When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Not sure why I need it. No one is going to be able to butt-sense 5hp or 5% structural rigidity enhancement. Also looks like a dog's breakfast in that rendering. Touring looks tidy though.
Not sure why I need it. No one is going to be able to butt-sense 5hp or 5% structural rigidity enhancement. Also looks like a dog's breakfast in that rendering. Touring looks tidy though.
In terms of performance gain, personally I'd rather through some Dundon long tube headers on my 991.2 for the HP gain, weight loss, sound, AND save me on the $75k-ish difference on trade-in for a 992 but I'm lucky enough to have the 991.2 here holding me over for a bit.
Every newer generation of GT cars generally look "busier" than the prior generation.
Compare a 996 GT3 to a 997 GT3 and one can easily come to the conclusion that the 997 is "busier".
Heck, take a look at the 991 GT3 RS ... you've naca ducts, air scoops on the sides (a la a Turbo), higher and larger wing. Part of this is the never ending chase for greater aero and downforce.
Just take a look at these side by side comparisons of the 997 GT3 RS and 991 GT3 RS.
Having the tail pipes integrated into the bumper just doesn't work for my eye. Yes, I know they were integrated on the GT2 RS...and I did not like it. Just cheapens the whole look of the rear, in my opinion.
Addendum: On second look, it looks like the renderings show the tail pipes are separate from the bumper. That would be a win, if it comes to pass.
From: The way to hell is paved by good intentions “Wenn ich Purist höre...entsichere ich meinen Browning” "Myths are fuel for marketing (and nowadays for flippers too,,,)" time to time is not sufficient to be a saint, you must be also an Hero
12-19-2019 | 05:34 PM
