Notices
993 Forum 1995-1998
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

9M build

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-30-2010, 11:39 AM
  #16  
RollingArt
Drifting
 
RollingArt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Oregon
Posts: 2,017
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes on 9 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by NineMeister
Well, think about it a bit more. How could the static compression ratio have such a profound effect on volumetric efficiency that a performance increase without change is not possible?

? ? ?? ? ?

WTF??

That there's some double doodle back talk.
Old 03-30-2010, 11:41 AM
  #17  
JPS
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
JPS's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Manhattan
Posts: 4,671
Received 19 Likes on 14 Posts
Default

and if you could, provide napkins for all the drooling that will most certainly occur
And baby oil...
Old 03-30-2010, 11:50 AM
  #18  
TheOtherEric
Rennlist Member
 
TheOtherEric's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Chicago
Posts: 12,065
Received 36 Likes on 24 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by NineMeister
Well, think about it a bit more. How could the static compression ratio have such a profound effect on volumetric efficiency that a performance increase without change is not possible?
Ok so you're actually doing that. I assumed that whoever said stock CR was simply mistaken. Although now that I think about it, I believe BMW was able to pull 100 hp/L from their mid-90's M3 engine using a CR of 11.3 and that's exactly what you're doing.

I thought I heard you were bumping up the CR, but perhaps it's more like "restoring" it to where it should be:
https://rennlist.com/forums/993-foru...ade-993-a.html
Originally Posted by Geoffrey
Additionally, Colin's cylinder heads .... It also raises the compression ratio slightly which basically will restore a 964/993 engine from the 10.5:1-10.7:1 compression it actually is to more like 11.1:1-11.3:1 it is advertised to be from Porsche.
Old 03-30-2010, 02:29 PM
  #19  
NineMeister
Addict
Rennlist
Site Sponsor

 
NineMeister's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Cheshire, England
Posts: 4,446
Received 191 Likes on 94 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by TheOtherEric
Ok so you're actually doing that. I assumed that whoever said stock CR was simply mistaken. Although now that I think about it, I believe BMW was able to pull 100 hp/L from their mid-90's M3 engine using a CR of 11.3 and that's exactly what you're doing.

I thought I heard you were bumping up the CR, but perhaps it's more like "restoring" it to where it should be:
https://rennlist.com/forums/993-foru...ade-993-a.html

You're not wrong in what you said Eric, the 9m heads have 3cc smaller combustion chambers than a stock 993 cylinder head, however as you have deduced from Geoffrey's comments the reason why we did this is because every standard engine we measured failed to make the Porsche-specified static compression ratio.

The only reason why I decided not to be immediately forthcoming is that there are a plethora of engine variables which can be altered to gain power or torque, for instance: valve timing (open & close, inlet or exhaust), valve size, valve seat cuts & angles, inlet port area/volume/length, inlet port area profile, header diameter/length, piston to head clearance, piston crown design, etc., etc., hence it has be technically wrong to isolate compression ratio as the one variable that must be changed otherwise none of the above will make any difference.

In fact, in some rare cases of engines with exceptionally high volumetric efficiency, it may actually be desirable to reduce the static compression ratio in order to yield more space to fill with mixture to burn....


Anyway, the build of the engine will use 9m billet heads (50mm/42.5mm valves), 9m Sport camshafts, 9m Sport valve spring set, mechanical rockers with ported intake runners, 100 cell cats and a live remap and we are expecting somewhere around 350hp on the 9m dyno, which will be around 300+hp at the tyres.
Old 03-30-2010, 03:46 PM
  #20  
RollingArt
Drifting
 
RollingArt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Oregon
Posts: 2,017
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes on 9 Posts
Default

Now you're talking!



Phil
Old 03-30-2010, 08:27 PM
  #21  
CalvinC4S
Drifting
 
CalvinC4S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: USA
Posts: 2,085
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Colin, how much of a hit would the lazy guys take that want to keep there hydraulic rockers? Can you adjust #6 intake with the motor in the car?

What are box stock 3.6 Varioram motors putting out on your dyno?

Are your cams keyed?

This great stuff, thank you!

Edit to add, Are your cams set up to keep power steering?

