Notices
993 Forum 1995-1998
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

I'm tired of this "designed to be driven hard" nonsense

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-19-2011, 01:21 PM
  #241  
richardew
R.I.P
Rennlist Member
 
richardew's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Ambler, PA
Posts: 693
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

THe theory is:
high rpm<====bad===good===>low rpm
high engine load<===bad===good===>low engine load

For any given speed there are 6 combinations of load and rpm. As you select a lower gear, rpms go up (bad) and engine load goes down (good). Clearly there is no simple rule to follow that is "good" for the engine.
There always is a sweet spot for the type of driving you are doing. If you are accelerating and braking a lot, you want to have higher rpms. If you are cruising at a steady speed on the highway you can get by with lower rpms. I don't look at it so much as driving hard or easy, but driving it intelligently.
I am a proponent of a proper engine break in when the car is new, and then a proper warm up when the car is cold. Then I proceed to drive intelligently and enjoy my car, a lot. Sometimes cruising down the highway, sometimes heelin n toein through some s curves.

Last edited by richardew; 02-19-2011 at 03:12 PM. Reason: I can't spell
Old 02-19-2011, 01:45 PM
  #242  
95 C4 993
Rennlist Member
 
95 C4 993's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Sandy, UT/Fish Haven, ID
Posts: 3,033
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by richardew
THe theory is:
high rpm<====bad===good===>low rpm
high engine load<===bad===good===>low engine load

For any given speed there are 6 combinations of load and rpm. As you select a lower gear, rpms go up (bad) and engine load goes down (good). Clearly there is no simple rule to follow that is "good" for the engine.
There always is a sweet spot for the type of driving you are doing. If you are accelerating and braking a lot, you want to have higher rpms. If you are cruising at a steady speed on the highway you can get by with lower rpms. I don't look at it so much as driving hard or easy, but driving it intelligently.
I am a proponent of a proper engine break in when the car is new, and then a proper warm up when the car is cold. Then I proceed to drive intelligently and enjoy my car, a lot. Sometimes cruising down the highway, sometimes heelin n towin through some s curves.
Great example of a 993 with 268,000 miles on the clock that defeats most theories of driving out there. Im sure your car has seen its mellow and spirited driving, and everything in between. At the rate Im going, I should expect to hit 268,000 miles in rougly 30 years.

Some live healthy and die young. Others live hard and die old. Sometimes **** just happens, regardless of the situation in life or with cars. The Sunday driver who needs a top end rebuild at 60k on the clock and the 268k vehicle that seems to just keep chugging along--whats the theory behind that? There is none---its just the way it is.
Old 02-19-2011, 05:23 PM
  #243  
timothymoffat
Rennlist Member
 
timothymoffat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Rainforest (Vancouver, BC)
Posts: 7,579
Received 1,040 Likes on 469 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Quadcammer
I'll say it...quality on any mass produced car I've ever seen has been relative dog****. From mercedes to bmw, to bentley to jaguar. Name a brand and you'll find the quality lacking. Not one car I've ever been in has impressed me with respect to assembly quality.
Quality relative to what? I'm serious. Apparently ALL cars are garbage in your mind. In order to come to this conclusion you MUST have owned something better. I'd really like to know what that is. And if you say E36 I'll laugh, not because I think the E36 3-series was a bad car but because it's not perfect either.

Maybe you need to start your own car company and build cars to the quality you expect. Don't forget it needs to be attractive, appeal to it's target market which no matter how small has wide-ranging expectations, good performance relative to it's competition, make it conform to worldwide regulations, and make it last. Good luck.
Old 02-19-2011, 05:46 PM
  #244  
cgfen
Rennlist Member
 
cgfen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Vista CA
Posts: 7,695
Received 870 Likes on 573 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Quadcammer

Right now my car has a few mechanical issues as its missing fuel injectors, and well most of its upper engine accessories.
ahhhhhhhhhhh but if you drove it "harder" you would not have these mechanical issues..................


Craig
Old 02-19-2011, 05:52 PM
  #245  
porschemikeandnancy
Pro
 
porschemikeandnancy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Greater Seattle (via NH)
Posts: 552
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Today on msn.com's home page is a list of "10 cars built to last". The 911 is listed as one of them.
Old 02-19-2011, 06:16 PM
  #246  
Ed Hughes
Rennlist Member
 
Ed Hughes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Bend, OR
Posts: 16,518
Received 80 Likes on 54 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by porschemikeandnancy
Today on msn.com's home page is a list of "10 cars built to last". The 911 is listed as one of them.
Where is their proof?
Old 02-19-2011, 06:44 PM
  #247  
Quadcammer
Race Director
Thread Starter
 
Quadcammer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Clifton, NJ
Posts: 15,667
Received 1,404 Likes on 813 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by timothymoffat
Quality relative to what? I'm serious. Apparently ALL cars are garbage in your mind. In order to come to this conclusion you MUST have owned something better. I'd really like to know what that is. And if you say E36 I'll laugh, not because I think the E36 3-series was a bad car but because it's not perfect either.

