When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
@kalachkin did he have a sample of Shade Green? I heard a lot of people saying it is more pastel than metallic.
shade green has been out there, do a search for Dakars. Shade Green was the launch color.
No metallic in Shade Green. I think it looks cool. Its the green version of Chalk
edit, I didnt realize they actually called it SGM. I stand corrected! I saw no metallic in it when I saw it last fall
How is that even possible, with extra torque and initial speed up GTS version should transfer the power way worse then 992.1 GTS, while .2 GTS and 4GTS have same 0-100km (or 0-60mph) stats?
How is that even possible that rear and 4wd car have same 0-60mph? WIth that much extra torque the difference should be bigger then .1 GTS vs 4GTS, where it was 0.2s difference.
This is total speculation, but using the electric motor during the initial launch might play a role is dishing out traction right at the limit of tire slip, therefore reducing the advantage the AWD cars have in terms of getting the power down. If you’ve ever driven a fast EV, the ability of those cars to accelerate HARD with no discernible loss of traction is amazing. My daily Tesla Model 3P will do 0-60 3.2s in hot/cold/rain and just doesn’t slip, nor do you feel any traction intervention - it just goes. While that car is AWD, I’ve always assumed that the electric motors/controllers can modulate torque so much faster than an ICE that they can flirt with the limits of traction in ways that just aren’t possible with ICE. This could all be total BS, but I’m hopeful if there is some truth to it, the benefits will apply to launching the 992.2 RWD GTS.
I don't think so. Here's my 992.1 versus the best picture I could find of the 992.2. It looks like two of the light control switches disappear on the 992.2 (maybe moved to the center LCD Display), but the real issue is the, lower half, what I'll call the "Tongue." This "Tongue" contains the Start Switch on the 992.1 and is simply an extension cover on the 992.2. If these "Tongue's were the same shape and size that'd be a good sign, but it sure looks like they're not. These "Tongue's are different shapes (Photoshop Overlay Tested) and the dash panel is shaped differently for each. The bottom of the 992.1 is round and the 992.2 is squared off. So if an interchange were possible electrically, one would also need to purchase that section of the dash (or whatever assembly it's a part of) to make the swap.
.
992.1 on top and 992.2 below.
I do not think Porsche redesigned the dash only to incorporate the "flap"(which is a piece people will never see), while leaving the left and right parts of the opening unchanged, just to fill them in with black plastic "blanks".
The 992.2 flap simply fits over the existing cutout on the existing dash, which is why the shape looks slightly different to you.
I just checked my 992.1, and the start assembly also has an upside-down trapezoidal "flap" shape; it is not actually rounded, as it appears to be from the driver’s vantage point or in the picture above.
Therefore, I am pretty sure one could retrofit the 992.1 start assembly in place of the 992.2 start assembly.
How is that even possible, with extra torque and initial speed up GTS version should transfer the power way worse then 992.1 GTS, while .2 GTS and 4GTS have same 0-100km (or 0-60mph) stats?
How is that even possible that rear and 4wd car have same 0-60mph? WIth that much extra torque the difference should be bigger then .1 GTS vs 4GTS, where it was 0.2s difference.
Our Stage 3 Power Kit for Base 992.1 Carrera (RWD), which includes the S/GTS turbos and link pipes (so basically a Stage 2 S or GTS but without LSD) did 0-60 in 2.9 on the street. This is an unprepped surface, 2 attempts. It would probably do a smidge better at a dragstrip. Porsche doesn't usually sandbag with their 0-60 times but it's not hard to get there with some bolt ons and tuning with the current 992.
I like the guy a lot but he also prefers black on black, which I'd never do and thinks buckets should always be optioned, which I wouldn't do since I don't track and also do long road trips. Everything else, I like about the guy. lol
Seems like my kinda guy
I do like Slate Grey Neo, and if they had it in the 992.1, it would have made the decision to go with Jet Black Metallic that much more difficult.
I do like Slate Grey Neo, and if they had it in the 992.1, it would have made the decision to go with Jet Black Metallic that much more difficult.
Slate grey was one of the first 911 colors. I love it. But with today’s non-metallic colors not being clear coated and the changes over the years in paint, I’d rather go with a metallic one.
Slate grey was one of the first 911 colors. I love it. But with today’s non-metallic colors not being clear coated and the changes over the years in paint, I’d rather go with a metallic one.
I thought only the matte/frozen paint colors tend to not have clear coat. Slate Grey Neo looks like a glossy color.
LB looks to be an improvement over SB. It would be nice to see LB in direct sunlight.
I haven't seen LB in person. How do you think it's an improvement? I was really looking forward to SB until they took it away. Now I figure I'll go GR unless I can see LB in person and like it. It looks darker and less vibrant to me in the pics.
I haven't seen LB in person. How do you think it's an improvement? I was really looking forward to SB until they took it away. Now I figure I'll go GR unless I can see LB in person and like it. It looks darker and less vibrant to me in the pics.
That's what I've done. I'd always SB or Lava Orange on a 992 and when I got an allocation, my build date was 2 days past the NLA and order wouldn't go to V200. I faffed on about IGM for a while, until I saw IGM , Carmine and Guards Red next to each other at a dealer and locked in GR for my upcoming GTS.
06-04-2024, 04:16 PM
