Notices
992 2019-Present The Forum for the Non-Turbo 911
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Official 992.2 Reviews Discussion

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-11-2024, 09:29 PM
  #181  
2SG5
Cruisin'
 
2SG5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2024
Location: Chicago
Posts: 9
Received 12 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 3520MMF
What are the iconic features you speak of ?
I think he is referencing the chubby half key that was around for 1.5 gens (991.1 - 992.1) and the single analog tach that was around for .5 gens (992.1). Both of these things are minor and irrelevant to the driving experience of the car. Im really excited for the base and the tuning potential that will come with it from utilizing the previous gen GTS turbo and intercooler from the turbo model as well as the larger breaks from the previous Gen S model.
The following 5 users liked this post by 2SG5:
3520MMF (07-11-2024), alaris (07-12-2024), fanboy (07-12-2024), Haros (07-13-2024), yellolab (07-14-2024)
Old 07-11-2024, 09:36 PM
  #182  
3520MMF
Advanced
 
3520MMF's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2024
Posts: 64
Received 38 Likes on 24 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 2SG5
I think he is referencing the chubby half key that was around for 1.5 gens (991.1 - 992.1) and the single analog tach that was around for .5 gens (992.1). Both of these things are minor and irrelevant to the driving experience of the car. Im really excited for the base and the tuning potential that will come with it from utilizing the previous gen GTS turbo and intercooler from the turbo model as well as the larger breaks from the previous Gen S model.


And let’s not forget the SC timer since the 997 gen. Iconic. Lol and let’s not forgot the ethos !
I’m in total agreement with you. There are so many nice upgrades.

Old 07-11-2024, 10:40 PM
  #183  
Nein Eleven
Racer
 
Nein Eleven's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2022
Location: CA
Posts: 438
Received 323 Likes on 179 Posts
Default

I just listened to the 992.2 portion of The Smoking Tire podcast and here were the highlights from Matt:
  • Hybrid system doesn't work with a manual
  • GTS has the best ride of any 911 model now with softer front springs
  • No more burble tune in any mode due to
  • No downsides to auto stop/start with hybrid system, which is a better *** implementation than 296 and Artura, given the smooth startup and accessories driven by battery now
  • Thinks that the S and Turbo will stay non-hybrid with manual option for differentiation from GTS and Turbo S, respectively
Confirmation that the manual doesn't work with the hybrid system doesn't bode well for potential manual S buyers given what @silversurfer6 wrote in another post.
Old 07-11-2024, 11:30 PM
  #184  
adm63
Pro
 
adm63's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2022
Location: Boston
Posts: 535
Received 899 Likes on 325 Posts
Default

I could see S as a detuned hybrid pdk only and T with the 3.0tt and manual, then if you want more power with a manual they upsell you on this rumored 992.2 manual Turbo or GT3. It's all just speculation though and sounds like it could go either way. I'm curious if there will be a way to get a 992.2 Targa with manual since it's currently GTS/hybrid only, i know silversurfer indicated the C4S will come later than the C2S and they did not launch a base C4, so I wonder if the Targa will remain GTS only or get 4S/4 variants like before later.
The following users liked this post:
rmb1973 (07-12-2024)
Old 07-11-2024, 11:41 PM
  #185  
22992
Burning Brakes
 
22992's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2021
Posts: 1,042
Received 796 Likes on 427 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Scott P
Haters gotta hate, Jalopnik thinks that's ridiculous

2025 Porsche 911 Carrera GTS T-Hybrid Is So Good It Makes The Haters Look Real Dumb

With a larger engine, a single turbo and a creative hybrid system, Porsche’s latest 911 is joyous.
https://jalopnik.com/2025-porsche-91...mak-1851583769
This actually makes the author look real dumb…because most of the haters are on rennlist, and there aren’t too many people that hate because of the drive or capabilities that are yet to be known. It’s more about the complexity, weight and reliability, resale etc. there is almost nobody saying it won’t be fun or joyous…
The following users liked this post:
InfiniteSmiles (07-12-2024)
Old 07-11-2024, 11:50 PM
  #186  
Ikone
Three Wheelin'
 
Ikone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2018
Location: NoVA
Posts: 1,336
Received 809 Likes on 402 Posts
Default

For me there are two main issues with the new GTS. First, no manual. Second, new engine and new t-hybrid motor. It's an early adopter car. No way am I going to be that guinea pig. In ten years when I'm looking for PDK/automatic, then maybe I'll consider something like this. I think it's an exciting car, just not willing to take that chance. Plus, no indy shop will be able to work on it when it's out of warranty.
Old 07-12-2024, 12:40 AM
  #187  
ipse dixit
RL Community Team
Rennlist Member
 
ipse dixit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 16,872
Likes: 0
Received 11,543 Likes on 5,065 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by jstap808
these guys along with Matt tWatson are just paid clowns. The car is faster, the interior is basically the same minus iconic features, the exterior looks like a cheap tuner bodykit, and it's more expensive. It's a no brainer PASS. Don't need a YouTube to tell me that l.
Bye.
The following 2 users liked this post by ipse dixit:
Haros (07-13-2024), Needsdecaf (07-12-2024)
Old 07-12-2024, 03:09 AM
  #188  
Macboy
Burning Brakes
 
Macboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2022
Posts: 901
Received 3,279 Likes on 729 Posts
Default

I saw the 992.2 in real life yesterday. I usually have no problems getting used to a new design. But after RL made me aware of the plastic part on the rear lights I must say it looks way cheaper than the old one. I have some pictures for comparison which I will post in 2 parts. First some good parts.








