60-130 on this thread somewhere (7.4s from memory but he was one up)


Edit:
Found one I did on this thread, June last year driver only 7.8s -lardy gearchanges and a bit downhill but they all seem to be that way

Last edited by TB993tt; 03-04-2008 at 05:25 AM.
Old 03-04-2008, 10:17 AM
  #1318  
Bill S.
Addict
Rennlist Member

Thread Starter
 
Bill S.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 649
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by TB993tt
Found one I did on this thread, June last year driver only 7.8s -lardy gearchanges and a bit downhill but they all seem to be that way
Thanks for finding that. It seems like you would be in the low 7s with slightly faster shifts. What octane gas were you using? We have 91 (R+M)/2.
Old 03-04-2008, 01:17 PM
  #1319  
TB993tt
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
TB993tt's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 4,441
Received 108 Likes on 68 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Bill S.
Thanks for finding that. It seems like you would be in the low 7s with slightly faster shifts. What octane gas were you using? We have 91 (R+M)/2.
Bill, 99RON which I think is about 93MON - the downhill slope of about 3m probably contributed a bit.....
The average at Bruntingthorpe (rough surface -bit of TC) with 2 people slightly uphill seemed to be about 8.3s...
The fastest recorded two people in car I have seen is the Sport Auto test which managed 6.4s 100-200kph which is about 7.2s 60-130mph
Old 04-28-2008, 04:38 PM
  #1320  
Jean
Addict
Lifetime Rennlist
Member

 
Jean's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 5,450
Received 172 Likes on 104 Posts
Default

I thought I would update the thread with my latest run.

This is the first all out run that I do with my stock gearbox, with the sequential gearbox I achieved a 6.6s. last year.. This run is 6.2seconds with one shift.

Temperature 29deg C. (84F) , tires Michelin Racing slicks on 2WD. The 60-130mph was achieved with one shift instead of two shifts as a result of the taller tires. Grip was decent, lateral Gs are still a bit wild, but nothing compared to my previous run of 6.6s on MPSC. Estimated full running weight 1510-1520 KGS (3330 LBS) . The most astonishing part for me is that I ran at less than 1 Bar of boost! The previous run was made at 1.18 bar and was slower

Some performance data to compare with high speeds available:
100-160KPH:2.8s/ Gemballa GTR750: 2.7s./ RUF RT12: 3.3s / Woodster: 3.48s
100-200KPH: 5.3s / Gemballa GTR750:5.3s / RUF RT12: 6.4s/ Woodster : 6.9s
100-220KPH: 7.4s / Gemballa GTR750:6.7s/ RUF RT12: N/A / Woodster: 9.54s
100-240KPH: 9.4s/ Gemballa GTR 750: 8.8s/ RUF RT 12:N/A/ Woodster: 11.54s
100-250kph: 10.6s RUF RT12: 12.0s. Woodster: 13.5s.

So I am about 1.4seconds faster than an RT12 from 100kph all the way up to250kph, that's really surprising despite my really poor aerodynamics!

Gemballa GTR 750: 0-300 KPH : 21.7s. 100-300KPH: 17.6S
RUF RT12: 0-300kph: 24.8s 100-300KPH: 21.4s
Woodster: 0-300kph: 27s. 100-300KPH: 22.2s.

60-130MPH: 6.2s.
60-150mph: 9.8s
60-159mph: 11.5s


Quick Reply: 60-130 MPH: New performance measurement!



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 08:13 AM.