Last edited by CalvinC4S; 03-30-2010 at 08:47 PM. Reason: another ?
Old 03-30-2010, 09:37 PM
  #22  
NineMeister
Addict
Rennlist
Site Sponsor

 
NineMeister's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Cheshire, England
Posts: 4,446
Received 191 Likes on 94 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by CalvinC4S
Colin, how much of a hit would the lazy guys take that want to keep there hydraulic rockers? Can you adjust #6 intake with the motor in the car?

What are box stock 3.6 Varioram motors putting out on your dyno?

Are your cams keyed?

This great stuff, thank you!

Edit to add, Are your cams set up to keep power steering?
We recommend mechanical lifters to anyone with a high miles engine that is going to be used heavily at high rpm, i.e. track use, irrespective of how hard it is to adjust them afterwards. That said, another customer who had the first non-Varioram +2 conversion (John S) told me the other day that he has had his clearances checked twice in the 20k+ track miles that he has done in the car and they still don't need adjusting. The penalty for using old or soft lifters is a loss of power when the engine gets very hot.

A stock NVR will make anything from 275-285bhp, the stock VR will usually make 290-300 with an exceptional few making 310. The best RS we have tested made 320bhp at the flywheel. The VR+2 conversion typically makes from 345-355hp and the VR+3 (3.8) makes 360bhp.

Yes, the cams are keyed and are set up by optimising the centrelines with a degree wheel then inlet lift checked at TDC. The cams come with PS take off, so if you don't need it you get out the hacksaw...
Old 03-31-2010, 02:34 AM
  #23  
1pcarnut
Drifting
 
1pcarnut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Sandy Eggo, Ca
Posts: 2,218
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Colin, curious about the intake manifold modification? Thanks.

Last edited by 1pcarnut; 03-31-2010 at 02:51 AM.
Old 03-31-2010, 07:02 AM
  #24  
NineMeister
Addict
Rennlist
Site Sponsor

 
NineMeister's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Cheshire, England
Posts: 4,446
Received 191 Likes on 94 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 1pcarnut
Colin, curious about the intake manifold modification? Thanks.
Simple - do this until the ports are the optimum profile from top to bottom:
Attached Images  
Old 03-31-2010, 01:01 PM
  #25  
1pcarnut
Drifting
 
1pcarnut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Sandy Eggo, Ca
Posts: 2,218
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Okay, thanks, that makes sense. Thought maybe you were changing the vario-ram mechanism.
Old 03-31-2010, 01:48 PM
  #26  
axl911
Drifting
 
axl911's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 2,559
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by NineMeister
Simple - do this until the ports are the optimum profile from top to bottom:
Interesting tool. What is it called? The lower section of the Vram is easily unbolted. I may do this the next time I have the intake off.
Old 03-31-2010, 01:57 PM
  #27  
CalvinC4S
Drifting
 
CalvinC4S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: USA
Posts: 2,085
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by axl911
Interesting tool. What is it called? The lower section of the Vram is easily unbolted. I may do this the next time I have the intake off.
Not a good idea with stock head ports.
Old 03-31-2010, 02:28 PM
  #28  
axl911
Drifting
 
axl911's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 2,559
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by CalvinC4S
Not a good idea with stock head ports.
Can you elaborate? Not good idea since it's useless on the stock head port???
Old 03-31-2010, 02:33 PM
  #29  
NineMeister
Addict
Rennlist
Site Sponsor

 
NineMeister's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Cheshire, England
Posts: 4,446
Received 191 Likes on 94 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by axl911
Interesting tool. What is it called? The lower section of the Vram is easily unbolted. I may do this the next time I have the intake off.
The tool in the end of the flexi-shaft electric die grinder is called a flap wheel, made from various grits of emery cloth glued to a 1/4" spindle. I use 40 grit to rough it out and 80 grit for fine finishing. Be warned that you need to use suitable protective equipment.
Old 03-31-2010, 02:51 PM
  #30  
CalvinC4S
Drifting
 
CalvinC4S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: USA
Posts: 2,085
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

If im not mistaken it's done to match the intake ports of the new heads.


Quick Reply: 9M build



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 02:13 PM.