Coding 992
PIWIS was reporting 13.8 to 14.1V while connected.
Agreed, Happy Holidays to all!
He also informed me that the Aero control module (PAA 907 483) may be damaged due to the low/dead battery. He said this is a known issue when the battery goes low or dies. WTF?
I'm not getting a good feeling from my local Dealer 'service'. They did replace the windshield of my 2022 C2S under warranty and provided a loaner. When they completed the job they took my car for a 'test' drive and it got rear ended!

The service technician is okay as well as the other driver, thankfully. The collision was minor and as far as I know the damage is limited to the rear plastic bumper.
But wait, it gets better. While waiting for the insurance process they let my 992 sit idle for over 2 weeks. This inactivity put stress on the 4 year old battery and it is most likely now toast and in need of replacement ($650 + labor). I guess I was due.
The repair for the rear bumper is $2419 and is covered by the other drivers insurance. The result of the collision is going to cost me an extra $650 for a battery and now $420 for an Aero module (PAA 907 483). I have no idea what they are going to charge for install of the Aero module. They claim this module controls the rear spoiler and the front hood. My SA tinks it is located behind the rear seat.
I have a week to mull over my next course of action. Sorry for the rant in the Coding 992 section
Is the Aero module really toast, did Porsche source or make a module that is that fragile?
Anyone else have this issue?
Any way to recover the functionality of the Aero module other than replacement?
I want to get my car out of there as soon as possible. I just get jankey feeling from them. They put my car in 'Privacy Mode' so I can't see what is going on. I turned it on once already. I do have a dash cam. I hope they did not shut that off too.
Also, what kind of dealership let's a customer's car idle for 2 hours to charge a battery!
The Best Porsche Posts for Porsche Enthusiasts
He also informed me that the Aero control module (PAA 907 483) may be damaged due to the low/dead battery. He said this is a known issue when the battery goes low or dies. WTF?
I'm not getting a good feeling from my local Dealer 'service'. They did replace the windshield of my 2022 C2S under warranty and provided a loaner. When they completed the job they took my car for a 'test' drive and it got rear ended!

The service technician is okay as well as the other driver, thankfully. The collision was minor and as far as I know the damage is limited to the rear plastic bumper.
But wait, it gets better. While waiting for the insurance process they let my 992 sit idle for over 2 weeks. This inactivity put stress on the 4 year old battery and it is most likely now toast and in need of replacement ($650 + labor). I guess I was due.
The repair for the rear bumper is $2419 and is covered by the other drivers insurance. The result of the collision is going to cost me an extra $650 for a battery and now $420 for an Aero module (PAA 907 483). I have no idea what they are going to charge for install of the Aero module. They claim this module controls the rear spoiler and the front hood. My SA tinks it is located behind the rear seat.
I have a week to mull over my next course of action. Sorry for the rant in the Coding 992 section
Is the Aero module really toast, did Porsche source or make a module that is that fragile?
Anyone else have this issue?
Any way to recover the functionality of the Aero module other than replacement?
According to the service tech the module was damaged. I pushed back on my service advisor and I did not want the dealer to do anything more to my car, they already cost me a new battery. My service advisor called the following day and told me they were going to cover the module replacement under warranty. My car was technically still in warranty when I dropped it off to have the windshield replaced. I am still troubled as to why that module is so sensitive to a low battery. I would think if it could be cleared with programming and a reset the service tech would go that route ranter than replace a module.




