Notices
993 Turbo Forum 1995-1998
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

60-130 MPH: New performance measurement!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-19-2006, 01:34 PM
  #706  
Woodster
Drifting
 
Woodster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: WEST SIDE OF MPLS, MN
Posts: 2,628
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Protomotive: the pinnacle of power or not ??

Thank you Mr. Moderator (Jean).
Lat, we will bench race this week, right?

My favorite words on the videos were:
1) MAN THIS THING IS FAST...Alex " Yeah it is"

2) To the twin turbo 350Z owner who has "EYE 1" on his license
plates: "are you gonna change your plates" Laughter....

Remember guys, the Midwest is getting our very own Protomotive
Car next month (Markski--Chicago) !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


Marty K.
Old 06-19-2006, 03:18 PM
  #707  
LAT
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
LAT's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,280
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

TB

Regarding the XA22

I agree regrding your concerns, however if used as it should be the XA is very good and the results are very repeatable. The XA does not come with a user manual however and that is a short coming. The manual or what there is of one has to be downloaded from the web site. It should have a quick start instruction sheet and an in depth manual.

LAT
Old 06-19-2006, 05:14 PM
  #708  
Jean
Addict
Lifetime Rennlist
Member

 
Jean's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 5,445
Received 168 Likes on 100 Posts
Default

LAT I love that CTR2 butt....PM sent

TB, I agree with your concerns about the AX22. I am surprised because I thought that the mix of GPS and accelerometers can offset any errors via calculations that the device makes.

Once I receive the data from LAT, I might be able to figure out something.

As for traction, good R compound tires with the right amount of heat in them will get you grip up to 1.3 Gs as I tested through my datalogs.

However personally I seem to have never reached those ideal temps on the street BTW there is huge loss of traction in Alex's run too.
Old 06-19-2006, 07:53 PM
  #709  
TB993tt
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
TB993tt's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 4,441
Received 108 Likes on 68 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Jean
LAT I love that CTR2 butt....PM sent

TB, I agree with your concerns about the AX22. I am surprised because I thought that the mix of GPS and accelerometers can offset any errors via calculations that the device makes.

Once I receive the data from LAT, I might be able to figure out something.

As for traction, good R compound tires with the right amount of heat in them will get you grip up to 1.3 Gs as I tested through my datalogs.

However personally I seem to have never reached those ideal temps on the street BTW there is huge loss of traction in Alex's run too.
Jean
I was also surprised with the error LAT got since even if you don't "calibrate" the unit when static and level at the begining of a run, the GPS does "catch up" and gets the speed right after a number of seconds, so maybe LAT's errors were more to do with the angle of the unit ?
Just to be straight, I am not doubting the numbers presented, just trying to imagine what it must feel like - can you maybe ask the owner if I can have a copy of the files so I can "feel" some of the Gs produced
Old 06-20-2006, 07:36 AM
  #710  
red993tt
Racer
 
red993tt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Pacific NW
Posts: 439
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I have asked Alex the owner of the 996TT to join us for further technical discussion regarding his 4.4s runs. He had agreed to chime in soon.
Vincent
Old 06-20-2006, 08:24 AM
  #711  
TB993tt
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
TB993tt's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 4,441
Received 108 Likes on 68 Posts
Default

Someone posted on 6speed numbers showing that this this protomotive car is faster than a '92 Williams F1 car 100-150mph.

the Williams is 600kg and had 650hp power to weight ratio 1100hp/tnne

So for the Protomotive car to match this ratio weighing ~3800lbs it would need 1866hp.

Like I said, I am having difficulty with making the numbers work
Old 06-20-2006, 08:49 AM
  #712  
LAT
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
LAT's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,280
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

TB
You sound like me that is how the whole thing between Jean and I started.
Let see what Jean finds with my data, it may give us insight into the XA and it vulnerability.
LAT
Old 06-20-2006, 12:32 PM
  #713  
riverflyer
Instructor
 
riverflyer's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 174
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

tb993tt, can you post some pics of your car or even better, send me some hi res shots? Looks so nice! yogajohn@mcn.org
thanks
Old 06-20-2006, 02:18 PM
  #714  
GuyR
Racer
 
GuyR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: UK
Posts: 400
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by TB993tt
Someone posted on 6speed numbers showing that this this protomotive car is faster than a '92 Williams F1 car 100-150mph.

the Williams is 600kg and had 650hp power to weight ratio 1100hp/tnne

So for the Protomotive car to match this ratio weighing ~3800lbs it would need 1866hp.

Like I said, I am having difficulty with making the numbers work
The 3.0sec 100-150mph claim was not posted by the owner or someone linked to the owner, just a calculation someone had done and I think their calculation must be wrong.

However F1 cars do slow down a lot above 150mph due to having a cD of about 4 due to downforce. McLaren themselves were quoted as saying the F1 roadcar accelerated faster than the Formula 1 racer above 150 due to the drag issues.

Guy
Old 06-20-2006, 06:33 PM
  #715  
Peter S 993tt
Racer
 
Peter S 993tt's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: New York
Posts: 287
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Maybe those funny wings have something to do with that?

;-)
Old 06-20-2006, 09:23 PM
  #716  
Bill S.
Addict
Rennlist Member

Thread Starter
 
Bill S.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 649
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Default

The CGT does 60 to 130 in about 7 seconds, assuming one shift. It's Weight/Power = 3042/605 = 5.

A 60 to 130 of 4.4 seconds (one shift) is 1.6 times less than 7. That requires a Weight/Power that's also about 1.6 times less.

Assuming Alex's car weighs 3600 lbs, that's 3600/HP = 3.1, HP = 1,161.

1,161 HP at the crank with 1.5 bar of boost, race gas and a very efficient intake and exhaust system is certainly not unheard of.

Of course this is all meaningless anyway since the whole point was to compare 60 to 130 times in an accurate way. Alex's 4.4 second run on the AX-22 seems OK, unless he was going downhill, which I doubt a man with Alex's reputation would do.
Old 06-21-2006, 11:24 AM
  #717  
Woodster
Drifting
 
Woodster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: WEST SIDE OF MPLS, MN
Posts: 2,628
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

We are very lucky to have such knowledgable people on this board,
I finally bought the "data flash card thingy" at Best Buy last night and will try AX-22 this weekend.
it is also difficult to find screwdriver that is small enough to secure black/red wires to orange plug-
in.
Marty K.
Old 06-21-2006, 12:05 PM
  #718  
LAT
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
LAT's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,280
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Marty

A screwdriver normally used for eye glassess works well.

LAT
Old 06-22-2006, 02:51 PM
  #719  
Craig.
Racer
 
Craig.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 341
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

How and where are you guys mounting your AX22 GPS antenna?

Details please.

Thanks,

Craig
Old 06-22-2006, 02:59 PM
  #720  
Jean
Addict
Lifetime Rennlist
Member

 
Jean's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 5,445
Received 168 Likes on 100 Posts
Default

Craig, extend the antenna cable through the passenger window and stick it on the top of your roof. I typically close the window on it barely , just to hold the cable in place. Without a proper antenna position, you can get wrong readings.


Quick Reply: 60-130 MPH: New performance measurement!



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 04:24 AM.