Maybe you need to start your own car company and build cars to the quality you expect. Don't forget it needs to be attractive, appeal to it's target market which no matter how small has wide-ranging expectations, good performance relative to it's competition, make it conform to worldwide regulations, and make it last. Good luck.
Quality relative to nothing. Quality is quality, I don't necessarily have to compare it to anything to know whether I think its good or bad. Whether its quality that is affordable or even possible, who knows. The bugatti veyron I examined (but didn't drive) had some beautiful detail work like the turn signal stalks, but also had some odd issues like steering column panel fit from a chrysler product.

The E36 is a great car but its far from perfect as well.

Originally Posted by cgfen
ahhhhhhhhhhh but if you drove it "harder" you would not have these mechanical issues..................


Craig
Lol, you may be right.

Originally Posted by porschemikeandnancy
Today on msn.com's home page is a list of "10 cars built to last". The 911 is listed as one of them.
Kinda funny you mentioned that...lets look at their quote:
Here's a vehicle that has scored a perfect 5 in J.D. Power's survey of Initial Quality for the past six years and between 3.5 and 5 in Overall Dependability for four out of the past five years. While most Porsche owners are reluctant to breathe a bad word about the brand for fear of being tossed out of the "club," there has to be something behind years of stellar satisfaction ratings. And if you're paying a base price of $77,800 — and nobody ever pays base price on a Porsche 911 — you have a right to demand perfection.
Seems they are basing their information on 996s and 997s...they also say we should be demanding perfection...which I am
Old 02-20-2011, 11:52 AM
  #248  
nsully
Instructor
 
nsully's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Amelia Island, Florida
Posts: 202
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 9 Posts
Default

I am embarrassed for myself that I just spent 5 minutes reading a portion of this thread.
Neil
Old 02-20-2011, 04:27 PM
  #249  
Amfab
Addict
Rennlist Member
 
Amfab's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 1,201
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

If I were Porsche, and was designing a car...
and knowing that the car could be driven either hard or not hard...
and it being a "sports car"
I would most likely design it with the intent that it be driven hard...

Of course I have no proof that such elaborate, convoluted thinking actually occurred.
Old 02-20-2011, 07:18 PM
  #250  
J.B.H.
Rennlist Member
 
J.B.H.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Northern, NJ
Posts: 444
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by Amfab
If I were Porsche, and was designing a car...
and knowing that the car could be driven either hard or not hard...
and it being a "sports car"
I would most likely design it with the intent that it be driven hard...

Of course I have no proof that such elaborate, convoluted thinking actually occurred.
Awesome!
Old 02-20-2011, 07:39 PM
  #251  
ilko
Agent Orange
Rennlist Member
 
ilko's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 16,194
Received 555 Likes on 199 Posts
Default

Can't believe this thread is still going on...

Old 02-20-2011, 07:57 PM
  #252  
SeanR
Rennlist Member
 
SeanR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 35,700
Received 500 Likes on 267 Posts
Default

Was there any consensus?

Cliff notes?
Old 02-20-2011, 07:59 PM
  #253  
Mark in Baltimore
Rennlist Member
 
Mark in Baltimore's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Baltimore, MD
Posts: 23,303
Received 499 Likes on 320 Posts
Default

Hard. Very hard.
Old 02-20-2011, 11:12 PM
  #254  
abiazis
Rennlist Member
 
abiazis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Berkeley Lake, Georgia
Posts: 4,274
Received 755 Likes on 551 Posts
Default

Since Quad has a financial background, and assuming with some certainty based on this post, that he has a probable bean counter mentality, he wanted tangible proof on something with just too many influencing variables to arrive at a distinct answer with black and white proof....

As many of you have probably dealt with financial people, you know it can be infuriating because sometime stuff just happens in business, things sometimes are just the way they are, etc. and that is about it..........proof difficult to put on paper or in black and white.....

It is a similar dynamic to when someone says someone is an "blank hole" and there is no real answer or proof that can be given when someone asks why....they just are......

The answer or proof provided for this "interesting topic or question" (to be consistent with my previous post), needs to be satisfied within a black and white expectation which is not practical ............therefore it is proposed that the post be informally retired for prosperity for future searchers of this topic to review for pure entertainment or amazement that it went on this long........frankly it has been amusing for us all to review and comment before the actual April Fool's Day this year......
Old 02-21-2011, 04:50 AM
  #255  
Bouzoukikid
Instructor
 
Bouzoukikid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 218
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

In my mind, the harder you drive, the more wear you cause. I find it hard to accept any other conclusion.

If a car gets clogged up and needs to be driven hard to run healthily, then it's been badly designed for road use.

OT
Changing gears at the "optimal" 4000-4500 revs as some have suggested, will quickly result in loosing your licence. In town you'd probably ever need to use 1st gear.

If there is no proof either way on this topic, I would rather take the risk and drive calmly.

With the occasional BLAST

Last edited by Bouzoukikid; 02-21-2011 at 05:59 AM.


Quick Reply: I'm tired of this "designed to be driven hard" nonsense



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 03:34 PM.