Notices
993 Forum 1995-1998

First Test: FDM 200 cell sport cats

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-18-2012, 01:58 PM
  #61  
Cupcar
Rennlist Member
 
Cupcar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: California Boardwalk, Skanderborg Denmark
Posts: 3,682
Received 95 Likes on 63 Posts
Default

I didn't think that Zeppo had such a fan base.

Here is a little blurb, note a Marman clamp held "Fat Man" the A -bomb in the Bockscar B-29 on the fateful day over Nagasaki.

http://virtualwayne.blogspot.com/201...man-clamp.html
Old 08-28-2012, 12:01 PM
  #62  
mpotvin
Rennlist Member
 
mpotvin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 245
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Darin, Any updates on the new system?
Old 08-28-2012, 12:32 PM
  #63  
diet97993
Rennlist Member
 
diet97993's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: California Central Coast Lompoc
Posts: 145
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Marman clamps were also used on the F-4 B and J models (NAVY)in the engine bay and along the leading and trailing edge Boundry Layer Control (BLC) ducts. Just wonder if there should be a metal hard conical seal used in the joint during assembly. Just a question.

Don
Old 08-28-2012, 02:18 PM
  #64  
CarreraX
Addict
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
CarreraX's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Dayton Ohio.....Americas Playground!!!
Posts: 2,892
Likes: 0
Received 29 Likes on 18 Posts
Default

Here is the update we have been waiting for!!
https://rennlist.com/forums/993-foru...at-videos.html
Old 08-28-2012, 05:00 PM
  #65  
vanguard
Instructor
 
vanguard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 179
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I raised this earlier but just curious FD, how come the idea of the right header connecting to the left muffler and vice versa wasn’t used in the prototype design? Maybe it's a packaging limitation but that’s what I did on my custom 200cat setup. It looks great nonetheless but I just remember reading full 180degree bends is equivalent of adding "x" feet of tubing for the evacuating gas. I really need to get a set of Stage II exhaust. They sound great combined with the 200cell cats (saw the video).

I'll snap a picture of mine later but it looks similar in idea to this.
Old 09-24-2012, 02:42 PM
  #66  
CarreraX
Addict
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
CarreraX's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Dayton Ohio.....Americas Playground!!!
Posts: 2,892
Likes: 0
Received 29 Likes on 18 Posts
Default

Just found out that mine have shipped and will be here Wednesday!!!
https://rennlist.com/forums/993-foru...ml#post9865524
Old 09-24-2012, 04:34 PM
  #67  
Aircooled Dave
Instructor
 
Aircooled Dave's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 107
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by vanguard
I raised this earlier but just curious FD, how come the idea of the right header connecting to the left muffler and vice versa wasn’t used in the prototype design? Maybe it's a packaging limitation but that’s what I did on my custom 200cat setup. It looks great nonetheless but I just remember reading full 180degree bends is equivalent of adding "x" feet of tubing for the evacuating gas. I really need to get a set of Stage II exhaust. They sound great combined with the 200cell cats (saw the video).
Exactly what I was thinking. Although the 993 exhaust routing was a huge improvement over the 964, it seems like it's not nearly as efficient as it could be given the number of bends in the system. Overall length is probably near equivalent to what you would get with a standard front engined car, which seems odd given the engines rear placement.

Not to get overly technical here, but when analyzing fluid dynamics, the Reynolds number (Re) does indicate that a 180deg bend is significantly worse when compared to lesser bends. I don't have the exact parameters of the Porsche exhaust characteristics here, but in previous work that impact can be as much as 30-40% loss in flow, whether it is laminar or turbulent in type.

The "over/under" design does seem like it could fit and in theory should be a better performer, but I have never messed with this to any degree. Even if the pipe size was physically smaller in diameter, it could in theory still be better performing than the 180deg large pipe. It would be interesting to see what comments others with more experience working on this exhaust may have.

Cheers,
Dave
Old 09-24-2012, 06:23 PM
  #68  
bart1
Race Car
 
bart1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Alabama
Posts: 3,599
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Aircooled Dave
Exactly what I was thinking. Although the 993 exhaust routing was a huge improvement over the 964, it seems like it's not nearly as efficient as it could be given the number of bends in the system. Overall length is probably near equivalent to what you would get with a standard front engined car, which seems odd given the engines rear placement.

Not to get overly technical here, but when analyzing fluid dynamics, the Reynolds number (Re) does indicate that a 180deg bend is significantly worse when compared to lesser bends. I don't have the exact parameters of the Porsche exhaust characteristics here, but in previous work that impact can be as much as 30-40% loss in flow, whether it is laminar or turbulent in type.

The "over/under" design does seem like it could fit and in theory should be a better performer, but I have never messed with this to any degree. Even if the pipe size was physically smaller in diameter, it could in theory still be better performing than the 180deg large pipe. It would be interesting to see what comments others with more experience working on this exhaust may have.

Cheers,
Dave
My Dansk 100 cell split flow are left to right, no 180s. No pics handy.



Quick Reply: First Test: FDM 200 cell sport cats



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 11:10 PM.