The following users liked this post:
RatherJaded (07-12-2024)
Old 07-12-2024, 03:13 AM
  #189  
Macboy
Burning Brakes
 
Macboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2022
Posts: 901
Received 3,279 Likes on 729 Posts
Default

Here are the comparison fotos which I think make the taillights way cheaper looking. The full glass was way more premium than this plastic. The underline is beautiful and suits the 992 design great but should have been clear/glass.









The following 4 users liked this post by Macboy:
autozero (07-12-2024), rasetsu (07-12-2024), RatherJaded (07-12-2024), soguinness (07-12-2024)
Old 07-12-2024, 10:13 AM
  #190  
autozero
Advanced
 
autozero's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2024
Posts: 94
Received 65 Likes on 39 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Macboy
I saw the 992.2 in real life yesterday. I usually have no problems getting used to a new design. But after RL made me aware of the plastic part on the rear lights I must say it looks way cheaper than the old one. I have some pictures for comparison
Are you located in Europe?

What did you think of the lugano blue in person?
Old 07-12-2024, 10:19 AM
  #191  
Scott P
Rennlist Member
 
Scott P's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2019
Location: Buffalo, NY
Posts: 3,099
Received 3,201 Likes on 1,375 Posts
Default

It seems to me that if the new Carrera engine has a single 992.1 turbo then perhaps that could be flash tuned to a power level equal to or better than the next S. We shall see @M-Engineering.
The following users liked this post:
yellolab (07-14-2024)
Old 07-12-2024, 11:21 AM
  #192  
ipse dixit
RL Community Team
Rennlist Member
 
ipse dixit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 16,872
Likes: 0
Received 11,543 Likes on 5,065 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Scott P
It seems to me that if the new Carrera engine has a single 992.1 turbo then perhaps that could be flash tuned to a power level equal to or better than the next S. We shall see @M-Engineering.
https://www.carscoops.com/2024/07/th...sible-to-tune/
Old 07-12-2024, 11:28 AM
  #193  
Needsdecaf
RL Community Team
Rennlist Member
 
Needsdecaf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: The Woodlands, TX.
Posts: 8,873
Received 2,580 Likes on 1,603 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by jstap808
these guys along with Matt tWatson are just paid clowns. The car is faster, the interior is basically the same minus iconic features, the exterior looks like a cheap tuner bodykit, and it's more expensive. It's a no brainer PASS. Don't need a YouTube to tell me that l.
Sorry, I can't help but laugh when someone says that these YouTube reviewers are "paid" when they disagree with their opinion. They are usually the people who are the first to post up multiple YouTube reviews as evidence to back up one of their points when they line up.

The bottom line is that YouTube reviewers are no more paid than traditional print journalists were / are, and in this day and age, there is probably less tomfoolery going on because anything dirty is instantly outed. The problem is that every single reviewer, ever, is biased. No matter how hard they try to be impartial, their background, likes and dislikes will almost ALWAYS show through in their review. And in this day and age, that's not really even discouraged, and people confuse reviewer's "opinions" for "truth". The truth is that every car is a compromise, every car has it's strong points and weak points, and how all of those combine with your specific needs will greatly influence your opinion of the car. Like someone else mentioned, Mark from Savagegeese is a JDM boy at heart and loves free revving engines, turbos, and more pure cars while his counterpart Jack just really loves power and a balanced chassis and DGAF how the power is made. Matt from Smoking Tire appreciates a super fast car but is of the opinion that once it's fast enough to scare the hell out of yourself on the Canyons, anything more is really too much. And etc.

So no, these guys are not paid clowns. Most of the info they get is from the press kit and the shoddy ones just repeat that, but Savagegeese at least try to go well beyond that and interview people from the development team to get deeper into the how and why certain things came to be the way that they are. Others, like Matt @ Smoking Tire, don't do that, but either don't repeat verbatim from the press pack, or call attention to specific points that matter, or call BS where the manufacturer tries too hard to wave the marketing magic wand over something less than optimal.

The problem is that if you don't regularly watch any of these outlets and take their review as a first timer, you don't recognize their bias, patterns, or delivery style. Just like I read every episode of Car and Driver and Road and Track growing up and could tell you reliably how Paul Frere, Dennis Simiantis, Peter Egan, Joe Rusz, Csabe Csere, Pat Bedard, Brock Yates, Rich Ceppos, etc. would approach an article, so to does every YouTuber have their own style. Much of it is just crap, but the bigger outlets or more reputable guys do have a style of reviewing.

So the facts are what they are. The hybrid GTS is a spectacular technological achievement that is faster with less pollution and a small weight gain vs. the 992.1 GTS. Whether that particular formula is of interest to you depends entirely on you, but does not change what the car actually is.
The following 8 users liked this post by Needsdecaf:
alaris (07-12-2024), Dezeinstein (07-12-2024), emix75 (07-13-2024), Haros (07-13-2024), lifelong_fan (07-12-2024), mashoutposse (07-14-2024), Nein Eleven (07-12-2024), rasetsu (07-12-2024) and 3 others liked this post. (Show less...)
Old 07-12-2024, 11:28 AM
  #194  
Salj
Rennlist Member
 
Salj's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Austin TX
Posts: 485
Received 122 Likes on 58 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Macboy
Here are the comparison fotos which I think make the taillights way cheaper looking. The full glass was way more premium than this plastic. The underline is beautiful and suits the 992 design great but should have been clear/glass.






Old one too fussy to my eye...
The following users liked this post:
Haros (07-13-2024)
Old 07-12-2024, 11:42 AM
  #195  
BondJ
Pro
 
BondJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2021
Posts: 682
Received 329 Likes on 227 Posts
Default

Very interesting. Until the tuning shops get hold of it I guess we’ll just have to take Porsche’s word for it. Not being able to tune could be a deal breaker for some


Quick Reply: Official 992.2 Reviews Discussion



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 10:18 AM.