Notices
992 Turbo and Turbo S 2019-Current
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Porsche San Francisco

992.2 turbo RWD & manual with "touring package"?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-07-2024, 08:55 AM
  #61  
iso87
Advanced
 
iso87's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2022
Posts: 73
Received 21 Likes on 16 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by CM991
It’s called camouflaged. Fairly common when testing mules
Sorry i edited my previous message. I think they wouldn't camouflage(in this case fully cover) air intakes as its significant and has big impact.
The following users liked this post:
Billy Bluejay (06-07-2024)
Old 06-07-2024, 09:26 AM
  #62  
CM991
Rennlist Member
 
CM991's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 316
Received 184 Likes on 107 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by iso87
Sorry i edited my previous message. I think they wouldn't camouflage(in this case fully cover) air intakes as its significant and has big impact.
You don’t know the impact or how significant the side vents can be on this mile. We don’t have sufficient details to make that assessment. This is a non issue. SportClassic has no side vents. Same engine. No issues.

Old 06-07-2024, 09:29 AM
  #63  
iso87
Advanced
 
iso87's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2022
Posts: 73
Received 21 Likes on 16 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by CM991
You don’t know the impact or how significant the side vents can be on this mile. We don’t have sufficient details to make that assessment. This is a non issue. SportClassic has no side vents. Same engine. No issues.
Agreed. For that reason I wouldn't rule out that the Touring package on a Turbo could mean no side vents.
Old 06-08-2024, 05:38 AM
  #64  
silversurfer6
Rennlist Member
 
silversurfer6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2023
Posts: 997
Received 630 Likes on 379 Posts
Default

So coming back to the facts, the people that do know:

Is this coming as a convertible?

Is there a PDK option?




P.S. Please do not discuss aboyt the PDK question. Let’s find the facts first and then let’s blame porsche for the “bad decisions”
Old 06-08-2024, 08:48 AM
  #65  
CM991
Rennlist Member
 
CM991's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 316
Received 184 Likes on 107 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by iso87
Agreed. For that reason I wouldn't rule out that the Touring package on a Turbo could mean no side vents.
You are welcomed to think that 👍

The rest of us will continue to try to validate more details with less conjecture.

Last edited by CM991; 06-08-2024 at 08:50 AM.
Old 06-08-2024, 02:57 PM
  #66  
cebe
Pro
Thread Starter
 
cebe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 511
Received 436 Likes on 184 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by CM991
You are welcomed to think that 👍

The rest of us will continue to try to validate more details with less conjecture.
I do not have any additional info, but would like to point out a couple of elements:

- the SC mules were tested without the side vents from the beginning

- this 992.2 mule would be different from the 992.1 turbo and from the SC as it would couple the absense of the side vents with different exhaust vents in the lower bumper for the intercooler ... this looks as a potential reason for functional testing of this configuration




This combination looks new to me.

Last edited by cebe; 06-08-2024 at 03:00 PM.
Old 06-08-2024, 03:38 PM
  #67  
CanAutM3
Three Wheelin'
 
CanAutM3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2020
Location: Montreal
Posts: 1,542
Received 1,290 Likes on 603 Posts
Default

Maybe this is a just a version of a "wide body" Carrera as we've seen in the past...
Old 06-09-2024, 01:59 PM
  #68  
cebe
Pro
Thread Starter
 
cebe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 511
Received 436 Likes on 184 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by CanAutM3
Maybe this is a just a version of a "wide body" Carrera as we've seen in the past...
It is my understanding that starting with the 992.1 all carreras are wide-bodies as Porsche eliminated the "slim" base carrera body with a single unified chassis to the width of the carrera 4 body.
Obviously the turbo wide-body is wider still.
Anyhow the remark that it may be a wide "turbo-look" estetic package is interesting.
Old 06-09-2024, 03:02 PM
  #69  
cebe
Pro
Thread Starter
 
cebe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 511
Received 436 Likes on 184 Posts
Default

Just read on Reddit the following potential linup, it makes some sense to me:

992.2 Turbo 3.6 twin e turbo + e motor 640 PS (585 gas + 55 e motor) RWD + manual option; presentation 1/2025

992.2 Turbo S 3.6 twin e turbo + e motor 710 PS (655 gas + 55 e motor) AWD + PDK only presentation 1/2025

I would add that 655 hp from the ICE sounds a lot to me for a lambda 1 compliant unit, I see the turbo or turbo S getting a 3.8 liter unit.

Just pure speculation.
The following 2 users liked this post by cebe:
AlexCeres (06-09-2024), cavemanmoore (06-09-2024)
Old 06-09-2024, 03:11 PM
  #70  
CM991
Rennlist Member
 
CM991's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 316
Received 184 Likes on 107 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by cebe
Just read on Reddit the following potential linup, it makes some sense to me:

992.2 Turbo 3.6 twin e turbo + e motor 640 PS (585 gas + 55 e motor) RWD + manual option; presentation 1/2025

992.2 Turbo S 3.6 twin e turbo + e motor 710 PS (655 gas + 55 e motor) AWD + PDK only presentation 1/2025

I would add that 655 hp from the ICE sounds a lot to me for a lambda 1 compliant unit, I see the turbo or turbo S getting a 3.8 liter unit.

Just pure speculation.
The TTS aligns with what I’ve heard/read as well. The Turbo seems a bit overstated.
Old 06-09-2024, 04:20 PM
  #71  
GT3ZZZ
Racer
 
GT3ZZZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: UK
Posts: 423
Received 153 Likes on 88 Posts
Default

No manual with the e-motor (see 992.2 GTS)

992.2 turbo won't have the e-motor, just the e-turbos.
The following users liked this post:
cavemanmoore (06-09-2024)
Old 06-09-2024, 04:47 PM
  #72  
CM991
Rennlist Member
 
CM991's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 316
Received 184 Likes on 107 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by GT3ZZZ
No manual with the e-motor (see 992.2 GTS)

992.2 turbo won't have the e-motor, just the e-turbos.
This is the correct speculation. There’s also ICE-only rumors.
Old 06-09-2024, 06:33 PM
  #73  
GT3ZZZ
Racer
 
GT3ZZZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: UK
Posts: 423
Received 153 Likes on 88 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by CM991
This is the correct speculation. There’s also ICE-only rumors.
Might well be correct. Not sure it's worth the battery just to power the e-turbos. All or nothing?
Old 06-09-2024, 11:35 PM
  #74  
cavemanmoore
Instructor
 
cavemanmoore's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2022
Posts: 101
Received 59 Likes on 35 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by CM991
This is the correct speculation. There’s also ICE-only rumors.
Would ICE only be subject to lambda 1 requirements?
Old 06-10-2024, 07:32 AM
  #75  
Schn3ll
Burning Brakes
 
Schn3ll's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2019
Location: Upstate SC
Posts: 896
Received 1,070 Likes on 444 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by GT3ZZZ
Might well be correct. Not sure it's worth the battery just to power the e-turbos. All or nothing?
I think it would be worth it. The battery would power 2 e-turbos instead of 1 of the GTS.

And we know the Turbo S is going to be hybrid, so it would be weird to position the base Turbo as non-hybrid all together.

From the consumer standpoint, there would be a weird gap in the assortment between GTS and Turbo S with no hybrid. So the Turbo could be seen as “inferior” to some without any hybridization (not to us nut jobs on the forums mind you).

I think they do the dual eTurbo for the base Turbo, as it also provides a meaningful upgrade vs. .1 cars. Gotta give people a reason to upgrade (other than just manual), and this could be a way to tell Sport Classic owners “look, yours is the only ICE manual 992 Turbo”

Last edited by Schn3ll; 06-10-2024 at 07:35 AM.
The following users liked this post:
GT3ZZZ (06-10-2024)


Quick Reply: 992.2 turbo RWD & manual with "touring package"?



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 04:55 AM.